What we know so far about the Israeli strikes on Iran
Israel said it had carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear and military sites, promising to continue its campaign and "achieve much more".
. Here is what we know:
What was hit?
Israel's military said its jets carried out strikes on "dozens of military targets, including nuclear targets in different areas of Iran".
It said 200 jets were involved in the raids, striking about 100 targets.
Blasts were reported in the capital, where state television said fire and smoke were seen at a key site for Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in the city's east.
Damage to residential buildings and civilian deaths were also reported.
State television said Natanz, in Iran's central Isfahan province and home to a key nuclear site, had been hit "several times", showing footage of heavy smoke billowing from the site.
The UN nuclear watchdog confirmed Natanz was among the sites targeted in the attacks and said it was in touch with Iranian authorities and its inspectors in the country "regarding radiation levels".
Additional strikes were reported against three military sites in Iran's northwest.
Iranian state media confirmed the deaths of Revolutionary Guards chief Hossein Salami and armed forces chief of staff Mohammad Bagheri in the attacks.
It also reported 50 people, including women and children, had been injured.
Why now?
Israel sees the cleric-run state in Tehran as an existential threat.
It says it took out Iran's air defences in October last year in retaliation for a barrage of about 200 missiles from the Islamic republic.
Defence Minister Israel Katz described the Israeli action as a "pre-emptive strike". The army said intelligence showed Iran was approaching a "point of no return" on its nuclear programme.
The United States and other western countries, along with Israel, have repeatedly accused Iran of seeking a nuclear weapon, which it has always denied.
Israel again called for global action after the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) accused Iran of non-compliance with its obligations on Wednesday.
There had been indications a military strike was likely, with US media reporting an imminent Israeli attack that would not be coordinated with the Washington.
"I don't want to say imminent, but it looks like it's something that could very well happen," US President Donald Trump told reporters yesterday when asked if an Israeli attack loomed.
A sixth round of talks over Tehran's nuclear programme had been scheduled between the United States and Iran on Sunday in Oman.
Mr Trump said after the strikes he was "still hoping" for talks.
Who was involved?
Israel relies on the United States for military and diplomatic support but carried out the strikes alone, top US diplomat Marco Rubio said.
"We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region," he said in a statement warning Tehran against targeting US interests.
Mr Rubio said Israel had "advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defence," without offering support or criticism of the strikes.
Meanwhile, Mr Trump told Fox News that he had advance notice of the strikes, warning Tehran "cannot have a nuclear bomb".
Tehran said Washington would be "responsible for the consequences" of Israel's deadly attacks, saying they "cannot have been carried out without the coordination and permission of the United States".
What reaction has there been?
Oman, due to host nuclear talks this weekend, called the strikes a "dangerous escalation" that threatened negotiations and regional stability.
Saudi Arabia condemned the "blatant Israeli aggressions".
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the strikes had been "very successful... and with God's help, we will achieve much more".
Air traffic was halted at Tehran's main international airport, and neighbouring Iraq closed its airspace entirely.
Israel warned Iran could retaliate at any moment, declaring a state of emergency and also shutting its airspace.
In Washington, the White House said Mr Trump would convene security chiefs after the strike, which was criticised by a senior Democrat.
"Israel's alarming decision to launch airstrikes on Iran is a reckless escalation that risks igniting regional violence," said Senator Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the US Senate Armed Services Committee.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
30 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
Iran launches new wave of missile attacks on Israel
Iran and Israel targeted each other with airstrikes after Israel launched its biggest-ever offensive against its long time foe in a bid to prevent it from developing a nuclear weapon. Air raid sirens sounded in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, the country's two largest cities before dawn, sending residents rushing into shelters. The military said its air defence systems were operating, seeking to intercept Iranian missiles. "In the last hour, dozens of missiles have been launched at the state of Israel from Iran, some of which were intercepted," the Israeli military said. It said rescue teams were operating at a number of locations across the country where fallen projectiles were reported, without commenting on casualties. Several explosions were heard in the Iranian capital Tehran, the semi-official Tasnim news agency reported. Israeli media said a suspected missile came down in Tel Aviv, and a Reuters witness heard a loud boom in Jerusalem. It was unclear whether Iranian strikes or Israeli defensive measures were behind the activity. Iran's Fars news agency said Iran launched a third wave of airstrikes today after two salvos last night. Those were in response to Israel's attacks on Iran early yesterday against commanders, nuclear scientists, military targets and nuclear sites. Israel's ambulance service said 34 people were injured last night in the Tel Aviv area, most with minor injuries. Police later said one person had died. The US military helped shoot down Iranian missiles headed for Israel, two US officials said. Israel's military said Iran fired fewer than 100 missiles yesterday and that most were intercepted or fell short. Several buildings in and around Tel Aviv were hit. The Israeli strikes on Iran throughout the day and the Iranian retaliation raised fears of a broader regional conflagration, although Iran's allies Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon have been decimated by Israel. Trump says it is not too late Iran's state news agency IRNA said Iran launched hundreds of ballistic missiles at Israel after Israel blasted Iran's huge Natanz underground nuclear site and killed its top military commanders. Iran says its nuclear programme is only for peaceful purposes. Israeli officials said it may be some time before the extent of damage at Natanz was clear. Western countries have long accused Iran of refining uranium there to levels suitable for a bomb rather than civilian use. The above-ground pilot enrichment plant at Natanz has been destroyed, UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi told the Security Council. He said the UN was still gathering information about Israeli attacks on two other facilities, the Fordow fuel enrichment plant and at Isfahan. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei accused Israel of starting a war. A senior Iranian official said nowhere in Israel would be safe and revenge would be painful. Iran's UN envoy Amir Saeid Iravani said 78 people, including senior military officials, were killed in Israel's strikes on Iran and more than 320 people were wounded, most of them civilians. He accused the US of being complicit in the attacks and said it shared full responsibility for the consequences. Israel's UN envoy Danny Danon said intelligence had confirmed that within days Iran would have produced enough fissile material for multiple bombs. He called Israel's operation "an act of national preservation." Iran has long insisted its nuclear programme is for civilian purposes only. The UN nuclear watchdog concluded this week that it was in violation of its obligations under the global non-proliferation treaty. US President Donald Trump said it was not too late for Iran to halt the Israeli bombing campaign by reaching a deal on its nuclear programme. Iran had been engaged in talks with the Trump administration on a deal to curb its nuclear programme to replace one that Mr Trump abandoned in 2018. Iran rejected the last US offer.
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Paul Hosford: Accusing Thunberg of Instagram activism over Gaza is missing the point
Earlier this week, I had a feeling of dread that I would wake up to news of the death of Greta Thunberg, a feeling others have echoed. When I went to sleep on Sunday night, the British-flagged yacht Madleen was sailing headlong towards Gaza carrying just a drop of the flood of aid required to ease the humanitarian disaster in the enclave. Twelve people on a yacht carrying baby formula, food, and medical supplies, including the 22-year-old climate activist, and there was legitimate concern that the Israeli administration would show no restraint — as it did in May 2010 when nine floatilla passengers were killed during a raid on a group of ships aiming to bring aid to Gaza. In the end, Israeli forces boarded the yacht and made a show of how humane the whole thing was, perhaps aware that killing innocents would be treated differently if their number included a French MEP. The captured dozen was given sandwiches and forced to turn over their phones as the yacht was escorted to Ashdod port. From there, the Israeli government began its mocking of the group. It published a picture of Ms Thunberg on social media and, before initiating deportation proceedings, was slamming the operation as a PR stunt — calling it a 'selfie ship' full of 'celebrities'. 'This wasn't humanitarian aid. It's Instagram activism,' said Israeli government spokesperson David Mencer, who extolled the virtues of his government, saying that it had delivered over 1,200 truckloads of aid in the last two weeks. This is despite the latest assessment from the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) which says that people in Gaza are starving and that this demands the urgent opening of all crossings and on impeded access for humanitarian organisations to deliver aid at scale, through multiple routes. There is no question that aid to Gaza is being choked off by the Israeli government and that what is getting through is just a drop in an ocean growing every single day. Ongoing incidents Meanwhile, hospitals in Gaza City said 25 people were killed overnight on Wednesday into Thursday, near a convoy transporting flour and at a food distribution site run by the US and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which has been criticised as the wrong vehicle to deliver aid. Staff of the GHF died in an ambush on Thursday after a bus transporting them was raked with gunfire, an attack the Israeli government has blamed on Hamas. While the Israeli government mocked those who put their hands up and volunteered for the aid mission, it was joined online by an unlikely ally — the 'reasonable' adult. In any news story or Instagram post, or whatever tweets are called these days, you will have found a cohort of people delighting in the failure of the Madleen to deliver baby formula to starving children. These people will call themselves reasonable, they will call themselves centrists, they will call themselves good, and at the same time they will delight in the failure of a small amount of medical supplies reaching what has been described as hell on earth because they don't like the 22-year-old autistic woman from the internet. They are Christians with the best intentions, calling for a stranger's head. Ms Thunberg has long attracted this kind of commentary, particularly angering men with her activism and general refusal to just be quiet. They will have the same reaction to Paul Murphy's arrest as part of a march to the Rafah Crossing. The rationale appears to be that they genuinely believe that this was a personal mission from the Swedish woman — little more than an image-raising exercise. To what end someone who has spent most of her life engaged in the kind of full-throated activism that comes at more personal cost than benefit would do this is never really explained, but these commenters are sure that she is some kind of 'silly little girl' or some variation thereof. It couldn't be that Ms Thunberg was simply doing what she believed was right and using her immense global platform to highlight the continued suffering of Gazans; there must be an ulterior motive, one for personal benefit. Protesters took part in a demonstration outside the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office in Whitehall, London, calling for the UK government to protect the crew of Madleen, which carried Ms Thunberg and other activists. Picture: James Manning/PA Those comments betray much about those who make them, those who throw 'virtue signalling' or 'do-gooder' as slurs. They cannot imagine virtue, or good or empathy, that is genuinely selfless because they lack the capacity for all three. They cannot, at the same time, understand why the residents of Los Angeles would take to the streets as their friends and neighbours are extrajudicially arrested. They cheer online as rubber bullets, which killed 14 people during The Troubles, are fired indiscriminately into crowds or with terrifying accuracy at members of the media, or women walking home, because they do not see those people as on their side. These are the same people who will say they are afraid of Dublin's O'Connell St in the daytime, mocking those who stand up to oppression or genocide. PR exercise Of course the Madleen was a PR exercise. Of course it was a publicity stunt. Nobody on board expected the aid they were carrying to fix everything. In fact, I'm sure the whole exercise finished the way most on board would have imagined. They are not ignorant to the reality of what Israel will and will not allow reach Gaza. However, great injustices require action, and if that means making social media users look at a group of people on a quixotic boat journey, then so be it. This is not about your personal feelings towards the messenger and, if your first reaction was to look at method rather than message, then that is on you. In Gaza over the last few days, the internet has collapsed, the OCHA said on Thursday, due to damage to the last fibre cable route serving central and southern Gaza — likely caused during heavy military activity. They warn that this is not a routine outage, but a total failure of Gaza's digital infrastructure. Lifelines to emergency services, humanitarian coordination, and critical information for civilians have all been cut. There is a full Internet blackout, and mobile networks are barely functioning. So if any Gazans had had worries about the online discourse surrounding attempts to bring them aid — in between trying to stay alive, of course — they would not have had the capacity by week's end to check in on the comments section. The reaction to a group of people — including a very high-profile young woman, yes — trying to do the right thing speaks volumes for where social media has driven us: To a place where a sentence can contain the words 'I'm not happy that aid was blocked from reaching Gaza' and be followed by a 'but'. Perhaps not every thought needs to be shared, not every issue opined upon. Maybe, just maybe, it is time to read and listen and understand more than we post, and talk and think. It is a time to act and support the bravery of those who act in ways we cannot ourselves. Anything else will lead to what folk singer Tyler Childers calls 'the start of a long, violent history, of tucking our tails as we try to abide'. Read More Three Irish people detained in Cairo ahead of protest walk to Gaza border
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Irish Examiner view: World peace is disappearing quickly over the event horizon
It is a mark of just how quickly the world changes that, as the Irish Examiner went onto the presses on Thursday night, carrying warning stories that Iran was in breach of its nuclear obligations for the first time in two decades, Israel launched devastating attacks on its deadliest enemy. And as we went to press on Friday night, the world was assessing Iran's retaliatory measures. Israel's provocative strikes, which targeted Iranian enrichment facilities and Tehran's military commanders, carry strategic objectives which go beyond the tactical advantages identified by Israel. It has undermined any attempts to revive a nuclear agreement, talks about which were scheduled to recommence in Oman on Sunday. Iran's initial response appears to have struck at the Israeli cities of Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. Other retaliation, including from Tehran's proxies, the Houthis of Yemen, is likely. Attacks on bases in the Gulf, the Horn of Africa, and the Red Sea are all plausible. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates may be dragged back into direct conflict with Yemen. The conflagration may spread to other fragile states such as Syria and lead to a rapid deterioration in a region already divided by the Gaza crisis. The warning signs have been there for all to see. There was the critical report from the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency; the US running their embassies down to essential staff only, Israeli hospitals being placed on war standby. Now, around the world, Israeli embassies and consular services have been closed, with no timeline established for their reopening. Its citizens have been urged to stay alert and not display Jewish symbols in public places. Meanwhile, Irish citizens are being advised not to travel to Israel, a prohibition which is already in place for Iran. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu described the attack by more than 200 jets as a 'targeted military operation to roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival', and said it will continue for 'as many days as it takes to remove this threat'. While Friday's raids were focused on six cities, including Tehran, it is the three locations of Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow which are at the hearts of Iran's nuclear programme where raw uranium is enriched to weapons grade material. Fordow is the most difficult target, with its facilities located in the heart of a mountain. Explosions were heard there on Friday evening. US president Donald Trump warned that Iran must come to the nuclear negotiating table and make a deal 'with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal'. However, the danger for the Israeli leadership is that when Operation Rising Lion is over, Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan may be capable of being repaired in a matter of months. All that Mr Netanyahu will have achieved is a short delay, a temporary roadblock, on Iran's progress towards an atomic arsenal. This implies a prolonged campaign. Just as Mr Netanyahu has pledged to eradicate the involvement of Hamas in the affairs of Gaza — a war aim increasingly acknowledged by many of the countries attempting to broker a settlement and recognition of Palestine — so the dismantling of Iran's predominantly secret 20-year programme will be another red line. The attack on Iran rewrites the agenda for the three day G7 leaders' summit which starts in the Rockies of Kananaskis, Alberta, on Sunday. Hopes for international peace are further away today than they were on Friday. By the middle of next week, they may have disappeared far beyond the event horizon. The enduring legacy of Cork Opera House Every great city needs its own stately pleasure dome where dreams can be enjoyed, and life- replenishing interests and leisure indulged. In Cork, that role has been fulfilled by the Opera House, whose 170-year contribution to the gaiety of the nation we mark in our Weekend magazine this morning. Corkonians have been lucky to have it, along with the Everyman Theatre which opened at Easter 1897. Cork Opera House is celebrating all year, and so it should given its rich cultural contribution to the region and beyond, and the platform it has provided to local, national, and international talent. The Opera House has always been a broad church. When its original iteration as The Athenaeum opened in 1855, it was for the 'promotion of science, literature, and the fine arts, and the diffusion of architectural knowledge'. Tastes change. It was renamed The Munster Hall before becoming the Opera House. While on its present site it survived the Burning of Cork by British forces in 1920, it finally succumbed to the flames in its centenary year of 1955 during a pantomime rehearsal. Cork Opera House in 1955 after a fire took hold during a pantomime rehearsal. Even in its death throes, thousands turned out to watch the performance with gardaí called in to control the crowds. The new Opera House rose from the ashes and as we enjoy its contemporary offerings, we can pay tribute to the shades of the past who were drawn to entertain us — Harry Lauder, Charles Dickens, the D'Oyly Carte opera company with their famous production of HMS Pinafore, Sarah Bernhardt, Ernest Shackleton, Jack Doyle — The Gorgeous Gael — Ella Fitzgerald, and, to bring it right up to date, Cillian Murphy. Thank you, Opera House, and all who have graced it. Size isn't everything when you're on the road There are many reasons why buying an SUV might be considered a contentious purchase. Their weight and consequential impact on road surfaces is one. Fuel consumption could be another in an era where it's widely recognised that reducing carbon gases is a desirable objective for the good of society. Then there's the amount of space they can take up, particularly in car parks which were designed at the end of the last century. Or the visual obstruction they present when a driver is attempting to assess whether to overtake. If none of this cuts any ice with Irish motorists, and all the purchasing evidence suggests that it doesn't, then what about considering a comprehensive report which concludes that the relentlessly rising bonnet height of new cars is a 'clear and growing threat to public safety, especially for children'. The report, by lobbyists Transport & Environment (T&E), said the average bonnet height of new cars in Europe rose from 77cm in 2010 to 84cm last year. A Belgian study of 300,000 casualties concluded that a 10cm increase from 80cm to 90cm raised the risk of death in a crash by 27% for pedestrians and cyclists. Children were substantially more likely to be killed as pedestrians in collisions than adults. T&E also commissioned Loughborough University's school of design to test the visibility of children from high-fronted cars. The driver of a Ram TRX was unable to see children aged up to nine who were standing directly in front, while a Land Rover Defender driver could not see children aged up to four and a half. The driver of a Ram TRX was unable to see children aged up to nine who were standing directly in front, while a Land Rover Defender driver could not see children aged up to four and a half. In collisions with pedestrians, high-bonneted vehicles are more likely to strike vital core organs in the bodies of adults and the heads of children. Lower bonnets tend to hit legs. In Europe, there is no legal limit to bonnet height, and researchers argue that one should be introduced by 2035 and set no higher than 85cm. The campaign against SUVs shows no sign of abating. Paris and Lyon in France, and Aachen in Germany, charge bigger cars more to park. In Britain, Cardiff, Bristol, Oxford, and Haringey are considering similar measures and last week the London Assembly called for limits on bonnet height. The International Energy Agency reported record global SUV sales in 2024 and record SUV CO2 emissions of 1bn tonnes. If SUVs were a country, they would rank as the fifth most polluting in the world, the IEA said. In Ireland, as many SUVs, which have their design inspiration in rugged terrain vehicles, are sold to urban and city dwellers as to people who live in rural locations. In other words, it is often a style choice. Like deliveries by drone and the establishment of large power-hungry and water-hungry data centres, it is a commercial development whose consequences have not been fully thought through. Read More Irish Examiner view: Intolerance fuelled unrest in Ballymena
