China, India shift to higher-grade coal, cut Indonesian imports
Top
thermal coal
importers China and India are slashing Indonesian shipments of the power generating fuel in favour of energy-dense grades from elsewhere as a global fall in prices has made higher-quality coal more competitive.
Coal purchases by China and India from Indonesia, the world's biggest exporter, are dropping faster than their overall thermal coal imports, as both nations shift toward higher-calorific value (CV) coal that yields more energy per ton, industry officials say.
"Higher CV coal is more expensive, but produces more energy for every dollar spent at current prices. One million tons of higher CV coal can replace 1.2-1.3 million tons or even 1.5 million tons from Indonesia," said Vasudev Pamnani, director at India-based coal trader I-Energy Natural Resources.
In China, Indonesian medium- and low-calorific thermal coal has been struggling to compete with discounted Russian supplies of similar grades, said Kpler analyst Zhiyuan Li.
Ramli Ahmad, the president director of Indonesian miner Ombilin Energi, said Indonesian coal could make a comeback if prices of higher grades rise due to the Middle East conflict, but lower-CV coal will suffer as long as more energy-dense grades are competitive.
Mongolian coal
in China and South African coal in India have been the biggest gainers at Indonesia's expense, with their shares touching record highs in these markets in the first five months of 2025, Chinese customs and Indian trade data showed.
Higher production and improved efficiency will continue to boost Mongolian coal exports despite falling thermal coal prices in China as Mongolian coal has remained price-competitive, said Xue Dingcui, analyst at Mysteel.
China and India have also stepped up purchases from Tanzania, which was largely been absent from the global seaborne coal trade map until Russia's war on Ukraine in 2022.
Indian traders have also increased
higher-grade coal
purchases from Kazhakhstan, Colombia and Mozambique this year, while Australian supplies have gained share in China.
Indonesian and Australian coal indexes, reflecting grades preferred by Chinese buyers, have been trending lower since October 2023, with the Australian benchmark declining faster than the Indonesian one.
LOOKING WITHIN
Overall, Chinese coal imports fell nearly 10% to 137.4 million tons in the first five months of the year, while shipments to India dropped more than 5% to 74 million tons.
Indonesian exports have been the worst hit, with supplies to China and India sliding 12.3% and 14.3%, respectively. The southeast Asian nation's total coal exports dropped 12% to 187 million tons in the January-May period, data from analytics firm Kpler showed.
To counter export declines, Indonesian miners are pivoting to domestic demand, with local deliveries poised to rise 3% this year and exports set to decline about 10%, according to the
Indonesian Mining Services Association
.
Domestic demand, driven by demand from nickel smelters, is on track to account for the highest share of Indonesian coal output in at least a decade and stands at 48.6% currently, according to government data reviewed by Reuters.
Indonesia caps the price of coal sold to power utilities, making smelters a more attractive alternative to exports.
"The smelter industry is the brightest spot for now, we get better prices than we get from the power industry or sales to China," Ombilin's Ahmad said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
11 minutes ago
- Indian Express
ExplainSpeaking: The truth about poverty in India
Dear Readers, Over the past few months, there's been a flurry of news about India's poverty rate, or the ratio of people who are considered officially poor. First, on April 25, the Government of India came out with a press release titled 'India's Triumph in Combating Poverty', where it used the World Bank's 'Poverty and Equity Brief' of April 2025 to state that '171 million lifted from extreme poverty in 10 years'. Then, earlier this month, the World Bank came out with an update on the methodology and level of its poverty line and stated that just 5.75% of Indians now live under abject poverty — down from 27% in 2011-12. There are two key takeaways. One, according to new WB estimates, India's poverty levels in the past were actually lower than previously estimated (see TABLE 1). For instance, in 1977-78, India's poverty level was not 64% but 47%. The dialling back of poverty rates continues through the decades. The second key change in the WB update was the adoption of a new poverty line — $3 a day — and according to this new income level, the proportion of Indians living in abject or extreme poverty has fallen from 27% in 2011-12 (around 344.4 million or 34.44 crore Indians) to just under 6% (around 75.22 million or 7.5 crore) in 2022-23. As heartening as this news is, there are several common misconceptions about how to read this data, what it actually means and why many question it. For instance, when you look at the $3-a-day poverty line, do you multiply it by 85 (the current market exchange rate between the US dollar and Indian rupee) to arrive at Rs 255 a day as the income level for ascertaining whether an Indian is poor or not? If you do that, you are mistaken because the $3 poverty line is calculated on a purchasing power parity (PPP) basis, and the conversion rate to Indian rupee is not 85 but 20.6. Simply put, it is the level of income used as a cut-off point for deciding who is poor in any economy. It is important to note here that the context (both time period and location) is critical to arriving at a meaningful poverty line. For instance, an Indian receiving a salary of Rs 1,000 a month may not have been considered poor in 1975, but today that income (Rs 33 a day) will barely buy anything. Similarly, a monthly salary of Rs 1,00,000 (or Rs 3,333 a day) in today's Patna will be comfortable for a person to live by, but the same salary in Paris or New York may not buy the same lifestyle. Since there is no one level of poverty — what is a comfortable level for one is just okay for another and barely enough for the third — one can create several poverty lines to match the context and analytical use. Governments, especially in developing and poor countries, want to identify the extent of poverty in their countries. This has two uses. One, to help them gauge the extent of poverty and shape welfare policies for the poor. The second use is for governments, policymakers and analysts to understand whether a set of policies has actually worked over time to reduce poverty and improve wellbeing. Historically, India had been a leader in poverty estimation and India's poverty line methodology and data collection influenced the rest of the world in how to study poverty. However, India's last officially recognised poverty line was in 2011-12. It was built on a 2009 formula suggested by a committee led by noted Delhi School economist Suresh Tendulkar. Since then, there has been no update on the method. In 2014, a committee led by former RBI Governor C Rangarajan was commissioned to provide a new method, but this recommendation was never officially accepted. Since then, thanks to gaps and changes in relevant data collection, India has increasingly used either the Niti Aayog multidimensional poverty index (which is fundamentally different in how it measures poverty) or relied on the World Bank's poverty line. As explained, poverty lines make sense only when they can capture the context, like the purchasing power at a particular time and place. That is why for WB's poverty line to make sense, it has to be based on the purchasing power parity calculations. The first-ever poverty line was set at a dollar a day. Here's how it came about: 'In 1990, a group of independent researchers and the World Bank examined national poverty lines from some of the poorest countries in the world and converted those lines into a common currency by using purchasing power parity (PPP) exchange rates. The PPP exchange rates are constructed to ensure that the same quantity of goods and services are priced equivalently across countries. Once converted into a common currency, they found that in six of these very poor countries around the 1980s the value of the national poverty line was about $1 per day per person (in 1985 prices). This formed the basis for the first dollar-a-day international poverty line,' according to the World Bank. Over time, as prices went up in every country, the WB had to raise its poverty line. In June, they have now raised it to $3 a day. The PPP exchange rate for Indian rupees in 2025 is 20.6. As such, the poverty line delineating abject or extreme poverty for an individual in the US is an income of $3 a day, while for India it is Rs 62 a day. For the UK, the PPP conversion rate is just 0.67, while for China it is 3.45 and for Iran it is a whopping 1,65,350. India's own (domestically formulated) poverty line in 2009, before the Tendulkar recommendation, was Rs 17 a day per person for urban areas and Rs 12 a day per person for rural areas. In 2009, Tendulkar raised the poverty line to Rs 29 per day per person in urban areas and Rs 22 per day per person in rural areas, and later to Rs 36 and Rs 30, respectively, in 2011-12. In 2014, Rangarajan recommended raising the domestic poverty line to Rs 47 per person per day in urban areas and Rs 33 in rural areas. Many economists, such as Himanshu, professor of economics at the Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi, and someone who worked with Tendulkar during the formulation of the last official poverty line, have written extensively on the subject. He showed how, in the absence of a robust and updated domestic poverty line and given the gaps and changes in data collection, India's poverty estimates exhibit wide variation, creating both confusion and controversy (see TABLE 2). Poverty in India could be as low as 2% or as high as 82% depending on the choice of poverty line and methodology. The same trend of variation exists in the reduction in poverty rates — they could be steep or fairly gradual. Upshot Bizarre as it may seem, especially for a country with so many people at low levels of income and consumption, as well as a country with an enviable record of studying poverty, India's poverty lies in the eyes of the beholder. How do you know if a person is poor or not? How many are poor? Should one quote 5.75% who live in abject poverty (Rs 62 a day)? Or look at 24%, the poverty line for 'lower middle-income countries' such as India? Should one consider 20% as the rate, the proportion of Indians who voluntarily line up to offer labour instead of a paltry amount? Or 66% who are provided free food by law? TABLE 3 attempts to provide some context on the World Bank's poverty lines and how they compare with India's reality as evidenced by official government surveys and data. Earlier this year, when the Union Budget was unveiled, the government waived off all income tax for those earning an income upto Rs 12 lakhs per annum — that works out to be Rs 3,288 per day. In essence, the government believes that imposing any income tax on such an Indian will be overtaxing them and holding back their consumption and the growth of the broader economy. There are two ways to look at the WB data, although they are not mutually exclusive. One, to celebrate the reduction in the proportion of Indians living in what is defined as abject poverty ($3 or Rs 62). Two, to give ourselves pause to understand the actual state of economic well-being (or the lack of it) of an average Indian when as many as 83% of Indians are living off Rs 171 a day. Remember, these poverty lines are inclusive of all income or expenditures. How much did you spend or earn today? Share your views and queries on Take care, Udit Udit Misra is Deputy Associate Editor. Follow him on Twitter @ieuditmisra ... Read More
Hans India
13 minutes ago
- Hans India
Karnataka bets big on quantum future
Bengaluru: Karnataka is positioning itself as the frontrunner in India's quantum technology landscape, with state leadership reaffirming its commitment to building a robust ecosystem for innovation in the sector. On Tuesday, Minister for Minor Irrigation, Science and Technology, NS Boseraju visited QpiAI's facility at Karle Town SEZ, Bengaluru, where he witnessed a live demonstration of QpiAI Indus—touted as India's first and most powerful indigenously developed quantum computer. The visit signals Karnataka's intent to not only harness next-generation computing capabilities but also emerge as a national anchor for strategic applications of quantum technologies in areas such as cybersecurity, healthcare, defence, and financial modelling. Speaking at the event, Minister Boseraju said the state was laying the groundwork for a future built on quantum innovation. 'Under the leadership of Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and Deputy Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar, we are committed to establishing Karnataka as India's hub for quantum technologies,' he said. 'Quantum computing is only one part of the story—quantum-secure cybersecurity, quantum imaging, and quantum communication networks will define the future digital economy.' The Minister added that Bengaluru, as the country's de facto innovation capital, is well placed to take the lead. 'With its top-tier academic institutions, technology-driven industries, and a skilled talent base, Karnataka has all the building blocks for a thriving quantum ecosystem. We are also planning to host the Quantum India Bangalore Conference to accelerate collaborative innovation and policy convergence in this space,' he said. QpiAI officials provided an overview of the company's quantum roadmap and reiterated their commitment to driving R&D, talent development, and strategic partnerships from within Karnataka. Founded by technologist Nagendra, QpiAI is among a handful of Indian startups at the forefront of quantum computing, combining software, hardware, and AI-based optimisation to create scalable quantum solutions. The Minister's visit was also attended by Sadashiva Prabhu, Director, Karnataka Science and Technology Promotion Society (K-STeP), senior officials from the Department of Science and Technology, and members of the quantum technology startup ecosystem.
Mint
17 minutes ago
- Mint
This Is Where Most Stock Investors Go Wrong in India (Without Realizing It)
India's stock market has been a beacon for investors seeking long-term wealth creation, especially as indices like the Sensex and Nifty 50 continue to scale new heights. In June 2025, the BSE Sensex surged 677 points to close at 81,796, while the Nifty 50 rose 227 points to close at 24,950, demonstrating strong resilience despite global headwinds. Yet, beneath this bullish facade, many Indian investors are quietly making mistakes that undermine their financial goals, often without even realizing it. In this blog, we will explore these common mistakes that investors should avoid while investing. Every investor has unique goals, risk tolerances, and knowledge. Several common mistakes that each investor should avoid are mentioned below: Recent market rallies, such as the Sensex's 7% surge in March 2025 and the gains in June, have fueled optimism among retail investors. However, this optimism often morphs into overconfidence. Many investors start believing they can time the market or pick 'winning' sectors based on recent trends, ignoring the fact that even experts struggle to predict short-term movements. This overconfidence and chase of trends can lead investors to end up with huge losses in their portfolio. Diversification is a well-known principle, yet Indian investors often pile into a handful of stocks or sectors, sometimes based on tips or media hype. Many Indian investors concentrate their investments heavily on one or two stocks or sectors, making their portfolio highly risky. When investors allocate all their funds to a particular sector, they expose their entire portfolio to a singular risk pattern. A diverse portfolio, on the other hand, enables investors to balance risk against potential gains by distributing assets among different sectors. Behavioral biases like the 'get-even' mentality, while holding onto losing investments in the hope they will rebound, are some of the most common mistakes that investors make in stock market investments. This approach is driven by the emotional need to avoid realizing a loss, but it can be financially costly to investors' portfolios. Also, after some success, investors become overconfident and start to ignore warning signs or dismiss contradictory information, reinforcing their poor decisions and increasing risk in their portfolio. One of the most common mistakes that investors make is that they overlook the risks associated with high valuations. While high valuations can reflect investor confidence and capital inflows, they also increase the risk of a market correction, which can result in huge losses. Valuation acts like gravity. It may not matter in the short term, but it eventually catches up in the long-term investment. Even strong companies can see their share prices decline if they are priced too far ahead of their fundamentals. Therefore, ignoring these warning signs can lead to huge losses for investors. Market volatility often triggers emotional responses. Emotional investing is a dangerous habit that often leads to irrational decisions. When investors allow emotions like fear, greed, and panic to dictate their actions, it leads to buying at market peaks due to FOMO (fear of missing out) or panic-selling during downturns, which often results in poor timing and lower returns. The "emotional rollercoaster" prevents investors from sticking to a well-thought-out investment plan. This behaviour not only locks in losses but also causes them to miss out on the subsequent rebound. To avoid this, the best way is to invest and forget, where investors can choose an 'invest and forget' strategy in stable stocks such as blue-chip or dividend stocks for their investments. An equity share that generates multiple times the returns on its original purchase price is known as a multi-bagger stock. It is challenging to predict in advance which stocks will be multibagger stocks in the future because not every company with strong fundamentals does not turn into a multibagger. Investors often make the mistake of chasing these stocks purely based on past performance or hype, without understanding the underlying risks. Penny stocks are small-cap stocks that trade at very low prices, between ₹ 10 to ₹ 20 per share in India. Most penny stock investors make penny stock investments without conducting thorough research and analysis. However, penny stocks are highly volatile and susceptible to manipulation by promoters or large operators. While a few penny stocks deliver substantial returns, this is not true for every penny stock. Many investors do not realize it and invest based on the low prices of penny stocks. India's stock market offers immense opportunities for wealth creation, but it also presents subtle traps that can derail even the most well-intentioned investors. The key to long-term success lies in avoiding these common pitfalls and staying focused on your financial goals. By understanding where most Indian stock investors go wrong, often without realizing it, you can navigate the market's ups and downs with greater confidence and build a more secure financial future.
