Taliban says will not allow any force to use Afghan territory against China
The Taliban interim government of Afghanistan on Wednesday assured Beijing that it will not allow 'any force' to use country's territory against China.
The Afghan side attaches great importance to China's security concerns and will never allow any force to use Afghan territory to engage in activities that harm China, Afghanistan's Acting Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi told top Chinese diplomat Wang Yi during their meeting here.
Afghanistan is willing to strengthen cooperation with China in the security field, combat violent crimes, safeguard China's interests in Afghanistan, and jointly maintain regional security and stability, Muttaqi told Wang, a Chinese Foreign Ministry press release here said.
Muttaqi, who also attended an informal tripartite meeting of the foreign ministers of China, Pakistan and Afghanistan on Wednesday, met Wang separately and discussed bilateral issues.
China was one of the early countries to continue diplomatic relations with Taliban government after it captured power in 2021.
Afghanistan shares a narrow strip of territory called Wakhan corridor connecting Afghanistan's Badakhshan province with China's volatile Xinjiang province where Beijing has launched a crackdown on the East Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM), which allegedly maintains links with the Islamic State and Al-Qaida.
Muttaqi told Wang that the Afghan interim government values the traditional friendship with China and places Beijing in an important position in its foreign policy.
The Afghan government will continue to firmly abide by the one-China principle and oppose interference in China's internal affairs, he said.
Wang, also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party, welcomed Muttaqi's visit to China on the occasion of the 70th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and Afghanistan.
China respects Afghanistan's independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity, as well as the independent choices made by the Afghan people, Wang said, noting that China will, as always, support the government of Afghanistan in achieving long-term peace and stability in the country at an early date.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Staying the course on trade pacts with the UK and US
The uncertainty unleashed by Donald Trump's tariffs has only been aggravated by a spate of recent court rulings. On May 28, the US Court of International Trade struck down Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs, saying that the emergency law (International Emergency Economic Powers Act) does not give the President the power to impose broad tariffs. However, a day later, a federal appeals court temporarily reinstated the tariffs. The case is now likely to work its way through the US legal system. The uncertainty is likely to linger on as the 90-day pause on the Liberation Day tariffs ends in the second week of July. The Trump administration may have hoped that some trade deals would be quickly negotiated. And while the US and the UK have reached an agreement — the deal was announced on May 8th — progress with other major trading nations/blocks remains a protracted process. Take the case of China. A few days ago, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is reported to have said that trade talks between the US and China 'are a bit stalled'. Last Friday, Trump said that China has 'totally violated' its agreement with the US, a charge that China has rejected. The US President is expected to speak to Chinese President Xi Jinping this week to iron out their differences. In the case of Japan, several rounds of talks have taken place, and another is expected before the G7 summit. But last Friday, the legal challenges to his tariffs notwithstanding, Trump also raised the tariffs on steel and aluminium to 50 per cent, potentially impacting countries such as Canada, Mexico and South Korea, which account for a sizeable share of US steel imports. A day later, the European Union, which had agreed to 'accelerate talks' on a US trade deal, has also responded firmly, saying it is prepared to impose 'countermeasures' against the US. It noted that such moves to increase tariffs 'undermine ongoing efforts to reach a negotiated solution'. The new tariffs are effective from June 4. These latest tariff moves come at a time when India and the US are negotiating a bilateral trade deal. A US team is expected to visit India over the coming few days. On Monday, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, speaking in Washington at the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum's leadership summit, said that a deal between the US and India could happen in the 'not too distant future'. The India-EU trade deal also appears to be on course. As per a report, the two sides have agreed on several chapters, and the pact could be concluded before the end of the year. Coming after the finalisation of the India-UK agreement, the successful culmination of these deals would increase the country's attractiveness as an investment destination.
Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
China's Top Diplomat Urges US to Put Relations on ‘Right Track'
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi used his first meeting with new US Ambassador David Perdue to complain about recent actions by Washington, underscoring a downturn in relations between the world's two biggest economies. 'Unfortunately, the US has recently introduced a series of negative measures on unfounded grounds, undermining China's legitimate rights and interests,' Wang said during the sitdown in Beijing, according to a Chinese government statement. He called on the US to 'create the necessary conditions for China-US relations to return to the right track.' Perdue said in a post on X that he raised the Trump administration's 'priorities on trade, fentanyl and illegal immigration,' and that communications was 'vital' to the two sides' ties. Wang's comments come after China accused the US of violating a trade deal reached in Geneva, saying Washington had introduced new discriminatory restrictions, including guidelines on AI chip export controls, curbs on chip design software sales to the Asian nation and plans to revoke Chinese student visas. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer last week accused Beijing of failing to comply with elements of that agreement, complaining that China had not sped up exports of critical minerals needed for cutting-edge electronics. President Donald Trump expressed confidence a talk with Chinese leader Xi Jinping could ease trade tensions, although it's unclear that such a call is being arranged. Perdue arrived in Beijing in mid-May with the expectation that he'll use his close relationship with Trump to reopen key communication channels in the difficult China-US relationship. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
C Raja Mohan writes: New America, churn in Asia and India's path
Two recent developments to India's east offer insights into the rapidly shifting contours of Asian geopolitics. The first was the annual Shangri-La Dialogue (SLD) in Singapore, where US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth outlined the administration's priorities for Asia. French President Emmanuel Macron's keynote address offered a European perspective on Asian security that diverged from Washington's in key respects. The second was South Korea's presidential election, where the likely victory of left-leaning candidate Lee Jae-myung could reshape not only Korea's political trajectory but also the strategic dynamics of Northeast Asia. More broadly, South Korea's political churn reflects the growing dilemmas across Asia in responding to an assertive China and an increasingly unpredictable US. As expected, US-China relations dominated discussions at the SLD. The absence of China's defence minister underscored the current crisis in bilateral ties. The SLD historically served as a valuable platform for US-China dialogue on regional security. Much of Asia was eager to hear from Hegseth about the Trump administration's strategic intentions. Many countries remain caught in the crossfire of President Donald Trump's trade wars and were watching closely to see if Washington would uphold traditional alliances or, as in Europe, move to dismantle them. Hegseth, however, steered clear of economics, saying his focus was 'tanks, not tariffs'. He had strong words on China's military capabilities and ambitions of annexing Taiwan. Even as Hegseth warned against Chinese hegemony, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced the breakdown of the trade truce with Beijing he had negotiated last month. Asia and the world, which welcomed the relaxation of US-China commercial tensions, must now brace for more turbulence. For those in the region worried about a US-China condominium or a potential G2 arrangement, there was some relief: A strategic alignment isn't imminent. Nor is Washington likely to cede an Asian sphere of influence to Beijing. However, Hegseth reinforced concerns about the risks of an escalating US-China rivalry, economic and geopolitical. On regional security, Hegseth reaffirmed a strong US commitment to alliances and partnerships in Asia. 'No one should doubt America's commitment to our Indo-Pacific allies and partners… We will continue to wrap our arms around our friends and find new ways to work together.' Yet, he made it clear that US support would not be unconditional: He called on allies to shoulder more responsibility, notably by raising their defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP. This is an impossible ask for most Asian nations. Japan has promised to raise it to 2 per cent but is having trouble mobilising the financial resources for it. India, despite a two-front threat from China and Pakistan, spends only about 2 per cent. Asked about NATO's potential role in Asia, Hegseth urged Europe to remain focused on Russia rather than overstretch its resources in the Indo-Pacific. Macron, however, had a different message. He emphasised Europe's stake in Indo-Pacific security and called for new coalitions between Europe and Asian partners. Macron stressed the importance of 'strategic autonomy' and a balanced approach to global power shifts. Kaja Kallas, the EU's High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy, echoed Macron. She argued that the security of Europe and Asia is deeply interconnected. Both were critical of China but avoided overt confrontation, reflecting the nuanced European posture amid the shifting dynamics involving the US, Russia and China. No Asian nation illustrates the impact of domestic politics on foreign policy more vividly than South Korea. The current election, prompted by the fall of conservative President Yoon Suk Yeol, follows a period of political turbulence. The frontrunner, Lee Jae-myung, represents the progressive tradition that seeks a more autonomous foreign policy. Yoon deepened South Korea's alignment with the US and Japan and adopted a tough stance on China and North Korea. Lee, by contrast, promotes 'pragmatic realism' — aimed at repositioning South Korea as a strategic balancer rather than a compliant US ally. While affirming the alliance with Washington, Lee advocates greater autonomy and legislative oversight over South Korea's military involvement in US-led operations, especially concerning Taiwan. This could complicate American contingency planning in the Indo-Pacific. Lee's China policy prioritises economic pragmatism over ideological confrontation. With China absorbing about a quarter of South Korea's exports, Lee seeks to stabilise trade and supply chains, especially in strategic sectors like semiconductors and batteries. Balancing economic ties with China against security expectations from the US will be a delicate act. On North Korea, Lee favours a return to engagement. He supports reopening joint projects like the Kaesong Industrial Complex in exchange for verifiable progress on denuclearisation. A potential diplomatic outreach from Trump — who has promised to re-engage Pyongyang — could provide new opportunities for Lee. On Japan, Lee diverges sharply from Yoon's approach. While supporting trilateral defence initiatives, he insists on historical accountability from Tokyo for its imperial-era abuses. This dual-track approach may resonate domestically but could generate diplomatic friction with Japan and the US, both of which have encouraged Seoul and Tokyo to move past historical disputes. Lee Jae-myung's foreign policy vision represents a significant departure from tradition, aiming to balance strategic autonomy, economic security, and principled diplomacy. His success will depend on managing the deep internal divisions on foreign and security policies, stabilising ties with the US, insulating the economy from US-China tensions, and navigating a complex external environment. Both the SLD and South Korea's political turn underscore the deepening uncertainty in Asian geopolitics, shaped by the tension between alliance building and strategic autonomy, between economic integration and commercial de-risking, and vastly divergent views within Asian polities on dealing with the changing external conditions. For over three decades, India's Asian strategy was premised on great-power harmony, regional stability, economic interdependence and stronger regional institutions. That era may be ending. Delhi must now contend with growing disorder, which demands both stronger national capabilities and enhanced strategic flexibility. (The writer is contributing editor on international affairs for The Indian Express and holds the Korea Chair at the Council on Strategic and Defence Research, Delhi)
