'There Shouldn't Be Politics Around Sensitive Matters': Pahalgam Attack Victim Shubham Dwivedi's Wife
Aishwarya also spoke about the upcoming Asia Cup match between India and Pakistan, stating that playing cricket with a country that is not even worthy of dialogue is 'wrong.'
Aishwarya Dwivedi, the wife of Pahalgam attack victim Shubham Dwivedi, on Monday said that Operation Sindoor shouldn't be questioned at any cost.
Speaking to CNN News18, she responded to the controversy surrounding Operation Sindoor following former Home Minister P. Chidambaram's remarks, stating, 'There should be no politics around such sensitive matters."
She further highlighted the sacrifices of the armed forces and stated, 'The army is fighting at the borders. We cannot question the army at any cost."
'I will not question the investigation going on. I will never question our armed forces. We should be first Indian not think like a politician," she told CNN News 18.
Aishwarya also spoke about the upcoming Asia Cup match between India and Pakistan, stating that playing cricket with a country that is not even worthy of dialogue is 'wrong."
'Pakistan is not even worthy of talking to, and yet we are going to play cricket with them… this is way, way, way too wrong," she said.
Shubham Dwivedi, who had married just weeks earlier on February 12, was vacationing with his wife and her sister in the picturesque Baisaran meadows of Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, when terrorists opened fire on unarmed Hindu tourists. According to eyewitnesses who spoke with the family, Shubham bravely stood in front of the attackers and declared his identity, saying, 'I am a Hindu." He was then shot point-blank in the head.
view comments
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
12 minutes ago
- Economic Times
No formal discussion on F-35 fighter jets with US: Centre tells Parliament
Union Minister of State (MoS) for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh informed the Lok Sabha in a written reply that there has been no formal discussion on F-35 fighter jets with the United States (US). Singh was responding to questions posed by Congress MP Balwant Baswant Wankhade, who enquired about the relationship with the US on military assistance. "During PM Modi's US visit, the joint statement issued after the meeting with Trump mentioned that the US will review its policy on releasing F-35 and underwater systems to India. However, no formal discussion has taken place on this issue so far," the junior minister said in his written reply. On the role of American diplomats to stop hostilities between India and Pakistan, MoS Singh said that there were a number of diplomatic conversations with various countries, including the US. He asserted that the discussion to cease military action took place directly between India and Pakistan, and it was initiated at Pakistan's request. "With specific reference to the United States, it was conveyed to Vice President JD Vance on May 9 that India would appropriately respond if Pakistan launched a major attack. The discussion to cease military action took place directly between India and Pakistan through the existing channels of communication between the two armed forces, and it was initiated at Pakistan's request," the reply read. When asked about whether India has evaluated the impact of receiving US military assistance on the autonomy of its foreign policy, considering strategic implications, especially in a conflict scenario involving third-party mediation, Singh said that the outstanding issues with Pakistan will be discussed only bilaterally. "Our longstanding position remains that any outstanding issue with Pakistan will be discussed only bilaterally. This has been made clear to all nations, including by the Prime Minister to the US President," the reply read. "The India-US Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership is anchored in mutual trust, shared interests, goodwill and robust engagement between our citizens. The partnership has also benefited from growing strategic convergence and cooperation. The Government of India closely evaluates all its external partnerships, including those in the defence and strategic domains, through the prism of India's national interest and commitment to strategic autonomy," it added.
Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Malegaon blast case acquittals expose a deep-rooted bias in Congress
The recent verdict in the Malegaon blast case has not just acquitted individuals like Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit and Sadhvi Pragya — it has exposed something far more sinister: The Congress party's consistent and deep-rooted prejudice against the Hindu community. As someone who believes in justice, constitutional morality, and the inclusive spirit of India, I find it essential to call out this ideological poison for what it is. The judgment in the 2008 Malegaon blast case is damning, not for the accused but for the political ecosystem that manipulated agencies, planted narratives, and criminalised identities. The court noted how the prosecution failed to provide evidence beyond reasonable doubt, how witnesses turned hostile, and how the fabric of the case was stitched together with political intent. As someone who has followed the case closely, including the detailed biography of Lt Col Purohit by journalist Smita Mishra, I was appalled. Here was a decorated Army officer who had been entrusted with infiltrating terror networks, but who ended up being framed as a terrorist himself. His nine years behind bars were not just a personal tragedy — they were the outcome of a Congress-led UPA regime that needed to invent 'Hindu terror' to balance Islamist terror in the public discourse. This perverse narrative was systematically constructed by three key Congress leaders. In August 2010, then-Union Home Minister P Chidambaram publicly warned of a new phenomenon of 'saffron terrorism', alleging that radical Hindu outfits were implicated in bomb blasts. His colleague Digvijay Singh then popularised the term within the Congress ranks, describing 'terrorism among Hindus' while paradoxically objecting to religious descriptors for terrorism. The campaign reached its peak when then-Home Minister Sushil Kumar Shinde defended 'saffron terror' at a party conclave in January 2013, claiming his ministry's confidential papers substantiated the allegations. Years later, Shinde would admit that coining the term was a mistake — but by then, irreparable damage had been done to innocent lives and India's social fabric. This perverse narrative found its way into diplomatic cables too. In the WikiLeaks cable from 2009, Rahul Gandhi reportedly told then-US Ambassador Timothy Roemer that Hindu radicalism was a bigger threat to India than Lashkar-e-Taiba. This was not a stray remark. It was a window into the Congress's ideological framework, where the Hindu is always the problem and the minority vote bank must always be coddled, even at the cost of truth. Go back to 1951. When the Somnath temple was reconstructed after centuries of devastation, India's first President Rajendra Prasad, agreed to attend the inauguration. But Jawaharlal Nehru disapproved, fearing it would look like 'Hindu revivalism'. Fast forward to 1985. The Supreme Court delivers a progressive judgment in favor of Shah Bano, a Muslim woman seeking alimony. But Rajiv Gandhi caved under pressure from conservative clerics and overturned the ruling through legislation. In 1988, the Congress government banned Salman Rushdie's The Satanic Verses — even before protests erupted in India. It wasn't about public order; it was about pre-emptively appeasing a vote bank. And perhaps the most shocking of all: In 2006, then-Prime Minister Manmohan Singh declared, 'We will have to devise innovative plans to ensure that minorities, particularly the Muslim minority, are empowered to share equitably in the fruits of development. They must have the first claim on resources.' I am a Dalit, and I cannot stay silent at the suggestion that national development should be filtered by religion. What about the poor Hindu, the Dalit student, the tribal child? Does their struggle not count? Today, when Rahul Gandhi speaks of 'social justice' and champions Dalit rights, one must ask: How does denying reservation to marginalised communities in prestigious institutions like AMU and Jamia serve social justice? This is the height of hypocrisy — using Dalit symbolism for votes while systematically undermining Dalit interests in policy. This isn't just about Congress. It's about the future of India's democracy. A nation cannot move forward if it continues to be shackled by ideological hatred and historical bias. Hindu identity is not extremist. It is civilisational. And those who equate it with terror not only insult India's history —they endanger its future. The Congress party owes an apology. To the falsely accused. To the institutions it compromised. And to the silent Hindu majority who have endured humiliation in the name of 'secularism'. The writer is national spokesperson of the BJP
The Hindu
12 minutes ago
- The Hindu
All about India-U.S. trade: Infographics
U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday (July 31, 2025) announced a 25% tariff on Indian imports into the U.S., effective August 1, following a 90-day pause in tariffs announced in April. In a post on the platform Truth Social, he called India's tariffs 'too high' and said that it had 'strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers.' He also criticised India for its fossil fuel trade with Russia. Mr. Trump has been trying to broker a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine to stop the three-year ongoing war between the two countries, with no firm deal in sight yet. In this context, here is an overview of the India-U.S. trade. How much does India export to and import from the U.S.? In 2024-25, India's exports to the U.S. were valued over 86,000 million dollars, with imports being over 45,000 million dollars. In terms of percentage, the U.S. made up around 20% of India's exports and 6.3% of its imports. India has always imported more than it exported to the U.S. Exports to the U.S. fell sharply in January this year and have continued to remain below levels not seen after 2022. India exported in March this year the lowest since April 2016. What does India send to the U.S.? India's major exports to the U.S. include telecom equipment, drug formulations and biologicals, textiles, petroleum, iron and steel, pearl and precious stones and more. However, there are variations in the percentage of each of these products that India exports to the U.S. compared to total exports of the product to all countries. For instance, India sends over 63% of all telecom exports to the U.S. For petroleum products, this is 7%. India-Russia trade One of Mr. Trump's criticisms is India's trade with Russia in the area of energy. As part of its opposition to Russia's actions in Ukraine, the European Union along with other Western countries imposed sanctions on Russian goods and individuals, and cut down on its imports of Russian energy after 2022. However, India increased its imports of Russian energy from around 2% of total Russian exports to over 20% in response to cheaper prices of discounted Russian oil. In a media briefing on Friday (August 1, 2025), the Ministry of External Affairs Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said that decisions regarding the sourcing of energy were 'based on the price at which oil is available in the international market and depending on the global situation at that time.' Similarly, External Affairs Minister said in 2023 that the country had to source oil where it was cheapest. He pointed out that European countries are 'diverting production out of the Middle East and raising prices.' Besides energy imports, India's imports of Russian military equipment was another of Mr. Trump's complaints. In 2024, India imported around 40% of its military imports from Russia. Exports to India made up 34% of Russia's total exports. According to SIPRI, Russia was the top supplier to India, followed by France and Israel in 2024. However, Indian sources told Reuters that the country was looking to pivot away from Russian arms since Russia's munitions were depleted due to its war with Ukraine. This also aligns with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 'Make in India' programme to boost domestic production. On military procurement, Mr. Jaiswal said sourcing was determined 'solely by our national security imperatives and strategic assessments' on Friday. (With inputs from Reuters)
