Bank of America Is One of the Largest Financial Companies by Market Cap. But Is It a Buy?
Bank of America is the second largest U.S. bank and the fifth largest financial company by market capitalization.
The company just reported strong second-quarter earnings.
There could be some positive tailwinds coming for the banking industry.
10 stocks we like better than Bank of America ›
To say that Bank of America's (NYSE: BAC) progress in the 15 years since the end of the financial crisis has been impressive would be an understatement. The bank went from being one of the most troubled of the major financial institutions to one of the most respected in the industry. In fact, Bank of America is now the second largest U.S. bank stock by market cap.
However, Bank of America could still be an attractive business to invest in, especially now. Let's take a quick look at where Bank of America ranks in the overall financial sector, how the business is doing, and why now might be a smart time to buy.
The largest financials companies by market cap
The largest financial company in the world is Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A)(NYSE: BRK.B), with a market cap of more than $1 trillion. Many investors don't realize it, but Berkshire is technically an insurance company at heart -- Warren Buffett built its empire using insurance float from subsidiaries like GEICO and others.
With that in mind, here's where Bank of America fits among the largest financial companies (the link leads to our up-to-date list) based in the United States by market cap:
Company (Symbol)
Description
Market Capitalization
Berkshire Hathaway
Conglomerate with insurance focus
$1.02 trillion
JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM)
Bank
$809 billion
Visa (NYSE: V)
Payment processor
$677 billion
Mastercard (NYSE: MA)
Payment processor
$502 billion
Bank of America
Bank
$352 billion
Data source: CNBC.com. Market caps as of 7/21/2025.
So, as of this writing, Bank of America is the fifth largest financial sector company by market cap and the second largest bank stock. It's likely it will stay this way for at least a little while, as there's a wide gap between Bank of America and the No. 4 (Visa) as well as with the No. 6, fellow big bank Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC), which has a $260 billion market cap.
How it's going
Bank of America, and most other large bank stocks for that matter, just reported second-quarter results. In general, the numbers looked strong, and here are some key highlights:
Revenue and EPS grew by 4% and 7% year over year, respectively.
Customer deposits grew 5% to $2 trillion. Bank of America has the No. 1 retail deposit market share, and this growth rate was better than most peers.
The bank achieved a 10% return on equity (ROE), which is generally considered to be the threshold of a strong ROE.
Consumer banking added 175,000 net new checking accounts and consumer investment accounts grew by 13% thanks to strong market performance and inflows of capital.
Bank of America has the No. 3 investment banking market share year-to-date.
The company is doing arguably the best of the big banks when it comes to leveraging AI. It has 1,400 AI and machine learning patents, and, just to name one example, its "Ask Merrill" and "Ask Private Bank" AI tools get 23 million interactions per year.
Bank of America spent $5.3 billion on stock buybacks and increased its dividend by 8%.
Net interest yield increased by 3 basis points year over year despite no recent Federal Reserve rate cuts.
Bank of America's net charge-off rate improved by four basis points compared with a year ago.
I'm paying close attention to numbers like the net interest margin in the persistent high-rate environment, and the bank's NCO rate, which is a great indicator of the financial health of its customers.
Is Bank of America a buy?
The bottom line is Bank of America is an excellent institution, and its management has done a great job of embracing technology. If rates start to fall later this year as many expect, it could provide a nice tailwind for the stock, and the banking industry as a whole.
In fact, there could be several positive tailwinds in the next few years, including a looser regulatory environment, the surge in IPO and M&A activity we're seeing, and potential lower corporate tax rates. With Bank of America shares trading for less than 13 times forward earnings and a historically attractive valuation of less than 1.3 times book value, Bank of America could be an excellent performer over the next few years.
Should you buy stock in Bank of America right now?
Before you buy stock in Bank of America, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Bank of America wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $641,800!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,023,813!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,034% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025
Bank of America is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Wells Fargo is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Matt Frankel has positions in Bank of America and Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase, Mastercard, and Visa. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Bank of America Is One of the Largest Financial Companies by Market Cap. But Is It a Buy? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This AI Stock Has Nearly Tripled in the Last Year
Symbotic (SYM) set a new 52-week high in morning trading on Aug. 5. The stock is showing strong technical momentum with a 100% 'Buy' signal via Barchart. Shares are up more than 170% over the past 52 weeks. Wall Street sentiment is bullish, with multiple 'Strong Buy' ratings and a consensus price target well above current levels. Today's Featured Stock Valued at $33.35 billion, Symbotic (SYM) is an automation technology company reimagining the supply chain with its end-to-end, artificial intelligence-powered robotic and software platform. What I'm Watching I found today's Chart of the Day by using Barchart's powerful screening functions to sort for stocks with the highest technical buy signals; superior current momentum in both strength and direction; and a Trend Seeker 'buy' signal. I then used Barchart's Flipcharts feature to review the charts for consistent price appreciation. More News from Barchart Dear Nvidia Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for August 27 Options Traders Expected Palantir Stock's Tamest Earnings Reaction in a Year. Did They Get It Right? Tesla Gains on Elon Musk's New Pay Package. Is TSLA Stock a Buy? Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now! SYM checks those boxes. Since the Trend Seeker signaled a buy on May 8, the stock has gained 136.3%. SYM Price vs. Daily Moving Averages: Barchart Technical Indicators for Symbotic Editor's Note: The technical indicators below are updated live during the session every 20 minutes and can therefore change each day as the market fluctuates. The indicator numbers shown below therefore may not match what you see live on the website when you read this report. These technical indicators form the Barchart Opinion on a particular stock. Symbotic shares hit a new 52-week high on Aug. 5, touching $62.61 in intraday trading. Symbotic has a Weighted Alpha of +213.61. Symbotic has a 100% 'Buy' opinion from Barchart. The stock has gained 172.36% over the past year. SYM has its Trend Seeker 'Buy' signal intact. Symbotic is trading above its 20-, 50-, and 100-day moving averages. The stock made 10 new highs and gained 30.53% in the last month. Relative Strength Index (RSI) is at 72.76%. There's a technical support level around $53.16. Don't Forget the Fundamentals $33.35 billion market capitalization. Revenue is projected to grow 20.96% this year and another 31.43% next year. Earnings are estimated to increase 132.24% next year. Analyst and Investor Sentiment on Symbotic I don't buy stocks because everyone else is buying, but I do realize that if major firms and investors are dumping a stock, it's hard to make money swimming against the tide. It looks like Wall Street analysts are bullish on SYM, and so are most major advisory sites. The Wall Street analysts tracked by Barchart have issued 7 'Strong Buy,' 1 'Moderate Buy,' 9 'Hold,' and 1 'Sell' opinion on the stock. Value Line gives the company its above-average rating with a price target of $74. CFRA's Market Scope rates the stock a 'Strong Buy.' Morningstar thinks the stock is fairly valued. 12,520 investors monitor the stock on Seeking Alpha, which rates the stock a 'Hold.' The Bottom Line on Symbotic Stock Symbotic currently has momentum and is hitting new highs. It has positive sentiment from Wall Street, plus analysts project double-digit increases in revenue and earnings. That said, I caution that SYM is volatile and even speculative in the current environment, which means investors should use strict risk management and stop-loss strategies. Today's Chart of the Day was written by Jim Van Meerten. Read previous editions of the daily newsletter here. Additional disclosure: The Barchart of the Day highlights stocks that are experiencing exceptional current price appreciation. They are not intended to be buy recommendations as these stocks are extremely volatile and speculative. Should you decide to add one of these stocks to your investment portfolio it is highly suggested you follow a predetermined diversification and moving stop loss discipline that is consistent with your personal investment risk tolerance. On the date of publication, Jim Van Meerten did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-Easy to lose, hard to restore: US data trust on the line
By Andrea Shalal and Davide Barbuscia WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) -Donald Trump's move to fire the head of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics has put trust in U.S. data reporting mechanisms on the line just as demand for reliable diagnoses of the health of the world's largest economy is bigger than ever. Examples from elsewhere show credibility is easily lost and hard to restore. A first test will be the choice to replace Erika McEntarfer, accused without evidence by Trump of manipulating U.S. job numbers after weaker-than-expected growth and large downward revisions were reported last week. "Imagine if one of your concerns is that there's a lackey in charge of the agency and the numbers are fake," said Michael Strain, director of economic policy studies at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, of an appointment Trump has said to expect within days. "That's a whole other level of problems." Policymakers, businesses and investors are scrambling to understand how Trump's attempt to up-end the global trade system will affect prices, employment and household wealth. Central banks, which once tried to guide market bets on rate moves months down the line, now say decisions are "data-dependent." The rub is that data collection is proving to be harder. Debt-laden governments have, as McEntarfer experienced, cut resources in their data departments; phone surveys, the go-to method for much macro research, are struggling to produce adequate samples as many households do without fixed lines. Trump's implicit accusation of partisanship by "this Biden Political Appointee" adds the troubling factor of a political dimension usually indicative of countries dogged by wider doubts over their democratic checks and balances. The key lesson from past examples of loss of data confidence is that it can take years for trust to be restored. 'MAN-MADE' NUMBERS When Argentina last year reported its first single-digit inflation in months, sceptics questioned the data and recalled the massive underreporting of inflation in the 2000s and 2010s for which it was censured by the International Monetary Fund. "They manipulated the data for a long time," said Aldo Abram of libertarian think tank Liberty and Progress Foundation in Buenos Aires. "It's logical people remember this and continue having doubts." Turkey has changed the head of its TUIK statistics institute four times since 2019, with opposition parties arguing the changes were political. Roger Marks, fixed income analyst at asset manager Ninety One, said the result for investors has been a "gradual erosion of our trust in the numbers." For Greece, whose efforts during the 2000s to conceal mounting public deficits fed that decade's sovereign debt crisis, it has been an equally long haul back to credibility. It required the overhaul of its ELSTAT statistics agency in 2016 and the creation of an international panel of experts to appoint its chief statistician - steps that have meant its hard-fought efforts to improve its budget are now unquestioned. It also prompted European governments to grant the Eurostat statistics arm of the European Union powers to check suspect national statistics reported to it. Longstanding doubts over the accuracy of Chinese statistics - with even former Premier Li Keqiang acknowledging in 2007 the country's output figures were man-made - have obscured genuine efforts to improve data quality, such as a new measure of youth unemployment excluding students that was released early in 2024. "There were genuine methodological reasons for the change, but because of the history around Chinese data a lot of people, particularly foreign investors, just didn't really trust that," Julian Evans-Pritchard, an analyst with Capital Economics. "That underscores to me that once you undermine confidence in the data, it is quite hard to restore that confidence." SPOILS SYSTEM Faced over the years with patchy official data, watchers of emerging economies have long sought to corroborate those numbers with other datasets. Capital Economics' China Activity Proxy is based on 18 indicators from freight traffic to electricity consumption. Another metric is found in the data and sentiment surveys provided by independent researchers in all the big economies. But they can only sketch in one perspective on the picture. "An awful lot of it is soft data: 'How do you feel? What do you think's going on?'" said Erik Weisman, chief economist and portfolio manager at MFS Investment Management in Boston. "They're not asking for specifics. They're not asking, how many widgets did you produce? How many insurance policies did you produce? How many hours worked?," he said, adding that the concerns raised by the sacking of McEntarfer could nonetheless force analysts to turn increasingly to those other sources. The most urgent question now is whether the breach in credibility which the Trump intervention has opened is now widened further or mended. Enrico Giovannini, former chief statistician for the Paris-based Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), said there was more scope in the U.S. for political appointments of key statistics roles than in other advanced economies which tended to make long, fixed-term appointments. "So the incoming government has to wait (to replace them), said Giovannini, who has also served in two Italian governments. "In the U.S., the spoils system works," he said of the practice of party supporters getting rewarded with government jobs. The International Statistical Institute, a professional organization for data collectors, issued a statement late on Monday that said Trump's move violated U.N. principles aimed at protecting fact-based statistics and called on his government to take steps to restore public confidence in U.S. federal data. William Wiatrowski, the BLS' deputy commissioner, will serve as acting commissioner until a successor to McEntarfer is named. Beyond that choice, some fear that further dangers may emerge from a Trump executive order on federal hiring intended to reserve posts for candidates who can prove they are "dedicated to the furtherance of American ideals, values, and interests." Aaron Sojourner, a senior researcher at the W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, said such a move would, if passed by Congress, apply to many jobs in federal economic statistical agencies. "This proposal would convert many of those jobs into political jobs where people can be fired for any reason if they displease a political leader," Sojourner said. (Writing by Mark John; additional reporting by Claire Fu in Singapore, Marius Zaharia in Hong Kong, Karin Strohecker in London, David Lawder in Washington, Leila Miller in Buenos Aires; Lefteris Papadimas in Athens, Indradip Ghosh and Sarupya Ganguly in Bengaluru; editing by Paul Simao) Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fed Rate Cut Speculation Is Building a Buy Case for T-Bond Futures Here
December U.S. Treasury bond futures (ZBZ25) present a buying opportunity on more price strength. See on the daily bar chart for December T-Bond futures that prices are now trending up and have just hit a four-week high. See, too, at the bottom of the chart that the moving average convergence divergence (MACD) indicator is in a bullish posture, as the red MACD line is above the blue trigger line and both lines are trending higher. More News from Barchart Dear Nvidia Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for August 27 Options Traders Expected Palantir Stock's Tamest Earnings Reaction in a Year. Did They Get It Right? Tesla Gains on Elon Musk's New Pay Package. Is TSLA Stock a Buy? Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. Fundamentally, last Friday's U.S. jobs report abruptly changed the trajectory of marketplace thinking. Now, odds are 75% that the Federal Reserve will lower U.S. interest rates at the September Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting. That's bullish for U.S. Treasury futures markets prices. A move in the December T-Bond futures prices above chart resistance at 115 23/32 would give the bulls more power and it would also become a buying opportunity. The upside price objective would be 121 even or above. Technical support, for which to place a protective sell stop just below, is located at 113 16/32. IMPORTANT NOTE: I am not a futures broker and do not manage any trading accounts other than my own personal account. It is my goal to point out to you potential trading opportunities. However, it is up to you to: (1) decide when and if you want to initiate any trades and (2) determine the size of any trades you may initiate. Any trades I discuss are hypothetical in nature. Here is what the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has said about futures trading (and I agree 100%): Trading commodity futures and options is not for everyone. IT IS A VOLATILE, COMPLEX AND RISKY BUSINESS. Before you invest any money in futures or options contracts, you should consider your financial experience, goals and financial resources, and know how much you can afford to lose above and beyond your initial payment to a broker. You should understand commodity futures and options contracts and your obligations in entering into those contracts. You should understand your exposure to risk and other aspects of trading by thoroughly reviewing the risk disclosure documents your broker is required to give you. On the date of publication, Jim Wyckoff did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
