logo
‘What If I Don't Keep Feeling Strident?'

‘What If I Don't Keep Feeling Strident?'

The Atlantic22-05-2025
About two years ago, Ezra Furman gave up—first in her mind, and then, it seemed, in her body.
The 38-year-old singer was nearly two decades into a prolific rock-and-roll career. Her nervy, poetic sound had earned devoted fans and critical acclaim, plus a job soundtracking the Netflix TV show Sex Education. But her sixth solo album, 2022's All of Us Flames —an epic-scale protest album about surviving in a collapsing world—hadn't generated as much buzz as she'd hoped for, and she told me her label, Anti-, dropped her after its release. (Anti- did not respond to a request for comment.) She felt discouragement mounting, compounded by the stress of touring while raising a young son.
Then one day in April 2023, a stranger on the street pointed at Furman and laughed in her face. She knew why: Furman, a transgender woman, hadn't shaved that day. The cruelty was 'comic,' Furman told me, like something that happens in a movie, but it also damaged what was left of her inner resolve. That afternoon, Furman wrote down a confession to herself: She wanted to end her music career.
The next day, she collapsed and went to the hospital. She reported tiredness and pain in her body; the doctors ran tests but couldn't figure out what was wrong. She was discharged the same day, and experienced debilitating fatigue that persisted acutely for months, forcing her to cancel a tour. The illness, still unexplained, sometimes slows her to this day.
Furman described these events to me while we were seated at the kitchen table in her Somerville, Massachusetts, apartment. Wearing jeans and a colorfully striped blouse, she spoke haltingly, often taking long pauses to stare into the distance and hum along with the record playing in the background (Portishead's Dummy). Despite the resignation she felt that day in April, new songs started pouring out of her after the hospital. The resulting album, Goodbye Small Head, came out last week.
That album's existence might seem to suggest a success story, about an artist triumphing over adversity. But the tale Furman wanted to tell me—the theme that she kept returning to as we hung out in her house and then strolled around her neighborhood on a perfectly beautiful spring day—was mostly about feeling defeated. 'I'm in a time of over-admitting how much everything hurts,' she said. 'I'm leaning into every feeling, almost soaking it up.'
Furman is one of a kind: a trans, devoutly Jewish former rabbinical student who's written a book about Lou Reed and sings folk-punk songs in a mercurial tremble. Over nearly two decades, her music has evolved from scrappy college rock to expertly orchestrated art-pop. It's maintained an idiosyncratic spirit all along, combining references from across rock history—a Bob Dylan harmonica line here, a Cars synth line there—with lyrics that unspool in unsteady, careening cadences. Her claims to fame have had a fluky quality to them ('Take Off Your Sunglasses,' a 2008 track about depression and skiing, was a No. 1 hit in Austria). But to her fans, who testify under her social-media posts about how her work has become embedded in their life, she is one of rock's best-kept secrets.
Her trajectory has also, it's long seemed to me, been exemplary of a certain strain of Millennial idealism. When she founded her former band Ezra Furman and the Harpoons in 2006, as an undergraduate at Tufts University, her sound fit in with that era's boom for literary, openhearted indie acts in the vein of the Mountain Goats and Arcade Fire. She then publicly embraced queerness—identifying as bisexual, dressing femininely in public—around the same time that Laverne Cox featured on the cover of Time magazine and Target's sales racks started turning rainbow-themed during Pride month. 'It felt like pure, weird synchronicity,' she said when I suggested she was part of an LGBTQ cultural wave in the 2010s. 'Like I'm finally ready to start wearing these clothes in public and not just in my friends' bedrooms. And then it was like, trans people are in public. And I was like, What? '
When Donald Trump was elected for the first time, she doubled down on her long-standing penchant for socially conscientious lyricism, joining the burst of rock-and-roll #resistance that erupted in response to the president's agenda. She posted on social media about defending immigrants and women; onstage at Coachella in 2017, she called out Philip Anschutz, the businessman bankrolling that festival, for investing in oil exploration and donating to anti-LGBTQ causes. ('I support the rights of all people and oppose discrimination and intolerance against the LGBTQ community,' Anschutz said in a 2018 statement. 'I regret if any money given to a charity for other purposes may have indirectly worked against these values.') She also set about recording what she later called an 'anti-fascist trilogy' of albums. The final installment in that project was All of Us Flames —a record that, as she told The Guardian, she wanted to be a 'weapon of war,' striking against injustice and intolerance.
Now Trump is back in office and flirting openly with authoritarianism —but the defiant energy that swept the arts during his first administration seems dissipated and tentative. After years of gaining visibility and public sympathy, trans people find themselves undergoing concerted political assault: repealing their access to medications, bathrooms, and passports that accord with their gender identity. Goodbye Small Head isn't responding to these developments by rallying the troops or offering reassurance. It's a sumptuous shrug of an album, the sound of a onetime warrior owning up to weakness and burnout. 'I'm really moving away from a sense of, like, There's things I want to be saying to the public and I want to carry certain flags,' Furman said. 'There's a lot of fists in the air in our culture, and I'm a little fatigued in the arm area.'
Some of that fatigue can be traced back to an event in 2021 that, by all rights, was an occasion for pride. That's when Furman first posted on social media about being transgender—and revealed that she had a kid. Her coming-out wasn't a huge surprise to many of her followers, given that she'd long sung about the complexity of identity in ways that suggested she might be trans. (The title of her 2018 album was even titled Transangelic Exodus.) She finally made her transness explicit because, she told me, she figured that other queer people might be helped by her example. Certainly, she herself would have benefited from seeing a transgender mother in popular culture years earlier.
But her announcement reached more than just trans people, and more than just her fans. CNN and Fox News, who had never covered her music before, ran stories about her transition in the anodyne tone of everyday celebrity gossip. (One line from Fox News: 'Furman's fans will also be pleased to know she signed off her Instagram post with a promise that new music is on the way.') This meant that she was suddenly an object of consideration for all sorts of people she'd never intended to reach. Under Furman's coming-out post on her own Facebook page, one commenter wrote, 'Why are you coming up on my timeline? I don't follow people with an agenda.' Others left harsher replies—accusing her of being a sinner, an attention whore, a mentally ill child abuser.
Furman had, it seemed, walked into a trap. 'I didn't understand that I had created clickbait,' she told me. By the 2020s, visibility —that watchword of the movement for queer acceptance—was becoming freighted with new dangers. Backlash to trans rights had swollen into one of the animating causes of the Republican Party, whose leaders were evangelizing the notion that gender nonconformity was a social contagion that targeted children and threatened to undermine civilization itself. The news media and social-media algorithms seemed ready to capitalize on the way that the mere sight of a trans person in public life could incite controversy. Furman's post of self-expression wasn't just accidental clickbait; it was, to many onlookers, ragebait.
Furman read every hateful comment she received online. Initially, she tried to wave them off: 'I'm like, Psh, okay, buddy. Wow, you're really out of touch, huh? ' she said. ' And actually, while I'm saying that, the poison is already sinking into me. And some child in me fully believes everything they just said.' The vitriol didn't harden her shell—it hurt her. The conventional wisdom to 'shake it off' isn't working for her, she said. 'I don't know what else to do except start crying.'
Reflecting back on that episode, and the way that anti-trans sentiment has only continued to build in American culture since then, Furman said she's been thinking about the roots of the hostility against people like her. 'My life and my identity was known to all, including me, to be impossible or ridiculous,' she said. 'Just like: A boy becomes a girl? This is not something that happens. I like to think of trans people as people who were shown a wall and saw a doorway, made a doorway. They just did something impossible.'
The impossible becoming possible is a hard thing to process—and easier to reject or mock than to understand. She mentioned the slogan 'Facts don't care about your feelings,' popularized by the conservative pundit Ben Shapiro. 'I think it's out of the same playbook of, like, Women's feelings are why they can't be serious, rational people.' (Which, she added, is ironic because 'they're so emotional over there on the right.') Furman described herself as a 'defender of the irrational' in multiple spheres of life. Whether as an artist, a religious person, or a trans person, she's going out of her way to honor the importance of her inner life—her beliefs, her feelings, her desires—even when it's socially inconvenient to do so.
What she's realizing lately is how difficult that kind of life is to sustain. When the stranger on the street laughed at her in April 2023, it was a reminder that she couldn't just opt out of visibility. Every time Furman steps into public, she's opening herself up to judgment from society. If she stops putting care into her appearance—into passing as a cisgender woman, thereby avoiding drawing attention to her transness—she potentially becomes some 'illegible, laughable thing' to others. She doesn't know exactly why she collapsed. But she suspects that it had something to do with the fact that being trans requires constant assertiveness, which is an exhausting posture to maintain, day after day, year after year. 'Trans people just have to be strident personalities—we just all have to,' she said. 'What if I don't keep feeling strident?'
After she got out of the hospital, Furman felt that she needed a reset. Though her previous two albums had been recorded in California, she booked a studio in her hometown of Chicago. She also called up Brian Deck, the producer who'd recorded two of the first Ezra and the Harpoons albums nearly 20 years ago. Deck is a veteran indie producer who has worked with the likes of Modest Mouse and Counting Crows, and he hadn't stayed in touch with Furman. He told me he was amazed to find that she was basically the same person she was as an undergrad: articulate, precise, 'slightly socially awkward,' and possessing a 'coarse blunt instrument' of a voice, rippling with vulnerability and angst.
This time, Furman was using that instrument differently. Furman's past few albums have had a rollicking, anthemic sound channeling Bruce Springsteen and the Clash. But Goodbye Small Head is swirling and atmospheric, with dark, catchy melodies that recall '90s trip-hop and alternative rock. 'I think it's very beautiful,' Furman said, 'and I never really felt like we made beautiful music before this.'
In one new song, called 'Submission,' a beep that resembles the sound of an EKG machine plays on loop. 'We're fucked,' Furman hisses. 'It's a relief to say / We'll see no victory day.' The track, she wrote in the album's press notes, is about realizing that 'long-suffering 'good guys' have no chance against 21st-century forces of evil.'
In our interview, she told me she resisted finishing the song: 'I was like, This can't be what I'm writing. I don't want to. This isn't what anyone needs to hear.' But as she endured painful procedures for facial-hair removal—which meant lying on a table as electrified needles were stuck in her skin—the lyrics kept popping into her head, forcing the song into existence. In moments like those, Furman thought of the line 'No feeling is final,' by the poet Rainer Maria Rilke. 'What if we feel really bad?' Furman said. 'What if it feels really, really bad and we just let it feel that bad? Or just for a moment, anyway. What's under there?'
The final song of Goodbye Small Head, 'I Need the Angel,' is a garage-rock freak-out that sees Furman screaming for heavenly guidance. It's a cover of a song by Alex Walton, a 25-year-old trans musician who was once a fan of Furman's and struck up a friendship with her after the two exchanged messages online. When I spoke with Walton by videochat, she told me she was still processing the fact that her onetime role model—someone whose visibility as a trans person helped inspire her own career—had covered one of her songs. I asked her what Furman was like. 'There's this unerring optimism in her that's infectious,' Walton replied.
This took me aback. In the four hours I'd spent with Furman, she'd been sardonically funny and a curious-minded conversationalist, but we'd mostly talked about the terrible state of the world and the music industry. Walton allowed that Furman could come off as pessimistic—her music conveys 'never-ending struggle.' But beneath that, Walton said, Furman is motivated by a simple idea: 'She wants to live.'
Goodbye Small Head does have flashes of resilience. In its one overt protest song, 'A World of Love and Care,' Furman yowls, 'Who gets left out of your dream of a good society?' The chorus seems designed to ring out at rallies and marches: 'Dream better!' The track was a holdover from writing sessions during the first Trump administration, when Furman was working on that aforementioned anti-fascist trilogy. The original demo for the song was thrashing and punkish; the final version is built around pulsing cellos, making for a sound that's 'gentle and threatening' at the same time, as Furman put it.
The rest of Goodbye Small Head, however, isn't serving up slogans or straightforwardly trying to change the world. The album mostly arose, she said, out of her dreamlike instincts. Furman compared songwriting to religious practices—such as the ones she herself keeps (saying blessings over a meal, observing strict rules of conduct on the Sabbath). 'Why do I do these rituals?' she said. 'Religious people do religious acts not for any utility. There's something sacred about behaving this particular way, and even if nobody knows I'm doing it.'
And yet Furman still clearly feels like her work has a concrete, real-life purpose. She likened herself to professional mourners mentioned in the Bible: women who wailed because it was their duty to help their community express and move past emotions that would otherwise be paralyzing. 'We need the people who cry and clap their hands together and stomp their feet, because you need somebody to hold all that irrationality for you,' Furman said. 'I do think this is my job.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Netflix finally adds 'Outlander' season 7 — but there's one huge catch
Netflix finally adds 'Outlander' season 7 — but there's one huge catch

Tom's Guide

time26 minutes ago

  • Tom's Guide

Netflix finally adds 'Outlander' season 7 — but there's one huge catch

If you're a huge 'Outlander' fan and have been waiting for another season to hit Netflix, then you're in luck. One of the best streaming services has finally added season 7 of the fan-favorite historical romance time-travel series to its platform. The catch? You can only watch the first eight episodes on Netflix, and it'll be a while before the second half arrives. That's right, Netflix's annoying habit of releasing shows in batches continues, though this time the decision is really out of the streamer's hands. You see, "Outlander" is a Starz exclusive, so Netflix subscribers have always had to endure lengthy waits for the latest episodes to make their way over. As of this week (August 11), Netflix subscribers can watch the first eight episodes of "Outlander" season 7, the show's second-to-last season. We hope you like cliffhangers, though, because part two (episodes 9 through 16) won't arrive on Netflix until next year: January 17, 2027. If five months is too long to wait for part 2, you'll have to shell out for a Starz subscription to catch the rest of "Outlander" season 7 in the meantime. Starz usually costs $10.99/month, but right now you can get your first three months for just $4.99 a month. Prime Video also offers a Max and Starz streaming bundle in the U.S. that's 25% less than subscribing to each service individually, saving you around $6.99 each month. Since Netflix is the more popular streaming service of the two, season 7's arrival is the perfect opportunity to dive into this much-lauded saga before it wraps up with season 8 next year. As with past seasons, season 8 will premiere on Starz, and it's set to arrive in early 2025 with no official release date announced yet. Starz: was $10.99/month now $4.99 for the first three monthsStarz is one of the more underrated streaming services out there, offering access to some great thriller shows like "Sweetpea" and the hit drama "Outlander" season 7 part 2. With its rich library of original content, movies and shows, it's perfect for anyone seeking more premium entertainment. For those unfamiliar, "Outlander" is based on the novels of the same name by Diana Gabaldon. The series stars Caitríona Balfe as Claire Randall, a former World War II military nurse whose honeymoon takes an unlikely turn when she's mysteriously transported back to the year 1743. As she navigates life in a bygone century, she falls in love with another man named Jamie (Sam Heughan), a Highland warrior allied with Clan Fraser of Lovat. Claire adapts to having two completely different relationships, which naturally come with unforeseen consequences. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. In season 6, the couple navigated the trials and tribulations of life in colonial America, including building a home together and fighting a wrongful conviction that threatens to uproot everything they've worked for. Season 7 sees them facing the brutal birth of a new nation as the American Revolution breaks out. "Outlander" has remained consistently impressive throughout its run in terms of its narrative, character development, and world-building. The series has an overall critics' score of 90% on Rotten Tomatoes, with season 7 being heralded as a particular high mark, earning a 95% score. Netflix has been killing the game so far this year with new content on its streaming platform. There are many more movies and shows to watch on Netflix in August, including the highly anticipated season 2 of "Wednesday" and a charming new mystery, "The Thursday Murder Club," starring Helen Mirren, Pierce Brosnan, and Ben Kingsley. Now is your chance to stream every season of 'Outlander' again (or check it out for the first time) before the eighth season comes out next year. Watch "Outlander" season 7 on Netflix or find more of the best Netflix shows to tide you over in the meantime. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

Is Meghan Markle's New Netflix Deal a Win For Her?
Is Meghan Markle's New Netflix Deal a Win For Her?

Newsweek

time27 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Is Meghan Markle's New Netflix Deal a Win For Her?

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have signed a new Netflix deal on different terms, sparking a debate about whether it represents a victory or a loss for the couple. The Duchess of Sussex is preparing to drop the second season of her cooking show With Love, Meghan later in August. And she was this week able to shoot down media rumors that Netflix were going to dump her with the announcement of a new multi-year contract. Meghan Markle during filming of With Love, Meghan season one which was released by Netflix in March 2025. Meghan Markle during filming of With Love, Meghan season one which was released by Netflix in March 2025. Courtesy of Netflix © 2025 Why It Matters The couple's first Netflix deal, signed in September 2020, was worth a reported $100m and covered all projects produced over a five-year period. Its 2022 documentary Harry & Meghan retold the story of their move to the U.S., including their perspective on the royal rift and remains the streamer's most-watched documentary debut. The new arrangement is a "first-look deal" that gives Netflix first refusal on new projects. Some argue securing a second deal is for the couple a win in itself, after press reports suggesting the two sides were parting company. But while its financial terms have not been disclosed, the latest agreement is thought to be considerably less lucrative than the first, leading some to see it as a downgrade. What to Know Meghan said that she and Harry were extending their deal for films and TV shows with Netflix on Monday, saying the couple were inspired to "create thoughtful content across genres that resonates globally, and celebrates our shared vision." U.K. brand and culture expert Nick Ede, who predicted in July that a first-look deal would be the likely outcome of negotiations, said after Monday's announcement: "I see it as a win for Meghan and for Harry to have Netflix, it's still one of the biggest outputters of entertainment, still backing them in this way. "They're still going to have some of their office costs paid for and development costs paid for," he told Newsweek. Alongside the new deal, Meghan and Harry were able to announce a holiday special for With Love, due for release in December, as well as a new documentary, Masaka Kids, A Rhythm Within. The latter is based around an orphanage in Masaka, Uganda, home to what a press release calls "a vibrant, one-of-a-kind community where orphaned children transform hardship into joy, dancing their way toward healing, belonging, and the promise of a brighter future." It is due out later in 2025. Netflix is also an equity partner in Meghan's online shop, As Ever, which sells wine and products like jam, tea and honey featured in her cooking show. "We've got the second season of With Love, Meghan to come out, and we've got the Christmas special and Netflix have got the investment in the actual brand itself," Ede said. "So I don't think this is a fail. It's almost a bit like a natural progression. We know there's no more room for a kiss and tell. "That's what they did at the beginning, that's how they dangled the carrot and why Netflix bit. They haven't got that richness of content to talk about the royal family anymore so of course it's not going to be so fruitful for them anymore but it's a good outcome." While Harry & Meghan was hugely commercially successful, it was criticized for retreading the same ground covered in the couple's exclusive Oprah Winfrey interview, prompting Variety to run the headline: "It's Well Past Time for Harry and Meghan 2.0." Other projects since have been far less controversial—and have not gained the same viewer numbers. The first-look deal reflects the reality that second time around, the couple are unlikely to land a commercial mega-hit of royal bombshell proportions, which would explain why Netflix will not be paying them huge yearly sums, but rather funding specific ideas they consider to be worth the money. And Meghan and Harry have swerved the reputational injury that losing Netflix as a partner would have represented, although Ede argues the pressure is still on to produce great content. "Archewell is... a production company which has big salaries for big people in there who have come up with lots of ideas and... many of those ideas haven't seen the light of day," he said. "It's really important to show some more success, and to work out what success looks like and create content that people really want to see." He pointed to the example of Barak and Michelle Obama, who pivoted to producing shows that were not about their lives, such as 2023 series Leave the World Behind, starring Mahershala Ali, Julia Roberts, Kevin Bacon and Ethan Hawke. "That's what Archewell need to do," said Ede. What People Are Saying Former BBC royal correspondent Jenny Bond, asked whether the Netflix deal was like a phoenix emerging from the ashes for Meghan, replied: "We have to accept that it is us, the media, who created those ashes. There was no statement from Harry and Meghan, no indication at any point, but we all decided that the Netflix deal was dead in the water, so it's one in the eye for all her detractors. "They have won," she added. "Meghan has won and we have to eat humble pie." Eric Schiffer, chairman of Reputation Management Consultants, told Newsweek Meghan's lifestyle rebrand was like a "manufactured Martha Stewart and fans and those that are watching for the first time will cringe. Netflix is about data and the data from what I understand is not good." PR expert Mark Borkowski told the Daily Mail: "Netflix has done a very neat job of pivoting away from two very expensive people who didn't deliver, and they've taken that deal off the table, and they've given them a modest one. "It's not like they're gradually uncoupling—it's a downgrade. Netflix are not going to expose themselves to those budgets again." U.K. satirical show Have I Got News for You posted on X: "Netflix have signed a new deal that gives them 'first refusal' on Harry and Meghan's show ideas, frustrating rival streamers who wanted to have the rights to say no first." Jennie Bond (UK royal expert) : You talk about ashes but I think we have to accept that it is us the media who CREATE THOSE Ashes, There was not statement from Harry and Meghan and no indication at any point but we all decided that the Netflix deal was dead in the water . I... — DejaHudson( Sussex squad)(H&M) 🇧🇸🇧🇸🇧🇸 (@ChanteHudson4) August 12, 2025 What Happens Next Season two of With Love, Meghan is expected to drop later in August, while a holiday special is expected at Christmas. Jack Royston is chief royal correspondent for Newsweek, based in London. You can find him on X, formerly Twitter, at @jack_royston and read his stories on Newsweek's The Royals Facebook page. Do you have a question about Charles and Queen Camilla, William and Kate, Meghan Markle and Harry, or their family that you would like our experienced royal correspondents to answer? Email royals@ We'd love to hear from you.

Meghan Markle Makes a Prince Harry Confession in 'With Love, Meghan' Trailer That Sparked the Reaction, ‘And You Married Him?'
Meghan Markle Makes a Prince Harry Confession in 'With Love, Meghan' Trailer That Sparked the Reaction, ‘And You Married Him?'

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Meghan Markle Makes a Prince Harry Confession in 'With Love, Meghan' Trailer That Sparked the Reaction, ‘And You Married Him?'

NEED TO KNOW Meghan Markle talked about her husband, Prince Harry, in the new trailer for the next season of With Love, Meghan The Duchess of Sussex revealed what food Harry isn't into while chatting with chef José Andrés Season 2 of the show will premiere on Aug. 26Meghan Markle is spilling the beans on what food Prince Harry isn't into. On Aug. 12, the Duchess of Sussex, 44, shared the detail in the first official trailer for season two of her lifestyle series With Love, Meghan on Netflix. As seen in the sneak peek, Meghan revealed the seafood that her husband of seven years isn't interested in while in the kitchen with chef José Andrés. "You know who doesn't like lobster? My husband," the Duchess of Sussex said about Prince Harry, 40. "And you married him anyway?" Andrés joked in reply. Meghan previously revealed that the celebrity chef would be a guest on the next season of With Love, which PEOPLE exclusively confirmed would return to Netflix for a second season this fall. Meghan's admission that Harry doesn't like lobster follows her previous insight to PEOPLE about the foods her family loves. "My husband and Archie both love fried eggs," she said about Prince Harry and their 6-year-old son, Prince Archie. "There's a lot of bacon around here. And then sometimes you don't have time for all that, and you just put a frozen waffle in the toaster and call it a day. And there's no shame in that either." Can't get enough of PEOPLE's Royals coverage? to get the latest updates on Kate Middleton, Meghan Markle and more! The new trailer revealed that season two will premiere on Tuesday, Aug. 26, and welcome many new guests as well as a returning cameo. The second season of With Love, Meghan will feature appearances from Chrissy Teigen, Tan France, David Chang, Samin Nosrat, Christina Tosi, Clare Smyth, Jay Shetty and Radhi Devlukia. Meghan's friends Heather Dorak and Jamie Kern Lima also join, while her longtime friend and makeup artist Daniel Martin makes a return after appearing in season one. Read the original article on People

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store