Trump's Tariff Blitz Unleashes Delayed Shock to Global Economy
The World's Data Center Capital Has Residents Surrounded
An Abandoned Art-Deco Landmark in Buffalo Awaits Revival
We Should All Be Biking Along the Beach
Budapest's Most Historic Site Gets a Controversial Rebuild
San Francisco in Talks With Vanderbilt for Downtown Campus
But at an average of 15%, the world is still facing some of the steepest US tariffs since the 1930s, roughly six times higher than they were a year ago. Trump's latest volley outlined minimum 10% baseline levies, with rates of 15% or more for countries with trade surpluses with the US.
So far, the global economy has held up better than many economists expected after Trump's initial tariff blitz. A rush to beat the elevated rates spurred a front-loading of exports, aiding many Asian economies and shielding US consumers from price spikes.
That could all be about to change.
'For the rest of the world, this is a serious demand shock,' Raghuram Rajan, former India central bank governor and chief economist of the International Monetary Fund, who is now a professor at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, told Bloomberg TV on Friday. 'You will see a lot of central banks contemplating cutting as the rest of the world slows somewhat in the face of these tariffs.'
The months of negotiations, marked by Trump's social-media threats against US allies and foes alike, ended with new rates that were largely in line or lower than those on April 2, which were paused after stocks plummeted and bond yields surged. Still, there were some shocks, such as a punitive 39% rate for imports from Switzerland and an increase on some Canadian goods to 35%.
On Friday, Asian shares fell 0.7%, futures on the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 slipped about 0.5% and those for Europe declined 0.6% — all declines that were far more muted than in the aftermath of April 2.
While Trump's new rates provide some certainty to manufacturers, plenty of tariff uncertainty remains. The US president is expected to unveil separate tariffs on imports of pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, critical minerals and other key industrial products in the coming weeks. And US courts are still assessing the legality of the 'reciprocal' tariffs.
The past four months have also shown an increased willingness by Trump to use tariffs to settle geopolitical scores. While the 'Liberation Day' rates followed a crude formula linked broadly to a nation's trade deficit, the ensuing numbers appeared more arbitrary. Trump threatened Brazil over domestic politics, India over its ties with Russia and Canada over plans to recognize a Palestinian state.
If the new levies go ahead in seven days as planned and if deals on car tariffs with the European Union, Japan and South Korea stick, Bloomberg Economics estimates the average US tariff rate will rise to 15.2% from 13.3% — up significantly from just 2.3% before Trump took office.
'It's a very high tariff wall,' said Deborah Elms, head of trade policy of the Hinrich Foundation. 'The cost is going to be significantly higher for American companies and American consumers who will respond surely by buying less.'
Applying model results used by the Federal Reserve in the first trade war, Bloomberg Economics calculates the 12.8-percentage-point hike in the average tariff since Trump came back into office could cut US GDP by 1.8% and lift core prices by 1.1% over a period of two to three years.
That'll create downside risks for exporters that rely on US demand too.
Bloomberg Economics reckon Canada and Mexico, which has an additional 90 days to negotiate, are 'well placed to weather the storm' thanks to carve outs for compliant goods compliant with the USMCA trade deal. The EU, Japan and South Korea — all with 15% rates — also come off better than feared.
Switzerland, by contrast, was hit hard with a tariff of 39% on its products. The Swiss franc edged lower.
Thursday's tariff news didn't apply to China. Trump is set to make a call on whether to extend a tariff truce after talks wrapped in Stockholm this week. A Chinese official earlier said the two sides agreed to keep levies at their current levels for now, part of a trade truce after President Xi Jinping's government cut off the US from rare earth magnets in the wake of the April 2 levies.
Trump did include a provision to impose a 40% additional tariff on goods deemed to be transshipped, a measure that appeared aimed at China, but it lacked clarity on how such a ruling will be made.
'This provides a bit more clarity but there remains substantial uncertainty for manufacturers,' said Jonathan Kearns, Sydney-based chief economist at money manager Challenger Ltd. 'We've seen numerous changes in the US tariff regime to date and there could always be more. Companies will be wary of investing and setting plans while uncertainty remains.'
Kearns, a former central bank official, said he expects greater pass through to the US consumer in the months ahead.
The Trump administration is hoping the new tariff regime will bring in revenue, shrink the trade deficit and spur companies to set up factories on US shores — all without driving up prices or cratering demand.
'Global trade is now being organized around the principles of fair and balanced trade – all pursued in support of countries' economic and national security,' US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer wrote in a statement. 'This new trading system will lower the US trade deficit and lead to better outcomes for American workers, their families, and their communities.'
Still, since Trump's Rose Garden rollout in April, he's faced criticism for over promising on trade deals after he and aides vowed to broker numerous agreements, with at least one pledging '90 deals in 90 days.' Economists are also warning US households will pay a price — with the blow depending on how the burden is split between exporters prepared to eat slimmer margins to retain sales and their US importers.
Fed Dilemma
'Unlike Trade War 1.0, when Chinese exporters and the RMB bore the brunt of the adjustment, this time round since tariffs are universal with minimum rate of 10%, there would likely be some pass-through to the US consumers,' said Selena Ling, an economist at Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. in Singapore. 'This may complicate the picture for the Fed.'
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell this week shrugged off pressure from the White House and rejected arguments for an interest-rate cut from two dissenting officials, maintaining that the central bank needed to stay on guard against inflation risk.
'A reasonable base case is that the effects on inflation could be short-lived, reflecting a one-time shift in the price level, but it is also possible that the inflationary effects could instead be more persistent — and that is a risk to be assessed and managed,' Powell said Wednesday.
Also to be seen is whether the US levies spur more tariff barriers around the globe. While the EU has placed tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and others have mulled similar curbs on cheap Chinese goods, most have eschewed Trump's protectionist push.
'While we haven't returned entirely to a 'law of the jungle' system, we have taken several huge strides back in that direction,' said Stephen Olson, a former US trade negotiator now with the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.
'Don't assume this is the end of the story,' he added. 'Trump regards this as an ongoing reality show. More 'deals' or further tariff increases are almost certain to follow.'
--With assistance from Jennifer A. Dlouhy and Anup Roy.
Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash
Russia Builds a New Web Around Kremlin's Handpicked Super App
Everyone Loves to Hate Wind Power. Scotland Found a Way to Make It Pay Off
It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan
Cage-Free Eggs Are Booming in the US, Despite Cost and Trump's Efforts
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
1 Top Dividend ETF I Can't Wait to Buy More of in August
Key Points The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF holds 100 top dividend stocks. The fund offers a blend of yield and income. It has produced strong total returns over the long term. 10 stocks we like better than Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF › Dividend stocks are powerful investments. They've outperformed nonpayers by more than two to one over the past 50 years. The strongest results come from companies that steadily increase their dividend payments. They've delivered a 10.2% average annualized return, according to Ned Davis Research and Hartford Funds. Invest in Gold American Hartford Gold: #1 Precious Metals Dealer in the Nation Priority Gold: Up to $15k in Free Silver + Zero Account Fees on Qualifying Purchase Thor Metals Group: Best Overall Gold IRA One of the easiest ways to capitalize on this powerful total return potential is to invest in an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that focuses on dividend-paying stocks, such as the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (NYSEMKT: SCHD). Here's why I can't wait to buy more shares of this top dividend ETF this August. High-quality, high-yielding dividend stocks The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF employs a straightforward strategy to invest in dividend-paying stocks. Its goal is to closely track the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. That index aims to measure the performance of 100 top high-quality, high-yielding U.S. dividend stocks. It tracks companies that have consistent records of growing their dividends and strong financial profiles. The index screens for companies based on four dividend quality factors: Cash flow to total debt Return on equity Indicated dividend yield Five-year dividend growth rate These characteristics allow these companies to pay stable, rising dividends. At its annual reconstitution last March, the index's 100 holdings had an average dividend yield of 3.8%, and had increased their payouts at an average annual rate of 8.4% over the past five years. This blend of yield and growth positions the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF to deliver attractive total returns in the future. Cream of the dividend crop The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF is a who's who list of top-tier dividend stocks. Chevron (NYSE: CVX) currently clocks in as its top holding at 4.4% of its net assets. The oil giant has a 4.5% dividend yield, several times higher than the S&P 500's (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) 1.2% yield, and has increased its dividend for 38 consecutive years (and by a peer-leading pace over the past decade). That spans multiple commodity price cycles, demonstrating the durability of its dividend. The oil company backs its high-yielding payout with the lowest production costs in the sector and one of its strongest balance sheets. Meanwhile, it has plenty of fuel to grow its dividend after closing its needle-moving Hess acquisition, which enhances and extends its growth outlook into the 2030s. PepsiCo (NASDAQ: PEP) is another top holding, at 4.2% of the fund's assets. The beverage and snacking giant currently has a 4% dividend yield. It raised its payment by 5% earlier this year, extending its growth streak to 53 years in a row. That keeps it in the elite group of Dividend Kings. The growing demand for its iconic brands, combined with acquisitions such as its recent deal for healthier soda brand Poppi, should support continued dividend growth. Strong returns SCHD's portfolio of high-quality, high-yielding dividend stocks has delivered strong returns for investors. The fund has paid a steadily rising dividend as the companies it holds increase their payouts: The fund's high-yielding and steadily rising payout has really added to its returns over the years. The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF has delivered double-digit annualized total returns over the past five- and 10-year periods, producing an 11.5% annualized total return since its inception in late 2011. The ETF currently offers investors a dividend yield of around 3.8% -- more than three times higher than the S&P 500. This should provide a strong and growing base return as its holdings increase their dividend payments. Meanwhile, growing earnings from the fund's companies should support continued growth in the fund's value. A top-tier dividend ETF The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF holds 100 of the best dividend-paying stocks in the country. These companies pay high-yielding and steadily rising dividends supported by high-quality financial profiles. These features put the fund in a strong position to continue delivering robust returns for investors. That's why I can't wait to buy more shares this month. Should you invest $1,000 in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF right now? Before you buy stock in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $625,254!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,090,257!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,036% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 181% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Matt DiLallo has positions in Chevron, PepsiCo, and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Chevron. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 1 Top Dividend ETF I Can't Wait to Buy More of in August was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (HMC) Reports Production and Sales Report for June 2025
Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (NYSE:HMC) is included in our list of the . Image credit: Wikipedia/Public Domain Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (NYSE:HMC) released its June 2025 production and sales report on July 30, 2025, highlighting both strategic shifts and obstacles. In June 2025, the company's total worldwide output came to 287,783 units, a tiny 0.6% year-over-year (YOY) decrease led by a 2.4% decline in production outside of Japan. However, Japan experienced a robust recovery, with 60,804 units produced, an 8.5% year-over-year increase. Japan's production increased by 9.7%, contributing to the overall trend. The Japanese market also experienced difficulties, with sales falling 16.9% year over year to 49,263 units, the third consecutive month of declining sales. Sales of mini-vehicles fell 8.3% year over year, continuing their poor performance. Despite a robust 190.7% year-over-year growth in June shipments, which came to 12,012 units, Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (NYSE:HMC) faced difficulties with its export operations. The 472.4% increase in shipments to the USA, which made a substantial contribution to the overall export rise, was a noteworthy highlight. Despite these conflicting figures, Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (NYSE:HMC) is steadfast in its commitment to sustainable technologies, emphasizing environmentally friendly options. Notably, Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (NYSE:HMC) revealed a new plan on June 30, 2025, for the production of fuel cell modules in Moka City, Japan. The strategy aims to maintain the company's long-term commitment to hydrogen technology while reducing initial manufacturing capacity. Meanwhile, Macquarie downgraded Honda from 'Outperform' to 'Neutral' on June 25, 2025, indicating a more cautious stance in the face of global manufacturing challenges. Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (NYSE:HMC) makes motorcycles, automobiles, and power products in Japan. It is included in our list of cheap solid state battery stocks. While we acknowledge the potential of HMC as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio


CNN
25 minutes ago
- CNN
Did the Fed just royally screw up?
Federal agencies Job market EconomyFacebookTweetLink Follow It took only a few days for the Federal Reserve's latest decision on interest rates to age like milk. The central bank on Wednesday said it was holding borrowing costs steady yet again, extending a wait-and-see pattern that began in January. That same day, Fed Chair Jerome Powell told reporters that a 'solid' labor market means central bankers still have the luxury of waiting to see how President Donald Trump's tariffs affect prices before resuming rate cuts that could help boost jobs but could also reignite inflation. Just two days later, it turned out that the job market is on shakier ground than Powell had suggested. It may take a bit more time to know if that's really the case. But the Fed may walk away with egg on its face. The Fed did not respond to a request for comment. On Friday, the Labor Department reported that employers added just 73,000 jobs in July, well below the threshold of monthly job growth necessary to keep up with population growth. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate ticked up to 4.2% from 4.1%. And the monthly report was even worse than it seems: The Labor Department also massively revised downward the job gains for the prior two months. It's now clear that job growth has been anemic, based on the newly revised data: The average pace of monthly job growth from May through July was the weakest than any other three-month period since 2009, outside of the pandemic recession in 2020. 'Powell is going to regret holding rates steady this week,' Jamie Cox, managing partner at Harris Financial Group, said in commentary issued Friday. But not everyone at the Fed shared Powell's view on the labor market. The Fed's latest decision generated pushback from within like it hasn't seen in decades. Fed Governor Christopher Waller and Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman cast dissenting votes, marking the first time that more than one Fed governor has done so since 1993. In statements issued Friday, both officials pointed to signs of weakness in labor market as a major reason why they dissented, while downplaying the potential effects of Trump's tariffs on prices. The Fed is tasked by Congress to address both high inflation and a weakening labor market. 'The labor market has become less dynamic and shows increasing signs of fragility,' Bowman wrote, adding that just few industries have propelled job growth this year, which remained the case in July, according to the latest data. Still, it may be too soon to conclude that the Fed has royally screwed up. 'It was a disappointing report to be sure, but when I look at the data, we try not to make too much out of any one individual report,' Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack told Bloomberg on Friday after the July jobs report was released. 'I feel confident with the decision we made earlier this week.' Last year, after the unemployment rate climbed quickly in a short period of time and there were similar calls that the central bank was too late to lower rates, the Fed stepped in with a bold, half-point rate cut to stave off any further weakening. By the end of last year, it turned out that the labor market wasn't falling off a cliff: In December, employers added a massive 323,000 jobs as the unemployment rate edged down from the prior month to 4.1%.