logo
Why it's a smart time to buy an EV

Why it's a smart time to buy an EV

Now might be a good time to pull the trigger if you're thinking about buying an electric vehicle.
President Donald Trump signed the "Big Beautiful Bill" into effect on Friday. That means the $7,500 tax credit established under former President Joe Biden's EV initiative will expire on September 30.
"If you're in the market for an EV and you're ready to commit to a new car, you should do that," Joseph Yoon, consumer insights analyst at car shopping website Edmunds, told Business Insider.
Revised rules for the $7,500 federal tax credit went into effect last year and limited the number of EVs that qualified for the credit. However, 20 electric and hybrid vehicles, including all of Tesla's models and the Ford F150 Lightning, still qualify for the discount (you can check out the full list here.)
Some auto manufacturers, like Slate Auto, have already started to adjust their listings. The Jeff Bezos-backed EV startup recently removed the "under $20,000" expected price tag for its upcoming EV pickup truck, which the company previously expected to qualify for federal tax incentives. Now it says it's expected to cost in the "mid-twenties."
The federal EV tax credit has two parts. Consumers can qualify for a $3,750 credit if the vehicle meets either the critical minerals or battery component requirements. If it satisfies both criteria, consumers can get the full $7,500 credit.
To qualify for the $7,500 incentive, several additional criteria must be met: the vehicle must have a battery capacity of at least 7 kilowatt-hours, a gross vehicle weight rating under 14,000 pounds, and final assembly must take place in North America. Additionally, at least 50% of the battery's minerals and components must be sourced from the US or a country with a US free-trade agreement. There's also a suggested price cap for the incentive to apply.
Used EVS also have a clean vehicle tax credit, which allows certain buyers in an income bracket to be eligible for up to $4,000 for an EV with a sale price of $25,000 or less.
Brian Moody, lead senior editor for Autotrader and Kelley Blue Book, said that buyers in search of a used EV should also strive to make a purchase as soon as possible. Long-term, though, it won't make too much of a difference because used EVs "depreciate very rapidly," Moody said. The average 1 to 5-year-old used EV price is around $31,110, according to data from iSeeCars.com.
"Even without the incentive, they're still going to end up being a great deal," Moody said about used EVs.
New EVs are another story — often commanding higher price tags than their gas-powered rivals.
Yoon said the average sticker price of a new EV is $63,026, and the average manufacturer's suggested retail price for a gas car is $50,273. While not having the $7,500 rebate will have an impact, some manufacturers may add their own discounts and incentives to help move inventory, Yoon said.
If you happen to be on the fence about getting an EV and you're not in the place for a big-ticket purchase, there may be some benefit to waiting. With the incentives increasing competition in the market, some auto manufacturers may up their game to convince buyers to convert, Moody said.
"This could end up making electric cars better overall because they'll have to now compete on an even playing field with cars that are powered by all different types of fuels, whether it's hydrogen, electric, or just gas," Moody said.
The shift wouldn't happen overnight or in the near-term future, given that manufacturers will have to work on outsourcing, tariffs, and price adjustments. However, it could be a long-term benefit.
But if you were already planning on buying a new EV in the coming months and can afford it — you might as well take advantage of the federal incentive while you still can.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem says Trump wants FEMA 'remade,' not dismantled
DHS Secretary Kristi Noem says Trump wants FEMA 'remade,' not dismantled

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem says Trump wants FEMA 'remade,' not dismantled

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Sunday that President Donald Trump wants the Federal Emergency Management Agency 'remade' rather than dismantled entirely. 'I think the president recognizes that FEMA should not exist the way that it always has been. It needs to be redeployed in a new way, and that's what we did during this response,' Noem said in an interview on NBC News' 'Meet the Press,' referring to the federal government's response to the Texas floods. 'It's not just FEMA that can respond in these situations. The federal government has all kinds of assets, and we deployed them,' Noem added, pointing to the Coast Guard and U.S. Customs and Border Protection helping with disaster response. Both groups routinely respond to disasters. Trump has previously slammed FEMA, which is part of the Department of Homeland Security, and mused about possibly 'getting rid' of the agency, which administers emergency relief. Noem, too, has previously said that the administration would eliminate FEMA. Asked on 'Meet the Press' a second time whether Trump no longer wanted to end the agency, Noem reiterated that she believed the president 'wants it to be remade so that it's an agency that is new in how it deploys and supports states.' In the aftermath of the Texas floods, which have killed at least 129 people with 166 still missing, the administration has shifted away from its harsh rhetoric targeting the agency. Noem told reporters on Saturday that the federal response in Texas would be how Trump envisions 'what FEMA would look like into the future.' It's a far cry from how the president has previously targeted the agency. Just days into his second term, he said, 'FEMA has really let us down, let the country down.' That same day, Trump signed an order directing a 'full-scale review' of FEMA. Noem also acknowledged reports from NBC News and other outlets that the secretary requires that she personally sign off on all agency spending over $100,000. 'The $100,000 sign-off is for every contract that goes through the Department of Homeland Security,' Noem said. 'It's an accountability on contracts that go forward,' Noem added. 'But there was no break in contracts. Those contracts were approved as soon as they were in front of me, and FEMA knew they were fully to deploy them the instant that the local officials asked for the request.' In the aftermath of the deadly floods, some Democrats have criticized the administration's response, with Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., going so far as to say that Noem should resign. Noem responded to Warren on Sunday, brushing off the comment with a laugh. 'I don't care what she thinks,' Noem said, adding there was 'no' chance she would resign. Gov. Andy Beshear, D-Ky., said later on "Meet the Press" that it was important "that we make sure that we learn from" the floods. He pointed to previously deadly floods in Kentucky, saying, "We asked every question after. We didn't shy from anything." "What I hope happens is people embrace the questions because the questions don't have to be a political football, and shouldn't be," Beshear said. "It's 'how do we do better? How do we save more lives? How do we get a better weather forecast? Do we have enough people at the National Weather Service? Can we deploy faster than we did this time?' All of those things are legitimate." Noem on Sunday responded to criticism of what the administration is calling 'Alligator Alcatraz,' an immigrant detention center in Florida. Some Democrats have criticized the center's conditions, with Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., calling them 'really appalling.' Noem argued that standards at federal detention centers 'are extremely high.' The 'Alligator Alcatraz' facility is state-managed, which Noem acknowledged. Wasserman Schultz, who visited the facility with other Florida Democrats, said that detainees were 'essentially packed into cages' that held more than 30 people each. 'Wall-to-wall humans,' Wasserman Schultz said Saturday. Noem said she 'wouldn't call them jail cells,' adding, 'I would call them a facility where they are held and that are secure facilities, but are held to the highest levels of what the federal government requires for detention facilities.' The secretary said the administration is looking into establishing additional detention centers, and she encouraged people to 'self-deport.' Noem's comments also come one day after the administration faced a setback in deportation efforts in California. A federal judge ruled on Friday that officials could not solely rely on a person's race or spoken language in determining whether to detain them. Noem said she would comply with the judge's order, but denied that people are targeted solely for those factors. She said the administration would appeal the judge's decision. "What we have always done is built a case and done investigative work in who we go after and who we target," Noem said. Enforcement officials, though, also arrest people collaterally when other migrants are present during arrests. Border Czar Tom Homan acknowledged "collateral arrests in many areas" in a CNN interview on Sunday, but denied that law enforcement relied solely on a person's looks in determining who to detain. "Let me be clear: Physical description can't be the sole factor to give you reasonable suspicion," Homan said on CNN's "State of the Union." He said a person's appearance could contribute to a decision over whether to detain someone, giving an example of someone with an MS-13 tattoo. This article was originally published on

'Inexcusable' failures led to Trump assassination attempt: Senate report
'Inexcusable' failures led to Trump assassination attempt: Senate report

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'Inexcusable' failures led to Trump assassination attempt: Senate report

A congressional inquiry into the attempt to assassinate US President Donald Trump at a campaign rally a year ago on Sunday lamented "inexcusable" failures in the Secret Service's operations and response, and called for more serious disciplinary action. On July 13, 2024, a gunman shot the then-Republican presidential candidate during a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, grazing his ear. One bystander was killed and two other people in addition to Trump were wounded before a government sniper killed the gunman, 20-year-old Thomas Crooks. "What happened was inexcusable and the consequences imposed for the failures so far do not reflect the severity of the situation," said the report released by the US Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. The dramatic incident energized Trump's bid to return to the White House, with his campaign using a photo of him bloodied and pumping his fist as he was hurried offstage to woo voters. The report did not shed new light on the gunman's motive, which still remains a mystery, but accused the Secret Service of "a cascade of preventable failures that nearly cost President Trump his life." "The United States Secret Service failed to act on credible intelligence, failed to coordinate with local law enforcement," said the committee's Republican chairman Rand Paul. "Despite those failures, no one has been fired," he added. "It was a complete breakdown of security at every level—fueled by bureaucratic indifference, a lack of clear protocols, and a shocking refusal to act on direct threats. "We must hold individuals accountable and ensure reforms are fully implemented so this never happens again." - 'Mistakes were made' - The Secret Service cited communication, technical and human errors and said reforms were underway, including on coordination between different law enforcement bodies and establishment of a division dedicated to aerial surveillance. Six unidentified staff have been disciplined, according to the agency. The punishments range from 10 to 42 days' suspension without pay, and all six were put into restricted or non-operational positions. Reflecting on the assassination attempt earlier this week, Trump said "mistakes were made" but that he was satisfied with the investigation. In an interview with his daughter-in-law on Fox News' "My View with Lara Trump," Trump said the sniper "was able to get him from a long distance with one shot. If he didn't do that, you would have had an even worse situation." "It was unforgettable," Trump said of the events. "I didn't know exactly what was going on. I got whacked. There's no question about that. And fortunately, I got down quickly. People were screaming." md/sst

Up another 6% in the last week! Is the BP share price ready to go gangbusters?
Up another 6% in the last week! Is the BP share price ready to go gangbusters?

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Up another 6% in the last week! Is the BP share price ready to go gangbusters?

The BP share price (LSE: BP.) has had a good week. It climbed 6% and is now up more than 20% over the past three months. That offers some relief to long-suffering shareholders, although it's still down 11% over the past year. Tragically, the rally began when conflict between Israel and Iran drove the oil price from just over $60 to just under $80 a barrel. BP is not purely an oil producer, but energy prices remain the biggest driver of earnings. The oil price pulled back after the bombing stopped, but started rising again last week. That was partly down to Donald Trump delaying threatened tariffs, kicking the decision into August, while renewed Houthi attacks on shipping pushed the geopolitical risk premium higher. Reports that Trump may make a 'major' announcement on Russia added to the uncertainty. OPEC also updated its long-term forecast, projecting global oil demand will rise to 122.9m barrels a day by 2050, driven by growth in India, Africa and the Middle East. That helped steady nerves. There are dozens of moving parts. And the reality is that nobody has a clue where oil goes next. Which means nobody really knows what the BP share price will do either. To be fair, I could say that about any stock. BP released a Q2 update on 11 July. While reported upstream production rose, falling oil and gas prices took their toll. Oil averaged $67.88 a barrel in Q2, down from $75.73 in Q1. That could knock $600m to $800m off earnings. The gas and low carbon energy segment may face a further hit. The company expects stronger refining margins, rising from $15.2 to $21.1 a barrel, while oil trading should also deliver a strong result. Net debt has fallen slightly, but remains close to $30bn. BP's ailing share price has driven up the trailing dividend yield to an attractive 6.02%. Forecasts suggest that could climb to 6.3% next year. The board is still busily buying back billions of its own shares. BP's forward price-to-earnings ratio sits at 12.5, falling to 11 in 2026. Which looks decent. We also learned last week that BP is returning to Libya, signing a deal to explore three sites and reopen its Tripoli office. That may help improve long-term production. Still, strategy remains muddled with BP torn between shareholders demanding it refocuses on fossil fuels, while activists demand greater commitment to renewables. Expectations are modest, with 28 analysts forecasting a median 7.5% rise in the share price to 432.5p over the next year. As of 11 July the shares traded at 401.75p. Throw in the yield and the total return jumps to around 13.5%. I bought BP last autumn, and my double-digit loss is now in single digits. Add dividends, and I'm roughly flat. Could it go gangbusters from here? I'd like to think so but suspect the challenges and uncertainty are simply too great, especially with the world potentially slipping into recession. BP is still worth considering with a long-term view, for income as much as growth, but only as part of a balanced portfolio. This is a volatile sector. It's a long time since BP could be called a no-brainer buy. The post Up another 6% in the last week! Is the BP share price ready to go gangbusters? appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Harvey Jones has positions in Bp P.l.c. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store