&w=3840&q=100)
Alternative data sources help in 'proactive intervention' for growth: CEA
'It is important to note that the value of alternate data is not in its volume or novelty, but in the distinctive lens it offers,' he said at the National Workshop on Alternate Data Sources and Frontier Technologies for Policy Making. The two-day event in New Delhi is organised by the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI).
'These data sources enable policymakers to move from retrospective diagnostics to proactive intervention. It captures emergent behaviour and reflects the lived experience of economic agents that conventional aggregates sometimes cannot.'
It is important that researchers understand the huge amounts of data that is being generated, as it helps in improving the forecast accuracy of economic aggregates such as consumption, gross domestic product and investments, said Nageswaran.
'For example, satellite-based night-time luminosity has been used to indicate economic activity in regions with delayed or weak statistical reporting. The satellite data can help policymakers detect cropping patterns, assess soil moisture, and detect early signs of drought. These insights can inform timely decisions on input provisioning, crop insurance payouts, and regional procurement strategies.'
Suman K Bery, vice-chairperson of NITI Aayog, told the workshop conventional data should be integrated with alternate sources while ensuring quality.
'The insights from traditional as well as alternate data sources need to be strengthened with emphasis on data processing and assimilation at the same time,' said Bery.
Saurabh Garg, secretary at MoSPI, listed five building blocks for enhancing harmonisation of data. These are meta data structures, international and national classifications, unique identifiers, self-quality assessment tools and reconciliation of diverse data to achieve such endeavours.
Nageswaran said data generated by statistical systems and alternate sources complement rather than substitute each other. The latest trends in technology, like artificial intelligence and Internet of things, have to go hand in hand with skilling manpower.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
13 hours ago
- Time of India
TSDSI, ATU ink pact for collaboration on 5G, 6G, AI, rural broadband standards
NEW DELHI: The Telecommunications Standards Development Society , India ( TSDSI ) said on Wednesday that it has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Africa Telecommunications Union ( ATU ) for technical collaboration on global standards for 5G , 6G, artificial intelligence ( AI ), the Internet of Things (IoT), and rural broadband. 'It is poised to strengthen the Global South's voice in international standards bodies such as the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), and to address the long-standing "standardisation gap" that has limited the effective participation of developing countries,' the TSDSI said in a joint statement. Historically, global standardisation has been steered predominantly by advanced economies, the Indian telecom standards body said, adding that the pact with the ATU aims to enable Africa and India to co-develop technical contributions as per their domestic markets. TSDSI has already made significant contributions, including the 5Gi specification, aimed at improving rural 5G coverage. The ATU, as the ITU regional telecommunications body for Africa and the ICT arm of the African Union, has similarly coordinated common African positions at the ITU. ATU Secretary General John Omo said, 'Africa and India share not only development aspirations but also an urgent need to be more meaningfully represented in the global standards-setting scene. This MoU offers us a necessary opportunity to share technical leadership in areas that can benefit both Africa and India.' 'The inclusion of needs such as coverage, ubiquitous connectivity, sustainability and AI assisted) networks and communication in the IMT2030 Framework, is indicative of how telecom technologies are expected to be developed and deployed for digital public good, especially in rural and remote areas,' said AK Mittal, director-general, TSDSI. Mittal said that the collaboration between TSDSI and ATU is a 'natural alliance' which will help discover common requirements and interests of end-users, telecom service providers and policy makers from India and Africa, strengthening their voice on the global standards arena. With 5G-Advanced and 6G discussions already underway in standardisation forums, the TSDSI–ATU alliance is well-positioned to influence the design of next-generation networks. In this regard, both TSDSI and ATU intend to collaborate and build synergies in telecoms and ICT standardisation, radiocommunication, and the inclusion of regional requirements into the global standards development processes. The pact also provides a framework for coordination on global standards, radio, and ICT development forums, as well as the implementation of joint capacity-building initiatives in these areas.
Time of India
16 hours ago
- Time of India
Chinese FDI: Global lessons for India's guardrails strategy
Figure 1 - India's FDI inflows from China over the years. Source: DPIIT Newsletters Live Events Figure 2: Distribution of FDI inflows from China to various industries in India, as per the NIC 2008 section-wise classification (2016-2025). Source: Author's Calculations using FDI data from DPIIT Newsletters and Classification from NIC 2008. This is the first article of a three-part bilateral relationship between India and China, long defined by a complex interplay of geopolitical frictions and economic interdependencies, has recently shown cautious signs of improvement, particularly after being severely strained by the 2020 Galwan Valley clashes. This shift has been evident since October 2024, marked by the renewal of high-level dialogues and the softening of stance towards Chinese investments by India in recent years. Amid these ongoing efforts, NITI Aayog's recent proposal to allow Chinese companies to acquire up to a 24% stake in Indian firms without prior approval signals a further positive shift in both India's approach to Chinese FDI (foreign direct investment) and broader diplomatic present, all Chinese investments into India fall under the purview of Press Note No. 3 (PN3), which was introduced by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade ( DPIIT ) in April 2020. This note outlines the guidelines regarding the treatment of FDI inflows from countries that share land borders with India. As stated in the official note, the PN3 was introduced for 'curbing opportunistic takeovers/acquisitions of Indian companies due to the Covid-19 pandemic' by requiring prior government approval for all investments from countries sharing a land border with India, including China. The policy amendment was an immediate response to growing concerns over predatory Chinese capital acquiring stakes in Indian firms and start-ups, triggered particularly by the decision of the People's Bank of China to increase its shareholding in HDFC Bank from 0.8% to 1%.China's history of strategic acquisitions in the US and Europe had also prompted several countries, including Germany, Italy, Spain, and Australia, to tighten their FDI norms, which further influenced India's decision to adopt stricter screening measures. The situation was only further intensified following the clashes between the countries in Galwan Valley, prompting India to take further steps to restrict Chinese investment in India, such as rejecting several high-profile investment proposals, including one from electric vehicle manufacturer impact of the changing policy environment is evident in the FDI inflow trends. Between 2016 and 2025, cumulative FDI from China amounted to approximately $954 million (see Figure 1). The average annual inflows stood at $886 million during 2016-2020, before the issuance of PN3, but dropped sharply to just $68 million during 2021-2025, following the announcement of the inflows over the past decade (2016-2025) were concentrated in manufacturing industries, which account for 68.2% of the total FDI inflows (Figure 2).At a more disaggregated level, electrical equipment and electronic goods accounted for around 31%. Thus, the Indian government's gradual signalling over recent months towards a possible openness to Chinese investments in the electronics sector in the future, provided they come through joint ventures (JVs) with Indian firms and include clear technology transfer provisions, reflects a cautiously evolving official approval of such decisions would not mark an unprecedented shift but rather a continuation of India's selective approach to Chinese investments. In recent years, the government has demonstrated a willingness to approve JVs involving Chinese firms, particularly in strategic sectors like electronics and automobiles, where such collaborations promise technology absorption and value addition while also aligning with national interests. For instance, in 2024, approvals were granted to the Micromax-owned Bhagwati for a JV with Chinese original design manufacturer Huaqin and to Dixon Technologies for acquiring a stake in Ismartu India, a subsidiary of China's Transsion on these evolving stances, the way forward for India lies in adopting a calibrated framework towards Chinese investments—one that incorporates lessons from other countries' regulatory experiences and establishes clear guardrails to safeguard national security while facilitating the inflow of capital and technology.A key step in this direction for India would be to adopt a sector-specific FDI framework that clearly defines, maintains, and periodically updates the list of sensitive and non-sensitive sectors. For example, Australia maintains a list of sensitive sectors, including critical infrastructure, critical minerals, advanced technologies, investments near sensitive government sites, and those involving access to sensitive data, which are particularly subject to enhanced scrutiny under its investment regime. In fact, Australia not only screens foreign investments at the pre-entry stage but also exercises 'call-in' and 'last resort' powers to reassess previously approved investments if national security concerns arise—a safeguard that India can also consider US, in February 2025, also outlined specific sectors where it would restrict investments, particularly from China-affiliated entities. These sectors included advanced technology, critical infrastructure, healthcare, agriculture, energy, raw materials, and other strategically significant areas. On similar lines, Germany and Italy also cover a broad range of strategically sensitive sectors subject to strict scrutinising mechanisms, such as defence, critical infrastructure, healthcare, media, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity and data security, semiconductors, and other high-tech by carefully identifying its strategic and non-strategic sectors, India can consider restricting Chinese investments in areas critical to national sovereignty, such as defence, telecommunications, critical infrastructure, and emerging technologies, while continuing to permit and even encourage foreign equity inflows in its non-sensitive sectors. In non-strategic sectors, such as manufacturing, India could permit up to 49% equity from China—higher than the proposed 24%, provided there is a strong pre-entry screening mechanism, which could perhaps be more attractive for Chinese investors and at the same time would not compromise on national addition, India can work towards institutionalising post-approval review mechanisms, establishing a central registry to monitor foreign ownership patterns, and enabling conditional approvals, such as restrictions on board representation, mandatory technology transfer clauses, and periodic compliance writers Nisha Taneja is professor at ICRIER and Vasudha Upreti is Research Assistant.
Time of India
19 hours ago
- Time of India
Powering Viksit Bharat: The new solar frontier
One of the extraordinary achievements of recent years has been the success in the development of solar power. When the Solar Mission was launched in 2010, solar power capacity in the country was negligible, less than a fifth of a GW. It is now over a 100 GW. The price then was around ₹17 per unit. It is now around ₹2.50 per unit, far cheaper than electricity from a new thermal power plant using coal. Prime Minister Modi demonstrated responsible climate leadership at COP21 in Glasgow when he announced that India would create 500 GW of fossil fuel free capacity by 2030. Increasing the pace of solar power development is the key to the achievement of the 500 GW capacity goal. Solar power along with storage has also become cheaper than new thermal. Going forward, new solar and accompanying storage capacities have to be created together. Battery electricity storage systems (BESS) are becoming cheaper. These can be installed where needed and their installation time is not large. Hydro pump storage project development with private investment is also gaining momentum rapidly. Achieving the 500 GW goal does not impose any additional cost. It is in fact the cheaper way of meeting the increasing demand for electricity. As solar power has become the driver of India's energy transition away from fossil fuels, the natural question that arises is, what is the solar power potential of the country. Is it large enough for the needs of a Viksit Bharat . In 2014 the potential for solar power had been assessed at 748 GW. This is large. But India's per capita electricity consumption is still a modest 1400 units per year. It needs to go up to four times as India moves towards becoming a developed country. With over 100 GW of solar power capacity already installed, the assessed potential of 748 GW then appears inadequate over the long run. Hence India would need other options to be able to have an emission free electricity system. Nuclear power became one. Government has recently announced the ambitious goal of creating 100 GW of nuclear power capacity by 2047, a massive increase from the present level of 8.18 GW. The advantage of nuclear power is that there are no emissions of carbon dioxide. Finally, the international community has recognised nuclear energy as an acceptable solution to the challenge of climate change. The other option would be to capture the carbon dioxide produced by the burning of coal in a thermal power plant and store it permanently under the earth's surface. This carbon capture and storage (CCUS) is technically feasible. But there is the substantial cost of capturing carbon dioxide, taking it through a pipe to a suitable place from where it can be injected inside the earth's surface to a formation where it would stay permanently. In addition to this cost, finding suitable formations where carbon dioxide would stay is a challenge across the world. The NITI Aayog has prepared a strategy paper for this for India. A recently released report of TERI has concluded that at a conservative basis the solar power potential in the country is 10,380 GW. This is over twelve times the earlier estimate. How has such a large, revised estimate emerged. The earlier estimate had assumed that only 3 per cent of the wasteland of the country could be used for putting up solar panels. The study has assumed that 40 per cent of the wasteland can be used, a reasonable assumption going by the way projects are coming up in Rajasthan and Gujarat. The Prime Minister's roof top solar panel program has created the potential of every home ultimately having a solar panel on the roof. This potential is huge. Tiles with embedded solar panels which generate electricity and can be used instead of normal tiles on the exterior of buildings, have entered the market. Public spaces in urban areas offer considerable possibilities for the installation of solar panels. The real game changer, however, is the emergence of agri-solar . Solar panels can be put over agricultural land. Around forty pilot projects are being implemented in various parts of India. In theory the farmer would get a higher income from solar power with the panels being mounted at a height without coming in the way of what is growing on his land. As this is at an early trial stage, a very modest potential has been assumed in the report. If the pilots succeed then all the cultivated land could in theory become available for solar power generation. These solar panels could also be of help in adaptation also as temperatures rise in the future. This completely changes the paradigm of the ongoing energy transition. There is more than enough solar power potential in the country for having a carbon emission free electricity system which produces all the electricity that we would need as we become a developed economy. (Ajay Shankar is a Distinguished Fellow at The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), and former Secretary, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, Government of India. Views are personal.)
