logo
Large drop in number of pupils studying Welsh at A-level since 2005, data shows

Large drop in number of pupils studying Welsh at A-level since 2005, data shows

The drop has come despite the Welsh Government having set a target of one million Welsh speakers by 2050.
Around 538,000 people can speak the language in Wales.
Data examined by the PA news agency shows some 372 students took Welsh as a first or second language at A-level this year, down from 927 in 2005.
The lowest year on record was 2023, when just 353 pupils took the subject.
This year has been the lowest year for people taking Welsh as a first language, with 185 entries, compared with 260 in 2020.
Some 187 pupils took the subject as a second language, with 209 having taken it in 2020.
Efa Gruffudd Jones, the Welsh Language Commissioner – an officer appointed by the Welsh Government to oversee an independent body aiming to promote the use of the Welsh language – described the drop as a 'matter of concern'.
Speaking to PA, Ms Gruffudd Jones said she supported calls from the Coleg Cymraeg Cenedlaethol (Welsh National College) for Welsh to become a protected subject.
She said: '(This would) make sure that every educational institution post-16 offers the course.
'What I hear from people who get in touch with my office, if only you know three or four people want to study it, then schools don't offer the subject at all.
'I believe they need 12 before they decide to run the course. I don't think that's right.
'I think it should be offered at every educational institution post-16.'
Ms Gruffudd Jones also said the qualification itself is under review, and the content needs to be made more attractive and relevant to students.
She added: 'The other thing is that you can study many more courses through the medium of Welsh now than you used to be able to.
'You can study psychology, criminology, etc, through the medium of Welsh.
'Maybe people in the past who would have wanted to study through the medium of Welsh chose Welsh, but now they have a wider range of choice.'
The commissioner stressed that Welsh is not the only language to have seen a decline, with many European languages having seen a drop across the UK.
Total entries for French, German, and Spanish were down by 20% from 443 to 352 in Wales this year, with Ruth Cocks, director of British Council Wales, describing the drop in interest in international languages as a 'concerning story'.
Ms Gruffudd Jones said the reason for the move away from studying languages was unclear, but may be due to pupils being encouraged to study more Stem subjects.
'I understand that we need people with technical ability, but I would argue that you also need linguistic ability in order to communicate with people in workplaces, to articulate yourself well in future,' she said.
'I would argue that literature gives you some insight into the world.
'I don't think really that it should be either or.
'What's important is that it doesn't go any lower, and we continue to make efforts to attract people to learn Welsh to a high standard.'
The Welsh Government's aim to have one million Welsh speakers by 2050 was first set out in 2017.
Earlier this year, a new five-year plan was unveiled by the commissioner to help achieve the goal.
And the Welsh Language and Education (Wales) Bill, which aims to close the gap in Welsh speaking ability among pupils from different schools, passed in the Senedd.
Figures from the 2021 census showed a decline in the number of people who can speak Welsh compared with a decade earlier.
Around 538,000 people in Wales – roughly 17% of the population – said they could speak Welsh, compared with 562,000 in 2011, around 19% of the population.
Recent years have seen Welsh place names take prominence over English as the default, with Eryri replacing Snowdonia on official communications from the national park authority.
In response to the decline in A-level entries, a Welsh Government spokesperson said: 'We would like more learners to take Welsh as a subject.
'A consultation is taking place to look at creating new Welsh AS and A-levels, making them engaging and attractive to learners.
'We see the Welsh Language and Education (Wales) Act 2025 as a means to provide more children and young people with access to the language within the education sector than ever before.
'We want all young people to leave school with better Welsh skills, regardless of whether they do A-level Welsh or not.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The good, the bad and the ugly of the Alaska summit
The good, the bad and the ugly of the Alaska summit

Spectator

time24 minutes ago

  • Spectator

The good, the bad and the ugly of the Alaska summit

The three-hour Friday summit in Alaska between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin ended as well as it conceivably could have ended: as a big nothingburger. But that does not mean that Ukraine and its supporters can breathe a sigh of relief. Trump may be unhappy that the prospect of his Nobel Peace Prize remains elusive as Putin has not agreed to an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine. But it is far from clear that he will end up directing his anger against Russia. To be sure, it is a good thing that nothing of substance was agreed in Anchorage. Any big great-power bargain made over the heads of Europeans and Ukrainians, which Trump and Putin would then seek to impose on the hapless old continent, would mean the end of any semblance of a rules-based international order, in which borders of European nations are not redrawn by force. We can be reasonably confident that Putin would have been happy to agree to an immediate ceasefire in exchange for Ukraine meeting his maximalist demands – Ukraine's capitulation, the ceding of territories that Russians do not yet control, or a prompt election to unseat Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The failure to reach a deal with Trump suggests that the US administration has not bought into Russia's interpretation of the war and how to end it – at least not yet. The presence of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, once a Russia hawk, in the room might have played a role in preventing the worst-case outcome – unlike in Helsinki where the US president was left with Putin unsupervised for several hours. Yet, 'normie' Republicans must have felt more than a bit of shame about the spectacle that Trump orchestrated – the red carpet, the ride in the 'Beast', and the apparent warmth extended to a mass murderer and child kidnapper all reflect poorly on the United States – and help return Putin from pariah status to a respected global leader. Relatedly, while the summit did not bring about a catastrophe for Ukraine, neither is it likely to lead to better Ukraine policy in Washington. It is hard to imagine now a tightening of existing, congressionally mandated sanctions by the executive branch – never mind the bill put forward by Senators Graham and Blumenthal, imposing a de facto trade embargo on countries buying Russian oil and gas, getting through a Republican-controlled Senate. And, even if Trump does not stand in the way of military sales to Ukraine, it will have to be the Europeans who continue to do the financial heavy lifting – all while being held hostage by America's sluggish defence industrial base. Finally, an ominous, ugly thought. In his remarks, Vladimir Putin warned Kyiv and European capitals against 'throw[ing] a wrench' into the works of the emerging deal (whatever it may be) between Russia and the United States. Clearly, the Russian dictator is playing the long game here: hoping to peel off the United States away from the broader pro-Ukrainian coalition. By itself, the summit has not accomplished that goal yet, but it has likely opened new opportunities to lure Trump and his inner circle closer to Russia. Even before the summit, there was speculation about 'money-making opportunities' that could bring the two world powers closer together. The presence of US Treasury and Commerce Secretaries, Scott Bessent and Howard Lutnick, and Russia's Kirill Dimitriev, the head of the country's sovereign wealth fund – alongside 'tremendous Russian business representatives', as Trump put it – signalled a desire on both sides for normalisation of 'businesslike' relations. In practice, that might mean more investment, trade and other 'deals' – especially ones that generate cash for the Trump family enterprise. What lies at heart of the summit is that the US president neither understands nor cares about understanding Putin's motives and the threat he poses to the world. In contrast, Putin, a former KGB lieutenant colonel, has a solid grasp of what makes Trump and his entourage tick. He might make the occasional mistake and overplay his hand but he has focus, consistency, and a voracious appetite. And all of those, wrapped in a thoroughly delusional view of the world and Russia's place in it, were both on full display and unchallenged on Friday.

'We didn't get there': Trump and Putin fail to reach Ukraine deal in Alaska talks
'We didn't get there': Trump and Putin fail to reach Ukraine deal in Alaska talks

ITV News

time24 minutes ago

  • ITV News

'We didn't get there': Trump and Putin fail to reach Ukraine deal in Alaska talks

After talks with President Trump, Putin has hinted a deal is immiment, as ITV News US Correspondent Dan Rivers reports A deal on ending the war in Ukraine has not been reached, despite the efforts of US President Donald Trump during face-to-face talks with Russia's President Putin in Alaska. On Friday, the two leaders greeted one another on the tarmac of Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. They shook hands and smiled for pictures together before making their way to Trump's presidential limousine. They spoke for around two and a half hours before delivering a joint news conference. Standing next to Putin, Trump said: 'We had an extremely productive meeting, and many points were agreed to. 'And there are just a very few that are left. Some are not that significant. One is probably the most significant, but we have a very good chance of getting there.' However, Trump also admitted: 'There's no deal until there's a deal.' Putin claimed they had hammered out an 'understanding' on Ukraine and warned Europe not to 'torpedo the nascent progress.' The meeting marked the Russian president's first time on US soil in more than a decade. Trump said he would call Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders to brief them on the talks. The US President pledged he would bring about an end to the conflict, which began after Russia 's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, on his first day in the White House. Despite not reaching any major breakthrough, Trump ended his remarks by thanking Putin and saying, 'we'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon'. When Putin smiled and offered, 'next time in Moscow,' Trump said 'that's an interesting one' and said he might face criticism but 'I could see it possibly happening'. The Russian president also praised the talks in the press conference, describing them as a "reference point" from which the conflict could be resolved. He went on to say he hoped they would mark the start of restoring "businesslike, pragmatic relations" between the two countries. Meanwhile, the UK's Ministry of Defence has said British personnel are ready to arrive in Ukraine just "days" after Moscow and Kyiv agree to put fighting on hold. The UK Government earlier this summer backed international efforts to set up a "Multinational Force Ukraine", a military plan to bolster Ukraine's defences once the conflict eases, in a bid to ward off future Russian aggression. "Planning has continued on an enduring basis to ensure that a force can deploy in the days following the cessation of hostilities," an MoD spokesperson said. It follows stern remarks from Trump last month, where he revealed a deadline for Russia to negotiate a ceasefire or face heavy tariffs, following his "disappointment" in Putin. At the beginning of August, Trump announced the repositioning of US nuclear submarines over what he described as "inflammatory" remarks by the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev. The war has caused heavy losses on both sides and drained resources. Ukraine has held on far longer than some initially expected since the February 2022 invasion, but it is straining to hold off Russia's much larger army.

MP resigns as trade envoy over northern Cyprus visit
MP resigns as trade envoy over northern Cyprus visit

Powys County Times

time28 minutes ago

  • Powys County Times

MP resigns as trade envoy over northern Cyprus visit

A Labour MP has resigned as the UK's trade envoy to Turkey amid controversy over a visit to Turkish-occupied northern Cyprus. A government spokesman told the BBC Afzal Khan, who represents Manchester Rusholme, had stepped down from his position on Friday. Mr Khan said the trip to the self-declared Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, which is not recognised by the UK Government, was to visit his nephew and to receive an honorary degree. He said he had paid for the trip himself. Turkish troops have occupied the northern section of the Mediterranean island since 1974.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store