New pension changes for 20m people in Pension Schemes Bill
The Government's new Pension Schemes Bill is designed to support working people plan for their retirement by making pensions simpler to understand, easier to manage, and drive better value over the long term.
Keeping track of pensions is notoriously challenging, with the average worker accumulating 11 different pension pots over their lifetime.
This has resulted in £26.6 billion in lost pensions across the UK, according to the Pensions Policy Institute and the Association of British Insurers.
One of its biggest benefits is the merging of small pension pots.
The bill also introduces a new system to show how well pension schemes are performing, this will help savers understand whether their scheme is giving them good value and protect them from getting stuck in underperforming schemes for years on end, to help working people feel more secure about their retirement savings.
For those approaching retirement, the changes will mean clear default options for turning savings into a retirement income. This means people will have clearer, more secure routes to decide how they use their pension money over time.
The full changes are listed in detail here.
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall says: "Hardworking people across the UK deserve their pensions to work as hard for them as they have worked to save, and our reforms will deliver a huge boost to future generations of pensioners."
Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves describes the bill as "a game changer", giving "bigger pension pots for savers and driving £50 billion of investment directly into the UK economy– putting more money into people's pockets."
Government launches plans to automatically combine small pension pots, here's what it's likely to mean for you... https://t.co/GtTdErcABJ
— Martin Lewis (@MartinSLewis) April 24, 2025
What do these pension changes mean for workers?
The bill will transform the £2 trillion pensions landscape to ensure savers get good returns for each pound they save, and drive investment into the economy, through a suite of measures, including:
Requiring DC schemes to prove they are value for money, to protect savers from getting stuck in underperforming schemes.
Simplifying retirement choices, with all pension schemes offering default routes to an income in retirement.
Bringing together small pension pots worth £1,000 or less into one pension scheme that is certified as delivering good value to savers, making pension saving less hassle and more rewarding.
New rules creating multi-employer DC scheme 'megafunds' of at least £25 billion, so that bigger and better pension schemes can drive down costs and invest in a wider range of assets.
Consolidating and professionalising the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS), with assets held in six pools that can invest in local areas infrastructure, housing and clean energy.
Increased flexibility for Defined Benefit (DB) pension schemes to safely release surplus worth collectively £160 billion, to support employers' investment plans and to benefit scheme members.
What is the difference between a Defined Benefit (DB) scheme and a Defined Contribution (DC) pension?
There are two different ways pension schemes work.
With a Defined Benefit (DB) pension scheme, also referred to as final salary pension schemes, the amount you get is usually based on your salary and how long you've been part of the pension scheme.
For a Defined Contribution (DC) pension, the figure you get is based on how much you and your employer invest in the pension and how your investments perform.
Recommended reading:
What's the expert view on the new pension changes?
Nausicaa Delfas, chief executive of The Pensions Regulator (TPR) says: "The Pension Schemes Bill is a once in a generation opportunity to address unfinished business in the UK pension system.
"Making sure all schemes are focused on delivering value for money, helping to stop small, and often forgotten pension pots forming, and guiding savers towards the right retirement products for them, will mean savers benefit from a system fit for the future.
"We have long advocated for fewer, larger well-run schemes with the size and skill to deliver better outcomes for savers. As such we are also pleased to see the proposed legislative framework for DB superfunds, providing options and choice in defined benefit consolidation."
Andy Briggs, CEO, Phoenix Group says: "The bill sets a clear direction for the future of pensions with the emphasis on building scale and ensuring savers receive value for money.
"People across the country will feel the impact of these changes with plans to consolidate small pots, ensure the dashboard delivers and provide default retirement income options at the point of retirement.
Patrick Heath-Lay, Chief Executive, People's Partnership adds: "This is a pivotal moment in pension reform. The bill contains many measures that will require providers to deliver better outcomes for savers and improve the workplace pension system."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
15 minutes ago
- Times
How Gordon Brown's ‘baby bonds' failed to raise a nation of investors
Rachel Reeves wants stubborn savers to embrace investing to earn better returns and boost the economy. The chancellor is looking to rip up red tape to let banks to nudge savers towards the stock market, and is also considering cutting back the cash Isa allowance to ensure more of our savings are invested. However, the New Labour chancellor Gordon Brown also had an ambition to create a healthier savings culture, and it did not exactly turn out as he had hoped. Brown wanted to raise a generation of investors by giving every baby at least £250 to kickstart the habit. When detailing the policy in his 2003 budget, he said: 'The child trust fund symbolises the difference between those who believe in modernising the welfare state and those who wish it to wither away. 'At age 18, on the basis of historic rates of return, the child trust fund will accumulate assets that will enable all young people to have more of the choices that were once available only to some.' The tax-free scheme was designed to encourage parents to invest for their children's future, and all babies born between September 1, 2002 and January 2, 2011 were eligible. In all, 6.3 million accounts were opened, and the government paid £2 billion into the accounts, which could be accessed from 18. Yet child trust funds were scrapped by the coalition government in 2011 and many have since been lost or forgotten. Some investors have even been locked out of their funds. The first children with funds turned 18 in September 2020. The latest available data shows the total value of the funds is about £9 billion. While up to 2.8 million accounts have now matured, of these, about a quarter (670,000) have not been claimed. On average it's estimated that each young person could have an account worth about £2,000. A further study revealed that most of the accounts did not have any money paid into them between April 2023 and April 2024, suggesting they've been abandoned as a savings vehicle. Maike Currie, an investment and savings expert who worked for Hargreaves Lansdown until recently, said: 'Child trust funds were a victim of the age of austerity after the 2008 financial crisis. 'On reflection, they were always doomed to fail — starting with the elaborate name. Many people were put off, thinking these were the preserve of trust fund babies, while others simply did not know about them. 'This simply reiterates the importance of awareness and education if you're to reignite a nation of investors. If the government today fails on getting this right, they will have another flop on their hands with disastrous consequences.' Education about these accounts was lacking — and remains the case, as shown by a trip by Money in April to one school where many pupils had no idea they had a child trust fund. The initial sum of £250 was doubled to £500 for low-income families. Children had a second payment when they reached seven. However, in 2010, the initial payment was reduced to £50, or £100 for lower-income families, and the second payment at seven scrapped. The first payment was abolished entirely in 2011. New parents were also invited to choose a home for the free cash. They could invest it in the stock market (either choosing the investments themselves or selecting a stakeholder version where the investments were chosen by the provider) or choose a savings-style account where interest was paid. If an account was not opened by the child's parent, HM Revenue & Customs set up a stakeholder account on the child's behalf. Many parents never engaged with the scheme. HMRC stepped in on behalf of 1.7 million parents (28 per cent) who failed to find a home for the £250 within the required 12-month period. All HMRC-allocated accounts were investment-based. According to the Share Foundation, a charity that helps to trace unclaimed funds, more than £400 million is sitting unclaimed in HMRC-allocated accounts. More than half of the unclaimed accounts worth £274 million belong to young adults on low incomes. About 55,000 trust funds mature every month and the charity forecasts that nearly £1 billion will be unclaimed for low-income young adults by the end of this parliament. Gavin Oldham from the Share Foundation said: 'Since September 2020, when the first account holders started turning 18, child trust fund owners have been able to withdraw funds or transfer savings into an adult Isa. 'Yet there's an enormous amount of money sitting unclaimed by youngsters, who could use it to go towards tuition fees, a first home or simply to kickstart their own savings for the future.' The charity has matched more than 85,000 young people with their child trust funds, recovering more than £165 million for young adult account owners. The accounts will continue to mature until 2029, when the last children to get a fund will turn 18, but the worry is that many won't be reunited with their money. • NatWest says stolen £8,500 child trust fund is not its problem There were many other criticisms of the scheme. For example, the investment options were limited and expensive. A parliamentary report highlighted that investment charges for managing the funds were 'very high'. Another issue is that no provision was made for children with disabilities who were unable to manage their own finances. A report has previously suggested 80,000 such young people were unable to access their funds without their families going through the Court of Protection — a process that can be costly and time-consuming. If the amount in the fund is relatively small, the legal fees might outweigh claiming the cash. Analysts have looked for positive outcomes. There was some evidence to show that the accounts appeared to have led some parents to open savings accounts for older siblings who did not benefit. However, it found the scheme did not have a statistically significant effect on the rate of savings for children overall. Education is essential when it comes to encouraging people to invest. Many prefer to keep their savings safe in risk-free cash accounts, where they are unlikely to keep pace with inflation. If you have long enough to ride out the ups and downs of the stock market, investing usually results in a much higher return. A £100 monthly investment into the average global equity fund for the past 18 years (£21,600) would today be worth about £52,800, according to analysis by the investment platform AJ Bell. The same £100 a month saved in an average child's savings account over the last 18 years at 2.93 per cent would today be worth about £28,465, according to Moneyfacts. That's 85 per cent less than if the money had been invested. Currie said: 'Education, awareness and ease are the cornerstones to creating a nation of investors or to put it differently: there needs to be a seismic shift in trust, ease and confidence. 'In the UK, investing is still associated with gambling — people must understand that when you're investing you're owning real assets and the potential for future growth. It's also about getting to grips with the concept of risk and understanding different levels of risk — and the hidden risks of holding too much cash against a backdrop of inflation and longer lives. These are big hurdles to overcome to establish a culture of retail investing in the UK.' • How to get a nation of savers investing Laith Khalaf from AJ Bell said that the UK had a long way to go before reaching the investing culture in the US. Khalaf said: 'The US has been a leader in terms of financial products such as unit trust funds, exchange traded funds, trackers and self-invested personal pensions. As a result there is a greater familiarity with investments and probably a greater risk appetite amongst everyday Americans. That's positive for US investors and stocks over the long term, but it's not without its risk.' In the UK there's perhaps not enough risk being taken, with many people holding large sums of cash and never considering the stock market. Khalaf said: 'At least £100 billion is sitting in cash Isa accounts held by savers with £20,000 or more in cash, but no stocks and shares Isa investments. 'The chancellor's efforts to ignite a retail investing revolution are therefore well met. Getting more people to invest in the stock market will be positive for their long-term wealth and for the economy as a whole. In particular a regular investment plan can help reassure those who don't like the full thrills and spills of the stock market because it leads to a smoother journey.' He added that some things needed to be addressed to encourage investing. 'For example, it's nothing short of bizarre that the Treasury wants people to invest in domestic stocks but charges stamp duty of 0.5 per cent on UK share purchases. An investor can buy shares in a US company like Apple with no stamp duty to pay, but if they buy £10,000 of London-listed AstraZeneca shares, they will pay the government £50 for the privilege.' • The Share Foundation is campaigning for the government to start automatically releasing unclaimed CTF funds once account holders turn 21.• You can search for lost CTF funds using a free HMRC-linked search tool. Have your national insurance number to hand. Tayo Olutunde, 22, received a £2,500 windfall last year when he decided to check whether he had a child trust fund account. Tayo, who lives in Leeds and is studying accounting and finance, watched a TikTok video that prompted him to check with his parents about a child trust fund. They remembered setting one up and contributing to it for a time but couldn't remember with which bank. Olutunde said: 'As a family we moved a lot, including abroad. The contributions would have stopped when we went abroad and the paperwork was lost. I came across the Share Foundation who helped me locate where my account was — with NatWest. 'It took a long time to access the money because I didn't know which address was registered with my account, so I kept failing security. Eventually I got through and found I had £2,400. I was shocked.' Olutunder decided to spend about £400 on a holiday to Italy to celebrate his 21st birthday and invested the rest. But he said more needs to be done to educate young people about the world of investing. He said: 'I have a friend who also located his child trust fund recently. He spent most of it on a fast car, which I'm not sure is the best use of the money.' Scott and Julie James were thrilled to receive the £250 from the government for their daughter Holly when she was born in 2009. The couple, who live in Glasgow, decided to invest the sum to start building a nest egg for her future. Scott, 54, who works as a company director, said: 'The government was giving away free money which was great. Sadly the rest of the scheme wasn't quite so impressive. We wanted to invest the money, knowing that stocks and shares perform better than cash over the longer term. 'But at the time we opened the account, there wasn't a huge number of companies to choose from, and those that did offer child trust funds had a limited investment choice and the charges were high.' They opened an account anyway and it was topped up with money from grandparents. But when junior Isas were launched two years later, Scott felt they offered a bigger range of investments and lower charges, so they started saving in one of those accounts instead. Scott says they are still saving for Holly, now aged 16, perhaps to help with a first property purchase or whatever she might need in adulthood. He said: 'The child trust fund was a nice try, but it just didn't work.
Scotsman
15 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why Chancellor Rachel Reeves must resist pressure to become a left-wing Liz Truss
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... There is no doubting that Rachel Reeves is in an extremely difficult position – caught between Labour's pre-election promise not to raise taxes on 'working people', party rebellions over proposed benefit cuts, her own 'fiscal rules', and a national debt of £2.7 trillion. Amid these competing pressures, the Chancellor somehow needs to find a way to fill a £51 billion black hole in the government's finances in time for her autumn Budget, according to the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, a leading think tank. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Despite the exhortations of some on the hard-left, the Chancellor must avoid seeking the easy way out by suddenly deciding to throw out the rule book and transforming herself into a sort of left-wing Liz Truss. To be fair to Reeves, she shows no signs of making such a horrendous mistake, but political pressure can do strange things to even normally sensible people. A lettuce covers the face of Liz Truss on a campaign advertising board ahead of last year's general election, when she lost her seat (Picture: Jacob King) | PA Clever ploy that backfired The immediate market reaction to the disastrous mini-budget concocted by Truss and her Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng in 2022 led to her downfall within weeks. Despite containing an eye-watering £45 billion of unfunded tax cuts, the then Conservative Prime Minister pretended this was not a proper 'Budget' but only a mere 'mini-budget'. They thought this was a clever ploy, as it avoided the need to get an assessment from the Office for Budget Responsibility. However it turned out to be another reason why investors were so worried that the government's plans did not add up. The result was a fall in the value of the pound, rises in both mortgage rates and the cost of UK Government borrowing, and very real pain for ordinary people. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ideological dreamers on the hard-left and hard-right may refuse to accept the advice of the 'experts' they love to deride, but no Chancellor can afford to be so cavalier and hope to survive in their job for long.
The Guardian
15 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Bank of England poised to cut interest rates on Thursday
The Bank of England is poised to cut interest rates on Thursday despite a growing divide between its policymakers over the dangers to the economy from high inflation and rising unemployment. In a development that will ease pressure on households and businesses, City forecasters expect the central bank to announce a quarter-point cut, its fifth rate reduction in a year. Financial markets predict an almost 100% chance of a quarter-point cut from 4.25%, the same as the last reduction in May. The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, will welcome the cut as Labour comes under pressure over its economic management and growing questions about potential tax rises at her autumn budget. Ministers have sought to claim credit for the Bank reducing its base rate four times since August last year, arguing that it had been able to do so only after Labour had worked to 'restore stability to the economy'. Publishing research before the rate decision at midday on Thursday, the party said a family buying a typical home was now paying almost £1,000 a year less on their mortgage than in July 2024, when the Conservatives left office. Figures from the property website Rightmove showed that a typical first-time buyer's mortgage payment was now almost £100 a month less than a year earlier. However, a fifth rate cut will highlight the dangers facing the economy amid a worsening slowdown, as households and businesses grapple with tax rises, stubborn inflation, and global uncertainty created by Donald Trump's tariff war. Analysts expect the vote on rates from the Bank's nine-strong monetary policy committee to be split, exposing tensions at the heart of Threadneedle Street over the best course of action to keep fast-rising consumer prices in check while also safeguarding jobs and growth. City investors are predicting a three-way split, with the external economists Alan Taylor and Swati Dhingra favouring a bigger, half-point cut amid concern about rising job losses. Most of the MPC members, including the governor, Andrew Bailey, are expected to vote for a quarter-point reduction. Huw Pill, the Bank's chief economist, could split from his colleagues to join the external economist Catherine Mann in voting to keep rates unchanged owing to concerns that inflationary pressures are mounting. Analysts believe that divisions have become more entrenched since the Bank last produced economic forecasts in May. Threadneedle Street will update its outlook on Thursday. Michael Saunders, a former MPC member who is now at the consultancy Oxford Economics, said the committee's split was understandable. 'You have weak growth, rising unemployment and inflation well above target; those signals go in opposite directions [for a rate decision],' he said. 'Different people will put different weights on them. It is not sign that they are more argumentative than other committees [in the past], just that they face a greater disparity between growth, unemployment and inflation.' Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Interest rate cuts support economic growth by lowering borrowing costs for businesses and households. However, bolstering economic activity can stoke inflationary pressures. 'Monetary policy remains quite tight. Fiscal policy is tightening, and the budget may include further tax hikes later this year. Trade policy uncertainty remains high, deterring investment and hiring.' China diverting cheap exports from the US to the UK during Trump's tariff war could also reinforce downward pressure on inflation, he added. Labour has come under pressure from business leaders blaming Britain's recent economic weakness on Reeves raising employment taxes in her first autumn budget, which firms warned would force them to cut jobs and put up prices. Official figures show unemployment has crept higher in recent months, while the economy shrank in April and May. Inflation has risen by more than expected, reaching 3.6% in June – significantly above the Bank's 2% target. Business surveys this week have shown a slowdown in the service sector and a collapse in construction output. Labour said cheaper mortgage rates available today – with the average two-year fixed rate falling to 4.52% – had saved borrowers £81.69 on average each month. The Treasury minister James Murray said: 'Labour's urgent task when we took office was to restore stability to the economy after 14 years of Tory failure. Since we came into office, rates have been cut four times, and that's putting more pounds in the pocket of homeowners through cheaper mortgages.'
