logo
The microplastics lurking in your kitchen cupboards: Experts reveal the popular products that release the most dangerous particles - including teabags, baby bottles, and chopping boards

The microplastics lurking in your kitchen cupboards: Experts reveal the popular products that release the most dangerous particles - including teabags, baby bottles, and chopping boards

Daily Mail​24-06-2025
Next time you eat from a container or swig from a cup, you may be ingesting more than just food and drink.
Scientists in Switzerland warn that ever-ubiquitous plastic food packaging is leaving us constantly exposed to tiny microplastics and even smaller 'nanoplastics'.
These fragments, less than 0.2 of an inch (5mm) in diameter, are so small that they're invisible to the naked eye.
The team's new study found evidence of microplastics in several popular items - including baby bottles, chopping boards, and even teabags.
When we ingest them, the tiny fragments don't just pass through the body and out the other end, but lodge in organs in the body, such as the heart, lungs and brain.
While the long-term effects of these particles on human health remain unclear, they've been linked to cancer and strokes, dementia and pregnancy complications.
'Plastic food contact articles can release microplastics and nanoplastics into foodstuffs,' the experts warn.
'To better protect human health, regulations could mandate microplastics and nanoplastics migration testing.'
In the study, the experts from Food Packaging Forum, a non-profit organisation in Zurich, evaluated 103 previously published microplastics studies.
These studies had investigated microplastics that had been in contact with 'food contact articles' (FCAs) – plastic items commonly found in the home and the industry.
Examples of FCAs include baby bottles, disposable cups, trays, wrapping such as cling film, chopping boards and even teabags.
The researchers warn that microplastics tend to be released during 'the normal use as intended by the manufacturer' of these FCAs.
For example, opening a bottle with a plastic lid leads to abrasion and microplastics rubbing off against the skin, as does cutting on plastic chopping boards.
Meanwhile, swirling a teabag in a mug of hot water effectively releases particles from the plastic sealant used in some teabags.
'Food contact articles are a relevant source of MNPs in foodstuffs; however, their contribution to human MNP exposure is underappreciated,' said Dr Zimmermann.
According to the team's findings, 173 of the studies found microplastics had been shed from plastic bottles – more than any other item.
Most of the plastics were in the microplastics range (1-1,000 micrometres) but others were defined as nanoplastics (less than 1 micrometre). Others were 'mesoplastics' (1-10mm) which are generally large enough to see with the naked eye
This does not necessarily mean that plastic bottles shed the most microplastics; rather that there are more studies to suggest plastic bottles are a source of microplastics compared with other FCAs.
Also, 115 studies found microplastics coming from 'other containers', 68 studies found microplastics from tea bags and 59 studies found them from cups.
Among the other FCAs identified as leaking microplastics were bags (57 studies), trays (19 studies), wrapping (11 studies) and chopping boards (one study).
Worryingly, 27 studies found microplastics had been shed from baby bottles and related accessories, showing that we're exposed to them from birth.
Also, the researchers found that the main food contact material was PET (polyethylene terephthalate) or rPET (the recycled version).
One of the most widely used plastics globally, PET is a clear, strong and lightweight plastic takes hundreds of years to break down in the environment when it is discarded.
Meanwhile, most of the plastics were in the microplastics range (1-1,000 micrometres) but others were defined as nanoplastics (less than 1 micrometre).
Others were 'mesoplastics' (1-10mm) which are generally large enough to see with the naked eye.
Already, microplastics have been found in human blood, the brain, the gut, the placenta of unborn babies and the faeces of adults and infants.
Health consequences of exposures to these particles 'are not yet fully understood', the team say in their paper, published in npj Science of Food.
But available scientific evidence indicates that microplastics and nanoplastics can alter 'the composition of the human gut microbiome', the trillion-strong community of microorganisms in your belly helps control digestion and benefits your immune system.
Other research suggests exposure leads to oxidative stress and inflammation, neurotoxicity, immunological and reproductive effects, and changes to endocrine signaling, a vital communication system within the body controlled by hormones.
Taken together, the emerging evidence strongly suggests that mitigating human exposure to MNPs [microplastics and nanoplastics] is prudent,' the team add.
To better protect human health, regulations could mandate MNP migration testing for FCAs
The team's full dataset is freely available through an interactive dashboard.
WHAT CAN MICROPLASTICS DO TO THE HUMAN BODY IF THEY END UP IN OUR FOOD SUPPLY?
According to an article published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, our understanding of the potential human health effects from exposure to microplastics 'constitutes major knowledge gaps.'
Humans can be exposed to plastic particles via consumption of seafood and terrestrial food products, drinking water and via the air.
However, the level of human exposure, chronic toxic effect concentrations and underlying mechanisms by which microplastics elicit effects are still not well understood enough in order to make a full assessment of the risks to humans.
According to Rachel Adams, a senior lecturer in Biomedical Science at Cardiff Metropolitan University, ingesting microplastics could cause a number of potentially harmful effects, such as:
Inflammation: when inflammation occurs, the body's white blood cells and the substances they produce protect us from infection. This normally protective immune system can cause damage to tissues.
An immune response to anything recognised as 'foreign' to the body: immune responses such as these can cause damage to the body.
Becoming carriers for other toxins that enter the body: microplastics generally repel water and will bind to toxins that don't dissolve, so microplastics can bind to compounds containing toxic metals such as mercury, and organic pollutants such as some pesticides and chemicals called dioxins, which are known to causes cancer, as well as reproductive and developmental problems. If these microplastics enter the body, toxins can accumulate in fatty tissues.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK's Assura's chairman steps down amid PHP takeover
UK's Assura's chairman steps down amid PHP takeover

Reuters

time11 minutes ago

  • Reuters

UK's Assura's chairman steps down amid PHP takeover

Aug 19 (Reuters) - British healthcare real estate investor Assura (AGRP.L), opens new tab said on Tuesday Ed Smith has stepped down as chairman of the board after seven years in the role and would be replaced by senior non-executive director Jonathan Davies. Smith's departure comes just a week after Primary Health Properties (PHP.L), opens new tab won a heated $2.4 billion takeover battle for Assura. Davies currently serves as the deputy CEO of restaurants operator SSP Group (SSPG.L), opens new tab.

AI will replace most humans, but then what?
AI will replace most humans, but then what?

Reuters

time41 minutes ago

  • Reuters

AI will replace most humans, but then what?

LONDON, August 19 (Reuters) - Is technology more job augmenting or job replacing? This has been a long-standing debate. But recent academic work suggests that technology has been a net destroyer of jobs for decades. Artificial intelligence and robotics could rapidly accelerate this trend, with significant implications for inflation, the size of government and U.S.-China relations. Over the long arc of history, technological advances have enabled industries to emerge, as workers, released from "older" jobs by machines, have been able to transition into newer ones. Indeed, 60% of workers today are employed in occupations that did not exist in 1940, or 74 percent if we consider just the professional category, which added the most workers during the past eight decades. However, recent academic research, opens new tab suggests we may have reached an inflection point in the U.S., whereby technology is now destroying more jobs than it is creating. David Autor, an economist at MIT and winner of the 2005 John Clark Bates Medal, argues that since 1980, the jobs replaced by automation have not been fully offset by new jobs created. This reflects the pace of technological change and the fact that advancements are now increasingly focused on 'professional, technical, and managerial occupations,' Autor notes, rather than lower-skilled work. He finds that machines that are more powerful than an average human (e.g., a tractor) are typically labour-augmenting and productivity-enhancing, while machines that are also smarter than the average human tend to be labour-substituting. And AI is on pace to be a lot smarter than most humans. While forms of AI have been around since the 1940s, the immense computing power resulting from advances in semiconductor technologies has now allowed machines to attain multidimensional intelligence. It is therefore reasonable to assume that many workers are going to be replaced by automation in the coming decades, even if the best AI is never as creative or imaginative as the smartest humans. In fact, a 2019 OECE report and a 2018 paper by PriceWaterhouseCoopers argue that some 15-30% of all jobs in developed markets are at risk of being automated. If AI does turn out to be a net job destroyer, what are some of the biggest implications? First, it's likely to be deflationary. High and rising unemployment resulting from ever cheaper and more capable machines should, in theory, lead to structural deflation, as technologies that can rapidly augment the supply of goods and services should reduce demand if they cause massive job losses. Next, the U.S government will probably get even bigger. In a mass unemployment scenario, the government would likely be compelled to step in to facilitate income and wealth transfers from the owners of robots and tech businesses to the unemployed workers. And which countries will come out on top? The economic winners and losers in the years ahead will likely be determined by who can best create and utilize technology. The U.S. and China, both dominant in cerebral technologies, therefore appear well positioned to thrive in this environment. These economic and technology superpowers have adopted muscular industrial policies, while Europe – the other big regional power – has not yet done so. What this also suggests is that, even if the trade war between the U.S. and China is short, the tech war between these two countries could be protracted – and ultimately much more consequential. The tech war, unlike the trade war, is dynamic, meaning it's not about challenging the static comparative advantages of nations, but rather continually evolving and advancing. Investors would be wise to keep this distinction in mind, as the dynamic aspect of the tech war is apt to become much more important than, say, whether Vietnam is allowed to sell cheap running shoes in the U.S. My views here are admittedly speculative. But the arguments for why AI and robotics could ultimately be labour-creating are as well. Furthermore, these arguments are often obscured by sloppy references to labour productivity, which is a simple ratio between output and labour input. When calculating this, there is often little explanation of what part of the output should be attributed to the labour input. For example, should subway train drivers account for the value of the entire subway system? Projections based on such questionable assumptions should be viewed cautiously. Finally, it's also true that populations in many developed markets are aging, so the heavy use of automation could simply offset the shrinkage in the labour force, something we're already seeing in Japan and South Korea. But aging, like natural evolution in general, is gradual, while computational and technological evolution accelerates at an exponential pace. Because of the convexity in technological advances, it's hard not to bet on technology rather than workers. (The views expressed here are those of Stephen Jen, the CEO and co-CIO of Eurizon SLJ asset management). Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI),, opens new tab your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI,, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn,, opens new tab and X., opens new tab

I thought my drink had been spiked on holiday but I'd actually had a STROKE at 23 – I was shocked to find out why
I thought my drink had been spiked on holiday but I'd actually had a STROKE at 23 – I was shocked to find out why

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

I thought my drink had been spiked on holiday but I'd actually had a STROKE at 23 – I was shocked to find out why

STRAPPED to a stretcher in an ambulance, Alicia Kember desperately tried to make sense of what was happening. On August 7, 2022, the now 26-year-old had woken up in the villa in Portugal where she was staying with a friend, looking forward to another relaxing day on the beach. 6 6 But as she got up to use the loo, Alicia was struck with an intense dizzy sensation - and collapsed on the floor, throwing up and passing out. Alicia, from Surrey, tells Sun Health: 'I think I was drifting in and out of consciousness for around an hour before I remembered, through the fog, that I was wearing my smart watch and could call my friend Chloe on it. 'After finding me lying on the bathroom floor, unable to get up, she immediately called an ambulance.' Chloe's initial assumption was that one of Alicia's drinks the night before had been spiked, and as she was rushed into A&E, Alicia too was trying to find an explanation for this sudden onset of illness. Alicia remembers: 'I thought I must have been spiked the night before when we were out. 'Or, maybe I was experiencing a reaction to some cheap alcohol, or had heatstroke or food poisoning? 'My mind was racing, and I felt scared and confused, as doctors and nurses surrounded me, trying to establish what was wrong.' Doctors also suspected there was a straightforward, holiday-related explanation for her state. She says: 'They thought it was down to drink or drugs, and I was just another young person on holiday who'd partied too hard. 'One asked me, 'Did you take something?' and in trying to answer no, I realised my speech wasn't normal. How to check your pulse, for risk of stroke 'My voice felt weak, and my mouth was shaky as I tried to form words. 'When it became clear my condition wasn't improving, and I couldn't even get out of bed unaided, I was taken for a CT and MRI scan. 'Then, a doctor delivered the shocking diagnosis that I'd suffered a stroke, explaining that the blood flow to a part of my brain had been cut off.' Stroke shock In the UK, over 100,000 people have a stroke or mini-stroke every year. Most people who have strokes are over 65, but one in four strokes happens in younger people, according to the charity Different Strokes ( which supports younger stroke survivors. 'I was immediately transferred to the ICU and hooked up to beeping machines and drips,' says Alicia. 'I still felt incredibly unwell and exhausted, and just couldn't properly process this news. 'Surely strokes were something that happened to the elderly, not a 23-year-old on holiday?' 6 6 Alicia's parents and her boyfriend Josh, now 27, flew to Portugal, where they spent the next month by her hospital bedside. 'The stroke had affected the cerebellum [part of the brain], which is responsible for coordination and balance,' says Alicia. 'As a result, although I wasn't paralysed and could eat and drink, my fine motor skills were very poor, my speech weak, and I was wobbly on my feet.' After a multitude of tests failed to confirm why Alicia had suffered a stroke, Portuguese doctors agreed she could fly home in September 2022. I was trying to process how I'd gone from being on holiday after graduating, planning a move to London for my career in sales, to lying in a hospital bed after a stroke. Alicia Kember She says: 'Getting on the plane was emotional, not just because I was scared I might fall ill in the air, but I was also very worried about what lay ahead in attempting to recover at home. 'I was trying to process how I'd gone from being on holiday after graduating, planning a move to London for my career in sales, to lying in a hospital bed after a stroke. 'When I'd flown out to Portugal, life had felt so good. I was at the beginning of a new, exciting chapter. 'A holiday had turned into a nightmare and I had no idea what I was now facing. 'Pause button on life' For three months, Alicia was cared for by nurses from a local hospital, which had a neuro-rehab unit, along with regular sessions with a physio and a psychotherapist. She says: 'With a lot of effort, I relearned how to walk properly, hold a pen, and climb stairs, all of which had become very challenging as a result of the stroke. 'As the weeks passed, things did improve.' But it was the emotional recovery that was hardest, as Alicia felt 'isolated'. 'I know now that can be common among stroke survivors,' she says. 'Stuck at home while friends were working, socialising and travelling, I felt like a pause button had been pressed on my adult life, just as it had been getting started. 'I'd feel angry and envious, then realise they were doing nothing wrong, it was just hard to be reminded of my past self. 'Even once I was well enough to go out again, I'd feel anxious about falling because I was still suffering from tremors on my right side, and I was extremely sensitive to noise and lights. 'Nobody truly understood what I'd experienced, and I felt very alone.' A year after her stroke and further tests, Alicia finally learnt what had caused it. She says: 'I had a patent foramen ovale - a hole in my heart since birth, which left me at increased risk of stroke, and I had to go through treatment to close it. 'It was another shock to come to terms with, another blow at a young age.' 6 6 A defining moment in her recovery came when she saw an Instagram post from Different Strokes - '50 things stroke survivors wish people in their lives knew about stroke'. 'I wept reading it, because it was like holding up a mirror to my own feelings,' she says. 'One of the quotes said 'I wish you knew how hard it is to watch others carrying on with their lives whilst you're stuck and left behind, trying to pick up the pieces'.' 'That's just how I felt.' Three years on from her stroke, Alicia is now living in London with a friend and still happily with Josh, but has to manage fatigue. She says: 'I am grateful I now have the chance to share what I went through to help other young people feel less alone, and give them hope that recovery - both physical and emotional - is possible.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store