Carney faces questions about US trade war, federal budget on his first day in House of Commons
Conservative House leader Andrew Scheer welcomed Carney to the House before launching into a question about Canada's response to U.S. tariffs.
"This is where democracy lives, and this is where we provide rigorous scrutiny on every word he says and every dollar he spends," Scheer said.
While Carney defended his government's response to U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs, Scheer accused him of falling into "old Liberal habits of not being able to answer questions."
Scheer pressed Carney on his decision not to table a budget until after the summer. In reply, the prime minister shot back that Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre's 100-day plan during the election campaign also didn't include plans to table a budget — and referred to Poilievre as the "former" MP for Carleton.
Poilievre was absent from the House of Commons Wednesday for the first time in two decades after failing to win re-election in his riding. He did not sit in the gallery to watch question period.
Bruce Fanjoy, the new Liberal MP who handed Poilievre his first electoral defeat in more than two decades, was given a rousing standing ovation from his Liberal colleagues when he rose to deliver his first member's statement in the House just before question period started.
Prime Minister Mark Carney fielded questions about the trade war with the United States and his decision to delay the federal budget to the fall as he faced his first ever grilling in question period in the House of Commons Wednesday.
Bloc Québécois leader Yves-François Blanchet, also went at Carney over tariffs, pointing out in a question that Tuesday's throne speech made no mention of trade or tariffs. In response, Carney pointed out that Blanchet didn't attend the speech, which was delivered by King Charles.
In all, Carney took nine questions in both languages in his first question period.
Carney has chosen to depart from his predecessor Justin Trudeau's practice of taking every question on Wednesdays.
Trump, trade and Canada's sovereignty were also front and centre as the Liberal caucus met on Parliament Hill Wednesday morning.
On Tuesday, hours after the King presented the speech from the throne in Ottawa — which included several lines asserting Canada's sovereignty — Trump said in a post on his Truth Social account that it would cost Canada $61 billion to join the planned "Golden Dome" missile defence program, or nothing at all if it joins the United States.
"Oh my God, he's got to give that stuff up. Never going to happen," Liberal MP Darren Fisher said on his way into the Liberal caucus meeting Wednesday morning.
"I take my lead from the people that I speak to in my community and across the country, and it's very clear that people want us to stand up for Canada's sovereignty," Justice Minister Sean Fraser told reporters.
"Obviously, we want to partner with the United States where possible, but we do have to stand up for Canada's interest economically and … from the sovereignty point of view."
Parliament got back to work Wednesday with a new Speaker, a new prime minister and plenty of new faces in the House of Commons.
Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia's office has confirmed that all 343 members of Parliament have now been sworn in.
Roughly a third of those MPs, including Carney, were elected for the first time in April.
Liberal House leader Steven MacKinnon told reporters six consecutive days have been set aside for debate on the throne speech before the government begins to table legislation. He did not say how many bills could be tabled during this short session.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Tom Mulcair: The government's back-to-work order was Carney's first major blunder
CTV News political commentator Tom Mulcair says the Carney government's back to work order is 'one of the worst messes' they've made since being elected. Tom Mulcair is a former leader of the federal New Democratic Party of Canada between 2012 and 2017, and a columnist for Prime Minister Mark Carney got burned in the Air Canada debacle, and it's his government's first real failure. Carney was understated in expressing his frustration when it became clear that the union representing flight attendants would defy an order to end their strike, saying simply that he was 'disappointed.' It was telling that he didn't try to put blame on the union. He understands that the nature of labour relations, like any relationship, is that there are two sides. Carney was warning his ministers and in particular his jobs minister, Patty Hajdu, that he expected better of them. It's a warning they should heed. Air Canada has had it far too easy since it ceased being a Crown corporation. It gets to play the big private corporation while at the same time relying on a historically cozy relationship with Ottawa to always get its way. The instantaneous back-to-work ruling by the Canada Industrial Relations Board drew attention to its new head, lawyer Maryse Tremblay. She was appointed within days of Carney's election victory. She is a highly regarded jurist, but her resumé includes long stints as an attorney for Air Canada. Not only must justice be done; justice must be seen to be done and the union cried foul. This one blew up in Ottawa's face and it will be a good thing for all Canadian travellers if the normal rules of the game start applying to Air Canada. A level playing field can lead to more competition and better prices for air travellers across this vast country of ours. When Air Canada was privatized, the rules were set down in a law adopted by Parliament. Air Canada broke that law. I remember vividly when, in 2016, shortly after coming to power, Justin Trudeau's Liberals brought in legislation to let Air Canada off the hook. They changed the rules retroactively. It was galling and so egregious that it resulted in a rare tie vote in the House of Commons but would nonetheless later pass into law. In 2015, the Quebec Court of Appeal had ruled that Air Canada had violated the Air Canada Public Participation Act because it had failed to maintain overhaul centres in Winnipeg, Montreal and Mississauga after the shutdown of Aveos, a company that Air Canada had spun off. Then, in 2016, the Liberal government introduced Bill C-10, which amended that Air Canada law retroactively. The wording applied 'as if it had always read this way,' meaning Air Canada's illegal actions were made legal retroactively. Talk about power and influence. You get caught breaking the law but you convince the lawmakers to change the rules to erase the offence. It's that sense of entitlement at Air Canada that again was on display this week: 'Nothing to worry about here, we're Air Canada and we always get our way.' Then something happened. National CUPE president Mark Hancock tore up the back-to-work order. I know Hancock and he's anything but a hothead or a showboat. He's honest, deliberative and a straight shooter. He also knows right from wrong and sensed in his gut, correctly, that Canadians were on the side of the flight attendants. Taking stock of the shambles his government had made of the situation, Carney's team used all of their influence to get everyone back to the bargaining table. Lo and behold, it only took a night of serious, good faith bargaining to settle the outstanding issues, including unpaid work. But that's little solace to the tens of thousands of travellers who remain stuck as a result of this mess. Carney is a quick study and as he and his closest advisors take the full measure of this debacle, there are important lessons to be learned. The first is that labour rights are Charter rights. During the election campaign, Carney would often be asked if the federal government would weigh in against discriminatory Quebec legislation before the Supreme Court. He had a ready-made answer: The Liberals are the party of the Charter. The Canadian Supreme Court, in a series of rulings, has made unionization and collective bargaining an offshoot of freedom of association and expression, guaranteed by the Charter. With some exceptions, that includes the right to withhold your services, to strike. The second big lesson learned is that you need unions and other social partners on side to carry out the sort of massive restructuring of the federal government that is required after nine years of bureaucracy under Trudeau. No social peace, no changes. Carney has said time and again that he ran to accomplish big things for Canada. So far, Canadians believe him and accord him their support and confidence. That can change very quickly and the debris field left by the Air Canada wreck should be a lesson in humility for his team. More from Tom Mulcair:
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Hodgson ‘hopeful' first batch of major projects announcements to start in fall
OTTAWA – Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson says he's 'hopeful' that the government will start announcing major infrastructure project approvals in the fall. In an interview with The Canadian Press, Hodgson says the federal government has been busy consulting with stakeholders over the summer and has been quietly getting a new major projects office set up to deal with companies hoping to build large-scale projects. Parliament's fall sitting is scheduled to run from Sept. 15 to Dec. 12 — but Hodgson says Prime Minster Mark Carney 'doesn't like sitting around' and that the government intends to move quickly. He says the federal government 'would prefer sooner rather than later' and insists that 'it will be in the fall' that announcements will start happening. It's been seven weeks since the Liberal government rushed Bill C-5, the Building Canada Act, through Parliament in June, which lets Ottawa quickly approve major projects it considers to be in the national interest. Carney has said the office that will deal with these large-scale industrial projects should be stood up and fully running by Labour Day, though the government has so far made few details about this new office public. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 20, 2025.
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
James Moore: Pierre Poilievre and an effective Opposition
James Moore is a former federal cabinet minister under prime minister Stephen Harper, and a columnist for Pierre Poilievre is back as a member of Parliament and as the leader of His Majesty's Loyal Opposition, and all Canadians will benefit from an energized, humbled and refocussed official Opposition. ADVERTISEMENT It has been over five months since Mark Carney became Canada's 24th prime minister and while he has faced enormous challenges – principally President Trump, but also the weight and complexity of standing up his own government – he hasn't faced any real opposition. That holiday is over. And the and the country will be better for it. A smooth honeymoon so far for Carney Since the 14th of March, when he was sworn in as prime minister, Mr. Carney has enjoyed a relatively smooth honeymoon – though I imagine many in his government would disagree. But, certainly compared to other new prime ministers through the sweep of Canadian history, he has had an open field in front of him and little to no significant obstacles to entangle his government. This comfort is useful for a new prime minister dealing with the current White House and all its associated challenges, but it doesn't serve Canadians well. Stephen Harper and Danny Williams Prime Minister Stephen Harper, left, and Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Danny Williams wait for their introduction at a ceremony in Gander, N.L. on Wednesday, April 12, 2006. (CP PHOTO/Andrew Vaughan) In my lifetime, I don't think there has been greater serenity between the Prime Minister of Canada and our 13 premiers. Stephen Harper had open ugly hostility from Premier Danny Williams of Newfoundland and Labrador that was a significant distraction for the government in the whole region of Atlantic Canada. He had Ontario Liberal Premier Dalton McGuinty leading a large majority government who was often not aligned on major priorities. Prime Minister Chretien had it significantly worse with Premiers Parizeau and later Bouchard in Quebec and the national unity crisis that reached its apex moment on Oct. 30th, 1995, with a referendum that nearly saw Canada permanently broken apart. Ralph Klein, Jean Chretien Alberta Premier Ralph Klein prepares to meet with Prime Minister Jean Chretien and his provincial and territorial counterparts to discuss Canada's health system in Ottawa Wednesday, February 5, 2003. Shown in the background are Ontario Premier Ernie Eves, Chretien chatting with Quebec Premier Bernard Landry (left to right). (CP PHOTO/Fred Chartrand) And, to his west, Prime Minister Chretien had Alberta Premier Ralph Klein (and the Reform Party movement behind him) that clashed with him regularly – particularly over health transfer cuts to provinces from Ottawa and Alberta's approach to delivering health services. Our history books are filled with examples of fed-prov tensions that have shaped Canada; think Peter Lougheed and Pierre Trudeau, Brian Mulroney and Clyde Wells, the list is long. Throughout Canadian history, governing effectively through the incoming fire of hostile premiers in one form or another is the normal reality, but not yet for Prime Minister Carney. To a large degree it is easy to understand why there is so much political peace at the moment. Canadians want to see solidarity by our political leaders in the face of the economic threats of President Trump. 'Elbows Up' and working together, and First Ministers Meetings, and consultations, and joint statements, and press conferences about putting Canada first and working together, that is order of the day and hope of Canadians in these stressful times. Even our big city mayors have all holstered their political weapons and aligned with Prime Minister Carney in the hope that collaboration will yield more meaningful outcomes for their cities and to avoid the accusation of rocking the 'must unite for Canada' ship in any way. Business & labour holding back Further, most business and labour organizations across the country are all holding back from any aggressive criticism of Prime Minister Carney in anticipation of the coming federal budget, which could be a watershed moment in Canadian politics and governance given the dynamic with the United States and the high expectations due to Prime Minister Carney's resume. The only significant opposition we have seen thus far has come from some First Nations and environmental voices related to Bill C-5, the 'One Canadian Economy Act.' And while the arguments in opposition to C-5 were loud, they have not had any negative impact on Prime Minister Carney's standing in public opinion. But the absence of a robust and thoughtful opposition to the government is bad for both the government and the country. The challenge function to our government has been absent for too long. Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, left, and Liberal Leader Mark Carney participate in the English-language federal leaders' debate in Montreal, Thursday, April 17, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld Since the election in April, there has been a holiday from the historic norm of an effective opposition. The NDP doesn't have party status or any announced leadership candidates making noise on the issues, the Bloc Quebecois have their usual regional mandate and an eye trained on the fall 2026 provincial election and what its fallout portends, and the Conservatives have been holding still until Pierre Poilievre secured his by-election win. When the House of Commons resumes, and the Speaker of the House begins the first question period by rising to his feed and nodding to the member of Parliament for Battle River-Crowfoot and saying 'Oral Questions, the Honourable Leader of His Majesty's Loyal Opposition,' at that moment, Prime Minister Carney will enter a new and unfamiliar theatre of quick clips, sharp rhetoric and tough questions like he has not yet seen. He may well thrive in the environment, time will tell. But it can certainly be said with confidence that Canadians will be better for the accountability. The deference the prime minister has been afforded has politically served him well up to now. But the accountability, questions and real pressure are now going to pour in. This will yield better government over time, accountability and a clear contrast between two leaders for Canadians to choose from whenever the next election may come. More from James Moore:
