IT bore brunt of FPI pullout in April amid tariff turmoil
Mumbai: The information technology (IT) sector saw the highest selling from overseas investors between April 1 and 15 as concerns over the impact of an expected US downturn heightened risk-off sentiment. Foreigners sold IT shares worth ₹13,828 crore in this period, after pulling ₹8,451 crore out of sector in March. In 2024, foreign investors pumped over ₹14,000 crore into the sector.
ADVERTISEMENT "A significant chunk of orders in the IT sector are driven by the US, and since the outlook on those orders is uncertain given the concerns of a slowdown in the US, the sector has seen highest outflows in the first half of April," said Divam Sharma, fund manager, Green Portfolio PMS.
Overseas investors offloaded shares in the financial services and capital goods sectors worth ₹4,501 crore and ₹3,019 crore, respectively. While capital goods had seen outflows last month, financial services had received foreign inflows worth over ₹14,000 crore.
"Most sectors are anticipated to be impacted by the confusion on Trump tariffs but sectors with premium valuations are more prone to higher foreign outflows," said UR Bhat, director, Alphaniti.
In the first half of April, foreigners sold Indian equities worth ₹37,108 crore across 17 sectors after infusing ₹31,877 crore in the second half of March, according to NSDL. Sharma said foreign sell-off in financial services has tempered after the recent outflows because of comfortable valuations."Bank Nifty has performed well owing to the short squeeze in banking stocks, and since it is a domestic-facing sector, tariffs are not likely to have a major impact on the sector," he said.
ADVERTISEMENT Metals and mining, oil and gas, automobiles and construction sectors also saw foreign outflows over ₹2,000 crore each. They bought shares worth ₹3,181 crore across 6 ix sectors in first half of April, with elecommunications receiving the highest inflows of ₹2,137 crore. Foreign investors have pumped over ₹17,600 crore into stocks in previous 5 trading sessions, but they remain net sellers in April of ₹16,670 crore.
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump signs orders intended to jolt US drone manufacturing
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads President Donald Trump signed executive orders on Friday aimed at bolstering the US drone industry, cracking down on unauthorized flights and countering threats to national security and public orders sought to expand opportunities for commercial and recreational drone use, and tighten restrictions to address security threats. American officials have been concerned about foreign adversaries using drones to spy on sensitive areas, including military installations, and about China's dominance of the drone market, which they see as a national security threat."Building a strong and secure domestic drone sector is vital to reducing reliance on foreign sources, strengthening critical supply chains and ensuring that the benefits of this technology are delivered to the American people," one of the orders drone orders were part of a broader federal push into airborne technology. A third order he signed Friday sought to revive high-speed commercial air travel, by repealing regulations prohibiting cross-country supersonic flights, which for decades have precluded nonmilitary air travel over land at faster-than-sound and Republican administrations, as well as Congress, have grappled in recent years with the risks posed by China's role in drone manufacturing. The United States has struggled to develop alternatives at a scale necessary to wean drone operators, including the US military, completely off Chinese the same time, the growing popularity of commercial and recreational drones, and an increase in incidents of drones flying over sensitive sites, have heightened demand for Trump administration warned that drones have been used to smuggle drugs across borders, and that they could pose threats to large public gatherings, such as the 2026 World Cup and the 2028 Summer Olympics, both of which are being held in the United of Trump's executive orders directed the Federal Aviation Administration to allow commercial users and public safety officials to fly drones beyond their range of sight. Under current rules, a user must be able to see the drone they are also backed a program to test aircraft that make vertical takeoffs and landings, which have the potential to improve cargo transport, medical responses and access to rural order also directed the commerce secretary to promote exports of US-made drones, and instructed federal agencies to prioritize purchases of executive order directed the FAA to develop processes to restrict the airspace over critical infrastructure, military installations, large airports, federal facilities and national also called on the attorney general and the FAA to more robustly enforce civil and criminal penalties for drone operators who violate laws or airspace restrictions. And it promoted grants for state and local law enforcement agencies to access drone-detection and tracking representatives said that the orders were an important investment in the US drone Ellman, CEO of the Commercial Drone Alliance, said in a statement that they were "long-overdue steps."The orders were Trump's most comprehensive attempt yet to boost the US drone his first term, he signed directives that sought to increase the use of drones. Days before he departed the White House, he instructed federal agencies to determine whether they could reduce the procurement of drones manufactured by foreign has taken steps to single out drone manufacturers for scrutiny and potential restrictions in the United States. In last year's defense bill, an annual measure that authorizes policies and funding for the Pentagon and military, lawmakers directed national security agencies to determine whether equipment produced by DJI or Autel, both Chinese companies that manufacture drones, posed a risk to the United States.A provision of the legislation said that if no determination was made within a year, the equipment would be added to the Federal Communications Commission's list of devices that cannot be sold in the United is not clear how many Chinese-manufactured drones exist in the United States, though they are estimated to be a majority of those in use. In the spring, there were over 1 million registered drones in the United States, according to the FAA, over 400,000 of which were commercial drones and over 350,000 of which were for recreational FAA requires the registration of all drones weighing more than 0.55 pounds. The FAA also restricts how high drones can be flown without authorization, to less than 400 feet, unless they are within a certain radius of tall structures. In restricted airspace, drone use is limited even Rocheleau, the acting FAA administrator, told House lawmakers this week that it was not possible for the FAA to know exactly how many drones were in the sky, given the limits of registration requirements."We do in fact work with legal operators, and we would be able to collect that," he told the Appropriations Committee, adding: "A child with a drone would be more challenging."
Mint
32 minutes ago
- Mint
Donald Trump reveals ‘true feelings' about fued with Elon Musk: ‘Nothing catches me by surprise'
US President Donald Trump revealed "his true feelings" about his public spat with tech billionaire Elon Musk in an interview with the New York Post. 'Nothing catches me by surprise. Nothing,' the president was quoted as saying when asked about the personal attacks launched at him by Musk, the former chief of the Department of Government Efficiency. Trump reportedly turned his conversation with The Post toward his polling numbers instead of directly addressing the strife with his former top ally. He said, "The numbers are through the roof, the stock market is up, billions are pouring in from tariffs, and my poll numbers are the highest they've ever been. Other than that, what can I tell you, right?" Later, Trump said while addressing reporters aboard Air Force One on Friday that he has no plans to speak with Elon Musk, signaling that the president and his former ally might not resolve their feud over a sweeping tax-cut bill anytime soon. Trump said he wasn't "thinking about" the Tesla CEO. "I hope he does well with Tesla," Trump was quoted by Reuters as saying. However, Trump said a review of Musk's extensive contracts with the federal government was in order. "We'll take look at everything," the president said. "It's a lot of money, He takes a lot of subsidy, so will take a look at that," he said. But Trump added, 'only if it's to be fair for him and for the country.' In a barrage of posts on the X social media platform since June 5, Elon Musk has criticised Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill', which awaits the Senate's nod. The Bill was narrowly passed the House of Representatives earlier. Musk amped up his attacks on Trump over the tax bill after he stepped down as the head of DOGE late May this year. The Tesla CEO's 130-day mandate as a "special government employee" in the Trump administration was set to expire around May 30. Trump had then bid him farewell. He had credited Musk with 'a colossal change in the old ways of doing business in Washington" and said some of his staff would remain in the administration. Meanwhile, Musk said he expects 'to remain a friend and an adviser and certainly, if there's anything the president wants me to do, I'm at the president's service.' Things turned south for Trump and Musk after the SpaceX owner unleashed an assault on the US President's flagship spending legislation -- the 'Big Beautiful Bill'. He urged Americans to lobby Congress to "KILL the BILL." On June 5, Musk intensified his offensive, cautioning that "America is in the fast lane to debt slavery" while insisting on a comprehensive overhaul of the legislation. "A new spending bill should be drafted that doesn't massively grow the deficit and increase the debt ceiling by 5 TRILLION DOLLARS," Musk demanded. Musk's comments came at a pivotal moment for Trump's self-described "big, beautiful bill", which encompasses sweeping tax reductions and expanded military expenditure. The House of Representatives had approved the measure by the narrowest of margins last month, with only three Republican members dissenting against solid Democratic resistance.
Economic Times
33 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Hustle culture or harassment? Techie shares her traumatic experience at dream startup: 'Was gaslighted for 3 years'
A young graduate faced harassment at an Indian SaaS startup. A senior leader assaulted her. HR offered no real help. She faced retaliation for speaking out. The company promoted mental health but silenced her. A co-founder acknowledged the abuse but did nothing. She suffered emotional and professional damage. The startup continues to promote its image. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Starting a career with a startup has become increasingly common among young graduates, promising rapid learning, diverse responsibilities, and the chance to be part of something from the ground up. But beneath this appealing exterior often lies a turbulent and unpredictable reality—one that blurs personal boundaries, disregards employee safety, and prizes image over 2022, a fresh graduate took her first step into the corporate world, joining a high-profile Indian SaaS startup focused on identity verification. Backed by elite investors and founded by business school alumni, the company appeared to embody promise and prestige. However, the glitter faded quickly. Within weeks, she was subjected to disturbing acts of misconduct. A senior leader, much older and in a position of power, made a non-verbal demand for physical contact—an inappropriate and humiliating request. Just days later, at a company event, the same man assaulted her while she was intoxicated, physically picking her up and ignoring her repeated pleas to immediate aftermath was marked by disbelief and betrayal. Her attempt to seek help through the HR department resulted in shallow assurances but no real action. Despite being encouraged to file a formal complaint, fear held her back. New to the workforce and only 21, she didn't feel safe challenging the very people in control of her she confronted the man who harassed her, he downplayed the incident with manipulative justifications and thinly veiled threats, suggesting he'd walked away from similar situations before. As she refused to stay silent, the retaliation began. Excluded from meetings, projects, and informal gatherings, she was systematically isolated and humiliated. The psychological toll deepened with each passing hostile environment wasn't limited to a single incident or individual. Even her female reporting manager crossed boundaries by asking extremely personal and inappropriate questions during the first week. It was clear that workplace harassment had been normalized within the company's culture of manipulation and gaslighting chipped away at her mental and physical health. Frequent illnesses, anxiety, and emotional breakdowns became part of her daily life. Conversations felt like navigating a maze filled with hidden traps. She found herself alone in a place that publicly celebrated trust and the startup continued to build its brand around mental health awareness and inclusivity while silencing voices like hers. Senior leaders mocked women's safety laws behind closed doors. When she raised concerns with one of the co-founders, he offered only passive resignation, acknowledging the abuse while doing nothing to address years later, she still bears the scars—emotional, mental, and professional. Her confidence eroded, her personal life was disrupted, and her career was derailed before it truly began. While the startup continues to promote its polished image and attract investments, she's left grappling with lasting story is a stark reminder that "culture" is not built through slogans, TED Talks, or branding campaigns. It's revealed in how power is wielded when no one is watching—and in whether people feel safe when they speak up.
