logo
Social boycott of SCs ends as both sides reach peace in Andhra

Social boycott of SCs ends as both sides reach peace in Andhra

KAKINADA: A social boycott against the Scheduled Caste (SC) community has ended with both sides agreeing to cooperate and live peacefully in Mallam village of Pithapuram Assembly constituency in Kakinada district on Monday.
The two groups reached an understanding through a six-point formula, including the unanimous withdrawal of a social boycott. A peace committee has been constituted by the Kakinada Collector to resolve tensions between upper-caste and Dalit communities.
Collector S Shan Mohan said that the Kakinada RDO, Pithapuram tahsildar, circle inspector, and social welfare officer visited the village, spoke to both communities, and facilitated the formation of the committee.
The committee comprises six members from the SC community and five from the upper community. The committee warned that cases would be filed against outsiders trying to incite hatred through social media. The members also stated that they would resolve future issues peacefully in the presence of officials. They agreed not to resort to any social boycott.
Meanwhile, CPI leader T Madhu visited the village and demanded that Deputy CM Pawan Kalyan visit and announce compensation for Pallapu Sureshbabu, a Dalit man who died by electrocution on April 16 while working at a house of an upper-caste family.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BJP's counter to Rahul Gandhi's ‘Vote Chori' charge - ‘Sonia Gandhi was on electoral rolls before Indian citizenship'
BJP's counter to Rahul Gandhi's ‘Vote Chori' charge - ‘Sonia Gandhi was on electoral rolls before Indian citizenship'

Mint

time2 hours ago

  • Mint

BJP's counter to Rahul Gandhi's ‘Vote Chori' charge - ‘Sonia Gandhi was on electoral rolls before Indian citizenship'

The Bharatiya Janata Party launched a counterattack on the Congress party on Wednesday by claiming that the former Congress chief Sonia Gandhi had been illegally, though briefly, added to the voter list 45 years ago, before she was an Indian citizen. Former Union Minister Anurag Thakur claimed Gandhi—born Sonia Maino in Italy in 1946 — was added to the list from 1980 to 1982, a year before she became an Indian citizen, NDTV reported. The allegation comes amid 'vote chori' charges by Rahul Gandhi, accusing the Election Commission of India of colluding with the BJP Thakur's allegations were first shared by BJP IT Cell chief Amit Malviya, who had posted on X hours earlier. Sharing a 'photocopy of what appeared to be an extract from electoral rolls of 1980, indicating Sonia Gandhi was a voter when she did not yet acquire the citizenship of Bharat'. "If this isn't blatant electoral malpractice, what is?" Malviya claimed Gandhi, who married Rajiv Gandhi in 1968, had been added to the voter list while the Gandhi family lived at the official residence of then-Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. In response, Congress leader Tariq Anwar told NDTV that Sonia Gandhi had not asked for her name to be included in the voter roll. Anwar said that it was the poll body officials of the time who did so. "See... the Election Commission is responsible. Sonia Gandhi did not say 'my name should be included in the voter registration list'. In the end it was the Election Commission that included her...," he said. Anwar said, Gandhi never made a request to be added to the voter list. The BJP also alleged Congress defeated Bhimrao Ambedkar, regarded as the father of the Indian Constitution, in the 1952 general election through electoral fraud. If we start from 1952, Congress and CPI together defeated Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar, a constitution maker and a saint-like leader, in the election. Congress laid the foundation of electoral corruption in the very first election of 1952," BJP MP Anurag Thakur said at a press conference held in the party's headquarters here. "Check the records: 74,333 votes were rejected, while Ambedkar ji lost by just 14,561 votes. Congress ensured that a constitution maker, a Dalit leader, was eliminated in the very first election. Imagine, the one who created the constitution was defeated by the Congress family through electoral fraud," he added. Sonia Gandhi did not say 'my name should be included in the voter registration list'. The BJP MP alleged that Rahul Gandhi and his family had a history of questioning the Election Commission when they lost elections. "This family and party have had a tradition from the beginning that if you lose an election, you raise questions about the Election Commission, the voters, or the functioning of the Election Commission. Indira Gandhi had said, Voters are a bunch of fools. When Rajiv Gandhi lost the election, he blamed the ballot paper. Rahul Gandhi's father used to say, conduct elections with voting machines, and Rahul Gandhi says, conduct elections with ballot papers," he said.

Shashi Tharoor joins stray dog debate following SC order, flags 'unwillingness of municipalities to neutering' canines
Shashi Tharoor joins stray dog debate following SC order, flags 'unwillingness of municipalities to neutering' canines

Mint

time2 hours ago

  • Mint

Shashi Tharoor joins stray dog debate following SC order, flags 'unwillingness of municipalities to neutering' canines

Congress leader Shashi Tharoor weighed in on the stray dog debate following the Supreme Court order, stating that that the 'flaw in our system is not lack of resources, but the unwillingness or inability of municipalities to perform the task of rounding up and neutering stray dogs, even when funds have been provided.' Shashi Tharoor's comments come after the Supreme Court on Monday, directed Delhi authorities to remove stray dogs from localities and house them in shelters due to increasing dog bite incidents. "This is a thoughtful response to the problem that is affecting ordinary citizens in every city. We need to protect humans while being humane to dogs. But one point no one mentions is that the flaw in our system is not lack of resources, but the unwillingness or inability of municipalities to perform the task of rounding up and neutering stray dogs, even when funds have been provided. These funds are never actually spent where needed — in making the arrangements that the SC, in understandable exasperation, has now decreed. Perhaps the funds should instead be allotted to Animal Welfare groups and sincere NGOs with a track record of sheltering animals? They are more likely to implement the ABC programme than the municipalities are," Tharoor posted on X. Calling the stray dog situation in the city "extremely grim," the Supreme Court on Monday ordered the Delhi government and municipal bodies to begin removing stray dogs from all local areas without delay and house them in designated dog shelters. A bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan directed Delhi authorities to set up shelters for about 5,000 dogs within six to eight weeks, to be expanded in phases. The court also warned that anyone obstructing the relocation drive — whether individuals or organisations — could face contempt proceedings. (This is a developing story. Keep checking for more updates)

‘When Paris removed stray dogs': What happened in the French capital in the 1880s?
‘When Paris removed stray dogs': What happened in the French capital in the 1880s?

First Post

time2 hours ago

  • First Post

‘When Paris removed stray dogs': What happened in the French capital in the 1880s?

The Supreme Court's order to remove stray dogs from the streets of Delhi and NCR has sparked major outrage in the country. BJP leader and animal rights activist Maneka Gandhi has called the directive 'impractical' and claimed that when Paris got rid of its strays in the 1880s, it had to face a rodent problem. Here's what happened A local resident walks her dogs past War propoganda posters in the Montmarte district in Paris on March 25, 2020. File Photo/Reuters The Supreme Court's recent ruling on the immediate removal of stray dogs from Delhi and the National Capital Region (NCR) has sparked a huge debate in the country. It has pitted public safety advocates against dog lovers who see the order as 'cruel'. The directive has garnered reactions from various quarters, including politicians. While some have hailed the top court's directive, others found it 'inhumane'. Former Union minister and animal rights activist Maneka Gandhi has described the order as 'impractical', 'financially unviable' and 'potentially harmful' to the region's ecological balance. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD She also brought up the example of Paris, which she said faced a rat problem after getting rid of the canines from its streets in the 1880s. Let's take a closer look. Supreme Court's stray dogs order The Supreme Court on Monday (August 11) ordered the Delhi government, civic bodies and authorities of Noida, Gurgaon, and Ghaziabad to start picking up stray dogs and relocate them to shelters. A bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan said that dog shelters have to be set up to accommodate around 5,000 stray dogs, which should be sterilised and immunised. The apex court gave authorities eight weeks to create the facilities and install CCTV monitoring to ensure no animals are released back onto the streets. It also warned that any person or organisation that obstructs the move will face strict action. The bench also refused to consider petitions from dog lovers or any other party on the issue. The order came amid a rise in dog bites and cases of rabies. However, it has divided the country, with many animal lovers criticising the ruling. Both Gandhi families have spoken against the Supreme Court's directive to remove the stray dogs. 'The SC's directive to remove all stray dogs from Delhi-NCR is a step back from decades of humane, science-backed policy. These voiceless souls are not 'problems' to be erased. Shelters, sterilisation, vaccination & community care can keep streets safe - without cruelty. Blanket removals are cruel, shortsighted, and strip us of compassion,' Congress MP Rahul Gandhi wrote in a post on X. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He added, 'We can ensure public safety and animal welfare go hand in hand.' The SC's directive to remove all stray dogs from Delhi-NCR is a step back from decades of humane, science-backed policy. These voiceless souls are not 'problems' to be erased. Shelters, sterilisation, vaccination & community care can keep streets safe - without cruelty. Blanket… — Rahul Gandhi (@RahulGandhi) August 12, 2025 Animal rights activist Maneka Gandhi warned that removing stray dogs from the streets will create new problems. 'Within 48 hours, three lakh dogs will come from Ghaziabad, Faridabad, because there's food here in Delhi. And once you remove the dogs, monkeys will come on the ground… I've seen this happen at my own house,' she reportedly said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Referring to 1880s Paris, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader stated, 'When they removed dogs and cats, the city was overrun with rats.' She said dogs were 'rodent control animals'. What happened in the 1800s Paris? In the 1800s, stray dogs were frowned upon in Paris, seen as transmitters of rabies, fleas, and dirt. Paris had a large number of strays at the time, with the administration considering them a threat to cleanliness, health, and safety. According to a research paper titled Stray Dogs and the Making of Modern Paris, shared by The University of Liverpool Repository, in 1883, pharmacist Emile Capron backed the removal of stray dogs from the streets of Paris, claiming that 'the infinite number of these awful mutts' spread rabies. She also blamed them for scaring horses and pedestrians, which resulted in traffic accidents. 'As Capron's remarks suggest, many commentators treated strays as dangerously mobile nuisances that hindered the movement, and threatened the health, of the city's productive human and nonhuman inhabitants. Strays contributed to the sense that Paris was a pathological city plagued by crime, filth, and insecurity, and elite commentators treated them as members of the city's criminal, dirty and uprooted 'dangerous classes,'" Chris Pearson wrote in the paper. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD To ensure 'public safety', many stray dogs were allegedly culled. As Paris moved towards becoming modern, 'Parisian public hygienists and authorities turned strays into a problem that they would solve to make the city safe, clean and modern,' Pearson wrote. As per some accounts, the killing of strays led to a surge in the population of rats in the French city. ALSO READ: With nearly 10 lakh stray dogs, how will Delhi implement the Supreme Court order? When Parisians ate dogs, cats, rats During the Siege of Paris (the Franco-Prussian War between 1870-1871), the allied German forces surrounded Paris and cut off most of the food shipments to the French capital. Amid food shortages, Parisians resorted to eating rats, cats, dogs, and even horses. On November 12, 1870, a stall on the Rue Rochechouart street sold several animals. 'On the right side of the stall was several large dogs, neatly dressed … next to these are several large cats, also very neatly dressed … On the left of the stall there is a dozen or more of rats stretched upon a tray, and a young woman, half veiled, is timidly approaching them with a little girl at her side. She wishes to inquire the price of the rats, and, if she has money enough, to purchase one,' Robert Lowry Sibbet, an American doctor who was trapped in Paris during the siege, wrote in the book The Siege of Paris by an American Eye-Witness, published in 1892. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store