3 things to know about America's recent changes in its military strategy in Africa
The United States has recently revised key military leadership roles to address emerging global threats, particularly in Africa.
For the first time, U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) is led by an Air Force commander, Lt. Gen. Dagvin Anderson, emphasizing air and space-focused strategies.
AFRICOM is considering an autonomous structure and evaluating potential new headquarters in Morocco.
Recent appointments in the United States military indicate a move toward greater integration of air and space power across Africa.
In a nutshell, the United States Africa Command recently appointed its first Air Force commander.
As the United States approaches a crucial development phase and AFRICOM focuses on air operations, here are five key points to consider regarding the U.S's involvement in Africa's security landscape.
AFRICOM gets its first Air Force commander
Air Force Lt. Gen. Dagvin Anderson has been confirmed as the new head of the United States Africa Command (AFRICOM).
His nomination is the first time that the command has been overseen by an airman rather than a soldier or Marine.
Anderson, who has a history in special operations and formerly led the United States Special Operations Command Africa, might provide a new air-and-space-focused perspective to AFRICOM's mission.
New command headquarters
After the Senate approved a new commander for U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM), the United States also began considering an autonomous military command for operations in Africa.
Morocco is reportedly being evaluated as the probable site for the new command headquarters, according to unconfirmed reports.
Up until now, AFRICOM and European Command shared a headquarters, which restricted its ability to respond independently to Africa's quickly changing challenges.
What led to the new developments
There was a growing debate concerning AFRICOM's future. The Pentagon has proposed lowering the number of senior generals and even integrating AFRICOM with the US European Command, as they did before 2007.
At the same time, AFRICOM is increasing airstrikes across Africa, and putting an airman in command rather than soldiers or marines, who have traditionally led the force, might signify a change toward more air and space-focused operations on the continent.
AFRICOM
U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) is one of the United States' 11 unified combatant commands, in charge of directing all US military activities, partnerships, and security interests on the African continent.
africom
AFRICOM is currently headquartered in Stuttgart, Germany, and collaborates closely with African countries to combat terrorism, promote stability, and give humanitarian aid.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Los Angeles Times
5 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Letters to the Editor: We should all feel ‘betrayed' by denial of retirement benefits for trans troops
To the editor: The news from the White House gets crueler every day that Donald Trump is president and we watch his GOP colleagues allow the implementation of policies that deny benefits to those who have served this country ('Air Force to deny retirement pay to transgender service members being separated from service,' Aug. 7). How dare the Air Force compel transgender troops with 15 to 18 years of service to retire early without full benefits? How could moral people go along with this punishing policy from a draft dodger who seems to care only about having power and enriching himself? The article quotes Logan Ireland, a master sergeant who has served for 15 years, including a deployment in Afghanistan. Ireland put his life on the line to protect our freedoms — the freedoms that Trump and all his complicit colleagues now enjoy. The patriot Ireland says he 'feels betrayed and devastated by the news.' Indeed, we all should feel that way. It's impossible to accept that we now have a president who would actually go out of his way to punish Americans who have risked making the greatest sacrifice of all. Peggy Jo Abraham, Santa Monica


Chicago Tribune
8 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Letters: Op-ed writer ignores the brutal toll of Larry Hoover's time as a gang leader
My jaw dropped while reading Jeremy Busby's impassioned plea for Gov. JB Pritzker to free from prison post-haste the notorious 1970s gang leader Larry Hoover ('Pritzker should take page out of Trump's book, free Larry Hoover,' Aug. 7). Busby makes not a single allusion, nor even a hint, at the wholesale destruction, misery and pain of not hundreds, but thousands of African-American families attributable to Hoover's vicious stranglehold on the city's South and West sides in the name of drug warfare for untold years. Has Hoover reformed? Today, is he truly committed to atoning for his past misdeeds in the name of, as Busby insists, improving 'the plight of those in the Black community'? I hope it is so. No person can say what is in another person's heart. But it does not undo the irreversible damage Hoover wrought in the very neighborhoods he now claims to care for. The right call, the only call, is to let Hoover continue his acts for the common good from where he truly belongs — in his jail cell. That would demonstrate more than any other act how much he has changed and to further his campaign for love and Jeremy Busby's op-ed, advocating for Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker to pardon Larry Hoover for his Illinois crimes: No. No. No. Hoover is a brutal murderer. He was still running the Gangster Disciples and its followers while incarcerated. He is cunning in renaming his criminal organization, leading people to believe it is legitimate. Hoover should never be released from Jeremy Busby forgets to mention in his opinion piece about freeing Larry Hoover is that Hoover was convicted of murder in 1973 for the killing of a 19-year-old drug dealer. For this, he was given 150 to 200 years in regards to the recent op-ed by Jeremy Busby suggesting Larry Hoover be freed by Gov. JB Pritzker because Hoover grew up in a tough environment and the 'organization' he created, the Gangster Disciples, was not only a symbol of empowerment but did good things for the community, I must be missing something. Killing, or ordering the killing of, people; terrorizing communities; and selling poisonous drugs to said communities are good things? How is freedom justified?Mayor Brandon Johnson made an alarming statement in saying that 'we have reached the point of no return' when it comes to Chicago's financial situation. While it's true that the city faces grave challenges — including the mayor's own decision to borrow $830 million for city operations and the mounting $35 billion in unfunded pension liabilities — I reject the notion that Chicago is beyond saving. Chicago has always been a city of resilience. We don't give up when things get hard. We organize. We innovate. And we fight for a stronger future. That's exactly why I launched Leading A Better Chicago — a civic engagement initiative dedicated to bringing transparency, accountability and bold action to the city's most pressing challenges. Our goal is to reimagine how we tackle long-standing issues, starting with the city's structural fiscal crisis. Our first step has been to partner with Tusk Philanthropies to commission an in-depth analysis of Chicago's current fiscal state, laying out out a road map of realistic, impactful reforms by examining proven approaches from cities such as New York, Detroit and Philadelphia and adapting them to fit Chicago's unique landscape. It's not just a critique — it's a call to action, rooted in data and informed by what has worked elsewhere. We don't just want to study the problem. We want to solve it. Leading A Better Chicago will pair this research with real-world input from people all across the city. We'll gather feedback from residents, engage with community and business leaders, and tap national policy experts to generate bold, actionable ideas for change. Does the mayor believe that there are no feasible solutions to Chicago's issues, that its leaders have tried everything and failed? I believe we haven't tried enough. What we need now isn't despair but determination. Chicago needs fresh thinking, a willingness to challenge the status quo and, most importantly, serious leadership. Because despite what anyone says, Chicago hasn't reached the point of no return. Chicago is always worth fighting for.I'm pleased to learn that the CTA is working to deal with the problem of ghost buses. I hope that it will now address another vexing issue: erratic bus arrivals. I have lost count of the number of times that I have waited for a bus, only to have two and sometimes three arrive simultaneously, and then I learn from the bus tracker that the next bus is 25 to 30 minutes away. This is not a rare occurrence, and it is not limited to certain times of day. I have encountered this problem on Routes 22, 36, 66 and 151. To make matters more annoying, this bunching sometimes occurs within a mile of the route's starting point. I have read that there are supervisors in the field monitoring bus arrivals. Clearly, this approach is not working. Perhaps a centralized system that allows for direct communication with drivers would be more effective. Trains sometimes bypass stops in order to get back on schedule. Why can't this be done with buses as well?I was sorry to hear about the horrible experience that a disabled traveler had at O'Hare International Airport ('O'Hare failed me,' Aug. 3). Mine was the complete opposite. I, too, require a wheelchair, and the redcap who greeted me at the United terminal entrance, and was told of my wheelchair request, sat me down, retrieved my boarding pass and arranged for a wheelchair. A nice young man came, wheeled me to the gate and informed the crew at the gate of my needs. I was the first to board. Coming home, there was a delay to get my wheelchair, but when the young man arrived, he could not be more considerate. I advised him that I would be taking an Uber. As he wheeled me down toward the luggage pickup, he advised me when to order the car, and he proceeded to stay and wheel me the long distance to the Uber pickup and stay with me until the car arrived. He earned the large tip I gave him and my thanks for being so thoughtful and extending such courtesy. All in all, a great experience at O'Hare.


American Military News
21 hours ago
- American Military News
Air Force denies ‘transgender' troops early retirement benefits
Transgender military members who have served between 15 and 18 years are being denied early retirement by the U.S. Air Force following the implementation of the Trump administration's 'transgender' military ban. An August 4 memorandum obtained by Reuters explains that transgender Air Force members will be denied early retirement and will not receive retirement benefits. The outlet noted that service members with between 15 and 18 years of service will instead be given the same option of voluntarily leaving the military as other transgender service members In the memorandum, Brian Scarlett, the U.S. Air Force's acting assistant secretary for manpower and reserve affairs, stated, 'After careful consideration of the individual applications, I am disapproving all Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) exception to policy requests in Tabs 1 and 2 for members with 15-18 years of service.' According to Reuters, while multiple transgender Air Force members had already been approved to receive early retirement benefits, the Air Force has reportedly rescinded the early retirement approvals for transgender troops. 'Although service members with 15-18 years of honorable service were permitted to apply for an exception to policy, none of the exceptions to policy were approved,' an Air Force spokesperson told The Guardian. READ MORE: Video: Pentagon removing transgender troops from US military The Air Force told ABC News, 'Approximately a dozen service members between 15 and 18 years of service were prematurely notified that their TERA applications under the gender dysphoria provision had been approved, but higher level review was required under the DoD gender dysphoria policy for those members.' ABC News reported that the memorandum indicates that transgender service members who voluntarily choose to leave the Air Force will receive twice the rate of pay compared to transgender service members who are involuntarily forced to leave the Air Force. Additionally, ABC News reported that the memorandum notes that transgender troops are 'entitled to an honorable discharge characterization, separation benefits and transition assistance.' The recent Air Force memorandum comes after the Trump administration announced earlier this year that service members with 'gender dysphoria' would no longer be allowed to serve in the U.S. military. In a May memorandum, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said, 'As the President of the United States clearly stated in Executive Order 14183, 'Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness,' January 27, 2025, expressing a false 'gender identity' divergent from an individual's sex cannot satisfy the rigorous standards necessary for Military Service.' 'Service by individuals with a current diagnosis or history of, or exhibiting symptoms consistent with, gender dysphoria is not in the best interest of the Military Services and is not clearly consistent with the interests of national security,' Hegseth added.