Kamal Haasan says 'won't apologise' for 'Kannada was born out of Tamil' remark despite backlash in Karnataka
Kamal Haasan's assertion that "Kannada was born out of Tamil" during a film promotion in Chennai ignited a major controversy, drawing strong condemnation and political reactions in Karnataka. Demands for an apology arose, with threats of film bans and protests erupting across Karnataka. Haasan defended his statement as an expression of love and suggested leaving the linguistic debate to experts.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Calls for Apology and Possible Film Ban
Protests and Police Complaint
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Kamal Haasan's Explanation
Actor-politician Kamal Haasan has caused a major controversy after saying 'Kannada was born out of Tamil' during a film promotion event in Chennai. His comment led to widespread anger and strong political reactions in Karnataka Karnataka's Kannada and Culture Minister Shivaraj Tangadagi demanded an immediate apology from Kamal Haasan to the people of Karnataka. In response, Kamal Haasan said his statement was 'out of love' and added, 'love will never apologise.'Tangadagi insisted that Kannada actor Shivaraj Kumar , who was present during Kamal's speech, should condemn the remark. He also urged the Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce to consider banning Kamal's films. The minister said, 'He must apologise to the people of Karnataka.'He further added, 'Regardless of the personality, we will tolerate none if they try to defame Kannada language, culture, water or boundary. He must apologise to the people of Karnataka. Being a veteran actor, he should not have commented in such a manner. They (Kamal) need Kannada to act and earn and run their propaganda. Should they be allowed to speak like this? Previously, singer Sonu Nigam courted controversy and apologised. There is a need to teach a lesson to all these people.'Kamal's statement triggered protests across Karnataka, with pro-Kannada groups holding demonstrations in Belagavi, Mysuru, Hubballi, and Bengaluru. The Karnataka Rakshana Vedike faction, led by Praveen Shetty, filed a complaint against Kamal at the RT Nagar police station. The complaint alleged that Kamal hurt the feelings of Kannadigas and caused unrest between Kannadigas and Tamilians. A senior police officer said the complaint was forwarded for legal opinion and further action will be decided accordingly. Karnataka BJP chief BY Vijayendra criticised Kamal, saying, 'Disrespecting another language in the name of their mother tongue is nothing but uncultured behaviour. Having acted in several Indian languages, Kamal's attempt to glorify Tamil language , especially in the presence of Kannada actor Shivaraj Kumar, reflects his arrogance and foolishness.'In response to the political backlash, Kamal Haasan spoke from Thiruvananthapuram. He recalled Tamil Nadu's history of diverse chief ministers from different linguistic backgrounds, including the late J Jayalalithaa, who was originally from Mandya in Karnataka.Kamal described his remarks as an 'explanation' rather than an 'answer' in a democratic country. He said, 'They (protestors) are confusing the issue. Politicians are not qualified to talk about language, including me. Let's leave all these discussions to historians, archaeologists and language experts. When there was a problem from a TN CM, who hailed from Karnataka, it was Karnataka that gave me support and Kannadigas offered to provide me with a house. So, people will take care of...'Referring to his 'statement of love' on language, made in the presence of Shivaraj Kumar, Kamal added, 'We (he and Rajkumar family) are a family and so are the languages. If you look at it from a northern point of view, according to them, it is right. If you look at it from Thenkumari (South), what I said was right. There is also a third angle - the scholars, linguists who say both are right - families and languages that came from the North.'Inputs from TOI
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
'Thug Life' makers move Karnataka HC, seek smooth screening of Kamal Haasan-starrer in state: Report
Raajkamal Films International, co-producer of the upcoming Kamal Haasan-starrer Thug Life, has moved the Karnataka High Court seeking directions to ensure that the film is allowed to be screened in the state without disruption, Bar and Bench reported. The plea was filed amid fears that the film's release in Karnataka could face hurdles following backlash over Haasan's controversial, 'Tamil gave birth to Kannada' comment. The Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce's (KFCC) also announced that it would not permit the screening of the film. Pro-Kannada groups have demanded a public apology from Kamal Haasan, alleging that his remarks hurt Kannada sentiments. In response to boycott threats over his upcoming film, Haasan stood firm, reaffirming his faith in the principles of 'law' and 'justice' in a democratic society.
NDTV
30 minutes ago
- NDTV
Radical Outfit May Soon Contest Bangladesh Polls. How It Impacts India
Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh and its student wing Chatra Shibpur have regained their political status, with the Supreme Court restoring their registration and allowing them to be listed with the Election Commission for fighting future elections. This follows the Muhammad Yunus government lifting a ban on the organisation soon after taking charge last year. The Jamaat has remained active in Bangladesh despite losing its registration in 2013 and being barred from elections. It is now trying to rebrand itself ahead of national elections after being accused of being involved in attacks on Hindus in the aftermath of Sheikh Hasina's ouster. Mr Yunus's critics have accused him of clinging to power with the Jamaat's support, which has used the students' movement in the country as a front to gnaw its way back into politics. Earlier, the court had overturned the conviction of ATM Azharul Islam, a key leader of the organisation who was sentenced to death in 2014 for rape, murder and genocide during the 1971 war for the liberation of Bangladesh. The Jamaat-e-Islami had supported Pakistan during the 1971 war - despite the torture and genocide that marred the erstwhile East Pakistan's history. The Pakistan Army, on the orders of the Pakistan government, had committed severe atrocities on citizens of Bangladesh during their liberation struggle, including mass rape and murder. Former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina had cracked down on the Jamaat-e-Islami for their involvement in terror activities. But with Jamaat clawing its way back into Bangladesh's political space, there are severe implications for the neighbourhood, especially India, which shares the longest border with Bangladesh. With Pakistan trying to regain space in Bangladesh, the resurgence of the Jamaat gives it the necessary political space to find a way back in. The Jamaat-e-Islami's pro-Pakistan stand is in tune with Muhammad Yunus's assertion to build "stronger ties with Pakistan. This is why political analysts in Bangladesh imply that Yunus came to power with the support of the Jamaat, which was the force behind the students' uprising, while his critics argue that he wants to extend his stay in power with the backing of the Jamaat. There are other geo-political implications of the Jamaat's stand on various issues. For example, last month, Bangladesh's Jamaat-e-Islami proposed the creation of an independent Rohingya state in a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) representatives in Dhaka. The delegation was led by Peng Jiubin, the Director-General of the Southeast and South Asian Affairs Bureau under the International Department of the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee. This comes amid a surge of Rohingyas into Bangladesh as Ethnic Armed Organisations (EAOs) seize power along Myanmar's international borders, especially the Arakan Army, an EAO operating in the Rakhine State of Myanmar. What If Jamaat Succeeds? If the Jamaat is successful in convincing other countries and cobbling together some consensus, it would impact India's geo-political interest in the region. India has invested in the Sittwe Port and the Kaladan Multi-Modal Transit Transport Project (KMTTP), India's flagship connectivity initiative in Myanmar, which aims to enhance road and maritime links with Southeast Asia. It will also provide an alternative access route to India's northeastern region, contributing to economic development there. The project connects Sittwe Port in Myanmar to the India-Myanmar border via a 225-kilometre waterway to Paletwa, where an IWT terminal is being set up, followed by a road from there to the border in Zorinpui in South Mizoram. The Jamaat has also established a network through South Asian immigrant communities. Its stated motive of establishing an Islamic state goes against the ethos of pluralism, which seems to be receding from the ideological space in Bangladesh. A hardline Islamic state, if the Jamaat has its way, with close links to Pakistan on the eastern side, could lead to huge security worries for India. The Jamaat-E-Islami, while holding a pro-Pakistan stance, however, so far never won a majority but has played the role of Kingmaker. It has earlier been an ally of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), which was the main opposition party in Bangladesh during the Sheikh Hasina regime. Of late, there have been issues where the BNP leadership and the Jamaat have disagreed. Among those is conducting elections by December 2025. The BNP has been firm on this demand, while the Jamaat has been comfortable with Yunus holding on for longer, as it gives the organisation more time to mobilise for elections. The Jamaat also has a larger motive in downplaying Bangladesh's freedom struggle and India's role in the 1971 war. The Chhatra Shibir, the student wing of Jamaat-e-Islami that was one of the main players in the 2024 uprising against Sheikh Hasina, faced massive backlash for an article in its magazine Chhatra Sangbad for describing Muslim participation in the Liberation War as "a failure" and a "lack of foresight". It apologised later amid pressure, but the BNP students' wing condemned this line of thought and openly took a stance diametrically opposite to the Jamaat, which has always harboured pro-Pakistan sentiments. Many saw it as the Jamaat testing the waters over its effort to create an Islamic brotherhood.
Indian Express
34 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Kamal Haasan row: Debate on which language came first is a waste of time
Written by Aniruddha Nagaraj During the audio launch of his upcoming film Thug Life in Chennai, the veteran actor Kamal Haasan made a rather controversial remark: 'Kannada was born out of Tamil.' It has drawn sharp criticism from pro-Kannada groups across Karnataka. During the event, Haasan, in the presence of another famous Kannada actor, Shiva Rajkumar, began his speech by saying, 'My life and my family are the Tamil language.' Further, he addressed Shiva Rajkumar and said, 'Your language (Kannada) was born out of Tamil, so you too are a part of it (my family).' Many believe that he made this statement to promote cultural unity between the languages of the two neighbouring states. This can be located in the context of the recent protests in Tamil Nadu against the three-language policy under NEP 2020, which are associated with a broader fear of Hindi imposition. However, the repercussions of his statement were exactly the opposite of what he seems to have intended. The idea behind protests against the imposition of any particular language upon others is to convey that no language is superior, each deserving equal importance. By positing Kannada as being born from Tamil, Haasan's statement implied a higher pedestal for the latter as the source language, contrary to the very essence of the said language resistance in Tamil Nadu. The pro-Kannada reactions to this statement need to be understood against the backdrop of longstanding tensions over language. During the 1990s, there was a growing sense of fear among Kannadigas about the dominance of Tamils in Bengaluru. This stemmed from the perception among Kannadigas that Tamils were not making an effort to learn their language while becoming a part of their society. Pro-Kannada organisations demanded that the government acknowledge the threat this posed to the Kannada language and culture, and to show the required political determination to ensure the promotion of Kannada in the state. This pro-Kannada sentiment had an interesting reflection in the business of cinema as well. Many may recall that during this period, Rajkumar's movies were released on exactly the same dates as MGR films. At times, this led to minor riots among the fans of the two superstars. It is to be noted that both the Kannada and Tamil film industries have played significant roles in fostering strong linguistic sentiments through their depictions of Tamil and Kannada pride. Most importantly, Haasan's statement is historically incorrect. Kannada, which belongs to the family of Dravidian languages, is not derived from any particular language. Tamil and Kannada are considered to be sister languages, with both having separate trajectories of development. There are many reasons to believe that Kannada differs significantly from Tamil. In Tamil, the norms of writing are clearly distinct from the spoken form. The written norms were fixed in the 13th century and continue to be followed today. However, spoken Tamil is more dynamic and has evolved over time. In contrast, the written and spoken forms of Kannada are largely similar, with both having a history of continuous, gradual changes. However, the debate on which language came first, or which is the source of other languages, is not a fruitful investment of time. Languages evolve and take various forms through the ages with their own base of speakers. In this process, a language borrows from and contributes to other languages that it comes into contact with. Thus, the discussion should instead be on how languages enrich each other. When questioned later about the controversy stirred by his remark, Haasan emphasised a legacy of harmonious coexistence among speakers of Kannada, Tamil, and other languages. He cited the example of Tamil Nadu having several chief ministers of non-Tamil origin. Similarly, we can add to this by citing examples of great Kannada writers who were originally from Tamil Nadu. There were playwrights like T P Kailasam, novelist Masti Venkatesha Iyengar, poets G P Rajaratnam and P T Narasimhachar, scholar A K Ramanujan, and many others who spoke in Tamil but produced some of their greatest works in Kannada. The description of Ramanujan's childhood is a wonderful metaphor for the shared history of Kannada and Tamil. He mentions in an interview with H S Shivaprakash (translated by Maithreyi Karnoor), 'We spoke Tamil downstairs – on the ground floor where my mother and my grandmother spent their time. The upper storey had my father's library where English was prevalent. And when I stepped out of the house, I encountered Kannada.' The writer teaches English at Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan College, GGSIPU, New Delhi
