Where the smart money went: Spring 2025's lessons for European VC sector
Spring 2025 marks a turning point for the European venture capital market: the turbulence of previous years is giving way to a search for new points of stability. On the surface, the overall volume of investments has held steady at around $12–13 billion for Q1, but the logic of deals and investor priorities has clearly shifted. There are fewer rounds, average check sizes have grown, and both startups and founders now face much higher standards.
In this article, I outline the key trends of the spring season, analyse where the money is actually going, which segments are attracting the attention of major and niche funds, and what this means for the market, LPs, GPs, and founders. I explain why infrastructure, deep tech, and B2B have come into focus—and which previously hyped sectors are now being left behind.
This perspective aims to understand how the market is building new foundations after the 'easy money' era, how the strategies of leading players are evolving, and which scenarios are becoming most likely for the second half of the year.
In spring 2025, European venture capital has taken a deliberate step away from chasing the next big platform for everyone. Instead, investors are channelling capital into start-ups that own one specific pain point—and solve it better than anyone else.
This change is most visible in the priorities of leading funds. When Cathay Innovation launched its $1B fund this spring, it made clear: that the capital would flow only into vertical AI applications, such as healthcare diagnostics, financial automation, or energy optimisation. The era of 'AI for everything' is over; now, investors want AI for something real. Smartfin, too, repositioned itself strictly as a backer of B2B infrastructure scale-ups, while Cherry Ventures doubled down on single-solution early-stage bets in key European hubs.
Investment rounds echo the same shift. Isomorphic Labs raised €556M for AI-driven drug discovery, not a generic platform. Rapyd's €474M round was all about expertise in the toughest corner of payments compliance. Even Reneo's €600M in climate tech was grounded in focused, technical innovation.
Why does this matter? Because LPs have grown tired of stories and scale for scale's sake. They want evidence: deep product-market fit, visible technical advantage, and a defensible moat.
At Zubr Capital, we see this as a healthy correction. The winners will be those who choose depth over spread—delivering mastery in one vertical, not chasing every market at once.
This spring, European venture capital has drawn a clear line: the era of quick-to-market wrappers and surface-level 'innovation' is over. Investors are backing startups that build true technology—from the ground up—with substantial engineering and proprietary IP at their core.
The distinction is sharp. Isomorphic Labs, a UK spinout from DeepMind, raised €556m not for a generic AI platform, but for a domain-specific stack in drug discovery: new algorithms, unique data pipelines, and technical depth rooted in biology and chemistry. Investors are no longer satisfied with startups layering a pretty interface on public models—they want hard science and engineering.
The same is true beyond AI. Sweden's Neko Health secured $260 million by combining proprietary hardware, sensors, and software for preventive diagnostics—redefining early health screening by building every layer in-house. France's Loft Orbital became a unicorn not by selling vision, but by delivering engineering: modular satellite buses, custom mission software, and reliable payload integration. Their latest funding will scale working infrastructure, not just prototypes.
Even in creative AI, substance wins. Synthesia's $180 million round is about advancing proprietary technology for avatar and voice generation—no reliance on off-the-shelf models, but a real R&D engine. And while Quantum Motion (UK) hasn't raised a headline round this spring, its pursuit of silicon-based quantum processors—rooted in physics, not hype—demonstrates the kind of depth investors now prize.
The signal is clear: capital is flowing to teams that deliver real, defensible technology. For founders, engineering depth and original IP are now the strongest currency in the European market.
Spring 2025 has brought a new level of discipline to European venture capital, as thesis-driven funds moved decisively into the spotlight. Instead of spreading bets across the entire innovation spectrum, more VCs are building portfolios around tightly defined investment themes and industry problems.
This trend is reshaping the funding landscape. Funds like Keen Venture Partners have launched dedicated vehicles for European defense and security tech, raising €40 million from EIF specifically for startups tackling national security infrastructure. Recent portfolio moves—EclecticIQ, Perciv.AI, Avalor AI, Rescale—underline a sharp focus on deep, vertical technologies with immediate strategic value.
Other funds are taking a similar approach. 7percent Ventures now concentrates on aerospace, dual-use AI, and moonshot innovation, consistently backing engineering-heavy founders solving mission-critical problems. Their recent investments—satellite comms, cybersecurity AI, aerospace telemetry—reflect this 'vertical expertise first' logic.
Lab-to-market models are also gaining ground. Chalmers Ventures has systematized partnerships with scientific teams, turning real innovations into commercial deep tech businesses—not just following buzzwords. Creator Fund backs only PhD-led start-ups in AI, life sciences, and frontier tech, while Deeptech Labs specializes in seed-stage, IP-rich companies moving from prototype to product.
The message is clear: targeted capital is a sign of genuine conviction. As generalist portfolios lose ground, thesis-driven strategies are setting new standards for discipline and sector insight. For founders and LPs alike, clarity of purpose and deep industry expertise have become critical differentiators in Europe's maturing VC market.
This spring, European venture capital sent a strong signal: location matters less than ever, and operational quality now outweighs geography. The largest rounds and new fund launches consistently favored execution and market traction over traditional 'hotspots.'
Take Reneo's €600m cross-border round—one of the biggest in Q1 2025. Its operations span France and Spain, proving that VC now follows product readiness and strategic vision, not the location of a company's headquarters. Similarly, Milan-based Hotiday raised €5,5M from top-tier investors, breaking through Italy's usual funding ceiling thanks to strong product focus and niche traction.
The fund landscape reflects the same shift. Soulmates Ventures closed a €50M fund for sustainability startups across Central and Eastern Europe, while 4Founders Capital launched a €44M fund for Spanish and Southern European founders—emphasising local expertise and regional commitment. Defiant's $30M fund connects Western and peripheral European markets, and Voima Ventures' €100M Fund III targets deep tech across the Nordics and Baltics.
Even previously secondary regions—Benelux, DACH, Southeast Europe—are seeing increased activity, as new funds target talent and technical strength wherever they emerge.
The bottom line: investors now assess startups by execution, product, and real market potential, regardless of location. For founders, this means access to capital is more meritocratic than ever. For the ecosystem, it signals a Europe-wide race for quality—where substance, not geography, wins.
Spring 2025 confirmed that infrastructure is now at the heart of Europe's tech agenda—not just for performance, but for resilience, control, and sovereignty. Governments and VCs are aligned: funding no longer just chases growth, but prioritizes the foundational layers powering AI, data, automation, and security.
This shift is massive in scale. The EU's InvestAI program launched with €200 billion to build core AI infrastructure—giga-factories, sovereign clouds, and advanced chips. France added €109 billion for AI leadership, and the European Technological Competitiveness Initiative is rolling out over €10 billion into chips, cybersecurity, and cloud through fund-of-funds structures.
Private capital is following suit. Investments in sovereign data pipelines, chip design, and next-gen autonomy are on the rise. Established players like Graphcore (UK) embody Europe's silicon ambitions, while stealth-mode AI hardware startups are quietly closing large rounds. Industrial infrastructure is another hotbed: FLOW X (Romania) stands out for integrating deep analytics and automation into industrial processes—moving far beyond dashboards. Funding is now targeting digital twins, industrial IoT, and process automation, making deep tech synonymous with infrastructure.
Cybersecurity has become a national priority. Deals now focus on architecture for industrial and state security, with companies like Unseen (UK) pioneering AI-native protection that moves beyond traditional firewalls. Zero-trust systems, sovereign clouds, and industrial cyber platforms are quietly attracting both private and state capital.
The message is clear: in 2025, infrastructure is no longer a supporting function—it's the main event. For investors and founders, building and owning the tech backbone of Europe is the highest-value play on the market.
Spring 2025 has redefined the European VC landscape: investors now demand focus, technical depth, and real traction. This new discipline is making the market quieter but stronger, with capital gravitating toward deep tech, infrastructure, and clearly defensible niches—regardless of geography.
Looking ahead, we expect this logic to hold. The second half of 2025 is likely to bring continued selectivity, with larger rounds flowing to proven teams and sectors solving fundamental problems—AI infrastructure, climate, industrial tech, and security. Government and private capital will keep reinforcing each other, driving further consolidation and accelerating the shift from hype to substance.
For founders and investors, the message is clear: building real technology and demonstrating market resilience will remain the keys to unlocking capital and long-term success. At Zubr Capital, we see a maturing market—one poised not just to survive, but to lead the next cycle of European innovation.
Oleg Khusaenov is CEO and founder of Zubr Capital Investment Сompany
"Where the smart money went: Spring 2025's lessons for European VC sector" was originally created and published by Retail Banker International, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Calculating The Fair Value Of Charisma Energy Services Limited (Catalist:YSV)
Charisma Energy Services' estimated fair value is S$0.052 based on 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity With S$0.051 share price, Charisma Energy Services appears to be trading close to its estimated fair value The average premium for Charisma Energy Services' competitorsis currently 346% In this article we are going to estimate the intrinsic value of Charisma Energy Services Limited (Catalist:YSV) by estimating the company's future cash flows and discounting them to their present value. One way to achieve this is by employing the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model. Models like these may appear beyond the comprehension of a lay person, but they're fairly easy to follow. Remember though, that there are many ways to estimate a company's value, and a DCF is just one method. For those who are keen learners of equity analysis, the Simply Wall St analysis model here may be something of interest to you. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. We are going to use a two-stage DCF model, which, as the name states, takes into account two stages of growth. The first stage is generally a higher growth period which levels off heading towards the terminal value, captured in the second 'steady growth' period. To begin with, we have to get estimates of the next ten years of cash flows. Seeing as no analyst estimates of free cash flow are available to us, we have extrapolate the previous free cash flow (FCF) from the company's last reported value. We assume companies with shrinking free cash flow will slow their rate of shrinkage, and that companies with growing free cash flow will see their growth rate slow, over this period. We do this to reflect that growth tends to slow more in the early years than it does in later years. Generally we assume that a dollar today is more valuable than a dollar in the future, so we need to discount the sum of these future cash flows to arrive at a present value estimate: 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Levered FCF ($, Millions) US$2.28m US$1.56m US$1.23m US$1.05m US$956.0k US$900.8k US$870.8k US$856.7k US$853.0k US$856.5k Growth Rate Estimate Source Est @ -46.00% Est @ -31.49% Est @ -21.34% Est @ -14.23% Est @ -9.25% Est @ -5.77% Est @ -3.33% Est @ -1.62% Est @ -0.43% Est @ 0.41% Present Value ($, Millions) Discounted @ 11% US$2.1 US$1.3 US$0.9 US$0.7 US$0.6 US$0.5 US$0.4 US$0.4 US$0.3 US$0.3 ("Est" = FCF growth rate estimated by Simply Wall St)Present Value of 10-year Cash Flow (PVCF) = US$7.4m The second stage is also known as Terminal Value, this is the business's cash flow after the first stage. For a number of reasons a very conservative growth rate is used that cannot exceed that of a country's GDP growth. In this case we have used the 5-year average of the 10-year government bond yield (2.4%) to estimate future growth. In the same way as with the 10-year 'growth' period, we discount future cash flows to today's value, using a cost of equity of 11%. Terminal Value (TV)= FCF2034 × (1 + g) ÷ (r – g) = US$857k× (1 + 2.4%) ÷ (11%– 2.4%) = US$10m Present Value of Terminal Value (PVTV)= TV / (1 + r)10= US$10m÷ ( 1 + 11%)10= US$3.6m The total value, or equity value, is then the sum of the present value of the future cash flows, which in this case is US$11m. To get the intrinsic value per share, we divide this by the total number of shares outstanding. Relative to the current share price of S$0.05, the company appears about fair value at a 1.2% discount to where the stock price trades currently. The assumptions in any calculation have a big impact on the valuation, so it is better to view this as a rough estimate, not precise down to the last cent. Now the most important inputs to a discounted cash flow are the discount rate, and of course, the actual cash flows. You don't have to agree with these inputs, I recommend redoing the calculations yourself and playing with them. The DCF also does not consider the possible cyclicality of an industry, or a company's future capital requirements, so it does not give a full picture of a company's potential performance. Given that we are looking at Charisma Energy Services as potential shareholders, the cost of equity is used as the discount rate, rather than the cost of capital (or weighted average cost of capital, WACC) which accounts for debt. In this calculation we've used 11%, which is based on a levered beta of 2.000. Beta is a measure of a stock's volatility, compared to the market as a whole. We get our beta from the industry average beta of globally comparable companies, with an imposed limit between 0.8 and 2.0, which is a reasonable range for a stable business. See our latest analysis for Charisma Energy Services Strength No major strengths identified for YSV. Weakness Interest payments on debt are not well covered. Opportunity Has sufficient cash runway for more than 3 years based on current free cash flows. Current share price is below our estimate of fair value. Lack of analyst coverage makes it difficult to determine YSV's earnings prospects. Threat Debt is not well covered by operating cash flow. Total liabilities exceed total assets, which raises the risk of financial distress. Valuation is only one side of the coin in terms of building your investment thesis, and it is only one of many factors that you need to assess for a company. It's not possible to obtain a foolproof valuation with a DCF model. Rather it should be seen as a guide to "what assumptions need to be true for this stock to be under/overvalued?" For example, changes in the company's cost of equity or the risk free rate can significantly impact the valuation. For Charisma Energy Services, we've put together three pertinent aspects you should consider: Risks: We feel that you should assess the 3 warning signs for Charisma Energy Services (2 make us uncomfortable!) we've flagged before making an investment in the company. Other High Quality Alternatives: Do you like a good all-rounder? Explore our interactive list of high quality stocks to get an idea of what else is out there you may be missing! Other Top Analyst Picks: Interested to see what the analysts are thinking? Take a look at our interactive list of analysts' top stock picks to find out what they feel might have an attractive future outlook! PS. The Simply Wall St app conducts a discounted cash flow valuation for every stock on the CATALIST every day. If you want to find the calculation for other stocks just search here. — Investing narratives with Fair Values Vita Life Sciences Set for a 12.72% Revenue Growth While Tackling Operational Challenges By Robbo – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: A$2.42 · 0.1% Overvalued Vossloh rides a €500 billion wave to boost growth and earnings in the next decade By Chris1 – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: €78.41 · 0.1% Overvalued Intuitive Surgical Will Transform Healthcare with 12% Revenue Growth By Unike – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $325.55 · 0.6% Undervalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
2 Canadian Stocks That Could Turn $10,000 Into $100,000
Written by Amy Legate-Wolfe at The Motley Fool Canada When markets feel uncertain, the idea of turning $10,000 into $100,000 sounds almost too good to be true. But every so often, certain stocks line up the right mix of growth potential, industry momentum, and financial strength to make it a real possibility. On the TSX, two Canadian stocks that stand out right now are Celestica (TSX:CLS) and ATS (TSX:ATS). Each brings something different to the table, but both could have the power to deliver serious long-term gains. Celestica is a global leader in electronics manufacturing and supply chain solutions. It works across industries such as aerospace, healthcare, and industrial equipment. While it's not a flashy tech stock, it has quietly become one of the most impressive turnaround stories on the TSX. Its recent earnings beat expectations, and the Canadian stock even raised its 2025 guidance. That's helped fuel a strong rally, with the stock climbing more than 30% in a single month following the announcement. The Canadian stock's recent quarterly results showed a continued increase in margins and revenue. With a market cap of about $20.7 billion, it still has room to grow. Celestica is benefiting from strong demand in its advanced technology segment and re-shoring trends as companies look to move manufacturing out of more volatile regions. As businesses invest in local, secure, and highly automated production, Celestica stands to gain. Over time, the power of compounding takes over. If Celestica were to grow at an average annual rate of 25% over the next decade, a $10,000 investment today could realistically be worth more than $93,000. Add in a few more strong quarters or an acquisition, and you're suddenly knocking on the door of that six-figure mark. Then there's ATS. This is a Canadian stock rooted in automation. It builds factory solutions for the life sciences, battery assembly, food and beverage, and clean tech sectors. With global companies racing to automate production and scale sustainable technology, ATS is in the right place at the right time. But its recent earnings report reminded investors that growth doesn't always happen in a straight line. ATS reported revenue of $2.5 billion for fiscal 2025, down 17% from the previous year. It also posted a loss of $0.70 per share, compared to a profit of $0.49 per share a year ago. The decline hit the Canadian stock hard. But despite the dip in revenue and earnings, ATS continues to generate strong adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) and maintains a solid backlog of future work. It's also worth considering the starting point. With a market cap around $4.1 billion, ATS still falls in the mid-cap range, leaving plenty of room for a multi-bagger move. If the Canadian stock returns to consistent double-digit revenue growth and improves margins, it could easily see its valuation rise dramatically over the next five to ten years. Of course, no Canadian stock is a sure thing. Celestica operates in a competitive space and depends on supply chain stability. ATS is exposed to cycles in capital investment and has work to do to regain investor trust. Yet both companies are backed by real demand, strong leadership, and smart positioning to benefit from key global trends. For investors with patience, a bit of risk tolerance, and a long-term mindset, these two Canadian stocks might just be the kind that can turn a $10,000 investment into something much bigger. It won't happen overnight, but with the right moves and a little market tailwind, the math makes sense. And in today's market, that kind of potential is worth a second look. The post 2 Canadian Stocks That Could Turn $10,000 Into $100,000 appeared first on The Motley Fool Canada. More reading Made in Canada: 5 Homegrown Stocks Ready for the 'Buy Local' Revolution [PREMIUM PICKS] Market Volatility Toolkit Best Canadian Stocks to Buy in 2025 Beginner Investors: 4 Top Canadian Stocks to Buy for 2025 5 Years From Now, You'll Probably Wish You Grabbed These Stocks Subscribe to Motley Fool Canada on YouTube Fool contributor Amy Legate-Wolfe has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends ATS Corp. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2025 Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Can Philip Morris Rely on Pricing to Drive 2025 EPS Growth?
Philip Morris International PM continues to lean on pricing as a key earnings driver. The company delivered a strong first quarter of 2025, with adjusted earnings per share (EPS) rising 12.7% year over year to $1.69. Pricing contributed 6 percentage points to organic revenue growth of 10.2%, supported by an 8.3% increase in combustible pricing and around 3% in smoke-free products, excluding devices. The company has raised its full-year EPS forecast to $7.36-$7.49. The question is whether pricing alone can sustain that pointed to continued pricing strength in markets like Turkey, Poland and Germany. However, it also noted that gross pricing and negative geographic mix are expected to moderate over the remainder of the year. In the smoke-free category, gross margins expanded 670 basis points to surpass 70%, now standing more than five points above combustibles at the current product and geographic mix. ZYN, a key contributor to smoke-free profit growth, saw shipment volumes rise 63% in the quarter, reinforcing the segment's scale and strategic so, Philip Morris delivered a 180-basis-point gross margin boost from pricing alone, reflecting the effectiveness of its pricing strategy. While pricing gains may be less pronounced in the second half, Philip Morris emphasized continued investments behind its smoke-free growth. With volume and mix improvements already visible in the first quarter, the company appears positioned to support earnings growth through a combination of pricing and product performance. Altria Group MO reported a 10.8% rise in net price realization for combustibles, which supported operating income growth despite steep volume declines. Yet, MO is facing consumer pressure, with many smokers trading down to discount brands, limiting pricing flexibility. In oral nicotine, Altria Group's on! posted 18% shipment growth alongside higher retail prices, but category competition and cost-conscious behavior remain visible Point Brands TPB saw explosive growth in its modern oral segment, with pouch sales increasing nearly tenfold year over year. However, this growth came with mix-driven margin pressure. Turning Point Brands' gross margin declined 220 basis points and it acknowledged the need for further investment to scale brands and improve profitability. With rising freight and tariff costs also in play, Turning Point Brands' pricing power remains limited without additional volume leverage. Shares of Philip Morris have gained 4.9% in the past month compared with the industry's growth of 5.1%. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research From a valuation standpoint, PM trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 23.19X, up from the industry's average of 15.64X. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The Zacks Consensus Estimate for PM's 2025 earnings implies year-over-year growth of 13.7%, whereas its 2026 earnings estimate indicates a year-over-year uptick of 11.7%. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research PM stock currently holds a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Altria Group, Inc. (MO) : Free Stock Analysis Report Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) : Free Stock Analysis Report Turning Point Brands, Inc. (TPB) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data