Supreme Court Rules 6–3 for Trump, Limits 'Nationwide Injunctions' in Birthright Citizenship Case
The case, Trump v. CASA, arose from several lawsuits challenging President Donald Trump's executive order purporting to abolish birthright citizenship for the U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrants and temporary legal visitors, such as people holding work visas. The federal district judges in those cases had issued nationwide injunctions against Trump's order.
"But federal courts do not exercise general oversight of the Executive Branch; they resolve cases and controversies consistent with the authority Congress has given them," declared the majority opinion of Justice Amy Coney Barrett, which was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh. "When a court concludes that the Executive Branch has acted unlawfully," Barrett wrote, "the answer is not for the court to exceed its power, too."
Writing in dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, faulted the majority for worrying more about overreaching judges than about an overreaching president. "The majority ignores entirely whether the President's Executive Order is constitutional, instead focusing only on the question of whether federal courts have the equitable authority to issue universal injunctions," Sotomayor wrote. "Yet the Order's patent unlawfulness reveals the gravity of the majority's error and underscores why equity supports universal injunctions as appropriate remedies in this kind of case. As every conceivable source of law confirms, birthright citizenship is the law of the land."
Barrett's ruling took no position on the lawfulness of Trump's executive order. Nor did it weigh in on the soundness of the district court rulings which found that Trump's order had harmed the individual plaintiffs who filed the cases. In other words, the underlying constitutional dispute about whether or not Trump's order violates the 14th Amendment was not revolved today. As Barrett put it, "the birthright citizenship issue is not before us."
What Barrett's ruling did do was to order the lower courts to make sure that their injunctions are not "broader than necessary to provide complete relief to each plaintiff with standing to sue."
So, if a pregnant woman successfully sues Trump over his executive order, the district court may still block Trump from denying birthright citizenship to her newborn. But, with nationwide injunctions now off the table, a different mother will now have to file a different lawsuit of her own to obtain the exact same relief for her newborn. Under this scenario, the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship will extend to some newborns but not to others, all depending on whether or not the parents were part of a lawsuit.
At the same time, Barrett's ruling did leave open the availability of class-action lawsuits against Trump's executive order. In fact, whether she meant to or not, Barrett effectively invited such suits by referring to nationwide injunctions as a "class-action workaround."
In other words, if a class-action lawsuit can achieve similar results to the now-verboten nationwide injunction, we should probably expect a slew of class-actions to be filed immediately against Trump's executive order. And we should also probably expect those class-actions to similarly block Trump's order from going into wide effect while those suits play out.
One reason to think that this result will happen is because Justice Samuel Alito wrote a separate concurrence today in which he fretted about what he called the class-action "loophole." According to Alito, "the universal injunction will return from the grave under the guise of 'nationwide class relief,' and today's decision will be of little more than academic interest" if class-action suits are allowed to proliferate against Trump's executive order.
In short, the fight over nationwide injunctions may be over for now, but the fight over class-action lawsuits against presidential orders is about to heat up.
The post Supreme Court Rules 6–3 for Trump, Limits 'Nationwide Injunctions' in Birthright Citizenship Case appeared first on Reason.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
20 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
France's Industry Minister Says 10% Tariffs Not Good Deal for EU
French Industry Minister Marc Ferracci said agreeing to 10% tariffs on European exports to the US would be a bad deal, signaling disapproval of a potential compromise with Washington. The European Union has until July 9 to clinch a trade arrangement with Donald Trump before tariffs on nearly all exports to the US jump to 50%. Some members of the bloc are willing to accept a deal that includes keeping a 10% universal tariff on many of the bloc's exports, but with lower rates in certain sectors, Bloomberg reported earlier.
CNN
22 minutes ago
- CNN
This artist hopes to be chosen to make a sculpture for Trump's ‘Garden of American Heroes'
President Donald Trump hopes to create a new national monument called the "National Garden of American Heroes" that would include 250 statues and be unveiled in one year. CNN's Sunlen Serfaty speaks with an artist and a marble fabricator who admit the timeline maybe unrealistic but who still want to help make the vision a reality.
CNN
25 minutes ago
- CNN
How ICE raids turned parts of Los Angeles into ghost towns
Santee Alley is known for its bargains and its crowds. Shoppers flock to the heart of Los Angeles' Fashion District to see what's on sale and get the latest styles from wholesalers and entrepreneurs, whose colorful goods spread out from the squat, industrial-looking stores. Music assails the senses, as do aromas from food vendors cooking up snacks for the visitors. Or that's what it used to be like. A visit late last month found a very different Santee Alley. Metal shutters were rolled down and padlocked shut, even on a mild Southern California day. Instead of people jostling around each other in the hubbub, the street was all but empty. Even the mannequins showing off clothes to buy were absent. Santee Alley is one of the places where immigration enforcement action by the Trump administration is having a visible and costly impact — turning parts of the US's second biggest city into ghost towns. 'This is something that's unprecedented,' said Anthony Rodriguez, the president and CEO of the LA Fashion District Business Improvement District. 'I personally think that the impact of this is more significant than that of the pandemic when we were in the lockdown phases.' The Fashion District, south of Downtown LA, had some of the first workplace immigration operations by federal agents early in June. CNN affiliate KTLA reported dozens of people were taken away from a clothing store. The raids, the protests that followed, the deployment of the National Guard and now a lawsuit by the Trump administration against Los Angeles for its sanctuary policy have all sent chills through this city of immigrants, documented and undocumented. 'The sense of fear is overwhelming,' Rodriguez said. 'This is largely an immigrant business community here, for the business owners, the consumers and the employees.' Visitors are down 45%, Rodriguez said, meaning 10,000 or 12,000 fewer shoppers a day and massive losses in revenue for what he said was one of the economic drivers of Los Angeles. Christopher Perez said his fashion store — where he said he and all his workers are citizens or in the country legally — has seen a 50% drop in sales, even though they are open. 'A lot of people are scared to come out,' he said. Even a whisper of a potential operation by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in the neighborhood can have an impact, Rodriguez said. 'Even when there isn't actual activity … someone thinks they hear something and that alone will shut down the entire area,' he said. From June 1 through June 10 this year, ICE apprehended 722 people in the Los Angeles area, according to government figures obtained and shared by the Deportation Data Project, a group of academics and lawyers. More than half of the cases — 417 — were classified as immigration violations. Some 221 people — or about 30% of the 722 apprehended — were convicted criminals. That compares with 103 apprehensions in the same period in 2024, when more than two-thirds of the people rounded up were convicted criminals, the statistics show. Santee Alley and the Fashion District are heavily Latino, as is Olvera Street a few miles away, one of the oldest streets in the city and considered its birthplace. It commemorates the founding of the community named 'El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora la Reina de los Ángeles de Porciúncula' by settlers in 1781. As the town grew, first as part of Spain, then Mexico and finally the United States, its name shrank to Los Angeles. Here too, the word on the street seems to be 'fear.' 'Everyone's afraid,' said Vilma Medina, who sells jewelry from her kiosk. 'People who we know are citizens, they're still afraid of being picked up even though they're … carrying around their documents.' It's putting a damper on what should be a good time of year for business, she added. 'We've all been waiting for this time because it's summer break, so you get the families coming in,' she said. But instead of the expected boom, there are no crowds and little trade. Medina said her sales have plummeted 80% since early June. 'There'll be days I've sold $10 the whole day. That's how bad it's gotten,' she said. 'And that's even with most of the kiosks not even opening, so you would think that would increase my sales.' She said she was tapping into her savings, hoping to keep going as she had through Covid and then the wildfires that devastated parts of her city earlier this year. For one 63-year-old man, keeping going means firing up his taco truck on the streets even if he has no papers to show ICE agents if they come to him. Urbano, who did not want to give his full name, told CNN he immigrated from Mexico 43 years ago and has lived undocumented in Los Angeles ever since. 'We have to go out to work because if not, who's going to pay our rent? To pay our bills?' he asked. 'Who's going to pay our taxes? Like I'm paying taxes. Can you imagine?' His story is far from unique, and the contributions of undocumented workers is acknowledged and applauded by state leaders. Lt. Gov Eleni Kounalakis highlighted the findings of a recent report from the Bay Area Council Economic Institute stating that California's undocumented immigrants contribute more than $23 billion in local, state and federal taxes. And if all 2.3 million undocumented people in California were deported, the report said the state's gross domestic product would decline by $278 billion. 'That's 9% of our GDP. That GDP value is larger than the entire state of Nevada, than the entire state of Oregon. These are not small outputs,' said Abby Raisz, the group's research director. 'These workers are really contributing to an entire economic engine that when one part of it crumbles, when we remove these workers who comprise 8% of the labor force, it has ripple effects that go way beyond just that one worker getting deported.' Rodriguez said his Fashion District organization is trying to get assistance for vendors in financial trouble, but he acknowledged some might not survive the slump. Even so, he insisted Santee Alley would endure. 'This is a resilient area. We're going to bounce back from this,' he said against a backdrop of shuttered storefronts. 'It'll be challenging, it'll be difficult — but we're absolutely going to persevere.' CNN's Kate Carroll contributed to this story.
