'Disabled people in Surrey need a fairer Spring Statement'
For Nikki Roberts, it is nothing new for disabled people to be unfairly treated by the government.They have been "severely impacted by austerity and cuts" over the last 15 years, said the charity worker, who is now worried about the impact Rachel Reeve's Spring Statement could have.Ms Roberts has called on the government to work with the group she leads - Surrey Coalition of Disabled People - and other organisations to help produce a "fairer" outcome for disabled people.A small business leader also told the BBC that the government should reverse some of its economic policies as they were having a negative impact on trade.
Ms Reeves earlier outlined a raft of cuts to benefits, some of which would affect disabled people. Ms Roberts said she was "extremely concerned", as disabled people had already been "disproportionately affected by the cost of living crisis and the global pandemic".She said: "These proposed changes will push more disabled people into poverty."
The Spring Statement also heard that The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has downgraded predicted growth for this year from 2% to 1%.Gary Hudson, the co founder of Surrey AI Centre, an artificial intelligence solutions company, was hoping for a better forcast."This is a tricky, tricky year for the smaller businesses in Surrey," said Mr Hudson, who also runs I Choose Local, a not-for-profit company which aims to help people with opportunities, apprenticeships, and training.For him, it was decisions the Chancellor made in the Budget last autumn on workers rights, the minimum wage and the National Insurance rate for employers which are causing many of the problems. "I think, talking to my business colleagues, the answer is clearly there needs to be a U-turn," he said."There needs to be more support given directly for the smaller businesses."Without it, if you continue on this path, that investment is not going to happen and what that really means is that not only are you losing that business investment critical to get people working, but you're also hitting the consumer confidence."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Universal digital 'BritCards' on an app could soon be used to prove who you are
You could soon need to show a card on an app to get a job or rent a house under a proposed universal digital identity scheme. A 'BritCard' would be a free, mandatory electronic credential stored on a person's smartphone on the planned Wallet app. Employers, immigration, banks and landlords could use a verifier app to conduct checks. The card was proposed today in a policy paper by Labour Together handed to Number 10, with a poll conducted by the influential think-tank finding 80% of Britons would support a digital identity card. The government are examining the proposals, which Labour Together said would also help reduce visa overstayers and benefit fraud. Mockups show that the document would show whether the holder has the right to work or rent. Their driving licence would also be on the app, with hopes that the app could be used to order a passport, access NHS services or display your National Insurance number. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sign up here. People would be required to show their online ID when renting a property or applying for a new job, as a system would check their official records. Landlords rarely face fines for not checking tenants' migration status, Labour Together said, while employers face complex right-to-work rules that vary drastically between groups of people. The paper also said it could help curb visa overstayers, with 63,000 non-EU nationals recorded as not leaving the country before their documents expired in the four years to March 2020, or fewer than 4%. Britain is the only country in Europe without an ID card, with those in the EU able to travel around the bloc with one instead of a passport. Sir Tony Blair attempted to introduce compulsory ID cards in 2006 after the September 11 and 7/7 bombings, only for it to be scrapped. Labour Together estimated it would cost £400million to build the e-ID system and £10million to run the free-to-use phone app. In the foreword, 'red wall' MPs Jake Richards and Adam Jogee said the BritCard 'should form an important part of Labour's enforcement strategy that does not compromise our principles and values'. They added: 'The Windrush scandal saw thousands of people wrongly targeted by immigration enforcement, including many legitimate British citizens who were unjustly detained or deported. More Trending 'We believe that a progressive government does not have to choose between dealing with these injustices. It must tackle them all head-on.' Morgan Wild, Labour Together's chief policy adviser, said: 'The state makes everyone, whether they are a British citizen or not, prove their right to work or rent. 'But we don't give everyone with the right to be here the ability to prove it. 'That leads to discrimination, unjust deportation and, as happened in the worst Windrush cases, dying in a country that is not your own. Through a national effort to provide everyone with proof of their right to be here, BritCard can stop that from ever happening again.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Full list of 12 countries on Donald Trump's travel ban MORE: Free school meals to be extended to 500,000 chilldren across the country MORE: Halving violence against women and girls will require more cash, watchdogs say
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Reeves refuses to rule out autumn tax raid
Rachel Reeves has refused to rule out further tax rises in the Autumn as Cabinet colleagues pile pressure on the Chancellor to unleash more money for public spending. Ms Reeves repeatedly declined to rule out raising taxes on families and businesses at an event on Thursday night as she prepares to set out Whitehall spending plans for the next three years. 'I'm not going to say that I'm not going to take any tax measures in the next four years,' she told an audience of business leaders at the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) annual dinner. Asked four times by CBI president Rupert Soames to reassure Britons they would not be subject to higher taxes, Ms Reeves could only commit to avoiding a repeat of the record £40bn tax raid she launched last Autumn. 'I'm not going to be able to write all four years of budgets sitting here this evening,' she said. Economists have warned that a series of spending commitments made by Sir Keir Starmer, including restoring winter fuel payments to most pensioners and speculation that the two-child cap on benefits will be lifted, will force the issue and lead to higher taxes in the Autumn. JP Morgan has estimated that taxes may need to rise by up to £24bn to cover recent policy announcements and to compensate for the hit to growth from higher tariffs. Pressure is also building on Ms Reeves from Labour's Left after the leak of a memo sent to the Treasury by Angela Rayner's department ahead of the Spring Statement. It detailed potential tax rises that could have avoided spending cuts to balance the budget. Ms Reeves on Thursday insisted the economy was 'turning the corner' even as she admitted that growth was too low, leaving families 'struggling with living standards not improving'. Bosses warned that Labour's workers' rights overhaul was set to worsen the problem. A survey by the Institute of Directors published on Friday found over seven in 10 business leaders believed the upcoming Employment Rights Bill would have a negative impact on UK economic growth. The Chancellor insisted growth around the world had been disappointing. 'None of our countries are growing at the rate that we used to or the rate that we want to. All of us are struggling with living standards not improving and our citizens are becoming restless,' she said. Cabinet colleagues including deputy prime minister Ms Rayner are piling pressure on the Chancellor to release more money for government departments ahead of the Spending Review on Wednesday. Ms Reeves also hinted that the Government was preparing a package of measures to help businesses deal with higher energy costs. She signalled her three year spending review would also unleash a wave of funding for infrastructure projects, from renewables to nuclear energy. She said: 'I know that one of the questions that we need to answer is how we're going to make energy more affordable, particularly for some of our most intensive energy-using businesses where the price differential with other countries around the world is just too acute for many to be competitive. 'And so that's a question we will answer in the industrial strategy in a few weeks.' The cost of power for factories in Britain is now about 50pc more expensive than in Germany and France, and four times as expensive as in the US. The commons business select committee on Friday warned that high energy prices were holding back growth and urged ministers to address the issue as part of the upcoming industrial strategy.
South Wales Argus
2 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
‘Vast Majority' of new homes will have solar panels, says Miliband
It comes a month after Downing Street confirmed the panels should be installed on as many new properties as possible amid speculation that ministers will make them a mandatory requirement on new builds by 2027. Speaking to the BBC, Mr Miliband described the proposed policy as 'just common sense' and said the panels should be 'almost universal' on English homes. Changes to regulations will be laid out in the Future Homes Standard, due to be published later this year. The previous Conservative Government considered a proposal that would have mandated rooftop solar panels to cover 40% of a building's ground area or equivalent. Ed Miliband says solar panels should be 'almost universal' on English homes. 'The problem about the previous system was that it said you would had to have a certain percentage of coverage of solar panels, but if you couldn't achieve that percentage, you didn't have to do anything at all,' Mr Miliband said. 'Under our plans, we are not going to say that. We are going to say even if you can't hit 40% you will still have to have some solar panels, except in rare, exceptional cases.' He added that the number of homes fitted with solar panels needed to be 'much higher'. The policy is estimated to add between £3,000 and £4,000 to the cost of construction, but to then save owners more than £1,000 on their annual energy bills, according to the Times, which first reported the change. Asked in May whether housebuilders would be legally required to fit the panels, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's official spokesman said: 'Of course we want to see solar panels on as many new homes as possible. 'The Future Homes Standard, which will be published in the coming months, will include measures to drive this, we're working on the detail of that and will provide an update on that in due course. 'But it's good news for householders who want lower energy bills.' Under the Government's new proposals, 80% of new builds would reportedly be required to have solar panels covering 40% of their ground area, while 19% would have slightly fewer because of exemptions, including roof pitch and overshading. Ministers last year rejected a private members' Bill aiming to force housebuilders to install solar panels on the roof of every new home, saying the proposals would potentially slow down construction and add to building costs. Labour's manifesto included a pledge to build 1.5 million new homes over the course of the Parliament.
