logo
European bank stocks surge to highest level since 2008 global financial crisis. What's behind the bull run?

European bank stocks surge to highest level since 2008 global financial crisis. What's behind the bull run?

Mint15 hours ago
European banking stocks, which have been on the back foot for over a decade and a half, have made a remarkable turnaround, rallying to their highest levels since September 2008, when the global financial crisis hit the world markets.
The STOXX 600 Europe Banks index has been in an uptrend during five of the last six trading sessions, buoyed by improved profits and resilience amid the tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump. Shares of HSBC, Barclays and Santander hit their 2008 highs while Italy's UniCredit rose to its highest level since 2011, according to a Financial Times report.
The gains were bolstered by a latest report from the European Banking Authority (EBA) on Friday as it presented the outcome of its latest health check of the sector. The STOXX 600 Europe Banks index rallied nearly 2% at the open today, August 4.
Banks across the European Union are well-positioned to withstand a major economic shock stemming from geopolitical and trade tensions, according to a report by Reuters, citing the EBA.
The EBA conducted stress tests on 64 European banks, including 51 based in the eurozone, simulating the impact of a prolonged recession across the EU and other advanced economies. The results showed that none of the banks would fall below their core capital requirements, and only one institution would breach its leverage ratio requirement.
However, under the adverse scenario, in case escalating geopolitical tensions and rising protectionist trade policies push up energy and commodity prices, disrupt supply chains, and dampen both consumption and investment - it would lead to a combined losses of €547 billion for the banks included in the stress test — higher than the €496 billion projected in the 2023 exercise.
The latest earnings from European banks show that the sector remains largely insulated from the tariff shocks.
Case in point is Barclays Plc. Its traders turned in their best second-quarter performance in three years as the volatility wrought by Trump's trade war helped them deliver revenue that topped analyst expectations.
According to a Bloomberg report, the fixed-income business brought in £1.45 billion ($1.9 billion), a rise of 26% compared with a year ago, while the equities desk made £870 million, an increase of 25% year-on-year. Measured in dollars, the increase in revenue from the entire global markets business was up 35%.
Barclays, one of Europe's biggest investment banks with a large Wall Street presence, generates the biggest portion of its revenue from dealmaking and trading.
Meanwhile, another European lender - Germany's Deutsche Bank - reported better-than-expected trading results, driving its stock to the highest level in a decade. The stock has gained over 70% this year.
French lender BNP Paribas also posted better-than-expected earnings as it got a boost from its fixed-income traders while equities slumped in the volatility triggered by the US tariff announcements. The stock has crossed its September lows and jumped 31% this year, in line with the index for European banks.
(With inputs from agencies)
Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India On Edge? Iran, Pakistan Revive Chabahar-To-Turkey Rail Link, Deepen Strategic Ties And Trade Corridors
India On Edge? Iran, Pakistan Revive Chabahar-To-Turkey Rail Link, Deepen Strategic Ties And Trade Corridors

India.com

timea few seconds ago

  • India.com

India On Edge? Iran, Pakistan Revive Chabahar-To-Turkey Rail Link, Deepen Strategic Ties And Trade Corridors

New Delhi: Iran and Pakistan have formalised a renewed partnership that opens up new transport routes and expands trade links across the region. During his first official visit to Pakistan, Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian signed a series of bilateral agreements aimed at boosting economic, technical and strategic cooperation between the two neighbours. Officials from both countries confirmed that Pakistani goods will now have overland access to European and Russian markets through Iranian territory. Analysts view this move as a potential game changer for regional logistics. They say it will offer an alternative to traditional maritime shipping routes that can be slower and costlier. This overland trade link is expected to be integrated with the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC), a multimodal trade network that begins at India's Mumbai port and runs through Iran to reach Russia and Europe. India and Russia have been actively developing this corridor, and the inclusion of Pakistan raises questions about new dynamics in the region. The Iran-Pakistan alignment also touches on Beijing's broader ambitions. China is exploring ways to link its China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) with the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC), which could allow Chinese goods to move through Iran and access the Gulf and Central Asia. It will reduce dependence on the Malacca Strait. With a strong naval presence from both India and the United States in that region, Beijing has been looking for strategic alternatives to safeguard trade routes. As part of the new partnership, Iran and Pakistan have set a target to increase bilateral trade from USD 3 billion to USD 10 billion. Both sides have framed this goal as a step toward strengthened economic cooperation and long-term regional integration. President Pezeshkian got an unusual welcome in Islamabad, with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif personally receiving him at Nur Khan Airbase. The gesture was seen by many as a signal of how seriously Pakistan views its relationship with Tehran. The visit also comes at a time when Islamabad is balancing ties with the United States while seeking closer engagement with Iran. Pakistani officials have also reportedly raised the issue of Baloch separatist groups operating across the border, some of whom Islamabad claims receive support from abroad. A major highlight of the visit was the revival of the Islamabad-Tehran-Istanbul rail project. Both countries agreed to restore and operationalise the 6,540-kilometer railway line that connects South Asia with Europe through Turkey. Once it resumes full operations, the journey will take around 10 days that will be a major improvement over the 21-day maritime route. The division of the railway spans 1,990 kilometres in Pakistan, 2,603 kilometres in Iran and 1,950 kilometeres in Turkey. Although the project was initially launched in 2009, it has faced repeated delays. Officials now hope to revive the corridor to full capacity. For India, the developments hold serious strategic implications. Iran and Pakistan have discussed linking the Iranian port of Chabahar, that India helped build, with Pakistan's Gwadar port, which is operated by China. Iranian leaders have expressed interest in connecting both ports via trade and logistics routes. This proposed maritime link could dilute India's strategic influence in the region and give China greater access to Gulf waters. Gwadar has already been a focal point of Chinese infrastructure investment, with reports suggesting that a future Chinese naval facility may be in the works. If Chabahar and Gwadar are connected, it could reshape the geopolitical balance of port infrastructure in the Arabian Sea and create new strategic concerns for New Delhi. The series of agreements signed during President Pezeshkian's visit marks a turning point in Iran-Pakistan relations. As the regional landscape continues to evolve, the implications of these developments are likely to resonate far beyond South Asia.

Numbers Don't Lie – But Leaders Might Not Like Them
Numbers Don't Lie – But Leaders Might Not Like Them

Time of India

timea few seconds ago

  • Time of India

Numbers Don't Lie – But Leaders Might Not Like Them

In the U.S., something strange and worrying just happened. Former President Donald Trump fired a government official named Erika McEntarfer. Why? Because the department she worked in (which tracks how many people have jobs) updated some numbers — and the new numbers didn't look good for Trump. At first, it looked like the U.S. had added over 140,000 new jobs in May and June. That was good news for Trump, because he had put tariffs (extra taxes) on imported goods, and people were worried those would hurt the economy. But later, after a closer check, the department said only 19,000 jobs were added in May, and 14,000 in June. July looked even worse. Trump didn't like these new numbers. He said they were 'rigged' to make him and his political party look bad. But experts say that's just not true. These job numbers are made by hundreds of people using detailed methods. Sometimes they're off at first because many companies are late sending their reports. Trump could've asked for better data systems — which would actually be helpful! But instead, he fired the messenger. That sends a bad message to the world: it looks like he's trying to control or hide the truth. If leaders start changing numbers to make things look good instead of being good, that's what dictators do — not what democracies should do. A researcher once showed that countries that fake their growth often look suspiciously brighter in satellite photos at night than their official numbers suggest. India did well in that test, but we still have problems with collecting accurate data. For example, we're still waiting on the national Census, and some job reports are slow or unclear. The big lesson? If you want to fix a problem, don't shoot the messenger — fix the system. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.

Stat Of The Nation
Stat Of The Nation

Time of India

timea few seconds ago

  • Time of India

Stat Of The Nation

Trump's sacking of a govt data official sends an awful message that all democracies must heed Convention demands that emperors don't shoot messengers, but Trump sacked Erika McEntarfer on Friday after her Bureau of Labour Statistics (BLS) revised US jobs data for May and June downwards. Those were the first full months to reflect the impact of Trump's 10% baseline tariff. Initially, BLS had reported 144,000 new jobs in May, and 147,000 in June, suggesting that fears about the impact of tariffs were overblown. Now, it says only 19,000 and 14,000 jobs, respectively, were added in the two months. Initial data for July looks even weaker, with only 73,000 jobs added. Post-revision, it might turn out to be a month of net job loss. Suddenly, Trump's tariff project is looking weak when high country-specific tariffs are about to take effect from Thursday. He's reacted predictably, alleging data was manipulated: 'In my opinion, today's jobs numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.' But as former US treasury secretary Larry Summers says, the charge is preposterous because the data is compiled by 'hundreds of people following detailed procedures'. The job numbers are off the mark every month simply because a third of the 121,000 employers BLS surveys don't send their responses on time. Trump could have asked for better data gathering. It's a fair demand, given that investors and the Fed, with which he has a running feud, base their decisions on such indicators. But Trump's cost-cutting – remember Elon Musk's Doge? – is among the culprits here. His personal attacks on officials and sackings will only weaken global confidence in US. If he manages to 'control' data somehow, he will push US into the league of dictatorships that are known to fudge economic data all the time. In 2018, University of Chicago researcher Luis Martinez made an interesting observation using satellite images: a 10% increase in nighttime lights was correlated with a 2.4% GDP increase in democracies, but 2.9-3.4% increase in authoritarian countries. India passed Martinez's test well, but our data framework isn't strong either. The delayed Census is a blemish, and even after improvements, getting a final estimate of GDP growth takes two years. There are questions about the accuracy of PLFS data also. To improve policy formation, and to attract more investment, we must improve our data collection and reporting. And if the data is sour, spare the messenger. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store