Pro-Europe mayor triumphs in crucial vote which could decide country's path
It was held months after the cancellation of the previous election plunged Romania into its worst political crisis in decades.
After 10.5 million of 11.6 million votes had been counted, Mr Dan was ahead with 54.32%, while votes for Mr Simion stood at 45.68%, according to official data.
When voting closed at 9pm (1900 UK time), official electoral data showed a 64% voter turnout.
About 1.64 million Romanians abroad, who have been able to vote since Friday at specially set-up polling stations, participated in the vote.
After polls closed on Sunday, Mr Dan told the media that 'elections are not about politicians' but about communities and that in Sunday's vote, 'a community of Romanians has won, a community that wants a profound change in Romania'.
'When Romania goes through difficult times, let us remember the strength of this Romanian society,' he said. 'There is also a community that lost today's elections. A community that is rightly outraged by the way politics has been conducted in Romania up to now.'
Turnout was significantly higher in Sunday's runoff and is expected to play a decisive role in the outcome. In the first round on May 4, final turnout stood at 9.5 million, or 53% of eligible voters.
Romania's political landscape was upended last year when a top court voided the previous election in which far-right outsider Calin Georgescu topped first-round polls, following allegations of electoral violations and Russian interference, which Moscow denied.
Standing on the steps of Romania's colossal Communist-era parliament building after polls closed, Mr Simion predicted a significant victory over his opponent, which he called a 'victory of the Romanian people'.
Mr Simion said that Mr Georgescu was 'supposed to be the president' before last year's election was annulled. He also called for vigilance against election fraud, but said that overall he was satisfied with the conduct of the vote.
Shortly after 6pm, Romania's ministry of foreign affairs spokesperson Andrei Tarnea said in a post on X that the election was subject to a 'viral campaign of fake news' on the Telegram messaging app and other social media platforms, which tried to influence the electoral process and had 'the hallmarks of Russian interference'.
Networks of co-ordinated disinformation have emerged as a pervasive force throughout Romania's entire election cycle. Romanian authorities debunked the deluge of fake news, Mr Tarnea said.
Mr Simion appeared alongside Mr Georgescu at a Bucharest polling station on Sunday and told reporters that he voted against the 'humiliations to which our sisters and brothers have been subjected'.
'We voted against abuses and against poverty,' he said. 'I voted for our future to be decided only by Romanians, for Romanians and Romania. So help us God.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
34 minutes ago
- Metro
What will happen after Trump's meeting with Putin in Alaska?
The stakes are high for Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin when the pair meet in Alaska on Friday to discuss ending the war in Ukraine. The US President and his Russian counterpart will sit down at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in the largest US state – a site chosen due to its close proximity to Russia. Addressing reporters at the White House last week, Trump suggested an agreement would involve some exchange of land between Ukraine and Russia. 'There'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both,' the Republican president said. But Volodymyr Zelensky has pushed against that, saying Ukrainians 'will not gift their land to the occupiers'. In a video address to the nation posted on his Telegram channel on Saturday, the Ukrainian President said any decisions without Ukraine would be decisions against peace. He added: 'They will not bring anything. These are dead decisions. They will never work.' When Trump revealed his plans for a meeting with Putin last week, he also floated a potential second meeting where Zelensky would join them. Following a virtual chat with European and Nato leaders yesterday afternoon, the US President again suggested the trilateral could take place soon after the Alaska summit. Trump and Putin would use their initial tete-a-tete to 'find out where we are and what we're doing', he said, adding: 'We'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin and President Zelensky and myself, if they'd like to have me there.' The Kremlin has confirmed additional details of the summit between the two leaders on Friday. Presidential aide Yuri Ushakov said they will initially meet one-on-one with interpreters at 11.30am local time, which is 8.30pm UK time. Afterwards, five additional members from each delegation will join Trump and Putin. The pair will then hold a joint press conference. Donald Trump notoriously promised he would be able to bring the war between Russia and Ukraine to an end on day one after being re-elected. Of course, that didn't happen – and after some success in bringing violence to a stop between Israel and Iran as well as other countries, he may see this conflict as something like a white whale. Negotiations between US and Russian officials so far this year have failed to bring the bloodshed in Ukraine to an end. Trump is a big believer in his deal-making talents, and he thinks getting himself into a room with Putin may present the best shot at nailing down a result. The meeting will also touch on co-operation and trade between the US and Russia, so the two presidents may be hoping for broader results. The likelihood of the trilateral taking place may depend heavily on the outcome of the Friday bilateral. Trump has said there will be 'very serious consequences' if Russia does not agree to a ceasefire, though he did not specify what they were. If the long-awaited three-way meeting does take place, one of the leaders will come to the table at a significant disadvantage, according to British Foreign Policy Group think tank director Evie Aspinall. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Aspinall said Trump is 'feeling relatively confident about the situation' after weeks of trumpeting his role in stopping conflicts between Israel and Iran, India and Pakistan, and several other regions around the world. She told Metro: 'I think in his mind, he's managed to bring Putin to the table, and he's going to use it as an opportunity to really cement himself as this deal maker and as someone that is able to secure peace in the world. 'And so what he wants, really, is a ceasefire. He wants an end to the war in Ukraine. His intent is fairly straightforward. He wants to see the war end, and he wants to be seen as the man that makes that possible.' Ultimately, the summit is 'as much as anything, an image thing' for Trump, she argued, as it would also mean disentangling the US from a global conflict. Putin, meanwhile, is 'making huge progress militarily' in Ukraine and is able to use the meeting to secure two big objectives – demonstrating to Trump he is 'reasonable' enough to negotiate, and buying time on the battlefield. Aspinall said: 'Putin will be building up his resources so that he is in the best position possible for when a ceasefire or full negotiation then happens. 'He wants to use this as an opportunity to show that he's on Trump's side.' The US President may have appeared to sharpen his stance against his Russian counterpart in recent weeks, notably hitting India with punitive tariffs for buying Russia's oil. But Aspinall explained it's likely a shrewd move from Putin to sit down for talks at this point in time. She said: 'I think Putin is playing quite well for the Russians. By coming to negotiating table, he's managed to get Trump to wait, step back from the threats of sanctions for now. 'What he'll be hoping is that he presents himself as reasonable in these meetings, and then Trump doesn't go on with the sanctions that are supposed to hit imminently.' For Zelensky, the summit will be much more of a high-wire act with far more risks. Aspinall said: 'I think there is possible progress. The problem with the progress is it will be on Putin's terms, rather than Zelensky's terms. 'I think there is a world in which you see Trump and Putin come out saying, 'This is a deal that would work,' and then you have Europe and Ukraine pushing back very heavily on that, and a negotiation over that deal.' The Ukrainian President's best bet might be to challenge Putin's position as the 'reasonable actor' in the negotiations by pressing hard on the Russian leader's red lines – such as agreeing to Ukraine joining Nato. This could 'push Putin into a corner', suggested Aspinall, which might be Zelensky's best chance at leverage. More Trending But she was clear Ukraine has more to lose in a likely deal. Russia could be flexible on territory swaps, and offer them in exchange for Putin's bigger prizes: blocking Ukrainian Nato membership, shrinking the size of its military, and forcing elections that would 'inevitably be biased by Russian disinformation'. Aspinall said: 'the Territory part is the part that they will probably be softer on, as a way for Trump to come out and say, we're not giving Putin everything. We've got the territory back, for example. 'But Putin can sell it as you know, we no longer have an aggressor on our doorstep. We have a supporter and ally of Russia on our doorstep.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Trump and Putin to discuss 'huge untapped potential' for Russia-US economic gains MORE: Fans slam iconic 80s rockers for calling Trump appointment 'great honour' MORE: Keir Starmer embraces Volodymyr Zelensky on Downing Street ahead of Trump-Putin meeting
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Poland foiled cyberattack on big city's water supply, deputy PM says
WARSAW, Aug 14 (Reuters) - A large Polish city could have had its water supply cut off on Wednesday as a result of a cyberattack, a deputy prime minister said after the intrusion was foiled. In an interview with news portal Onet on Thursday, Deputy Prime Minister Krzysztof Gawkowski, who is also digital affairs minister, did not specify who was behind the attack or which city was targeted. Poland has said that its role as a hub for aid to Ukraine makes it a target for Russian cyberattacks and acts of sabotage. Gawkowski has described Poland in the past as the "main target" for Russia among NATO countries. Gawkowski told Onet that the cyberattack could have meant there would be no water in one of Poland's big cities. "At the last moment we managed to see to it that when the attack began, our services had found out about it and we shut everything down. We managed to prevent the attack." He said Poland manages to thwart 99% of cyberattacks. Gawkowski last year that Poland would spend over 3 billion zlotys ($800 million) to boost cybersecurity after the state news agency PAP was hit by what authorities said was likely to have been a Russian cyberattack. The digital affairs ministry did not immediately respond to an email requesting further details. On Wednesday Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who has warned that Russia is trying to drive a wedge between Warsaw and Kyiv, said that a young Ukrainian man had been detained for acts of sabotage on behalf of foreign intelligence services, including writing graffiti insulting Poles. PAP reported on Thursday that a 17-year-old Ukrainian man detained, among other things, for desecrating a monument to Poles killed by Ukrainian nationalists in World War Two has been charged with participating in an organised criminal group aimed at committing crimes against Poland.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
WhatsApp hits back at Russia over latest move
WhatsApp has accused Russia of attempting to block its encrypted messaging service, stating that Moscow 's actions are a direct response to its commitment to secure communication. The Meta-owned platform has vowed to continue making its end-to-end encrypted services available to users in Russia despite these restrictions. Russia has also begun imposing restrictions on certain Telegram and WhatsApp calls, alleging that these foreign-owned platforms have failed to provide law enforcement with information on fraud and terrorism cases. Reports in Russian media earlier this week indicated that users were experiencing disrupted calls on both WhatsApp and Telegram. Both platforms have a history of disputes with Russian authorities, with critics suggesting Russia is expanding its control over the country's internet space.
