Libya commander Haftar seeks to force international engagement
Their visit was divided in two, as is Libya, which is still grappling with the aftermath of the armed conflict and political chaos that followed the 2011 NATO-backed uprising that toppled longtime dictator Moamer Kadhafi.
The delegation first visited the capital Tripoli, seat of the internationally recognised Libyan government of Prime Minister Abdelhamid Dbeibah.
They then travelled to Benghazi, in the east, where a rival administration backed by Haftar and his clan is based, and with whom the EU has generally avoided direct contact.
Almost immediately, a reported disagreement prompted the eastern authorities to accuse the European delegation of a "flagrant breach of diplomatic norms", ordering the visiting dignitaries to leave.
In Brussels, the European Commission admitted a "protocol issue".
Tarek Megerisi, a senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations think tank, said the scene at the airport "was a calculated move".
Haftar was playing to EU fears of irregular migration in order "to generate de facto European recognition", and thus "broaden relations with Europe away from just engagement with him as a local military leader".
Turning the delegation away showed that declining to engage with the eastern civilian administration was no longer an option.
'Punish Athens'
The complex situation in Libya has required unusual diplomacy.
European governments recognise and work with the Tripoli-based government and not the eastern administration, but still hold contact with Haftar's military forces.
In their visit earlier this month, the European commissioner and ministers were meant to meet with eastern military officials.
But once at the Benghazi airport, they saw "there were people there that we had not agreed to meet", a European official in Brussels told journalists on condition of anonymity.
"We had to fly back," the official said, adding that "of course" it was linked to recognition of the eastern government.
Claudia Gazzini, a Libya expert at the International Crisis Group, said she did not believe "it was a premeditated incident".
But "the question does present itself as to why" ministers from the eastern government were at the airport in the first place, and why Haftar would let it play out the way it did, she said.
"We can't completely rule out that there was some particular issue or bilateral disagreement with one of the countries represented in the delegation," Gazzini added.
Libya expert Jalel Harchaoui suggested Greece may have been the target.
On July 6, two days before the axed visit, "the Greek foreign minister had come to demand concessions on migration and maritime (issues) without offering any tangible incentives", Harchaoui said.
Despite Haftar's personal involvement, the July 6 visit "had yielded nothing", added the expert.
Then, on July 8, "a Greek representative -- this time as part of an EU delegation -- wanted to negotiate on the same day with the rival Tripoli government, placing the two governments on an equal footing", he said.
This was "an affront in Benghazi's view", Harchaoui said, and the administration wanted to "punish Athens".
Legitimacy
To Harchaoui, the diplomatic flap was a sign not to "underestimate" the Haftars' foreign policy.
"The Haftar family is an absolutely essential actor" in tackling the influx of migrants or, for example, advancing energy projects, due to its key role in securing Libya's eastern coast, said Harchaoui.
The message delivered at the Benghazi airport "is clear: take the eastern faction seriously", he added.
Harchaoui said that the Haftars, already "rich in cash and strong" in terms of strategic assets, have recently increased efforts to "consolidate their legitimacy".
Haftar himself was hosted in February by French President Emmanuel Macron, and in May by Russia's Vladimir Putin.
And Haftar's son, Saddam, recently visited the United States, Turkey, Italy and Niger.
Even Ankara, which has provided support for the Tripoli-based government in repelling attacks from the east, "is now seeking to further profit off the Haftars through things like construction projects", said Megerisi.
He added that Turkey also has wider geopolitical ambitions, hoping to see the Haftars endorse a maritime border agreement in the eastern Mediterranean, which Tripoli had already signed but Athens regards as illegal.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
6 hours ago
- Euronews
Many EU countries endorse Commission's migrant outsourcing plans
EU home affairs ministers meeting in Copenhagen on Tuesday have broadly endorsed two recent controversial proposals by the European Commission designed to curb irregular migration into the bloc. These proposals - dubbed 'innovative solutions' by the Commission - involve outsourcing to third countries asylum seekers and migrants whose claims have been rejected. 'We need to make innovative solutions and new agreements with countries outside of the European Union', said Kaare Dybvad Bek, Minister for Immigration and Integration of Denmark, which is currently chairing the EU. 'I've had good discussions with colleagues, a lot of similar opinions across the table, and I hope that we can make some progress in the coming six months.' A UK-Rwanda style policy By changing the EU definition of "safe third countries", member states would be allowed to dismiss asylum applications without consideration, and transfer applicants overseas, even if the migrant has no connection to the place in question. A 'safe third country' is a non-EU country where a person seeking international protection is treated according to 'international standards', and safeguards include the protection of asylum seekers from persecution and serious harm, the respect of the principle of non-refoulement, and the possibility to have access to a functioning asylum system. Under the Commission's proposal, no form of connection between the third country and the applicant meant to be transferred there is required. The change could therefore result in partnership with non-EU countries, similar to the UK's Rwanda deportation policy, which was ruled unlawful by the UK's Supreme Court. Previously considered taboo, many countries have now come around to the idea, according to the Danish Minister for Immigration. 'A lot of member states changed their position in these areas. I remember when I was a new minister in this Council three years ago, it was a bit uphill, I think, to try to introduce innovative solutions. [...] Now we see there's been a lot of countries that changed their position either because they changed their mind or because there's a new government,' said Dybvad Bek. While most countries seem to agree with the proposal, more opposition is expected from the European Parliament, with Socialists and democrats, Greens/EFA and The Left group traditionally against stricter rules on migration. Return hubs gaining traction The other innovative idea, enshrined in the return regulation, would enable member states to transfer rejected asylum seekers to 'return hubs' outside the EU, while completing the paperwork to get them returned to their countries of origin. The Commission's proposal does not foresee an EU-wide programme to build these deportation centres, but it lays the necessary legal groundwork to allow governments to strike arrangements with countries outside the bloc that might be willing to host migrants in return for financial incentives. Two centres built in Albania by the Italian government, initially meant to host asylum seekers, have been converted into return centres and could serve as a model. Other countries could follow suit with similar schemes, as suggested by French Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau. 'France has constitutional obstacles [on some measures], but we don't have any on return centres. And I'm in favour of anything that makes returns more efficient." Migration is a priority for Denmark, which would probably push the Commission's proposals forward, especially the return regulation: 'We hope to reach a general agreement on return policy within our presidency,' the Danish Minister said. The Commissioner for Internal Affairs and Migration Magnus Brunner considered Denmark 'very aligned' with the Commission's agenda over the next six months. He declined to pin a concrete target on the effective return rate of rejected migrants from EU countries, to be reached after the approval of the return regulation. Many countries seem to be on board with the Commission's proposals. Austria, Germany, France, the Czech Republic, and Poland recently signed a common declaration to beef up migrant returns, strengthen external borders, and build partnerships with third countries.
Euronews
6 hours ago
- Euronews
Will EU fertiliser tariffs hit Russia's coffers?
Russia supplies 25% of the EU's nitrogen fertilisers, worth €1.3 billion each year, but from 1 July these will be subject to tariffs ranging from 6.5% this year to levels close to 100% by 2028. The tariffs will apply to products from Russia and its neighbouring ally Belarus, which has facilitated military action against Ukraine. In addition, 50% tariffs will be imposed on agri-food products from both countries, such as meat, dairy, fruit and vegetables. "There is a strong moral and strategic justification. Russia imposes a 23.5% export tax on fertilisers, which means that by buying these products, the EU is indirectly financing the war in Ukraine," said Euronews reporter Gerardo Fortuna, who's covered the topic. "There's also an environmental aspect, because the EU production of fertilisers has roughly half the carbon intensity of the Russian manufacturing of fertiliser. So, by importing this fertiliser from Russia, we also drive emissions," adds Fortuna. EU fertiliser producers are pleased with expectations of increased market share. Since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the sector has faced higher energy costs and has been unable to compete with cheaper Russian exports, leading to the closure of production facilities. "Our producers have already lost a lot because of Russia. There is at least three million tons of idle capacity, compared to the eight million tons that the EU exported to other countries," said Latvian MEP Inese Vaidere, from the centre-right EPP group, who steered the proposal through the Parliament. Farmers fear being squeezed Farmers fear having to spend more of their budget to purchase fertilisers as a result however. "There are some mitigation measures from the European Commission, but farmers don't consider them adequate to deal with the expected price increase," says Gerardo Fortuna. To reduce the risk of price spikes, the block could eliminate tariffs on other fertiliser suppliers to the EU, such as the US, Canada, Oman, Morocco and Algeria. "Since the beginning of the war in Ukraine, around €500 billion has been spent to help farmers. The European Commission monitors monthly price fluctuations and will know what to do," said MEP Inese Vaidere. On the other hand, the bloc will not impose tariffs on Russian exports to third countries, as they are crucial for some developing countries, such as Vietnam and Bangladesh in Asia, and Kenya and Tanzania in Africa. Russia is the world's largest exporter of fertilisers, with its main markets being Brazil, India, the United States, China and Indonesia. Gas is an essential ingredient for fertiliser production, so the EU is indirectly trying to target this Russian asset as well. The EU justifies the measures on economic grounds, but also ethical imperatives, given the war in Ukraine. Watch the video here! Journalist: Isabel Marques da Silva Content production: Pilar Montero López Video production: Zacharia Vigneron Graphism: Loredana Dumitru Editorial coordination: Ana Lázaro Bosch and Jeremy Fleming-Jones
Fashion Network
a day ago
- Fashion Network
ESPR: How to Anticipate and Influence Future European Legislation for Sustainable Fashion
"The European Commission is due to issue a third study report on the subject, which will begin to specify its choices in November this year," said Carrière-Pradal. "This report will be submitted to stakeholders for comment. A fourth and final report will then arrive in early 2026. This will be followed by the work of a European working group, the Ecodesign Forum, which will exchange views with the European Commission to validate the project's political orientations. This phase should be completed during the first half of 2027, bearing in mind that the EC wants to avoid any delays, as textiles are the first sector to be covered by ESPR." Textiles, the first sector to be covered by ESPR Carrière-Pradal highlighted that this is the reason why France has moved so quickly on its Climate, Agec, and fast-fashion laws, in the hope of influencing the Commission's work on ESPR. The choice of the textile sector to take the lead would officially be due to a multi-sector assessment of existing impacts and possible improvements. Two points on which textiles would stand out. "I have a slightly different vision," confides Clarisse Reille. "Fashion is generally not taken seriously. What's more, when we look at the impact of the sector, we see that it's mainly due to ultra-fast-fashion, which has every interest in spreading its problems throughout the sector, to dilute its responsibility. And public authorities tend to be more attentive and benevolent towards sectors whose customers are mainly men. This analysis, which is less rationalist, is shared by the heads of federations." The head of Defi stresses above all that France, through its existing legislation and the joint work of its federations, will have a say in the final shape of the ESPR. This is confirmed by Carrière-Pradal: "Until recently, France was the only country to have an eco-organisation to manage the end-of-life of textiles, Refashion. But it's also important to bear in mind that, even if the French State has more weight than others in Brussels, the Commission still has an obligation to listen to other players." The reference document produced by Defi with the support of the various French textile-clothing federations is freely accessible in the Studies section of the forum's portal.
