logo
SYL dispute: Logjam persists, fifth round of talks on August 5

SYL dispute: Logjam persists, fifth round of talks on August 5

Hindustan Times10-07-2025
The fourth round of talks between the Centre, Punjab and Haryana governments on Wednesday to resolve the decades-old Sutlej-Yamuna Link (SYL) Canal dispute failed to break the logjam. Haryana CM Nayab Singh Saini, Union Jal Shakti minister CR Patil and Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann during a meeting in New Delhi on Wednesday. (HT Photo)
A meeting between Punjab chief minister Bhagwant Mann and his Haryana counterpart Nayab Singh Saini was called by Union Jal Shakti Minister CR Patil at the national capital. It was agreed that the chief ministers would meet again with the Union minister in early August to continue working towards an amicable solution. The move comes amid increasing calls for the Centre to mediate between the states and uphold inter-state water-sharing agreements.
The Supreme Court on May 6 had directed the two states to cooperate with the central government in arriving at an amicable solution. 'In case the issue is not resolved amicably between the parties, we propose to take up the matter on August 13, 2025,' the apex court had said.
At the New Delhi meeting, both Mann and Saini struck divergent notes after holding deliberations on the completion of SYL canal. While Mann said Punjab did not have spare water to share with any other state, reiterating a review of water availability and non-availability of land for SYL canal, Saini sounded optimistic stating that a meaningful dialogue was held with Mann on the contentious issue.
Mann said that SYL canal being an emotive issue for Punjab will lead to serious law and order problems having national and regional ramifications with Haryana and Rajasthan also bearing the brunt. Saini, on his part, maintained that the Punjab CM acknowledged that the SYL canal issue should be resolved, being pending for far too long.
Saini also expressed confidence that a positive outcome will be achieved on this issue in the August 5 meeting.
Mann said out of 34.34 MAF (million acre feet) water of three rivers ( Ravi, Beas & Sutlej), Punjab was allocated only 14.22 MAF, which is 40%. 'The remaining 60% is allocated to Haryana, Delhi and Rajasthan even though none of these rivers actually flow through these states,' Mann said.
'Haryana is already getting 1.62 MAF Ravi-Beas and 4.33 MAF Sutlej water which makes 5.95 MAF from these three rivers of Punjab. Besides, Haryana gets additional 4.65 MAF Yamuna waters and 1.62 MAF Sarda water by Sarda Yamuna Link,'' Mann said. He demanded that Punjab should be included as a partner state for Yamuna waters allocation and 60% surplus Yamuna water should be considered for Punjab.
The Punjab CM also suggested that the situation emerging after the suspension of Indus Waters Treaty should be taken advantage of to fulfil the water needs of Punjab by channelising water from the western rivers - Indus, Jhelum, Chenab within Indian territory and new storage dams upstream of Bhakra and Pong Dams in Himachal Pradesh should be constructed.
The Indus Waters Treaty, a 1960 water-sharing agreement between India and Pakistan governing the use of Indus river system, which included three western rivers (the Indus, Jhelum, Chenab) and three eastern rivers (Ravi, Beas and Sutlej) was suspended by India in April this year following a terror attack in Pahalgam, allegedly at the behest of Pakistan.
Mann also said that Punjab was facing groundwater depletion and must get priority in future strategies for the usage, diversion, or allocation of river waters. 'If we get 23 million acre feet (MAF) from Chenab, the whole dispute will be resolved forever,' the Punjab CM said.
'The long-conceived project of Sarda-Yamuna Link needs to be taken up on priority and surplus water be transferred to river Yamuna at a suitable location. Additional water available could offset the balance water requirement of the state of Haryana from the Ravi-Beas system apart from addressing the ever-growing drinking water requirement of Delhi and availability of the Yamuna water to Rajasthan,'' Mann said.
Haryana government is pressing for the implementation of Supreme Court's (SC) orders to complete the remaining portion of the canal by Punjab. The apex court in its January 15, 2002 and June 4, 2004 judgments had ordered completion of the remaining portion of canal in Punjab territory.
Conceived in 1978 to bring Haryana's share of Ravi-Beas water, the proposed 212-kilometre long SYL canal consisted of two segments, a 91-kilometre channel in Haryana and a 121 kilometre carrier channel in Punjab. Haryana completed its portion of the channel in 1979 at a cost of ₹56 crore, but Punjab has failed to complete the canal in its territory despite Supreme Court directions.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US' new tariff list: India at 25%, exports to get hit, competitors in lower band
US' new tariff list: India at 25%, exports to get hit, competitors in lower band

Economic Times

time14 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

US' new tariff list: India at 25%, exports to get hit, competitors in lower band

Synopsis Effective August 7, 2025, the US has imposed a blanket 25% tariff on all Indian-origin goods, placing India among the most harshly treated nations in its new tariff regime. This measure, part of a new Executive Order, denies India product-level exemptions, even for critical sectors like pharmaceuticals and electronics. Agencies US' new tariff list New Delhi: In a move that could dent India's exports to US, Washington has imposed a blanket 25% tariff on all Indian-origin goods, effective August 7, measure, part of a new Executive Order issued by US President Donald Trump on July 31, places India among the most harshly treated countries in the new American tariff regime, offering no product-level exemptions even for sectors deemed critical like pharmaceuticals, energy, and Order mentions that tariffs may be reduced once countries do a deal with the per the order, countries have been subject to tariffs ranging from 10% to over 41% with differential rates based on geopolitical risk, economic alignment, and trade said the new order puts India at disadvantage to majority competitors including Pakistan, Vietnam, Bangladesh, Turkey where the tariffs are 15-20%. 'India's exports of petroleum products, smartphones, pharmaceuticals, engineering goods, electronics, and textiles will bear the brunt of the tariffs,' said a representative of an export promotion penalty threatened by Trump on India for doing business with Russia has not yet been US, Wednesday, announced 25% tariffs on India along with undisclosed penalty on trading with Russia.'The implications of the recent development are being examined by the government. The Ministry of Commerce and Industry is engaged with all stakeholders including exporters and industry for taking feedback of their assessment of the situation,' commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal said in his statement in Parliament US was India's largest export destination in FY25 with shipments valued at $86.51 billion. But it accounted for less than a fifth of its total goods exports of $437.42 per the Order, unlike many other trading partners, India has been denied all product-level exemptions—even for products and sectors, the US exempted Goods from other tariff exempted categories include finished pharmaceutical drugs, APIsand other key drug inputs; energy products, critical minerals and a wide range of electronics and EU has been granted a special concession in which if the existing US most favoured nation (MFN) tariff on an EU product is below 15%, the total tariff will be increased to 15%. However, if the MFN tariff is already 15% or higher, then no additional duty will be charged.A 10% tariff applies to a few countries—Brazil, the UK, and the Falkland 15% tariff, which is the most common, covers 38 countries. Countries facing higher tariffs (25-30%) include India, Brunei, Kazakhstan, Moldova, and and Serbia at 35%, Switzerland at 39% (unusually high for a developed nation), Laos and Myanmar at 40%, and Syria at 41%, the US Customs Border Protection authority will realise a guidance clarifying on how this measure will be applied.

Not only Bengalis, every citizen has right to go anywhere in India, says economist Amartya Sen
Not only Bengalis, every citizen has right to go anywhere in India, says economist Amartya Sen

Economic Times

time14 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Not only Bengalis, every citizen has right to go anywhere in India, says economist Amartya Sen

Wading into the political slugfest over the alleged harassment of Bengali migrant workers in other parts of the country, noted economist Amartya Sen said every citizen of India has the freedom to go wherever they want, and any effort to curb that must be objected to. Speaking to reporters at his ancestral home in Santiniketan, Sen said it doesn't matter whether a person is a Bengali, Punjabi or a Marwari, the freedom to go wherever he wants and speak whichever language he wants is his constitutional right. "An Indian citizen has the right of movement in the entire country. There is no mention of territorial rights anywhere in our Constitution," he said."Every citizen of India has the right to be happy. We have to respect everyone...," he said on Thursday, responding to a question from reporters on the issue that has rocked the state. Sen said if Bengalis are being tortured and neglected, it must be objected to. "It is not a question of Bengal alone, but the whole country," he added."The language that was integrated with 'Charyapad' (Bangla), its value must be acknowledged. Various poems have been written in that language. The messages of Rabindranath Tagore and Kazi Nazrul Islam have been laid out very clearly in their works. These values must be acknowledged," he TMC has been raising its voice over the last one month, alleging that Bengali-speaking people, especially poor Muslim migrant workers, are being harassed in BJP-ruled states and being branded illegal Bangladeshi Minister Mamata Banerjee has led a mega rally in Kolkata over the issue last month, and also started 'Bhasa Andolan', sharpening her attack on the BJP. The BJP, on the other hand, has dismissed the allegations, claiming that the TMC did not think about the welfare of migrant workers over the last 14 years, and was now raising the issue with an eye on next year's assembly elections in the state.

Indian imports bill could rise buy $14 billion after stopping Russian oil imports
Indian imports bill could rise buy $14 billion after stopping Russian oil imports

First Post

time17 minutes ago

  • First Post

Indian imports bill could rise buy $14 billion after stopping Russian oil imports

If India were to stop buying Russian crude oil, Indian imports bill could rise by up to $14 billion as a result of expensive imports from elsewhere. But the true impact on India —and Western nations as well— could be larger as India's purchase of Russian oil has kept international prices low so far. read more Fuga Bluemarine crude oil tanker lies at anchor near the terminal Kozmino in Nakhodka Bay near the port city of Nakhodka, Russia. India's imports bill could rise by up to $14 billion after stopping Russian crude oil imports. In addition to slapping India with 25 per cent tariff, US President Donald Trump has threatened additional penalties over the trade with Russia, mainly the purchase of Russian oil — India has bought discounted Russian oil since Russia launched the war on Ukraine in 2022. The true cost of India replacing Russian oil imports in the wake of Trump's threats would be much higher than $14 billion for India and the world. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The true cost of replacing Russian oil for India — and the world India stopping the purchase of Russian oil could raise the price of oil by up to $10 per barrel, raising the country's import bill by around $13-14 billion, according to Prashant Vasisht, the Senior Vice President and Co-Group Head of Corporate Ratings at ICRA. Vasisht suggested the true cost could be higher as prices of gas and other petroleum products and derivatives will also rise. 'Additionally, domestic gas and LNG imports linked to dated Brent prices would also become dearer thereby impacting all gas consumers such as fertiliser, city gas distribution etc. A $10/barrel increase in Brent prices could increase the cost of LNG purchased annually under the RasGas contract by Rs 3,900 crore,' Vasisht told The Financial Express. Between May 2022-2025, India saved around $17.2 billion with the purchase of discounted Russian oil, according to ICRA's calculations. However, that may now change — and not just for India. With the purchase of discounted Russian oil, India and China have so far stabilised oil prices in the international market by absorbing Russian over-supply and easing the pressure on global prices. But, if and when India would stop importing Russian oil, the competition for non-Russian oil would rise and prices will rise as demand will rise in proportion to supply. Western nations will also feel the pinch. Firstly, prices of oil will also rise for them owing to greater demand and limited supply of non-Russian oil. Secondly, since 2022, Indian refiners had been processing Russian crude and selling finished products to Western nations at cheaper rates. As such discounted purchases would end, their bills will rise as well.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store