
A $2,000 foldable iPhone can take the heat off Tim Cook
Samsung
hardware engineers: Day after day, they toil at the cutting edge, devising almost inconceivable ways to defy physics. Components are shrunken, twisted, bent against their will. And then their work is unveiled to the world: the
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
, an unfathomably thin folding smartphone. The company eagerly awaits the reaction of American smartphone buyers. 'Meh,' they say.
Harsh? Maybe. But the sales won't lie. At this point, I don't know what it would take for Samsung Electronics Co. to engineer its way to a bigger slice of the US market, where
Apple
Inc. has a 56% share compared with Samsung's 25%. The consumer lock-in of iOS and the Apple product range is just too great. People love their iPhones.
And yet, ask a Wall Street investor and she'll tell you the
iPhone
segment is tired. Revenue growth (globally) has softened — 1.9% in the last quarter, down 0.8% in the all-important holiday quarter before that. The predicted upgrade 'supercycle' from artificial-intelligence features has failed to materialize because they are delayed. That's had some close observers half-heartedly questioning Chief Executive Officer
Tim Cook
's position. He can quiet at least some of that talk with the coming folding iPhone, which, according to Bloomberg News' Mark Gurman, is expected by the end of next year. That's a long way off but not too long. From a hardware standpoint at least, Samsung's Fold 7 is a blueprint for where the iPhone can and will go next.
The Korean giant's foldable efforts began in 2019 with the introduction of the Galaxy Fold. The head-turning engineering achievement was held back by obvious limitations: The screen was fragile and quickly developed a prominent crease at the fold. When closed, it was rather fat — 15.5 mm. The release was delayed after reviewers found severe reliability issues. The devices have improved since, but the foldable market is still less than 2% of the overall smartphone pool, CCS Insight's Ben Wood estimates — 22 million foldable units sold in 2024.
But with the Fold 7, announced at an event in Brooklyn earlier this month, there's more than a whiff of a suggestion that Samsung has made a foldable phone that everyday users might finally find appealing. The device has been well received in review circles. The $2,000 price tag is huge, granted, though that can be heavily discounted with trade-ins and other perks. And again, it's remarkably thin: When shut, the device is only six-tenths of a millimeter thicker than the latest iPhone 16 Pro.
None of this alters the challenge, however, which is that anyone who might be tempted away from the iPhone has too many practical considerations that overrule the novelty or utility of a folding phone. The years of photos, videos and messages; the effortless syncing with
MacBooks
and iPads; the commitment to never be the one who turns the group chat green. Above all, iOS' straightforward familiarity, and the fact that Apple has never wavered on the quality of its software, is what makes the huge majority of its customers transition from one iPhone to the next without hesitation. Switching from iOS to Android is like asking someone to learn to write with their other hand. They see no compelling reason to put themselves through the effort.
Some think that AI is the force that can break Apple's grip, given the company's well-publicized struggle to grasp the technology's potential. It's one reason, in addition to tariff fears, that Apple investors have been in a tizzy since the start of the year, worried that Cupertino has been asleep at the AI wheel and has put at risk the lasting appeal of the most successful consumer product in history. Shares are down more than 14% this year.
These concerns are overblown as both a short- and medium-term threat. No AI company is likely to build a device that competes with the iPhone, given the supply chain mastery required, within at least the next five years or longer. There's little to worry about from existing players, either. While watching Samsung's keynote presentation to launch the Fold 7 and other new devices, it was notable that for all the talk of Apple's intense struggle to introduce AI to the iPhone, Samsung hasn't exactly achieved much to get truly excited about either. The standout AI functions were created by Google, a company that aims to get its AI into as many affluent hands as possible, which means making much of the functionality work on the iPhone as well. In addition to this, the most impressive AI functions on Samsung devices require sending data to the cloud — something Apple has been steadfastly opposed to for privacy and performance reasons.
That's not to say Apple's AI problem isn't urgent.
Seasoned Apple
watchers rightly consider the recent fumbles an embarrassment. However, what investors seem to be overlooking is that Apple is on the cusp of a once-in-a-decade moment. The iPhone is about to receive a genuinely significant upgrade, a giant leap from the incremental changes consumers have grown accustomed to in recent years.
The last time Apple did this, with the all-screen iPhone X in 2017, analysts underestimated the consumer appetite to drop $1,000 on a smartphone. They shouldn't make the same mistake again — a
foldable iPhone
is expected to go for $2,000 or more, from which the company is expected to enjoy strong margins. Volumes may be low at first but, from the offset, 'the allure of a folding iPhone would immediately lift the market by many millions,' Wood said. Investors should also consider what happened when Apple introduced its 'Max' models with larger screens in 2014, which some at the time considered to have niche appeal. 'Apple was late in launching a large form factor compared to Samsung and other manufacturers,' wrote analysts at Consumer Intelligence Research Partners. 'Now, large-format displays account for over one-third of Apple iPhone US unit sales.'
There's a small chance the folding device will eat into other product lines, most obviously the iPad, though Apple has already started to reposition that device as a small computer rather than a large smartphone. There were cannibalization fears with the iPhone X, too, but its introduction led to the average selling price increasing by $118 over the subsequent two years, according to CIRP's weighted sales data (Apple has stopped disclosing its own figures). And, with more users carrying larger screens on the go, Apple can expect a bump in subscriptions to its streaming and gaming services.
All of this amounts to a real upgrade supercycle, if not with Apple's first foldable next year, certainly with the iterations to come. I'm confident it won't take much to persuade a great number of Apple users to start buying what ultimately amounts to one device for the price of two.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
25 minutes ago
- Economic Times
There is a Trump deal within the trade deal, which is making things tricky
Put on that poker face India seems to have hit a Trump wall in its trade deal negotiations with the US. Unlike other segments of the relationship like security and terrorism, where India has been able to nudge its pieces through the American system, the trade deal has got looped into a different White House orbit - an orbit with shifting goalposts and changing what's holding up the deal? After all, India was among the early movers on initiating a trade conversation with the Trump regime. And, yet, an agreement has eluded both sides, while others appear to be closing the gap sooner, including the EU, which struck a deal with US on a 15% tariff slab on Monday. In India's case, White House changed the frame last minute. Both sides had agreed in February to work on an early harvest agreement by September, which would cover close to 40% tariff lines. This was to be a concrete deliverable during a planned Trump visit to India around the same time. The early harvest was to be followed by widening negotiations on to more tariff lines with the object of covering 90% tariff lines that would then close Phase 1 of the trade deal. The second phase was to be a more detailed and protracted negotiation on aligning standards and adopting mutually acceptable quality control Trump, it appears, changed his mind when the proposed early harvest agreement reached his table. White House now feels Phase 1 should be completed in its entirety before any agreement is signed. Efforts are on to get Trump to reconsider. But, for now, negotiators are headed back to the table to pick up the threads again to rejig, and, if needed, recast the entire frame. Next month's talks would probably be the 50th round of negotiations with the US, making it by far the longest trade negotiation the Trump regime has held with any country or grouping. A big part of the reason is India has a comparatively higher tariff structure, which only complicates line-by-line negotiation. But New Delhi has, on this occasion, extended a bold offer going by its own track record. Yet, it will miss Trump's August 1 tariff it be extended for India, given that a US team is headed to Delhi for another round? The jury is still out on this because Trump has generally maintained a 'no-extension' stand. But with 15% slab agreed with the EU, revenues will swell, giving him room to accommodate some an Indian standpoint, the pattern emerging in the larger picture from Trump's negotiation with the EU and other countries is that focus is on arriving at an understanding on a single overall tariff figure. All tariff line negotiations will eventually have to settle at that one number. For Britain, it was 10%, the EU and Japan settled at 15%, Indonesia 19%, and Vietnam was about about 20%- this is the 'Trump deal' within the trade deal. It's unprecedented and, until now, not even properly documented as a model. However, that's the way the pattern has held. India doesn't have a number on offer yet from the US. But, in all probability, this is the direction in which negotiations are likely to head. The problem for India is its own complicated high-tariff structure, which will make it a more difficult exercise to reconcile, as opposed to generally low-tariff economies like the EU and tricky bit will be to figure out the minutiae of the Trump deal in the trade deal, which is also bundled into a number by way of procurements from the US, business deals and investment opportunities to US companies as well as crypto mining - not to forget the interests of the Trump Organisation and its India can, and must, do is prise open win-win opportunities like civil nuclear energy cooperation. Though not listed until now in Parliament's monsoon session agenda, GoI ought to consider expediting the introduction of a new or amended nuclear liability bill, along with relevant amendments to the Atomic Energy Act. A continuous emphasis on the criticality of strategic relationship from a security perspective is vital. On that score, Trump's inclination to play the Pakistan card is counterproductive - one that India will have to counter at all levels. On a broader plane, what's noteworthy is that the EU, for its 15% tariff deal, has committed to purchasing US energy supplies worth $750 bn over three years in a strategic shift from Russian fuel. France is already expressing concerns over the entire deal. The number for Japan is $550 bn worth of investment, which the Japanese government is scrambling to explain as loans to its domestic audience. Saudi Arabia and the UAE have announced $1.3 tn and $1.4 tn, respectively, of investments, procurements and business partnerships over 10 years with the are staggering numbers for GoI, which is still working on US defence procurement plans in the $8-10 bn range. In India's domestic politics, deals like these are a minefield for any government to navigate. This is a politically awkward situation on which the future of the trade deal may just rest, one that will require constant strategic bargaining, while at the same time considering doable commitments on the Trump commercial agenda. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Will TCS layoffs open the floodgates of mass firing at Indian IT firms? Sebi's settlement with market intermediaries: More mystery than transparency? Indian IT firms never reveal the truth hiding behind 'strong' deal wins Did Meesho's Valmo really deliver a knockout punch to e-commerce logistics? Piaggio sues former employee for 'Coldplay' reference on CEO Apple has a new Indian-American COO. What it needs might be a new CEO. Stock Radar: This pharma stock breaks out from a 9-month long consolidation phase; likely to fresh record highs Understand 'Market Coupling Approved' before reacting to IEX stock price movement and making any decision


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Aircraft crashes to regulatory hurdles: Despite several challenges, Boeing may be benefitting big from Donald Trump's trade war
The US aerospace giant has globally been in the news for all the wrong reasons. US President Donald Trump's trade war seems to be benefitting one aviation sector giant in America - Boeing! As Trump seals trade deals with countries around the world, he is also bringing in deals, and Boeing is reaping the rewards. Boeing is bagging new orders through these trade deals which could prove advantageous for the company as it recovers from recent difficulties, according to a New York Times report. Additionally, these deals enable Trump to demonstrate the effectiveness of his distinctive trade strategies in supporting American industry. Boeing's Recent Troubles The US aerospace giant has globally been in the news for all the wrong reasons - the biggest being the recent crash of Air India 's AI-171 aircraft which was a Boeing 787 Dreamliner. Investigations on the cause of the crash, which killed all but onboard, are ongoing. Additionally, Boeing faces critical challenges before it can convert its new orders into revenue. The manufacturer lags significantly in obtaining regulatory clearance for key aircraft models, including both the smallest and largest versions of the 737 Max, as well as the 777-9, which initiated FAA certification test flights twelve months ago. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Mini House for 60 sqm for Seniors with Toilet and Bath (Price May Surprise You) Pre Fabricated Homes | Search Ads Search Now Undo Boeing's operational difficulties have created significant setbacks. Following two tragic crashes, its bestselling 737 Max was suspended from service for approximately 24 months. A recent Reuters report quoted FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford saying that Boeing hasn't requested the removal of the 38-plane monthly production limit for 737 MAX aircraft. The agency will conduct a thorough assessment of the manufacturer's supply chain before reaching any conclusions. The production restriction was established by the FAA following a January 2024 incident where an Alaska Airlines 737 MAX 9 aircraft experienced an emergency situation mid-flight due to missing crucial bolts. In June this year, The National Transportation Safety Board issued a stern critique regarding Boeing's inadequate safety measures, which led to the cabin panel blowout incident on a 737 MAX 9 aircraft in January 2024. The incident triggered a significant crisis for the aircraft manufacturer. According to a Reuters report, the safety board delivered a scathing assessment of Boeing's safety protocols and highlighted the company's oversight failure in installing four crucial bolts during the production of an Alaska Airlines MAX 9. Meanwhile, Boeing's suppliers may face financial strain due to Trump's imposed tariffs, whilst potential retaliatory measures from trading partners, particularly the European Union, could adversely affect the aircraft manufacturer's business. Boeing New Order Book Industry experts suggest that the trade agreements could lead to additional orders, as potential buyers might feel compelled to secure their positions now to avoid future delays. Aircraft ordered at present will be delivered in subsequent years. Recent announcements include orders for numerous Boeing aircraft from Indonesia and Japan this month, following earlier agreements with Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and Qatar. However, aviation industry experts express doubt about the necessity of US trade negotiators' intervention in securing Boeing aircraft orders. The procurement of aircraft involves meticulous planning by airlines, including state-owned carriers, spanning several months to years. The limited choice between Boeing and Airbus, the sole manufacturers of large commercial aircraft, further influences purchasing decisions. Nevertheless, analysts acknowledge the strategic emphasis placed by Trump's administration on Boeing contracts within trade agreements. This focus aligns with Boeing's significant role as a major American employer and prominent export contributor. The financial markets have responded positively to the new order announcements, with Boeing's stock value showing consistent growth since April, coinciding with Trump's introduction of tariffs. The company's CEO Kelly Ortberg accompanied Trump during his Middle East visit in May when the Qatar agreement was disclosed. "If the president of the country says, 'Come with me and be certain that we sign something big that says there will be many jobs in the US,' what will you do?" said Adam Pilarski, president of Avitas, an aviation consulting firm, according to the New York Times report. However, Pilarski and additional industry specialists advised that these orders might not be as significant as they appeared. Trump's Role Overstated? The specifics of these agreements remain largely undisclosed, indicating ongoing complex discussions between the aircraft manufacturer and various airlines. A case in point from this month shows Trump's announcement of Indonesia's commitment to 50 Boeing aircraft, whilst an Indonesian official later clarified that negotiations were still ongoing between Garuda, their state carrier, and Boeing. "I suspect these orders are, as we used to joke at air shows, MOUTHLs — memoranda of understanding to have lunch," said Richard Aboulafia, a managing director at AeroDynamic Advisory, a consulting firm. "The real hard work of contract negotiation and finance package negotiation takes place after the president's plane has left the country,' he said according to the New York Times report. Industry analysts suggest that many of these orders would likely have materialised regardless of Trump's involvement. In May, Qatar Airways, a significant international carrier, confirmed a substantial order of 150 Boeing wide-body aircraft. This particular announcement was notably comprehensive in its details. Whilst political influence may drive some orders, circumstances can shift substantially before aircraft delivery. Both Boeing and Airbus maintain extensive order books spanning multiple years of manufacturing. Airlines retain the option to withdraw from agreements, albeit potentially losing deposits. Additionally, carriers can request delivery postponements or order reductions. Manufacturers might accommodate such adjustments, particularly if it enables them to redirect aircraft to other airlines with urgent requirements for new aircraft. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 faces major durability test, surprising results inside
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 has just been put through its paces in a fresh durability test by popular YouTuber JerryRigEverything, and the results might surprise those who still question the toughness of foldable phones. For those who don't know, Zack Nelson (the man behind the channel) is best known for torturing smartphones on his YouTube channel with several tests, including bending, scratching, and burning, to name a few. As is tradition, he took Samsung's latest and greatest foldable for a spin with his usual tools and techniques, and the Galaxy Z Fold 7 did not disappoint. advertisementFirst, let's get into the durability side of things. The scratch test started on the cover screen and back panel of the Galaxy Z Fold 7, both of which are protected by Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2. Like most modern smartphones, scratches began to appear at level 6 of the Mohs hardness scale, with deeper grooves at level 7. The main inner display, though more delicate, held up well too. The aluminium frame didn't fare as well under sharp tools, but that's not something everyday users need to worry notable improvement on the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is the camera ring design. Unlike its predecessor, the Galaxy Z Fold 6, or even the Galaxy S25 Ultra, Samsung has reverted to a more robust metal setup. Zack tried to dig into the camera rings with his blade, but to no avail — the camera rings stayed in place, showing impressive strength. While the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 doesn't offer a traditional IP68 rating like regular bar phones — where the '6' stands for complete dust protection — the phone still has an IP48 rating. This means the '4' denotes that the phone can handle dust or solid objects 1mm or larger in size. That said, Zack went all in by sprinkling fine dust over the hinge and inner screen and opened and closed the phone multiple times. To everyone's surprise, the phone's hinge continued to function smoothly, without any visible said, the flame test — where a lighter is held to the screen — left lasting marks on both displays, as expected. The cover screen showed damage after about 15 seconds, and the inner display lasted roughly 10 seconds. Neither recovered, but that's the typical nature of OLED displays under direct flame. Credit: JerryRigEverything/ YouTube Then came the all-important bend test. With pressure applied from both directions — folded and unfolded — the Galaxy Z Fold 7 managed to survive without breaking, bending or snapping. Considering this is the thinnest foldable phone yet, that's impressive. And speaking of thinness, a recent study conducted by the Korean Consumer-Centred Enterprise Association found that Samsung's official thickness claim of 8.9mm is actually slightly overstated — the real number is 8.82mm. In contrast, competitors like Honor, Vivo, and Xiaomi have been caught stating lower thicknesses than what their phones actually for instance, advertises its Magic V5 as the world's thinnest foldable at 8.8mm, but real-world measurements show it to be over 0.5mm thicker. Vivo and Xiaomi have similar gaps between their claims and reality. On the other hand, Samsung seems to have gone the other way — not just matching its specs, but doing better. Now, this could point to a more conservative approach, or perhaps it's simply a genuine effort to avoid the marketing exaggeration we often see in this category. We think the what it's worth, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 has passed JerryRigEverything's brutal durability test with flying colours — and at the end of the day, that's all that matters.- Ends