Airbnb to offer exclusive "experiences"
Airbnb is launching a new tier of exclusive, curated "experiences" — think hip hop wine tours in Portland or a Kansas City barbecue with Patrick Mahomes.
Why it matters: The company is increasingly going beyond what it is best-known for, arranging home rentals for travelers.
Driving the news: The so-called Originals is one of several new offerings announced at Airbnb's 2025 Summer Release event this week in Los Angeles.
What they're saying: Jay Carney, the company's global head of policy and communications, tells Axios that Originals events are the highest tier of experiences they have to offer.
"These are once-in-a-lifetime kind of experiences because of who the host is and what they're offering. It's that combination of 'I can't believe I'm doing this with this person' and the fact you can only do it on Airbnb."
Airbnb has been offering "experiences" since 2016, but the new Originals promise to be more exclusive, with prices ranging from $20 to $200 per guest.
How it works: From the home page, search your city or the one you're visiting under the Experiences tab, select dates and the number of guests.
Originals will be labeled as such in the search results and you can book by clicking on the listing.
Airbnb also announced that Experiences will be "vetted for quality" and are now available in 650 cities worldwide.
Later this year, guests will be able to see who's going before they book, message the group or individual guests during the experience, and stay in touch afterward.
The bottom line: The vacation rental company is aiming to get people to use the app even if they aren't traveling.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
2 hours ago
Trump appears to undercut US proposal to Iran, declaring he won't allow any uranium enrichment
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump on Monday appeared to undercut a proposal that was offered by his special envoy to Iran, saying he will insist that Tehran fully dismantle its nuclear enrichment program as part of any deal to ease crushing sanctions. Trump and Steve Witkoff, who is leading the negotiations for the U.S., have repeatedly offered inconsistent public messages about whether Iran would be allowed to retain the capacity to enrich uranium to lower levels for civilian purposes. The Trump administration maintains that it will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. The negotiations have been framed by Trump as both countries' best chance to avoid direct military conflict over Iran's nuclear program. Tehran, which denies seeking a nuclear weapon, has insisted that it will not agree to any deal that fully scraps its enrichment program. 'Under our potential Agreement — WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM!' Trump wrote on social media. Addressing the seeming contradiction, a White House official said Trump was speaking the 'cold, hard truth.' The official said the terms the U.S. gave the Iranians were 'very tough' and would make it impossible for them to obtain a nuclear bomb. Trump's post comes after media reports that Witkoff's latest proposal to Tehran would allow Iran to retain low levels of enrichment for civilian uses like nuclear medicine and commercial power if it agrees to shut down its heavily protected underground sites for a period of time. The U.S. and Iran have engaged in several rounds of direct nuclear talks for the first time in years. Senior officials — including Witkoff and Trump himself — have said within the last few weeks that Iran would not be able to keep enriching uranium at any level. The proposal, reported by Axios and confirmed by a U.S. official, called for the creation of a regional consortium to handle uranium enrichment for civilian uses — a plan first studied more than a decade ago in negotiations that led to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. Trump was sharply critical of that agreement — which also allowed set limits on uranium enrichment but permitted Iran to maintain such a capacity — and withdrew the U.S. from it in 2017 during his first term. The officials spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity to discuss private diplomatic negotiations. The International Atomic Energy Agency found that Iran has further increased its stockpile of uranium enriched to near weapons-grade levels since its last update in February, according to a confidential report released by the U.N. nuclear watchdog on Saturday. Iran has maintained that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only, but Iranian officials have increasingly suggested that Tehran could pursue an atomic bomb. 'President Trump has made it clear that Iran can never obtain a nuclear bomb," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement before Trump's post. "Special Envoy Witkoff has sent a detailed and acceptable proposal to the Iranian regime, and it's in their best interest to accept it. Out of respect for the ongoing deal, the Administration will not comment on details of the proposal to the media.' The proposal that Trump appeared to undercut on Monday evening included significant concessions by the administration certain to anger Israel along with pro-Israel lawmakers in the United States. Several of the main points were essentially the same or very similar to conditions outlined in the 2015 nuclear deal. Early iterations of that agreement negotiated by the Obama administration also suggested the possibility of a regional consortium that would put Iranian uranium enrichment above a certain level under the control of Iran and its neighbors. The idea was scrapped, however, because of Gulf Arab nations' objections and Iranian suspicions of the ultimate aims of the consortium. People who were involved in the 18-month negotiations for the 2015 deal reacted immediately to reports that the Trump administration might allow Iran to continue with an enrichment program at any level, particularly after senior officials repeatedly said Iran would not be able to retain such programs. 'This proposal poses a moment of truth for critics of previous Iran nuclear negotiations/agreements (and) those who have called for a no-enrichment, full-dismantlement deal,' Dan Shapiro, Obama's former ambassador to Israel, wrote on X. 'Will they hold Trump to the same standard?'
Axios
3 hours ago
- Axios
Historic Ruan space revived for Sips in the City
Sips in the City, one of Winefest Des Moines' most anticipated events, is returning downtown this year with a fresh twist — it's happening inside the newly renovated Ruan Pavilion at the Ruan Center. Why it matters: This is the first time the Ruan Pavilion — a former bank lobby turned office space — is being used for Sips, marking a new chapter for the used downtown venue. Ruan Center officials aim to transform the 11,000-square-foot space into a regular events destination. Catch up quick: The Ruan Center, added to the National Register of Historic Places this year, encompasses the 600 block of Grand and Locust avenues. The 36-story office building includes the Pavilion and the adjacent 14-story Two Ruan, which is under residential redevelopment. Flashback: The pavilion space was once a bustling public area with bank tellers. Over the decades, it was sectioned off for private offices until 2021, when those offices were relocated and the open space was mainly used for Ruan Center employee activities, building manager Jona Schmidt tells Axios. State of play: Ruan officials recognized the potential for an events space following a Des Moines Metro Opera gala there last year. Sips will help them assess possible future enhancements, Schmidt said. Zoom in: Sips was at Smash Park in West Des Moines in recent years and is moving downtown partly in response to guest feedback, Winefest board member Chris Diebel tells Axios. If you go: 6-9pm June 13.
Axios
5 hours ago
- Axios
AI pioneer Bengio launches $30M nonprofit to rethink safety
Machine learning pioneer Yoshua Bengio is launching a new nonprofit lab backed by roughly $30 million in funding to make AI systems act less like humans. Why it matters: While the move bucks a trend toward AI that acts independently, Bengio and others argue the current approach risks creating systems that may pursue their own self-preservation at the expense of humanity. "We've been getting inspiration from humans as the template for building intelligent machines, but that's crazy, right?" Bengio said in an interview. "If we continue on this path, that means we're going to be creating entities — like us — that don't want to die, and that may be smarter than us and that we're not sure if they're going to behave according to our norms and our instructions," he said. Driving the news: Bengio, a Montreal-based researcher who has long warned about the risks of a technology he helped develop, has raised about $30 million for the nonprofit, dubbed LawZero. LawZero currently has about 15 staffers, Bengio said, "but the goal is to hire many more." Bengio is among those who have called for tougher regulation of AI development and even the breakup of big tech companies. Earlier this year he gave a TED Talk urging greater caution and collaboration. The big picture: There's a growing sense of worry among critics — and even AI practitioners — that safety is taking a back seat as companies and countries race to be first with AI that can best humans in a wide variety of tasks, so-called artificial general intelligence (AGI). Bengio said there is also a high risk in concentrating control of advanced AI in a handful of companies. "You don't want AGI or superintelligence to be in the hands of one person or one company only deciding what to do, or even one government," Bengio said. "So you need very strong checks and balances." Between the lines: Bengio says a large part of the problem is how current systems are trained. During initial training, the systems are taught to mimic humans and then they're honed by seeing which responses people find most appealing. "Both of these give rise to uncontrolled agency," Bengio said. Some early glimmers of this are already appearing, such as Anthropic's latest model which, in a test scenario, sought to blackmail its engineers to avoid shutdown. By contrast, Bengio says he wants to create AI systems that have intellectual distance from humans and act as more of a detached scientist than a personal companion or human agent. "The training principle is completely different, but it can exploit a lot of the recent advances that have happened in machine learning," he said. Yes, but: Bengio told Axios that the $30 million should be enough to fund the basic research effort for about 18 months.
