Inside Lucy Liu's 7-Year Journey to ‘Rosemead': ‘Gut-Wrenching From a Cellular Level'
Lucy Liu has been in Rosemead for years. No, she hasn't taken up residence in the SoCal city – but the community within L.A. County's San Gabriel Valley has left an indelible mark on the actor as both the setting and title of her latest film, 'Rosemead,' a passion project that's taken hold of her for over seven years.
The film (which was actually produced largely in New York) dramatizes the tragic true story revealed in a 2017 Los Angeles Times article by Frank Shyong about a terminally ill mother and her schizophrenic teenage son.
More from Variety
'Billy Joel: And So It Goes' Review: The Tribeca Festival Opens with a Luscious Longform Documentary That Captures Just the Way He Is
'Twelve Moons' Debuts First-Look Clip Ahead of Tribeca Premiere, Director Victoria Franco Speaks About Societal Pressures on Women (EXCLUSIVE)
'Billy Joel: And So It Goes' Directors Share Inspirational Message From Ailing Singer: 'He Will Be Back'
'I don't know that anyone really would believe it if it wasn't a true story,' Liu, who also serves as a producer, tells Variety over Zoom ahead of the 'Rosemead' world premiere at the Tribeca Festival on Friday. 'It resonates with me because we're missing this. We don't have this story. And I think a lot of the time, people are very excited about action movies, or how wealthy Asians are – but we don't have a story that talks about our community in a more realistic manner.'
It wasn't an easy journey bringing the film to the big screen over the last seven years (which 'felt like 100 years,' Liu quips with a laugh). 'I really think that the reason why it's taken so long is because it's not a sexy idea,' she says. 'What people want is, 'What's going to bring in the money? What's going to go viral?' What's important to me, and has always been important to me, is a true story about something that's dramatic and emotional. This story resonates on a universal level.'
Many words come to mind when thinking of Liu's impressive career spanning four decades: badass, trailblazing, charismatic, alluring. But the world has never seen her quite like this. In 'Rosemead,' the actor lays it all bare in a tour-de-force performance as Irene, a cancer-stricken mother grappling with her own mortality as her 17-year-old son, Joe, begins experiencing the delusions and paranoia associated with schizophrenia. Overwhelming fears about Joe's well-being after her terminal diagnosis ultimately lead Irene to take drastic measures (which we wouldn't dare spoil).
'It feels like there's a responsibility behind playing that character to make sure that people don't tune out,' Liu says. 'She has to be seen in a light that is coming from love. I just don't want people to think that she's a monster.'
To tap into Irene, a soft-spoken, widowed business owner, Liu drew inspiration from her own family and Chinese-American community. 'I really borrowed from relatives and family members in my own life: physicalities, the way the slang would be, and the customs, the culture, the sequestering of what really happened because of the 'saving face' culture,' she says.
That notion of 'saving face' is crucial to understanding 'Rosemead.' When acquaintances learn that Joe is taking medication to treat his condition, they're quick to pass judgment on Irene as a mother. Each time Irene is confronted with Joe's worsening mental health, she refuses to meaningfully engage with those trying to help, be it a kind-hearted psychologist or concerned friends at school. 'The story is something that, in our community, especially, is not projected as a positive conversation. 'Oh, this person's on medication? There must be something really wrong with them.' It's not something that's embraced or supported,' she says with a sigh.
But that idea of projecting only the positives and concealing one's struggles isn't unique to the Chinese community, Liu says. 'It's kind of what social media is in some ways globally now: 'Look at my great life! Look how shiny everything is!' But the reality is, there's a lot going on behind the scenes that nobody's talking about.'
Getting that behind-the-scenes look at how schizophrenia affects Joe, and pushing back on the assumptions made about those who suffer from the disorder, was of paramount importance to Liu as a producer. She recalls staple-gunning audition pamphlets during a broad search for the right actor before finally discovering newcomer Lawrence Shou, who expertly tackles the challenging character in his first-ever film role. 'There was something incredibly special about his choices, and I think that he's really a great talent. He did an excellent job with a very difficult subject matter,' Liu says, beaming with pride.
Joe's episodes in 'Rosemead' are characterized by whispered thoughts, hallucinations and chaotic drawings of spiders and other dark imagery – all of which frighten Irene, despite reassurance from Joe's doctor that he will not become violent.
'We really wanted to make sure that we were truthful to what that is. People who have schizophrenia might have these discussions and these obsessions, but they don't act on them. They don't have that violence factor. That's the stigma: 'They're going to be the ones that are going to pull the trigger,'' Liu says. 'The reality is something quite different. And when you're afraid of something, that's when you step away, when you really should be stepping in.'
It's her greatest hope that a film like 'Rosemead' will encourage viewers to speak more openly about mental health, to prevent a tragedy like Irene's. 'If it's not talked about or understood, that lack of education creates these extreme results,' she says. 'There are so many people struggling. Statistically, we know that it's teenage Asian American boys that are committing suicide. That's the highest rate. That is something to be that we need to be terrified by, so that we can actually act on it, and we can support our community and have this out there so that people know that they shouldn't feel alone.'
'Rosemead' will surely stick with audiences long after credits roll, but the film's most profound impact was perhaps on Liu herself, who's had trouble shaking Irene's story after all these years. 'It was so gut-wrenching from a cellular level that I haven't actually done anything since then, because it was just so intense,' she says of the transformative role. 'I really needed to take a break after that and just reset, because I think it did something for me, on a much deeper level than I thought it would. It changed me.'
Best of Variety
'Blue Velvet,' 'Chinatown' and 'Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas' Arrive on 4K in June
All the Godzilla Movies Ranked
'House of the Dragon': Every Character and What You Need to Know About the 'Game of Thrones' Prequel
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ryan Reynolds and Colin Hanks' Documentary ‘John Candy: I Like Me' to Open Toronto Film Festival's 50th Edition
'John Candy: I Like Me,' a documentary from director Colin Hanks and producer Ryan Reynolds, will open the 50th edition of the Toronto International Film Festival. It's set to screen on Sept. 4 at Roy Thomson Hall. Candy was a Toronto-born comedian who rose to fame on Canada's sketch comedy show 'SCTV' and went on to star in films such as 'Spaceballs,' 'Uncle Buck,' 'Planes, Trains and Automobiles,' 'National Lampoon's Vacation' and 'Little Shop of Horrors.' He unexpectedly died of a heart attack at age 43 in 1994. More from Variety 'The Shadow Scholars,' Executive Produced by Steve McQueen, Debuts Trailer Ahead of North American Premiere at Tribeca (EXCLUSIVE) Bill Murray to Topline Second Annual Croatia International Film Festival (EXCLUSIVE) 'Welded Together' Acquired by Lightdox Ahead of Sheffield DocFest Premiere (EXCLUSIVE) 'Comedy fans all over the world grew up on John Candy's humor,' said Cameron Bailey, CEO of TIFF. 'We love that John's global career started in Toronto. Colin Hanks has made a hugely entertaining film packed with some of Hollywood's biggest stars, but like John, this movie is all heart.' 'John Candy: I Like Me' presents an unvarnished look at the funnyman's life on and off camera, featuring home videos and candid interviews with his family, friends and collaborators. According to the official logline, 'it's the story of a son, husband, father, friend, and professional driven to bring joy to audiences and loved ones while battling personal ghosts and Hollywood pressures.' Amazon MGM is backing the film, which will debut on Prime Video in the fall. 'When you hear the name John Candy, your face lights up. He wasn't just a great actor; he was an even better person,' Hanks and Reynolds said. 'People loved his everyman qualities, but they didn't know how relatable John really was. He went through the same struggles we all do, except now we talk about them. We are incredibly honored to have gotten to know the man better through this process and to bring the real John Candy to audiences starting with his hometown of Toronto.' Other than the opening night film, TIFF's lineup hasn't been released. This year's festival will take place from Sept. 4 through 14. Best of Variety What's Coming to Netflix in June 2025 New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts?
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Justin Baldoni to ‘March Forward' With Blake Lively Legal Battle After $400 Million Defamation Suit Thrown Out: Facts Are ‘on Our Side'
Justin Baldoni plans to keep at his legal battle with 'It Ends With Us' co-star Blake Lively after a judge dismissed his $400 million defamation lawsuit against her and her husband, Ryan Reynolds. 'Ms. Lively and her team's predictable declaration of victory is false, so let us be clear about the latest ruling,' Baldoni's lawyer Bryan Freedman said in a statement to Variety. 'While the court dismissed the defamation related claims, the court has invited us to amend four out of the seven claims against Ms. Lively, which will showcase additional evidence and refined allegations. This case is about false accusations of sexual harassment and retaliation and a nonexistent smear campaign, which Ms. Lively's own team conveniently describes as 'untraceable' because they cannot prove what never happened.' More from Variety Judge Throws Out Justin Baldoni's $400 Million Defamation Suit Against Blake Lively Judge Rules Blake Lively's Emotional Distress Claims Against Justin Baldoni Are Officially Dead Blake Lively Abandons Claims Against Justin Baldoni of Infliction of Emotional Distress Freedman's statement continued, 'Most importantly, Ms. Lively's own claims are no truer today than they were yesterday, and with the facts on our side, we march forward with the same confidence that we had when Ms. Lively and her cohorts initiated this battle and look forward to her forthcoming deposition, which I will be taking. We are grateful for the organic show of support from the public and for the dedication of the Internet sleuth community who continue to cover the case with discernment and integrity.' On Monday, a judge tossed out the entire lawsuit filed by Baldoni that accused Lively and Reynolds of extortion and other claims. Judge Lewis J. Liman, who found that Lively's accusations of sexual harassment were legally protected and therefore immune from suit, allowed Baldoni to amend and refile a couple of allegations regarding interference with contracts. Baldoni's lawsuit against The New York Times, which Baldoni claimed had conspired with Lively and Reynolds to destroy his career with false allegations, was also dismissed. 'As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the court saw right through it,' Lively's lawyers said on June 9 after the dismissal. 'We look forward to the next round, which is seeking attorneys' fees, treble damages and punitive damages against Baldoni […] and the other Wayfarer Parties who perpetrated this abusive litigation.' Lively has sued Baldoni in federal court for sexual harassment and retaliation, alleging the director and producers of 'It Ends With Us' launched a smear campaign against her after she complained about the conditions on the film's set. A trial on Lively's complaint against Baldoni and his company, Wayfarer Studios, has been set for March 2026. Best of Variety 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? 25 Hollywood Legends Who Deserve an Honorary Oscar New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Judge Throws Out Justin Baldoni's $400 Million Defamation Suit Against Blake Lively
A judge on Monday dismissed Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation claim against Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds, finding that her accusations of sexual harassment were legally protected and therefore immune from suit. Judge Lewis J. Liman dismissed Baldoni's entire lawsuit — which also alleged extortion and other claims — but allowed him to amend and refile a couple of allegations regarding interference with contracts. More from Variety Judge Rules Blake Lively's Emotional Distress Claims Against Justin Baldoni Are Officially Dead Blake Lively Abandons Claims Against Justin Baldoni of Infliction of Emotional Distress Taylor Swift Excluded From Baldoni-Lively Narrative, as Subpoena Is Withdrawn 'Today's opinion is a total victory and a complete vindication for Blake Lively, along with those that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Parties dragged into their retaliatory lawsuit, including Ryan Reynolds, Leslie Sloane and The New York Times,' Lively's lawyers said in a statement. 'As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it. We look forward to the next round, which is seeking attorneys' fees, treble damages and punitive damages against Baldoni, Sarowitz, Nathan, and the other Wayfarer Parties who perpetrated this abusive litigation.' Lively has sued Baldoni in federal court for sexual harassment and retaliation, alleging that he and the producers of 'It Ends With Us' launched a smear campaign against her after she complained about conditions on the set of the film. Baldoni brought the defamation claim against the New York Times, Lively, Reynolds, and their publicist, alleging that they had conspired to destroy his career with false allegations. In his ruling on Monday, Liman found that initial claims — first made in a complaint to the California Civil Rights Department and shared with the Times — were covered by the litigation privilege, which immunizes legal claims from defamation actions. The Times' reporting on the claims was also protected under the 'fair report' privilege, which allows media outlets to cover legal proceedings without incurring defamation liability. Best of Variety 25 Hollywood Legends Who Deserve an Honorary Oscar New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week Emmy Predictions: Animated Program — Can Netflix Score Big With 'Arcane,' 'Devil May Cry' and the Final Season of 'Big Mouth?'