WW2 postcard campaign reminds homeowners that fallen ‘lived where you live'
HALIFAX - Over the last week, selected homes across Canada received poignant reminders of military members who fought and died in the final months of the Second World War.
Each address was mailed a postcard with the name, story and fate of an individual soldier, sailor or airman who had lived there prior to enlisting in Canada's war effort.
As part of its 'He Lived Where You Live' program, the Juno Beach Centre — Canada's war memorial museum in Normandy, France — issued postcards to 1,945 addresses to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Victory in Europe Day on May 8, 1945.
At their Toronto home, Gary Domski and his family recently received a postcard commemorating Pte. Peter Forbes Flett, a member of the Highland Light Infantry of Canada who died on Nov. 2, 1944, at the age of 20 — two days after he was wounded fighting in the Netherlands. Flett is buried at the Adegem Canadian War Cemetery in Belgium.
Domski said in an interview Thursday that he was already familiar with Flett's story prior to receiving the postcard because of a letter that had been dropped off by one of the late soldier's relatives. It detailed the family's history at the residence, which Domski bought about 10 years ago.
He said he tries to make sure his three children are aware of Canadian history, adding that getting the postcard 'connects you personally to the event and to the sacrifice.'
'It definitely brings a different perspective to someone that lost their life, and being a parent with a son it kind of hits you,' Domski said. 'This (card) is a great reminder … and I think it's a great thing to unify the country.'
Sal Falk, a spokesperson for the Juno Beach Centre Association, said the aim is to pay tribute to Canada's war fallen, while making sure that communities can connect with the personal stories and the overall history of the war.
'It's a pivotal moment in Canada as we all know with a heightened sense of pride and trying to figure out our identity,' said Falk. 'I think this is a piece of Canadian history that everyone can rally behind, understanding that people who served from across the country … came from every walk of life, every neighbourhood and every community.'
Over the last two years the centre conducted research using digitized files from Library and Archives Canada as well as the archives of the Commonwealth War Graves Commission to gather information about service personnel as well as their last known addresses in Canada.
The data was cross-referenced with Canada Post records to confirm that the addresses for the 1,945 service personnel chosen to be honoured — who died between July 1944 and May 1945 — still exist.
'We know the number seems somewhat arbitrary, but we figured that with the symbolic (year) number of 1945, choosing 1,945 postcards to send felt like the right thing,' said Falk.
Another postcard was sent to an address in New Glasgow, N.S., where Cpl. Gerald Austin Ellis lived. A native of Digby, N.S., Ellis was a machinist at the nearby Trenton Industries steel plant prior to enlisting in the army in February 1944.
Ellis landed in Europe in September 1944 and fought in the Netherlands where he was killed in action on Feb. 27, 1945. He is buried in the Groesbeek Canadian War Cemetery and is one of more than 45,000 Canadians who died in the war — with about 14,000 killed in Europe during the conflict's final months.
After the carnage of the Allied breakout from Normandy in August 1944, the Canadian Army took part in the pursuit of German forces through France and into Belgium before liberating the Netherlands and striking into Germany.
Falk said the centre's latest postcard campaign is its third; the idea was initially conceived to mark the 75th anniversary of D-Day in 2019, with about 200 postcards being mailed. A similar campaign was used in 2022 to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the Dieppe Raid.
'We found that the response was overwhelming,' said Falk, who added that the campaign helps the D-Day museum at Juno Beach in France reach Canadians at home.
'There is a pilgrimage spot for Canadians to go over and learn more, but we know that not everyone can make that trip,' said Falk. 'So this helps make sure that history gets into the homes of Canadians.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 25, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
SF fountain that divides public opinion to be fenced off
SAN FRANCISCO (KRON) — A controversial fountain along San Francisco's waterfront has been ordered closed off from the public. The Vaillancourt Fountain across from the Ferry Building at Embarcadero Plaza is being fenced off in the interest of public safety, according to city officials. A representative with the San Francisco Recreation and Parks Department told that a recent report had made it clear that the fountain, in its current state, is a potential hazard. 'The Vaillancourt Fountain was designed for people to interact with,' an official said. 'This report made it clear that is no longer safe.' Two Bay Area restaurants named among 'world's best' by prestigious global ranking According to a Rec and Parks official, parts of the fountain are 'cracked, corroded, or missing,' including a key support rod in one of the structure's arms. The fountain also contains hazardous materials like lead and asbestos. 'As a result, we are fencing it off,' a parks official said. People will still be able to view the fountain, but not to walk through it or get close to it. Installed in 1971, the Vaillancourt Fountain divides public opinion. Fans of brutalist architecture and preservationists have defended the 710-ton sculpture, which has been inactive as a fountain for the past year due to a pump failure. Recently, plans were unveiled for a $30-million renovation of the Embarcadero Plaza and adjoining Sue Bierman Park. The fountain was not pictured in renderings for the planned renovations. Armand Vaillancourt, the Canadian artist behind the fountain, visited SF last month to try and urge city officials to preserve the structure. Parks officials maintain that the report will have no impact on long-term plans for the future of Vaillancourt Fountain. 'This step is strictly about ensuring public safety,' officials told KRON4. 'It doesn't impact the timeline or scope of the broader Embarcadero Plaza and Sue Bierman Park Renovation Project.' Parks officials maintain that long-term decisions regarding the fountain's future will follow public process established by the San Francisco Arts Commission, including review from the Visual Arts Committee, and will include opportunities for community impact. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
North Rustico lobster fishers still facing harbour problems
Despite the federal government having dredging completed ahead of this year's spring lobster season in North Rustico, P.E.I., fishers around the area still struggle to bring in their catches. Dredging is a process required in some harbours because tidal currents and wave action can fill in navigational channels and harbour basins with sediment. In an interview with The Guardian on June 1, Joey's Deep Sea Fishing co-owner Julie Ann Gauthier said the tides were low due to the moon phase affecting the tide conditions this past week at North Rustico Harbour. 'Same as what happened at the end of April, happened again, except we were just more aware of it,' said Gauthier recalled an April 29 incident at the harbour. To bring the incident into context, more than a dozen lobster vessels sailing in and out of North Rustico Harbour were stuck offshore for some time as they struggled to land their catches on April 29. 'Nobody did get stuck out there, but there were some days that we maybe didn't get to haul all of our traps because you had to get back to shore before the tide was going to be too low,' Gauthier said. The lobster fishermen around the area have more than enough to worry about, she said. 'Like, is our crew safe? Are we catching enough lobster? What do we need to do? Where are we moving around? All that kind of stuff,' Gauthier said. Dredging the harbour is a simple solution, she added. 'There's talk, but we haven't seen action yet. We have been working with Heath MacDonald, who is our member of Parliament here,' Gauthier said. He is also a member of the cabinet, which means he is around the table with the right people, she added. 'However, we have not yet been told what they plan. But as we phase out of lobster fishing and we phase into deep sea fishing, it continues to be a concern,' Gauthier said. Despite the problems on the water, many residents and visitors of North Rustico, P.E.I. enjoyed a public event on June 1 that was part of Ocean Week Canada, a national celebration of ocean learning, stewardship and connection. The Rustico Surf Club hosted the event in partnership with Cavendish Beach and Central Coastal Drive. Jason Woodside, a professional oyster shucker and former Canadian champion, gave a presentation at the event about sustainable oyster practices. In an interview with The Guardian, Woodside said that P.E.I., as an industry, should continue to focus on creating quality oysters. 'For years and years, the idea is people either think oysters are a food that should be cheap, like buck-a-shuck oysters, or it should be a premium high-quality product, and it should fetch top dollar,' said Woodside. We still need to appreciate that it takes that oyster grower or that oyster four to five years to get to market, he added. 'When we start appreciating the oyster and where it's from, the rest will come,' Woodside said. The nature of the oyster itself and its behavior kind of instills sustainability, he added. 'It takes a long time to grow an oyster and so we nurture and care for our oysters, of course, you know, because each one is precious and special and those oysters also only grow in special places,' Woodside said. Oysters don't just grow anywhere, said Woodside. 'They're in these very delicate places and so, we nurture those places and we sort of tend to the oysters similar to gardening in a way,' he said. Wherever the oysters are from, the person who eats them can connect with the location from which they originated, Woodside added. 'It's not just a frozen chicken breast that nobody cares about. It's about connection, feeling – people try oysters from New Zealand or Ireland or B.C. or New England, U.S.A., and it immediately connects them with that place,' he said Yutaro Sasaki is a Local Journalism Initiative reporter, a position funded by the federal government. He can be reached at ysasaki@ . Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
San Francisco Chronicle
7 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
If people stopped having babies, how long would it be before humans were all gone?
(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.) If people stopped having babies, how long would it be before humans were all gone? – Jeffrey Very few people live beyond a century. So, if no one had babies anymore, there would probably be no humans left on Earth within 100 years. But first, the population would shrink as older folks died and no one was being born. Even if all births were to suddenly cease, this decline would start slowly. Eventually there would not be enough young people coming of age to do essential work, causing societies throughout the world to quickly fall apart. Some of these breakdowns would be in humanity's ability to produce food, provide health care and do everything else we all rely on. Food would become scarce even though there would be fewer people to feed. As an anthropology professor who has spent his career studying human behavior, biology and cultures, I readily admit that this would not be a pretty picture. Eventually, civilization would crumble. It's likely that there would not be many people left within 70 or 80 years, rather than 100, due to shortages of food, clean water, prescription drugs and everything else that you can easily buy today and need to survive. Sudden change could follow a catastrophe To be sure, an abrupt halt in births is highly unlikely unless there's a global catastrophe. Here's one potential scenario, which writer Kurt Vonnegut explored in his novel 'Galapagos ': A highly contagious disease could render all people of reproductive age infertile – meaning that no one would be capable of having babies anymore. Another possibility might be a nuclear war that no one survives – a topic that's been explored in many scary movies and books. A lot of these works are science fiction involving a lot of space travel. Others seek to predict a less fanciful Earth-bound future where people can no longer reproduce easily, causing collective despair and the loss of personal freedom for those who are capable of having babies. Two of my favorite books along these lines are ' The Handmaid's Tale,' by Canadian writer Margaret Atwood, and ' The Children of Men,' by British writer P.D. James. They are dystopian stories, meaning that they take place in an unpleasant future with a great deal of human suffering and disorder. And both have become the basis of television series and movies. In the 1960s and 1970s, many people also worried that there would be too many people on Earth, which would cause different kinds of catastrophes. Those scenarios also became the focus of dystopian books and movies. Heading toward 10 billion people To be sure, the number of people in the world is still growing, even though the pace of that growth has slowed down. Experts who study population changes predict that the total will peak at 10 billion in the 2080s, up from 8 billion today and 4 billion in 1974. The U.S. population currently stands at 342 million. That's about 200 million more people than were here when I was born in the 1930s. This is a lot of people, but both worldwide and in the U.S. these numbers could gradually fall if more people die than are born. About 3.6 million babies were born in the U.S. in 2024, down from 4.1 million in 2004. Meanwhile, about 3.3 million people died in 2022, up from 2.4 million 20 years earlier. One thing that will be important as these patterns change is whether there's a manageable balance between young people and older people. That's because the young often are the engine of society. They tend to be the ones to implement new ideas and produce everything we use. Also, many older people need help from younger people with basic activities, like cooking and getting dressed. And a wide range of jobs are more appropriate for people under 65 rather than those who have reached the typical age for retirement. Declining birth rates In many countries, women are having fewer children throughout their reproductive lives than used to be the case. That reduction is the most stark in several countries, including India and South Korea. The declines in birth rates occurring today are largely caused by people choosing not to have any children or as many as their parents did. That kind of population decline can be kept manageable through immigration from other countries, but cultural and political concerns often stop that from happening. At the same time, many men are becoming less able to father children due to fertility problems. If that situation gets much worse, it could contribute to a steep decline in population. Neanderthals went extinct Our species, Homo sapiens, has been around for at least 200,000 years. That's a long time, but like all animals on Earth we are at risk of becoming extinct. Consider what happened to the Neanderthals, a close relative of Homo sapiens. They first appeared at least 400,000 years ago. Our modern human ancestors overlapped for a while with the Neanderthals, who gradually declined to become extinct about 40,000 years ago. Some scientists have found evidence that modern humans were more successful at reproducing our numbers than the Neanderthal people. This occurred when Homo sapiens became more successful at providing food for their families and also having more babies than the Neanderthals. If humans were to go extinct, it could open up opportunities for other animals to flourish on Earth. On the other hand, it would be sad for humans to go away because we would lose all of the great achievements people have made, including in the arts and science. In my view, we need to take certain steps to ensure that we have a long future on our own planet. These include controlling climate change and avoiding wars. Also, we need to appreciate the fact that having a wide array of animals and plants makes the planet healthy for all creatures, including our own species. Hello, curious kids! Do you have a question you'd like an expert to answer? Ask an adult to send your question to CuriousKidsUS@ Please tell us your name, age and the city where you live. And since curiosity has no age limit – adults, let us know what you're wondering, too. We won't be able to answer every question, but we will do our best.
