Russia sanctions: EU restrictions on Russian oil could hit India's $15 billion fuel exports; 'will have to walk a fine line…'
The EU's 27 member states have introduced their 18th sanctions package against Russia, primarily targeting the oil and energy sector revenues.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
From an Indian standpoint, the biggest takeaway is that these new sanctions also apply to imports of petroleum products refined from Russian crude oil in any third nation.
India imports crude oil from Russia in a big way and then exports it globally.
How India's $15 billion Oil Exports Will Be Hit
The European Union's latest sanctions will adversely affect countries including India, Turkey, and the UAE, which process Russian crude oil to produce and export diesel, petrol, and jet fuel to European markets.
"India's $5 billion exports of petroleum products to the EU are at risk. The EU's new sanctions ban imports of refined petroleum made from Russian crude via third countries like India," GTRI Founder Ajay Srivastava said according to a PTI report.
GTRI's assessment indicates that the new restrictions affect refined petroleum products from third countries using Russian crude, with exemptions granted to only a handful of nations including the US, UK, Canada, and Switzerland.
The think tank reports that whilst India's petroleum product exports to the EU stood at $19.2 billion in FY24, then declined significantly by 27.1% to $15 billion in 2024-25.
India's crude oil imports from Russia were around $50.3 billion in FY2025. This is more than one-third of India's total crude expenditure of $143.1 billion.
"Although India continues to engage in legitimate trade with Russia, the political optics of such transactions are shifting in Western capitals. As energy ties deepen, India will have to walk a fine line between economic pragmatism and geopolitical pressure," Srivastava said.
Nayara Energy and Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) are expected to encounter challenges due to the European Union's latest sanctions against Russian oil.
The EU has lowered the Russian oil price cap from $60 to $47.6 per barrel and introduced restrictions on vessels transporting Russian oil. These measures will become effective September 3.
According to an ET report, whilst Nayara Energy faces direct operational constraints from EU's targeted sanctions, RIL must navigate complications arising from restrictions on fuel products derived from Russian oil.
Industry specialists and analysts suggest that both companies risk being shut out of European markets. These sanctions also complicate Rosneft's reported plans to divest its 49% stake in Nayara. As India's principal fuel exporters, both RIL and Nayara stand significantly affected by these developments.
Also Read |
Advantage India & Less Cause For Worry
The new oil price limit will force Russia to sell its crude at reduced rates to countries including India.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
As Russia's second-biggest oil customer, India stands to benefit from this situation. Russian oil currently makes up about 40% of India's total oil imports.
Whilst India could see advantages from lower prices, there are concerns about future imports due to potential American sanctions. US President Donald Trump has warned that nations buying Russian exports could face penalties or heavy tariffs if Russia does not achieve peace with Ukraine within 50 days.
Oil Minister Hardeep Singh Puri has rejected concerns about possible consequences for India if Russian oil access becomes restricted through additional tariffs. "I'm not worried at all. If something happens, we'll deal with it," Puri has said.
"India has diversified the sources of supply and we have gone, I think, from about 27 countries that we used to buy from to about 40 countries now," he said.
Also Read |
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Canada could join UK, France in recognising Palestine: The significance
Canada announced on Wednesday (July 30) that it would formally recognise Palestine in the United Nations General Assembly in September. The statement comes after Britain made a similar announcement on July 29, with its recognition conditional on a ceasefire. France and Malta have also said it will recognise Palestine. Palestine is facing a severe humanitarian crisis that has led to massive starvation. Canada Prime Minister Mark Carney has blamed this on Israel's refusal to give international organisations control of aid in Gaza. UK's Keir Starmer, meanwhile, said the UK would support Palestinian statehood in September unless Israel halts its military campaign, abandons annexation plans in the West Bank, and engages in peace efforts to establish a two-state solution. This decision marks a major shift in UK foreign policy. Israeli ambassador to Canada, Iddo Moed, strongly criticised Canada's position, saying that it is 'rewarding terrorists'. As many as 147 out of 193 UN member countries recognise the state of Palestine at present. The 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA 80) will open on September 9, in the US. What does achieving statehood do for Palestine? We explain. For Palestine, achieving statehood would mean international recognition as an independent and sovereign country. Currently, Palestine holds the status of a 'Permanent Observer State' at the United Nations. This allows Palestine to participate in debates and UN sessions but not to vote on resolutions. To become a full UN Member State, Palestine would need a recommendation from the UN Security Council, followed by a two-thirds majority vote in the General Assembly. However, any of the five permanent members (P5) of the Security Council (US, UK, France, Russia, and China) can veto the application. A US veto blocked Palestine's last bid for full UN membership in April 2024. While the 2012 upgrade to observer status was seen as progress, full recognition would give Palestine greater diplomatic and legal standing in international affairs and further its pursuit of a two-state solution. As of March 2025, 147 out of the 193 UN member states (roughly 75%) recognise the State of Palestine. The recognition movement gained momentum following the intensification of the situation in Gaza and growing international outrage over the humanitarian crisis. In 2024, a group of UN experts urged all member nations to recognise Palestine in a bid to bring about a ceasefire in Gaza. This had come a week after Spain, Norway, and Ireland recognised Palestine. Most nations in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East (including India) have long recognised Palestine. In contrast, several Western countries have not. The United States, Japan, South Korea, and Australia are among those that still withhold formal recognition. In Europe, while France and the UK recently announced they will recognise Palestine in September in hopes of promoting peace, countries like Belgium and Germany are yet to do so. In a post on X, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded to the U.K.'s decision, saying: 'Starmer rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism & punishes its victims.' Despite this opposition, the growing number of recognitions signals a shift in global opinion, with many countries increasingly aligning with the call for Palestinian statehood as a step toward resolving the conflict. The UK's decision to recognise Palestine as a state holds immense political and symbolic importance as it marks a significant shift in British foreign policy. The UK would become the second G7 nation (after France) to recognise Palestine, followed by Canada being the third, putting additional diplomatic pressure on Israel. The timing also matters. The announcement comes in the wake of public outrage over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, with images of starving children sparking global condemnation. By linking statehood recognition to a ceasefire and progress toward peace, the UK is using its diplomatic clout to incentivise negotiations. Britain's historical role adds further weight to this decision. The 1917 Balfour Declaration, in which Britain supported the establishment of a 'national home for the Jewish people' in Palestine, played a key role in shaping the modern Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Many Palestinians view the declaration as the beginning of their displacement and suffering, culminating in the Nakba of 1948. If the UK proceeds with recognition, the United States would become the only permanent member of the UN Security Council (P5) not to do so. That isolation could further challenge the US's position as an 'impartial mediator' in Middle Eastern peace talks. Shaarvi Magazine is a summer intern with The Indian Express
Hindustan Times
16 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Want to boost your career as a finance professional? Here are 5 important ways to climb the ladder of success like a pro
As a finance professional, do you often wonder how to rise above your peers and reach the next level of success? In the competitive world of finance, possessing only a strong number-crunching skills is no longer the easy way to boost your career. An individual must also have rich expertise in other areas - from communication skills, leadership qualities, tech savviness to the ability to take decisions and strategic thinking. Check the five smart ways by Forbes that finance professionals can consider to climb the ladder of success. (Unsplash) For lasting success and a future-proof career, finance professionals must be ready to be committed to lifelong learning, irrespective of whether they are starting out in their profession or aiming for leadership opportunities. Also read: Are you an AI engineer looking for jobs? Check out these 7 high paying jobs shared by Forbes This is where some smart tips for finance professionals by Forbes Finance Council members comes into play, offering clear guidance to accelerate growth and unlock new opportunities in the finance domain. In this article, we have listed down 5 tips published in the Forbes report. Staying true to one's word Finance professionals should let their work speak for themselves, and not get involved in workplace politics. Individuals must avoid taking everything they hear at face value. Additionally, they should also not get swept away by the highs or bogged down by lows. Learn by taking as many tasks as possible Finance professionals must try to learn as much as possible by taking multiple tasks. The rule is simple - the more one does, the faster he/she learns. This in turn also helps them get noticed by their seniors who acknowledge your efforts of getting things done, thereby making you a dependable team-player and a have a potential for growth. Also read: Study Abroad: The dos and don'ts of student visa applications amid new social media scrutiny Make yourself indispensable Another tip to climb the corporate ladder as a finance professional is by making onself someone that the team cannot do without. It is extremely important to continuously upskill, build a strong network and share new insights. Professionals must know how to create opportunities to grow rather than waiting for chances. Finding the right environment A crucial point that finance professionals should understand is that success in the financial sector also depends on the workplace - one that allows them to grow and encourages your progress. They should understand that not every role can be the best match, therefore it is important to identify the environment that keeps them motivated and pushes them to excel. Also read: Where Indian Students Can Study for Free in 2025: These countries offer full scholarships Networking is key Finance professions must always keep in mind that success lies beyond numbers - they should also possess people skills. They should be able to connect to people, and be able to build trust. In addition, they should be brave to take calculated risks, work with integrity, and be ready to embrace change. This, as the Forbes report points out, will help the finance professionals stand out. (With inputs from Forbes)
Hindustan Times
16 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Gender equity finds its place in India–UK trade talks
There is a great deal of cheer and celebration surrounding the India–UK Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), and rightly so. Like most trade agreements, there is a focus on critical areas, including growth in trade volumes, expanded market access, tariff reductions, and deeper bilateral cooperation – all of which contribute to India's ambition of becoming a $5 trillion economy. However, what caught my attention and perhaps not something that would make the front page, but holds a deep potential to shape development outcomes over the long-term, is Chapter 23, dedicated to trade and gender equality. Gender Equality (Pixabay) While one might argue its relevance since the chapter does not include any binding commitments, financial pledges, or even subject to any dispute resolution. In my view, although limited in scope, this chapter highlights a significant step forward as it is the first time India has included a standalone trade and gender equity chapter in any of its agreements. It indicates a marked shift in how India is approaching its external economic engagements with a more intentional alignment with its domestic priorities on women-led development and its broader vision for a Viksit Bharat 2047, where growth is inclusive, sustainable, and equitable. Chapter 23 acknowledges that trade policies do not affect everyone equally, especially women, and discusses gendered economic barriers, including unpaid care work, limited access to finance, and a lack of representation in emerging sectors such as digital trade and STEM, all of which significantly limit women's ability to benefit from trade agreements. It outlines the scope for potential collaborations, including facilitating women's access to trade finance and literacy, enabling participation in global value chains through skilling and digital inclusion, and building capacity in under-represented fields such as STEM, among others. From an Indian context, this chapter creates an international platform to complement what India has been trying to address over the past decade through initiatives and schemes such as the MUDRA Yojana, DAY-NRLM, Stand-Up India and the PM Kaushal Vikas Yojana--creating an enabling ecosystem for more women to access finance, skills, employment and entrepreneurship opportunities to participate more equitably in the domestic, regional, and global economies. In India, most women are engaged in informal sectors, many of which intersect with CETA-linked industries such as textiles, handicrafts, jewellery, seafood and agriculture. An intentional engagement by both countries could help these women to scale up or formalise their operations. To me, this reflects both an intention and a prospect that can enhance the participation and competitiveness of women in business, trade and the economic growth story. Particularly, two areas that stood out to me in the chapter. First, the focus on both countries developing and exchanging sex-disaggregated trade data, analysing that data, and utilising evaluation tools to better understand the effects of trade policies on women. If engaged and implemented effectively, this could be a game-changer in making trade more gender-inclusive. For India, where the availability of such data is limited or inconsistent, this presents a significant opportunity to strengthen data practices across the government and translate insights into meaningful actions to support greater economic participation of women. Second, the recognition of unpaid care work as a key barrier to women's economic participation. There is potential for both countries to explore the integration of social protection policies into trade-related initiatives, a key lever to empower more women to enter formal employment, pursue entrepreneurial opportunities, and engage in value-added trade. To operationalise these commitments, CETA proposes setting up a Trade and Gender Equality Working Group, comprising government representatives, to guide cooperation activities, review implementation, and engage with relevant stakeholders, including women entrepreneurs and civil society organisations. If this working group is made truly functional and action-oriented, this platform could be a valuable opportunity for India to shape the agenda on women's economic participation in global trade. As global trade evolves in tandem with shifting geopolitical realities, a growing consensus is emerging that trade must contribute to broader development goals, including building equitable economies, strengthening supply chain resilience, and promoting inclusion. Gender equity is now becoming a part of that conversation. By including a dedicated chapter on it, India signals that its trade policy can be inclusive and aligned, rather than separate from, its development priorities. Chapter 23 may not be the most visible part of the CETA, but it lays important groundwork. If implemented effectively, it can help make trade more accessible and beneficial for women, who comprise nearly half of India's population. That alone makes it a commitment worth investing in. This article is authored by Suryaprabha Sadasivan, senior vice president, Chase Advisors.
