A key NATO ally said it would be 'really big mistake' for Europe to break away from the US weapons industry
A key NATO member warned that it would be a "really big mistake" for Europe to break away from the US defense industry.
European defense spending has risen sharply since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, and President Donald Trump has cast doubt on his commitment to NATO and Ukraine, prompting warnings that Europe has to prepare for America withdrawing support.
Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, said in March that"we must buy more" European weapons, and "that means creating an EU-wide market for defense equipment."
Some countries have even said they were rethinking some of the most key types of US-made weaponry, like the F-35 fighter jet, even though there is no like-for-like replacement for the fifth-generation aircraft.
Kestutis Budrys, Lithuania's foreign minister, said during the NATO summit on Tuesday that it would be a "really big mistake for Europe just to draw the line, to build defense" capabilities without US involvement, Breaking Defense reported.
He said there is "room enough for everyone, and I'm talking about our transatlantic relations on this specific element."
Lithuania's defense spending is among the highest of any NATO member as a proportion of its GDP, at an estimated 2.85% in 2024 according to NATO figures.
It's one of the countries sounding the alarm that Europe needs to keep increasing its defenses, as Russia could attack beyond Ukraine.
Last month, former CIA director David Petraeus said Lithuania was the country he thought was most at risk of a Russian invasion.
Defense spending across Europe has soared since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
EU countries spent an estimated $379 billion on defense in 2024, a 30% rise from 2021, per official figures.
But many nations on the continent warn that shortfalls in manufacturing capacity mean that increased spending is not yet enough.
Many other European countries, including Lithuania, are still ordering defense equipment from the US.
The country already has many US-made weapons in its arsenal, and has placed orders for others like the High Mobility Artillery Rocket System made by Lockheed Martin.
Lithuanian Defense Minister Dovilė Šakalienė said in March that her country has signed off on $2 billion worth of business with US defense firms in the past three years.
US manufacturer Northrop Grumman announced on Tuesday that it had signed a memorandum of understanding with Lithuania to co-produce ammunition.
The UK said on Tuesday that it's buying 12 F-35As, saying they will be used to carry nuclear weapons.
The Spanish subsidiary of US defense company Lockheed Martin signed a new agreement with the country's defense ministry in May. Under the agreement, it will work with two Spanish companies on parts for its PAC-3 missiles, which are used by the Patriot air defense system.
On his way to the NATO summit, Trump raised doubts about his commitment to Article 5, which obliges members to come to each other's defense, telling reporters on Air Force One there were "numerous definitions" of it.
Rutte later said the US president was "totally committed" to Article 5.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
34 minutes ago
Nestle says it will remove artificial dyes from US foods by 2026
Nestle said Wednesday it will eliminate artificial colors from its U.S. food and beverages by the middle of 2026. It's the latest big food company making that pledge. Last week, Kraft Heinz and General Mills said they would remove artificial dyes from their U.S. products by 2027. General Mills also said it plans to remove artificial dyes from its U.S. cereals and from all foods served in K-12 schools by the middle of 2026. The move has broad support. About two-thirds of Americans favor restricting or reformulating processed foods to remove ingredients like added sugar or dyes, according to an AP-NORC poll. Both California and West Virginia have recently banned artificial dyes in foods served in schools. On Sunday, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas signed a bill requiring foods made with artificial dyes or additives to contain a new safety label starting in 2027. The label would say they contain ingredients 'not recommended for human consumption' in Australia, Canada, the European Union or the U.K. The federal government is also stepping up its scrutiny of artificial colors. In January, days before President Donald Trump took office, the U.S. regulators banned the dye called Red 3 from the nation's food supply, nearly 35 years after it was barred from cosmetics because of potential cancer risk. In April, Trump's Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said the agency would take steps to eliminate synthetic dyes by the end of 2026, largely by relying on voluntary efforts from the food industry. Nestle has pledged to remove artificial dyes before. Early in 2015, the company said it would remove artificial flavors and colors from its products by the end of that year. But the promise didn't hold. Nestle said Wednesday it's been removing synthetic dyes from its products over the last decade, and 90% of its U.S. portfolio doesn't contain them. Among those that do is Nesquik Banana Strawberry milk, which is made with Red 3. Nestle said Wednesday it wants to evolve with its U.S. customers' changing nutritional needs and preferences. 'Serving and delighting people is at the heart of everything we do and every decision that we make,' Nestle's U.S. CEO Marty Thompson said in a statement.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trading Day: Whirlwind fades, calm returns
By Jamie McGeever ORLANDO, Florida (Reuters) - TRADING DAY Making sense of the forces driving global markets By Jamie McGeever, Markets Columnist After two days of strong gains in world stocks amid the widespread relief over cooling Middle East tensions, relative stability was the hallmark of trading on Wednesday, with major asset classes moving in much narrower ranges. In my column today I look at U.S. foreign direct investment - was the sharp decline in the first quarter an anomaly, or a warning of what's to come in the brave new tariff world? More on that below, but first, a roundup of the main market moves. If you have more time to read, here are a few articles I recommend to help you make sense of what happened in markets today. 1. Fed's Powell cautions against ending Fed power to payinterest on reserves 2. U.S. current account gap clocks pre-2008 crashmilestone: Mike Dolan 3. Israel-Iran war highlights Mideast's declining influenceon oil prices: Bousso 4. NATO commits to spending hike sought by Trump, and tomutual defence 5. U.S. exchanges, SEC in talks to ease public companyregulations Today's Key Market Moves * World stocks and the Nasdaq 100 hit new peaks for a secondday in a row. The S&P 500 slips, but is still very close to itsrecord high. * Some big moves in U.S. tech, with Super Micro Computer+8.8%, Nvidia +4.3% to a record high, AMD +3.6%, and Tesla-3.8%. Real estate is the biggest declining sector, -2.5%. * Oil stops the rot, kind of, gaining nearly 1% on inventory drawdown and signs of strong U.S. gasolinedemand. * The dollar slips to fresh multi-year lows against the euroand sterling. * Platinum up another 2.5% to new 11-year high above$1,350/oz. Now up 28% in June, on for its best month since 1986. Whirlwind fades, calm returns The MSCI All Country index and Nasdaq 100 touched new record highs for a second session, and Asian and emerging market stocks posted solid gains earlier in the day. But the Dow, U.S. small caps and benchmark European indexes all fell. The euro's march higher is taking its toll, and European stocks have underperformed since the brief Israel-Iran war broke out on June 13. The euro on Wednesday rose for a fifth straight day to $1.1665, its highest since October 2021. Sterling hit its highest since February 2022 at $1.3670, and Britain's FTSE 100 slipped to its lowest this month. Bank of England policymakers may be secretly cheering the pound's rally, however, if it helps tame inflation pressures. The latest Citi/YouGov survey of UK consumers' inflation expectations on Wednesday showed that long-term inflation expectations among the British public rose to the highest since September 2022. One sector faring better in Europe on Wednesday, though, was defense, after NATO leaders agreed big increases in defense spending, especially from Europe. U.S. defense stocks have moved in the other direction this week following the Iran-Israel ceasefire. On the policy and macro front, Fed Chair Jerome Powell's second day of congressional testimony passed off without fireworks, although there were sparks in his exchanges with some lawmakers. He reiterated his view that the central bank is right to wait and see what the impact is from tariffs before considering further rate cuts. U.S. foreign investment slump - anomaly or warning? Much of the 'de-dollarization' debate has focused on foreign exposure to U.S. securities like stocks and bonds. But investors shouldn't ignore foreign direct investment flows, the traditionally sticky capital that may also be sending out warning signals. Foreign direct investment typically involves an overseas entity acquiring the assets of a company in another country or increasing its holdings, often via the purchase of machinery, plants or a controlling stake. FDI is therefore considered a longer-term investment compared to portfolio flows, which can be more volatile. U.S. President Donald Trump says he has attracted record foreign investment into the country. Indeed, the White House has a page on its website with a "non-comprehensive running list of new U.S.-based investments" since Trump's second term began. The running total is in the trillions of dollars and includes pledges from several foreign countries. Included are more than $4 trillion in U.S.-bound investments pledged by the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Japan and Saudi Arabia. During Trump's trip to the Middle East last month, he said the U.S. is on track to receive $12-$13 trillion of investments from countries around the globe, which includes "projects mostly announced ... and some to be announced very shortly." These flows may emerge in full, in time. But official figures on Tuesday showed that FDI in the first quarter actually fell to $52.8 billion, the lowest total since the fourth quarter of 2022. That's well below the quarterly averages of the past 10 and 20 years. The Commerce Department figures also showed that the U.S. current account deficit widened to a record $450.2 billion in the quarter, or 6% of U.S. GDP, meaning FDI inflows barely covered 10% of that shortfall. Should the Trump administration be worried? TARIFF DISTORTIONS The short answer is probably not, at least not yet. FDI flows are typically far smaller than portfolio flows into equity and fixed income securities, so from the perspective of funding the current account deficit, the drop in FDI is not as pressing a concern. On the other hand, if foreign investors are also buying fewer U.S. securities, capital from elsewhere will be needed to fund that deficit. Additionally, America's balance of payments data in the first quarter was hugely distorted by domestic consumers and businesses front-running Trump's tariffs, loading up on imports before the duties kick in later this year. Trump's bet is that the deficit will shrink this year and beyond as his 'America First' policies spur more "onshoring" from domestic firms as they bring production back home and the weakening dollar helps U.S. manufacturing by making exports more competitive. The subsequent boom will attract investment from companies and governments overseas. In theory. However, these dynamics work both ways. For example, the European Union is by far the largest provider of U.S. FDI, accounting for 45% of the total in 2023, according to Citi. The combination of the continent's German-led fiscal splurge, U.S. tariffs and 'de-dollarization' concerns could easily crimp that flow, perhaps significantly. Another potential risk to U.S.-bound FDI is 'Section 899' - the possible tax of up to 20% on foreigners' U.S. income that could be part of Trump's budget plans. A Tax Foundation report in May found that Section 899 would "hit inbound investment from countries that make up more than 80 percent of the U.S. inbound FDI stock." Industry pushback may water down Section 899, but it remains a cloud on the U.S. investment horizon. The U.S. is the world's biggest recipient of FDI, with a 25% share of global volumes in 2023, up from around 15% before the pandemic, according to Citi. Its economy is the largest in the world, a thriving hub of innovation, pioneering technology, artificial intelligence and money-making potential. That will always attract FDI. Whether it attracts as much in this new environment remains to be seen. What could move markets tomorrow? * Germany GfK consumer confidence (July) * European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde, VicePresident Luis de Guindos and board member Isabel Schnabel speak(at different events) * Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey and Deputy GovernorSarah Breeden speak (at different events) * U.S. weekly jobless claims * U.S. durable goods (May) * U.S. trade (May) * U.S. GDP (Q1, final estimate) * U.S. 7-year note auction * Richmond Fed President Thomas Barkin, Cleveland FedPresident Beth Hammack and Fed Governor Michael Barr speak (atdifferent events) Want to receive Trading Day in your inbox every weekday morning? Sign up for my newsletter here. Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias. (By Jamie McGeever; Editing by Nia Williams) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Politico
42 minutes ago
- Politico
Graham a "yes" on rescissions
With President Donald Trump's July 4 deadline drawing near, Senate Majority Leader John Thune told POLITICO on Tuesday night he believes the Senate is 'on a path' to start voting on the megabill Friday. But he's got several fires to put out first. For one, he's under immense pressure to water down the Medicaid provisions the Senate GOP is counting on for hundreds of billions of dollars worth of savings. Speaker Mike Johnson is warning in private that Senate Republicans could cost House Republicans their majority next year if they try to push through the deep Medicaid cuts in the current Senate version, according to three people granted anonymity to describe the matter. That comes as Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) cautions GOP senators that those same cutbacks could become a political albatross for Republicans just as the Affordable Care Act was for Democrats. '[Barack] Obama said … 'if you like your health care you can keep it, if you like your doctor we can keep it,' and yet we had several million people lose their health care,' the in-cycle senator told reporters Tuesday. 'Here we're saying [with] Medicaid, we're going to hold people harmless, but we're estimating' millions of people could lose coverage. GOP leaders are trying to ease concerns by preparing to include a fund to help rural hospitals that could be harmed by the reductions, even as Thune insisted Tuesday 'we like where we are.' Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who's been pushing for the fund, said while that 'helps lessen the impact,' she remains 'concerned about the changes in the funding for Medicaid in general.' The other drama hanging over the bill are several imminent, critical rulings from Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough. Several committees that already have rulings in hand are due to release revised text as soon as this morning, according to a person familiar with the plans. And Republicans could know as soon as Wednesday whether MacDonough will clear major parts of their tax package. As of late Tuesday, the parliamentarian had not yet ruled on provisions linked to the so-called current policy baseline, an accounting maneuver that zeroes out the costs of $3.8 trillion of expiring tax cuts, according to two people granted anonymity to disclose the private discussions. Make no mistake: Adverse rulings could send Republicans back to the drawing board on making their tax plan permanent or otherwise force them to go nuclear and override or ignore MacDonough altogether. There's uncertainty from all sides about how that would play out, given the gambit has never been tried before with tax legislation. This much is already clear: With the tax package in flux and Medicaid savings under threat, GOP leaders have a major math problem on their hands. And House fiscal hawks are watching to see, regardless of the accounting method, whether the Senate sticks to the budget deal they agreed to with Johnson earlier this year. What else we're watching: — Bove on the Hill: Senate Judiciary lawmakers will convene the first blockbuster judicial hearing of the second Trump administration later Wednesday, where they will grill Emil Bove, a top Justice Department official and former criminal defense lawyer for Trump who has a shot at a lifetime appointment on the federal bench. Some even see him as a potential future Trump Supreme Court nominee. — Vought testifies on rescissions: OMB Director Russ Vought will testify in front of the Senate's full bench of appropriators Wednesday afternoon to justify the White House's request for $9.4 billion in cuts of previously approved money. Expect pointed questioning from various Republicans on the panel, including Collins, who has publicly opposed cuts to PEPFAR, the HIV and AIDS foreign aid program. — Iran briefings incoming: Senators will have a postponed briefing on the situation in Iran on Thursday, after which Democrat Tim Kaine (Va.) is aiming to call a vote on his resolution seeking to block further U.S. military action against Iran. On the House side, Speaker Johnson said that members will now be briefed Friday. Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Tuesday there had been no Gang of Eight meeting yet. Jordain Carney, Meredith Lee Hill and Hailey Fuchs contributed to this report.
