Scroll, watch, burn: sunscreen misinformation, its real-world damage
'I don't trust this stuff anymore," she said to the camera, holding the bottle up like a piece of damning evidence.
The clip had been viewed over half a million times, with commenters applauding her for 'ditching chemicals" and recommending homemade alternatives like coconut oil and zinc powder.
In my research on the effect of digital technology on health, I've seen how posts like this can shape real-world behaviour. And anecdotally, dermatologists have reported seeing more patients with severe sunburns or suspicious moles who say they stopped using sunscreen after watching similar videos.
Sunscreen misinformation created by social media influencers is spreading and this isn't just a random trend. It's being fuelled by the platforms designed to host influencer content.
In my book, The Digital Health Self, I explain how social media platforms are not neutral arenas for sharing information. They are commercial ecosystems engineered to maximise engagement and time spent online – metrics that directly drive advertising revenue.
Content that sparks emotion – outrage, fear, inspiration – is boosted to the top of your feed. That's why posts questioning or rejecting science often spread further than measured, evidence-based advice.
Each second a user spends watching or reacting gives the platform more data – and more opportunities to serve targeted ads. This is how health misinformation becomes profitable.
In my work, I describe social media platforms as 'unregulated public health platforms". They influence what users see and believe about health, but unlike public health institutions, they're not bound by standards for accuracy or harm reduction.
If an influencer claims sunscreen is toxic, that message won't be factchecked or flagged – it will often be amplified. Why? Because controversy fuels engagement.
I call this environment 'the credibility arena": a space where trust is built not through expertise, but through performance and aesthetic appeal. As I write in my book: 'Trust is earned not by what is known, but by how well one narrates suffering, recovery, and resilience." A creator crying on camera about 'toxins" can feel more authentic to viewers than a calm, clinical explanation of ultraviolet radiation from a medical expert.
This shift has real consequences. Ultraviolet rays are invisible, constant and damaging. They penetrate cloud cover and harm skin even on cool days.
Decades of research, especially in countries like Australia with high skin cancer rates, show that regular use of broad-spectrum sunscreen dramatically reduces risk. And yet, myths spreading online are urging people to do the opposite: to abandon sunscreen as dangerous or unnecessary.
This trend isn't driven solely by individual creators. It's embedded in how content is designed, framed and presented. Algorithms prioritise short, emotionally-charged videos. Interfaces highlight trending sounds and hashtags. Recommendation systems push users toward extreme or dramatic content.
These features all shape what we see and how we interpret it. The 'For You" page isn't neutral. It's engineered to keep you scrolling, and shock value outperforms nuance every time.
That's why videos about 'ditching chemicals" thrive, even as posts on other aspects of women's health are shadowbanned or suppressed. Shadowbanning refers to when a platform limits the visibility of content – making it harder to find, without informing the user – often due to vague or inconsistently applied moderation rules.
The system rewards spectacle, not science. Once creators discover that a particular format, like tossing products into a bin, boosts engagement, it's replicated over and over again. Visibility isn't organic. It's manufactured.
Those who throw away their sunscreen often believe they're doing the right thing. They're drawn to creators who feel relatable, sincere and independent — especially when official health campaigns seem cold, patronising or out of touch. But the consequences can be serious. Sun damage accumulates silently, raising skin cancer risk with every hour spent unprotected.
Sunscreen isn't perfect. It needs to be reapplied properly and paired with shade and protective clothing. But the evidence for its effectiveness is clear and robust.
The real danger lies in a system that not only allows misinformation to spread, but also incentivises it. A system in which false claims can boost an influencer's reach and a platform's revenue.
To resist harmful health trends, we need to understand the systems that promote them. In the case of sunscreen, rejecting protection isn't just a personal decision – it's a symptom of a digital culture that turns health into content, and often profits from the harm it causes. (The Conversation) NSA NSA
First Published:
July 19, 2025, 11:15 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
2 days ago
- News18
Should I limit how much fruit my child eats because it contains sugar?
Sydney, Jul 30 (The Conversation) Parents are often told fruit is 'bad" because it contains sugar, prompting concerns about how much fruit they should allow their child to eat. This message has been fuelled by the 'sugar-free" movement, which demonises sugar with claims it's fattening and causes diabetes. The movement promotes arbitrary lists of foods to avoid, which often include kids' favourites such as bananas and berries. But like many claims made by the diet industry, this one isn't backed by evidence. Naturally occurring versus added sugars Sugar itself isn't inherently harmful, but the type of sugar kids eat can be. The good news is whole fruits contain naturally occurring sugars that are healthy and provide kids with energy. Whole fruits are packed with vitamins and minerals needed for good health. This includes vitamins A, C, E, magnesium, zinc and folic acid. All fruits are suitable – bananas, berries, mandarins, apples and mangoes, to name just a few. The insoluble fibre in fruit skins also helps kids stay regular, and the soluble fibre in fruit flesh helps keep their cholesterol in a healthy range, absorbing 'bad" cholesterol to reduce their long-term risk of stroke and heart disease. Added sugars – which add calories but no nutritional value to kids' diets – are the 'bad" sugars and the ones to avoid. They're found in processed and ultra-processed foods kids crave, such as lollies, chocolates, cakes and soft drinks. Added sugars are often added to seemingly healthy packaged foods, such as muesli bars. They're also hidden under 60-plus different names in ingredient lists, making them hard to spot. Sugar, weight and diabetes risk There's no evidence backing claims that sugar directly causes diabetes. Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease that can't be prevented or cured and has no connection to sugar consumption. Type 2 diabetes is typically caused when we carry excess body weight, which stops the body from working efficiently, not sugar intake. However, a diet high in added sugars – found in many processed, ultra-processed foods (for example, sweet and savoury packaged snacks) – can mean kids consume excess calories and gain unnecessary weight, which may increase their chance of developing type 2 diabetes as they get older. On the other hand, research shows that kids who eat more fruit have less abdominal fat. Research also shows fruit can reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes, with one study finding kids who ate 1.5 servings of fruit daily had a 36% lower risk of developing the disease. Nutritional deficiencies A diet high in added sugars can also result in nutritional deficiencies. Many processed foods offer low-to-no nutrition, which is why dietary guidelines recommend limiting them. Kids filling up on these foods are less likely to eat vegetables, fruits, whole grains and lean meats, producing a diet lacking in fibre and other key nutrients needed for growth and development. But these 'discretionary foods" make up one-third of Aussie kids' daily energy intake. My advice? Give kids fruit in abundance There's no need to limit how much whole fruit kids eat – it's nutritious, filling and can protect their health. It's also going to fill them up and reduce their desire to scream out for the processed, packet food that is low in nutrition, and calorie-rich. Just go easy on juiced and dried fruits because juicing leaves the goodness (the fibre) behind in the juicer, and drying strips fruits of their water content, making them easy to overconsume. The nutritional guidelines recommend just two serves of fruit a day for those nine years of age and older, 1.5 serves from 4-8, one serve from 2–3, and half a serve from 1–2 years. But these guidelines are dated and need to be changed. We do need to reduce kids' sugar consumption. But this needs to be achieved by reducing their intake of processed foods that contain added sugars, rather than fruit. Added sugars aren't always easy to spot, so we should focus on reducing kids' consumption of processed and packet foods and teaching them to rely on fruit – 'nature's treats" – as a way to keep unhealthy sugars out of their diets. (The Conversation) NSA NSA (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
India Today
3 days ago
- India Today
How makeup on babies can trigger allergies and disrupt hormones
Dabbing perfume on a baby, painting their tiny nails with polish containing formaldehyde or dusting blush onto their cheeks for a photoshoot, might sound like innocent acts in the age of social media, but such practices are actually far from kajal applied to eyelids to mehendi drawn on tiny hands, cosmetic use on babies and toddlers is increasingly common. In fact, you type 'child makeup influencers' and you're bound to get dozens of Instagram Reels showcasing young girls doing the multi-step skincare routine or picking up a large eyeshadow kit and applying loads of glitter dust on their eyelids and does science say when it comes to applying cosmetic products? Infant skin is fundamentally different from adult skin, it's thinner, more permeable, and still in development. This makes it more susceptible to irritation, allergic reactions, and long-term health risks, including hormonal disruption. Newborns have the same number of skin layers as adults, but those layers are up to 30% thinner. This means chemicals from cosmetics can more easily pass through the skin and into deeper tissues or the to Adam Taylor, an expert in anatomy at Lancaster University, baby skin also contains more water and less sebum, the natural oil that acts as a protective barrier. This increases vulnerability to dryness and irritation, especially when exposed to products not specifically designed for infant skin, he wrote in The Conversation Delhi-based dermatologist Dr. Deepali Bhardwaj cautioned, 'You cannot use kajal, it needs to be very genuine and authentic. Many over-the-counter products may contain harmful additives or chemicals not suitable for a baby's delicate eyes and skin," advising against casual use of traditional or cosmetic formulations on skincare ingredients are likely to harm health by disrupting hormones or causing allergies. Alkylphenols, triclosan, and BPA can affect hormone activity, while cyclosiloxanes may build up in the body. Ethanolamines can form potentially harmful compounds, and parabens mimic estrogen. Phthalates are linked to reproductive issues, especially in children, and benzophenone in sunscreens may trigger allergic reactions and hormonal to the issue is the increasing presence of children's makeup and body products in the market. These include everything from body glitter and face paint to lipstick, nail polish, hair gel, and perfume.A 2023 study published in Environmental Research and Public Health by Columbia University researchers highlights this growing trend and the accompanying risks. These items are often designed with bright colours and cartoon characters to appeal to children, and marketed through social media platforms that even young users can contain multiple allergens, including fragrance compounds, lanolin (wool alcohol), preservatives, and hair dye chemicals. Even products labelled 'natural' or 'herbal' are not automatically safe. In fact, allergic contact dermatitis is a well-documented reaction to many of these researchers found that most children in the US use makeup and body products that may contain carcinogenic and other toxic chemicals. Many cosmetic products for children contain heavy metals and other toxic chemicals that are linked to cancer, neurodevelopmental harm, and other serious and irreversible health bottom line is that the skin of infants and toddlers is not equipped to handle cosmetic products meant for adults—or even for older children. As the wellness industry continues to push boundaries, experts urge parents to prioritise safety and long-term health over short-term aesthetics or trends.- Ends
News18
3 days ago
- News18
‘Fibremaxxing' is trending – here's why that could be problem
London, Jul 29 (The Conversation) You need fibre. That much is true. But in the world of online health trends, what started out as sound dietary advice has spiralled into 'fibremaxxing" – a push to consume eye-watering amounts in the name of wellness. In the UK, NHS guidelines suggest that an adult should consume at least 30g of fibre a day. Children and teens typically need much less. Yet despite clear guidelines, most Britons fall short of their daily fibre target. One major culprit? The rise of ultra-processed foods, or UPFs. UK adults now get over 54% of their daily calories from ultra-processed foods. For teenagers, it's nearer 66%. This matters because UPFs are typically low in fibre and micronutrients, while being high in sugar, salt and unhealthy fats. When these foods dominate our plate, naturally fibre-rich whole foods get pushed out. Studies show that as ultra-processed food intake increases, fibre consumption decreases, along with other essential nutrients. The result is a population falling well short of its daily fibre target. Dietary fibre is essential for good health as part of a balanced diet. And it is best found in natural plant-based foods. Adding high fibre foods to your meals and snacks throughout a typical day, such as switching to wholegrain bread for breakfast, keeping the skin on fruits like an apple, adding lentils and onions to a chilli evening meal and eating a handful of pumpkin seeds or Brazil nuts between meals, would help an average person hit their 30g-a-day dietary requirements. Displacement With fibremaxxing, what might make this trend somewhat dangerous is the removal of other food groups such as proteins, carbohydrates and fats and replacing them with fibre-dense foods, supplements or powder. This is where the potential risk could mitigate the benefits of increasing fibre, as no robust studies in humans – as far as I'm aware – have been conducted on long-term fibre intakes over 40g a day. (Some advocates of fibremaxxing suggest consuming between 50 and 100g a day.) Eating too much fibre too quickly – especially without enough water – can lead to bloating, cramping and constipation. It can also cause a buildup of gas that can escape at the most inconvenient moments, like during a daily commute. Rapidly increasing fibre intake or consuming too much can interfere with the absorption of essential micronutrients like iron, which supports normal body function, as well as macronutrients, which provide the energy needed for movement, repair and adaptation. However, it's important to remember that increasing fibre in your diet offers a wide range of health benefits. It supports a healthy digestive system by promoting regular bowel movements and reducing the occurrence of inflammatory bowel disease. Soluble fibre helps to regulate blood sugar levels by slowing the absorption of glucose, making it especially helpful for people at risk of type 2 diabetes. It also lowers LDL (bad) cholesterol, reducing the risk of heart disease. Fibre keeps you feeling full for longer, which supports healthy weight management and appetite regulation. These findings are all well documented. Additionally, a high-fibre diet has been linked to a lower risk of certain cancers, particularly colon cancer, by helping to remove toxins efficiently from the body. Gradually increasing fibre intake to recommended levels – through a balanced, varied diet – can offer real health benefits. Given the evidence, it's clear that many of us could benefit from eating more fibre – but within reason. Until we know more, it's safest to stick to fibre intake within current guidelines, and get it from natural sources rather than powders or supplements. Fibre is vital, but more isn't always better. Skip the social media fads and aim for balance: whole grains, veg, nuts and seeds. Your gut – and your fellow commuters – will thank you. (The Conversation) NSA NSA view comments First Published: July 29, 2025, 10:15 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
