Jamb 2025: Nigeria's exam body admits 'glitch' amid low pass rate
Nigeria's national examination body has admitted to a "technical glitch" which compromised some results of this year's university-entrance exams, after nearly 80% of students got low grades.Students have complained about not being able to log in to the computers, questions not showing up and power cuts making it impossible to take the examinations.The low pass rate has sparked widespread outrage, especially after one candidate took her own life.Faith Opesusi Timileyin, 19, who was aspiring to study microbiology at university, died after swallowing poison, her family said.
Her father and elder sister told the BBC that she had sat the exam for the second time and got 146 marks out of 400, lower than the 193 she had last year."The pain made her take her own life," her father, Oluwafemi Opesusi, told BBC Pidgin.Generally 200 or above out of 400 is enough to get a place in university.Only 400,000 of the 1.9 million students achieved that mark, one of the worst performances in recent years.One student, Favour Eke, told BBC Igbo that 10 of the 165 questions didn't appear on the screen - all she could see was the multiple choice options for the answers."We were told to omit the blank questions and continue the exam but it was very hard to concentrate after that," she said.She has also experienced technical problems getting her results, meaning she is very unlikely to get into university this year - the third time she has taken the exams.She sat the test in the capital, Abuja, which is not one of the centres where students can retake their exams, leaving her completely distraught.The exams body has apologised for the "painful damage" and "the trauma that it has subjected affected Nigerians".In a press conference, the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (Jamb) registrar Ishaq Oloyede broke down in tears as he apologised.He announced that almost 380,000 candidates in 157 affected centres from a total of 887, would be able to retake their exams starting from Saturday.The zones that are most affected are Lagos and several states in the south-east.Jamb blamed a failure of the computer system to upload exam responses by candidates in these areas during the first days of the exams.It said an "unusual level of public concerns and loud complaints" had "prompted us to do an immediate audit or review". Ordinarily, this would have happened in June, it said.The national exam, known as the Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME), is a computer-based test that is a requirement for those joining universities and other tertiary institutions.The 2025 test, which was conducted in March, was marred by disruptions due to power outages in some areas.The head of the exams body earlier this week defended the poor results, saying they reflected the "true academic abilities" of the students and were because of a clampdown on cheating.Many Nigerians on social media have been calling for accountability, with some seeking Oloyede's resignation.Opposition figure Peter Obi said that while the admission of fault was commendable, the issue raised "a very concerning issue on glitches and the grave havoc" in critical institutions.Rights activist Rinu Oduala said it was "incompetence. It's educational sabotage. He should be arrested immediately."Additional reporting by Chukwunaeme Obiejesi, Andrew Gift and Marvelous Obomanu in Nigeria
You may also be interested in:
'I screamed': Nigerian Doctor Who fan thrilled show is coming to LagosHusband of late Nigerian gospel singer sentenced to deathNigerians fear savings lost as investment app freezes them outNigerian bandit kingpin and 100 followers killed
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Free school meal expansion in England will benefit fewer than claimed, IFS says
The expansion of free school meals will initially benefit far fewer children in England than claimed, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, as data shows more than one in four at state schools already receive free lunches. The figures from the Department for Education's annual school census show that 25.7% of all pupils now receive free school meals (FSM), up by more than a percentage point compared with last year and nearly double the 13.6% in 2017. The record of nearly 2.2 million children is an increase of 77,700 since January 2024. The figures come as Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, announced expanded FSM eligibility from September 2026, allowing all children from households receiving universal credit benefits to receive free lunches. Currently those with a net earned household income of below £7,400 a year are eligible. While poverty campaigners and teaching unions welcomed Phillipson's announcement, the IFS said the expansion would take several years to affect levels of child poverty. The IFS said in the long run it would lift 100,000 children out of poverty but 'in the short run, both the costs and the benefits of this policy are likely to be much smaller', because of the high proportion who already receive FSM. Christine Farquharson, associate director at IFS, said: 'Transitional protections introduced in 2018 have substantially increased the number of children receiving free school meals today. So in the short run, today's announcement will both cost considerably less, around £250m a year, and benefit considerably fewer pupils [than the government's estimate of 500,000]. This also means that today's announcement will not see anything like 100,000 children lifted out of poverty next year.' The previous government allowed transition arrangements in 2018, during the introduction of universal credit, to protect children receiving FSM and extend their eligibility. The transition ended in April this year, and would eventually have led to fewer children receiving FSM. The IFS said: 'The ultimate impact of these transitional protections is that many more children are currently receiving free school meals than would otherwise be the case. This makes the short-run costs of expanding eligibility lower, but also means that fewer families will benefit on day one.' Tammy Campbell of the Education Policy Institute noted that schools would not receive additional pupil premium funding for each child on FSM under the new extension. The funding, which ranges from £1,000 to £2,600 per pupil, will still be paid under the existing criteria including the £7,400 household income cap. 'There does not appear to be a clear rationale from government as to why the new free school meal eligibility criteria will not be reflected in pupil premium eligibility. The government is clear that these children are growing up in difficult circumstances. As such, they are more likely to have lower attainment and benefit from additional support in school,' Campbell said. Phillipson also said the government would review school food standards. Speaking to the BBC Radio 4 Today programme, she said school food had not been looked at 'for a very long time' and that the government wanted to 'make sure that the food that's being served is healthy and nutritious'. Henry Dimbleby, the restaurateur who chaired the last school food review in 2013, said a fresh review was overdue as some schools were not following existing standards. Campaigners have called for government guidance to encourage consumption of fruit, vegetables, and legumes and less use of processed meats.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Highland school with no pupils saved from closure
A Highland school with no pupils has been saved from closure because there could be children joining in the Primary School was mothballed in January 2022 after its last few children were relocated to Ullapool Primary - a 60-mile (97km) round trip for some of Council officers recommended shutting the school permanently, but councillors have voted to keep it available to future pupils and Marianne Hutchison, who brought forward the proposal, said a new fish farm being built nearby could potentially bring workers' families to the area. A report to Highland Council's education committee said pupils who had moved to Ullapool Primary had settled in well and were enjoying a positive learning the report added the children had also expressed "sadness" at the loss of their old Hutchison told the committee's meeting on Wednesday the new fish farm at Badcaul was expected to be operational later this year, and could mean families moving to the said there was also some opposition in the local community to the school being closed for councillor Ruraidh Stewart described the plans to shut the school entirely "short-sighted" and risked "killing off a community".The committee voted against closing the school, and instead to keep it mothballed, meaning it would be shut but kept in a condition ready for future by local democracy reporter Will Angus.
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
All di court cases wey Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan dey face
Justice Idris Kutigi of di Federal High Court Abuja don order di Senate President of Nigeria, Godswill Akpabio to appear bifor am, sake of one defamation case wey Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan bin file against am. Dis na just one out of di plenty court cases wey involve Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan, di suspended lawmaker wey dey represent Kogi Central Senatorial District for di National Assembly. According to tori by local media, Justice Kutigi bin grant di lawyer of Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan, Victor Giwa, permision to serve Akpabio wit di court proceedings thru substituted means, since di senate president bin no show face for court on 7 May, 2025 wey di matter bin suppose start. Di Judge order Akpabio to show face for di court on Monday, 9 June, 2025. Though e neva dey clear weda dis date go get head since di Nigeria goment don declare am as public holiday for di muslim celebration of Eid-El-Kabir. Since late February dis year wen di crisis start between di female lawmaker and di senate president Akpabio, na so court cases dey pile up betwin di two. Some of dem na Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan start am, di odas na either di Nigeria goment or Akpabio family start am. Remember say Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan dey accuse Akpabio of sexual harrasment, wey she claim say e happen several times including for Akpabio house and for di senate premises. However, Akpabio don deny di allegations. Here na listicle of dis court cases and wetin be di issues: 350 billion naira suit by Mrs Akpabio Shortly afta Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan accuse Akpabio of sexual harassment during one TV interview, Mrs Ekaette Akpabio, wife of di senate president, call a press conference, wia she tok say she don sue Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan for defamation against her husband. Akpabio wife say she file two court cases - marked CV/814/25 and CV/816/25 - for di federal high court Abuja, demanding damages of N250 billion and N100 billion respectively. She tok say di allegations against her husband don cause her and her children "emotional and psychological abuse", and e don make her family to dey live for constant fear of threat to dia lives. She want make di court restrain Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan from making defamatory statements against di Akpabio family, and for her to withdraw di allegations and tender "unconditional apology to di senate president" wey go dey published for two national newspapers. 100 billion naira suit by Akpoti-Uduaghan Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan bin also file court case against Godswill Akpabio and imegislative aide, Mfon Patrick, wia she allege say di aide bin post one article on Facebook wey wan damage her reputation. Di Kogi lawmaker ask di court to order di defendants to pay her N100 billion for damages and anoda N300 million in litigation costs. Inside di suit, marked CV/737/25, Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan say di post by Mfon Patrick dey "defamatory, provocative, and damaging to her reputation". Oga Patrick bin make dis post afta di wahala wey happen for di senate chambers on 21 February, 2025, wia Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan bin para and shout for di senate president afta dem change her sitting position. Di incident wey show for national TV bin see di female lawmaker telling Akpabio say "I am not afraid of you", "I don take a lot from you. I bin no wan go public, but if you want I go let Nigerians know how you don discriminate against me, how you dey malign me..." Days later, oga Patrick den post di article on Facebook wit di title: "She di Local Content Committee of di Senate be Natasha Birthright?" Di legislative aide say Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan dey para bicos di Senate President bin remove her as di chairman of dat senate committee. But di female lawmaker vex for di part wia Patrick say she no sabi anything about being a legislator except to dey "pancake her face and dey wear transparent outfits to di chambers." Dis remarks, she tok, "dey false and na to ridicule her, damage her credibility, and expose her to public contempt". Natasha vs Senate, Akpabio, Senate committee E also get anoda court case wey Natasha file to challenge her six-month suspension from di senate, afta a report by di senate comittee on etichs, privileges, and public petitions. Di committee bin recommend di suspension afta Natasha fail to appear bifor dem for investigation into her conduct for di senate chambers on February 21. Natasha hersef explain say she no attend dat investigation sake of say court bin don order di committee to postpone di hearing pending di determination of di matter bifor di court. But di committee members say dem no dey bound by any court order since dem dey do dia work as independent arm of goment. Dis matter on weda Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan suspension dey valid or not, dey bifor Justice Binta Nyako of di federal high court Abuja, and e dey expected say sho go deliver di judgement dis July. AGF vs Natasha Most recently, di office of di Attorney General of di Federation file anoda court case for di Federal Capital Territory High Court, sake of allegations of defamation against di senate president Godswill Akpabio and di former guvnor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello. For di three-count charges wey di goment bring against di female lawmaker, dem say Mrs Akpoti-Uduahan bin claim say Akpabio and Bello bin get plans to kill her, and say dis allegation na lie. According to di AGF, Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan know or she suppose know say "dis imputations go harm di reputation of Senator Godswill Akpabio, President of di 10th senate of di Federal Republic of Nigeria, and di reputation of Yahaya Adoza Bello, former guvnor of Kogi State". Di witnesses wey di FG say dem go call for dis matter include Akpabio, Yahaya Bello and one oda senator Asuquo Ekpenyong plus three oda pipo. Dis matter suppose start on Tuesday, 3 June, 2025, but e no come go ahead bicos of strike wey di Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria (Jusun) bin start di previous day. E never dey clear wen di new date go be.
