
Patient with rare cancer finds hope in a Memorial Healthcare clinical trial
A runner, Judith Hetlage repeatedly felt pain in her left lower leg while on her daily path around Davie.
Several trips to the orthopedist, however, left her frustrated and without an explanation.
Eventually, though, Hetlage's primary doctor ordered a scan of her calf that showed a tumor, and a biopsy led to the diagnosis of a rare cancer of the soft tissue called synovial sarcoma. Her initial treatment at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston — involving chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery — seemed successful, and Hetlage followed up regularly with quarterly scans.
Ten years later, though, what began w as synovial sarcoma in her calf ultimately resulted in cancer cells spreading to her lungs. 'I felt like that was the death sentence,' Hetlage said. 'There were 13 tumors in my lungs in a matter of three months.'
Hetlage, 65, has some hope in what could be a medical breakthrough.
She is enrolled in a pioneering clinical trial that has implications far beyond her rare form of cancer. Through Memorial Cancer Institute and its partnership with Moffett Cancer Center, she is participating in a trial for T-cell Receptor Therapy (TCR-T). The treatment is an immunotherapy that harvests a patient's T-cells, a type of white blood cell that helps the body's immune system fight disease. After removal, the T-cells are genetically modified to recognize a specific protein within cancer cells and infused back into the patient's immune system to search and destroy the diseased cells.
It is the first engineered cell therapy for solid tumor cancer approved in the United States. If effective in trial participants, it could extend the reach of TCR-T cells for use beyond just blood cancers to solid tumor cancer in the head and neck, lungs, and skin. Cancer patients whose disease has been resistant to traditional chemotherapy drugs or metastasized within their bodies could benefit.
For Hetlage's type of rare cancer, the standard treatment after the disease spreads is chemotherapy. She had begun chemotherapy while waiting to be accepted into the trial.
According to the National Cancer Institute, it has been more than a decade since the FDA approved a new therapy for synovial sarcoma.
'There is an exceedingly high need for new treatment options for patients,' said Dr. Sandra D'Angelo of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, who led a small, initial trial of TCR-T for 44 people with synovial sarcoma. The therapy shrank tumors in 19 participants and kept tumors from growing for an average of six months. For two participants, tumors went away and did not return during the three-year study period, according to D'Angelo's report for the National Cancer Institute.
Initially, Hetlage's type of cancer hadn't been included in the current national trial of TCR-T for solid tumors. However, the FDA cleared Hetlage to participate. She began treatment three months ago.
'We took her cells and we activated them in a way that now they will recognize her cancer,' said Dr. Atif Hussein, Hetlage's oncologist and director of Memorial's Hematology & Oncology Fellowship training program.
Hussein said he infused Hetlage with 'super immune cells' and then gave her a second dose about two weeks later to empower her immune system, which had been depleted and emptied of bone marrow prior to the treatment. The process, called lymph depletion therapy, allows the supercells to find a home in the immune system.
While a similar approach has been successfully used to treat blood cancers, it had never before been used on solid tumors. Now, at least 30 clinical trials of engineered TCR-T cells are underway for a variety of solid tumor types including melanoma, lung and colon cancer.
Patients have to qualify for Memorial's TCR-T trial by having a specific immune type. Hussein said dozens of his patients with other types of cancer did not have the right immune type to qualify, but Hetlage did. 'Hopefully, we'll have more who will qualify for this study,' he said.
So far, it's too soon to know whether the treatment will work for Hetlage.
At a cancer survivor's event at Memorial Cancer Institute, Hetlage, a mother of three daughters and former occupational therapist, stood behind the podium, telling other cancer patients: 'I'm not a survivor yet; it's not the end. I believe that survivorship is the day you're diagnosed. I believe that it's all the ups and downs. I stand in the storm. It's about being here and continuing to fight. You can't give in.'
Hussein is optimistic about Hetlage's outcome: 'I have been doing oncology for 26 years and I have rarely seen somebody who is so positive, so strong. She is empowering herself, fighting so hard, and if anybody is going to respond, it is somebody like Judith.'
Hetlage says she meditates, eats a healthy diet and walks six to seven miles a day. 'I believe your head has got to be in the game,' she said. 'You've got to do the best you can do for yourself while they're doing the medical end.'
'Everyone else I had ever known that had this (type of cancer) isn't still on this earth,' she said. 'This is something I'm going to have to watch and fight the rest of my life.'
Hussein said if T-cell receptor therapy can treat solid tumors, it will represent hope in the fight against cancer. He predicts that new cell therapies will be tested in patients in the coming years and represent the next wave of cancer treatment.
South Florida Sun Sentinel health reporter Cindy Goodman can be reached at cgoodman@sunsentinel.com or 954-304-5908.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Over 4,400 Riders Embark on Ride to Conquer Cancer, Canada's Largest Athletic Fundraiser, Raising Over $20.61 Million for Life-Saving Research
Riders Begin 2-Day, 200+ KM Journey in Support of The Princess Margaret for a World Free From the Fear of Cancer TORONTO, June 7, 2025 /CNW/ - The 18th annual The Princess Margaret Ride to Conquer Cancer, presented by Johnson & Johnson, commenced this morning with over 4,000 riders departing from Sherway Gardens, Toronto in a group peloton. At the same time, more than 400 riders began their journey from the Niagara-on-the-Lake start line. Both groups will converge at McMaster University in Hamilton for overnight camp later today. This year's Ride sets a record for funds raised with $20.61 million, surpassing the previous record of $20.6 million set in 2024. United in their mission to create a world free from the fear of cancer, all riders are taking on the two-day, 200+ km journey to Niagara-on-the-Lake in support of Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, one of the world's leading cancer research and treatment centres. "Cancer remains one of the greatest global health threats of our time," said Dr. Miyo Yamashita, President and CEO of The Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation. "Yet, through the unwavering dedication of our Ride community— riders, donors, supporters and volunteers, together we are transforming the way cancer is understood, prevented, diagnosed and treated in Canada and around the world." Among the riders was Dana Fox, who knows firsthand the importance of this cause. Diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma, a rare and aggressive cancer, Dana is currently undergoing treatment at The Princess Margaret but is committed to completing the 200km journey. "You are fueling hope, you are funding discovery, and you are changing lives," Dana rallied to the crowd in his opening ceremony's patient remarks. "This isn't just a fundraiser. This is a movement." Participants have collectively raised an astounding $20.61 million this year, bringing The Ride's all-time fundraising total to more than $320.61 million since its inception in 2008. These funds directly support life-saving cancer research and patient care at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, one of the world's leading cancer research and treatment The Ride's 2025 Honourary Chairs, Nicholas and Lia Fidei said, "After witnessing some of the success stories and meeting cancer patients who have overcome cancer, there is no doubt in our minds how much we need to support The Ride and the advancements in cancer research that The Princess Margaret is renowned for." Nicholas, President of Treasure Hill and President of the Nicholas Fidei Foundation, and this year's top individual fundraiser also added, "No other fundraising event that I have participated in has inspired me to greater achievements." All riders are now making their way to Hamilton, where they'll be welcomed by cheering family and friends, enjoy a hot meal at camp ceremonies and spend the night at McMaster University. On Day 2, they'll continue their journey to the finish line at Peller Estates Winery in Niagara-on-the-Lake. For more information, to donate or to register for the 2026 Ride to Conquer Cancer, please visit ABOUT PRINCESS MARGARET CANCER FOUNDATION The Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation is Canada's largest cancer charity. We're dedicated to raising funds for Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, one of the world's leading cancer research and treatment centres, known for its breakthrough discoveries that transform patient outcomes. Together, our work benefits cancer patients everywhere in our mission to create a world free from the fear of cancer. Through philanthropy, fundraising events, and our world-leading lottery program, we're changing how the world understands, prevents, diagnoses, and treats cancer, benefitting patients at The Princess Margaret, throughout Canada, and around the world. SOURCE Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation View original content to download multimedia:
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - How thousands of unreviewed ingredients got into our food — and what FDA can do about it
At least 1,000 ingredients in food products on our grocery store shelves have never been checked for safety by the Food and Drug Administration. Dozens have raised serious safety concerns among experts. How did the FDA allow this? The answer can be found in the agency's lax interpretation of a little-known legal designation that lets companies decide for themselves if ingredients in their products are safe. Fortunately, there are steps the agency can take right now to stem the flow of potentially unsafe ingredients into our food supply. Environmental Defense Fund outlined these steps in a letter we recently sent to the agency, but first let's take a closer look at how we got here. 'Generally Recognized as Safe' is a designation Congress created in 1958 to allow commonly used food ingredients to bypass the FDA's pre-market safety review process. It was meant for food substances — such as oils, vinegar, baking soda and common spices — that were widely considered safe due to their long history of everyday use. Since 1958, this status has been coopted to cover a universe of foods that extends far beyond its original intent. According to FDA regulations, a chemical can receive the designation if experts widely agree that scientific evidence shows its use to be safe. But because 'Generally Recognized as Safe' wasn't meant for newer ingredients, Congress allowed ingredients so designated to skip the FDA's premarket approval process — despite requiring similar evidence for other additives. Under the agency's current interpretation, companies can designate the use of a substance as safe and take products with that substance to market without informing the FDA or the public of its decision. While companies may voluntarily submit a notice to FDA offering safety evidence, they are not required to — and often don't. Our organization estimated that manufacturers have notified FDA of fewer than half of the ingredients they market as safe under the 'Generally Recognized' standard. Companies that do bother to submit a notice to the FDA are free to withdraw it at any point and take their product to market, provided they can cite evidence of its safe use. But this 'evidence' is often far from independent. Companies can, and often do, enlist their own employees or handpicked consultants to conduct their safety assessments. The result is a process riddled with conflicts of interest that lets unsafe foods into Americans' homes. We analyzed 'Generally Recognized as Safe' notices received by the FDA, obtained via a Freedom of Information request, and found that of the 1,163 submitted by companies between 1997 and April 2024, 192 were later withdrawn, with safety concerns cited in at least a dozen cases. We also identified 31 ingredients that companies have advertised to be recognized as safe, such as in press releases, trade publications and on their own websites (see the Appendix of our letter). However, we were unable to find the scientific evidence required under this standard to demonstrate these ingredients are commonly regarded as safe among experts. This raises red flags that FDA should be taking seriously. Although a comprehensive fix to the 'Generally Recognized' standard will require legislation from Congress, there are significant steps the FDA can take right away to ensure a more rigorous determination process that better protects Americans' health. Starting today, the FDA can use existing authority to remove safe designations from ingredients it deems unsafe and take them off the market. It can also notify manufacturers, importers, distributors and retailers that the substance is no longer recognized as safe. In addition, the FDA can enforce the requirement that companies base safety designations on publicly available data. Although this won't curtail companies' ability to self-declare substances as safe, it will require those who do to be transparent in citing their evidence. Third, the FDA can enforce the requirement that safety assessments consider vital health information such as a substance's dietary sources, potential cancer risks and the cumulative health effects of similar substances. Finally, the FDA can make companies revise and resubmit their data for review when they submit 'Generally Recognized as Safe' notices that fail to comply with the criteria. The 'Generally Recognized as Safe' designation is far from a perfect system, but it can work better if it is interpreted and enforced more comprehensively. If the FDA is serious about protecting public health, it should start by fully exercising the tools already at its disposal. Maria Doa is senior director at the Chemicals Policy at Environmental Defense Fund. Maricel Maffini is an independent consultant focused on human and environmental health and chemical safety. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Egg recall over salmonella warning spans across nine states
Almost two million eggs have been recalled in the United States over concerns of salmonella contamination. The recall, announced on Friday by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, affects products distributed in nine states and is associated with various grocery store chains. According to the FDA, California-based August Egg Company of Hilmar is recalling 1,700,000 dozen brown cage-free and brown certified organic eggs due to potential contamination. The eggs were distributed from February 3 through May 15, with sell-by dates from March 4 to June 4, within California and Nevada. Products were distributed at locations including Save Mart, FoodMaxx, Lucky, Smart & Final, Safeway, Raleys, Food 4 Less, and Ralphs. Eggs were also distributed from February 3 through May 6 with sell-by dates from March 4 to June 19 to Walmart locations in California, Washington, Nevada, Arizona, Wyoming, New Mexico, Nebraska, Indiana, and Illinois. The recalled eggs will have the plant code number P-6562 or CA5330 printed on the carton or package, with Julian Dates between 32 and 126. The recalled retail eggs will be in fiber or plastic cartons, with the above codes printed on one side of the carton. Salmonella can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, the frail or elderly, and others with weakened immune systems, according to the FDA. Healthy persons infected with Salmonella often experience fever, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and even bloody diarrhea. In rare circumstances, infection with Salmonella can result in more severe illnesses. A statement from August Egg Company read: 'It is important to know that when our processing plant identified this concern, we immediately began diverting all eggs from the plant to an egg-breaking facility, which pasteurizes the eggs and kills any pathogens. 'August Egg Company's internal food safety team is also conducting its own stringent review to identify what measures can be established to prevent this situation from recurring. 'We are committed to addressing this matter fully and to implementing all necessary corrective actions to ensure this does not happen again.'