New poll shows Scots overwhelmingly back independence over direct rule
37%, meanwhile, said they would back direct rule again.
The question asked, specifically: 'If there were to be a second independence referendum tomorrow and the ONLY options on the ballot paper were full independence or the permanent closure of the Scottish Parliament at Holyrood and a return to direct Westminster rule, how do you think you would vote?'
READ MORE: Scottish MPs panned over up to £3500-a-month taxpayer-funded London homes
Interestingly, Labour voters during last July's General Election are quite split on the issue – narrowly backing direct rule by 51% to 49%, according to the survey.
The same Norstat survey, which was initially commissioned for The Sunday Times, found that overall support for Scottish independence is at 54% but would rise even further if Reform UK's leader, Nigel Farage, were to become the next prime minister.
Data from the poll, which was published Saturday evening, shows the Yes side has opened up an eight-point lead, sitting at 54%, when undecided voters are excluded.
But this would rise to 58% if Farage were to be in power.
It comes after the Clacton MP hinted that he would scrap the Scottish Parliament's funding mechanism if he were Prime Minister.
Asked during a rare appearance in Scotland on Monday about whether he would get rid of the Barnett formula, which is used to fund Holyrood, Farage said the mechanism was 'out of date'.
He added: 'What I'd like to see is a Scottish Government that's able to raise a bit more of its own revenue and a Scottish economy that's actually got genuine growth and I don't believe that can happen without this sector [oil and gas] booming.
'I think, you know, the Barnett formula goes back to the 1970s. Is there an argument it should be looked at again? Of course there is.'
Norstat polled 1007 Scottish adults between May 27 and May 30.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
14 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Edinburgh transport convener loses to list MSP in selection battle for Scottish Parliament elections
Edinburgh's transport convener Stephen Jenkinson has failed in his bid to be selected as a candidate for the Scottish Parliament at next year's elections. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... He was beaten by sitting Lothian list MSP Foysol Choudhury in Labour's selection contest to choose one man and one woman to fight the twinned seats of Edinburgh Northern and Edinburgh South Western. There was a shortlist of two male and two female candidates. Lawyer Catriona Munro topped the poll, with Mr Choudhury in second place, ahead of Cllr Jenkinson and party activist Rebecca Bell. Catriona Munro, Foysol Choudhury and Stephen Jenkinson | collage Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As the overall winner, Ms Munro got to choose which of the two seats she wanted to fight and she opted for Edinburgh South Western. Mr Chodhury will become candidate in Edinburgh Northern. Ms Munro was the Labour candidate in the recent Fountainbridge / Craiglockhart council by-election, where she came top in first preferences but narrowly lost to the Lib Dems when votes were redistributed. She made a bid to be Labour's candidate in the Westminster seat of Edinburgh South West against the SNP's Joanna Cherry at last year's general election, but lost to Scott Arthur, who went on to win the seat. And back in 2009, she lost by just one vote in the selection contest for Edinburgh East when long-serving Labour MP Gavin Strang announced he was standing down. Sheila Gilmore became the candidate and was elected to Westminster in the following year's general election. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The renamed Edinburgh South Western constituency replaces Edinburgh Pentlands, which has been held by the SNP's Gordon MacDonald since 2011. Before that it had been represented by Labour's Iain Gray and then former Scottish Tory leader David McLetchie. Mr MacDonald is standing down and the SNP has chosen the party's council group leader Simita Kumar as candidate. Lothian list MSP Sue Webber is standing for the Tories. Edinburgh Northern is a new seat, taking in a chunk of the current Edinburgh Western and part of Edinburgh Northern & Leith. The Lib Dems have high hopes of winning it with their candidate, Forth ward councillor Sanne Dijkstra-Downie. The SNP is fielding councillor Euan Hsylop and the Tories have chosen councillor Christopher Cowdy.
BBC News
14 minutes ago
- BBC News
Nigel Farage urges PM to appoint Reform peers to House of Lords
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has called on the prime minister to allow him to appoint peers to the House of Lords. In a letter to Sir Keir Starmer, Farage said he wanted "the democratic disparity" in the upper chamber to be addressed, suggesting it was unfair that parties with fewer MPs were has four MPs in the House of Commons and controls ten councils in England, but currently has no appointments to the Lords are made at the discretion of the prime minister. Downing Street has been approached for comment. The House of Lords is a part of Parliament. It scrutinises the work of government and is independent from the House of Commons, where MPs sit. Members of the Lords are called peers. Like MPs, they scrutinise the work of government and recommend changes to proposed legislation. There are currently more than his letter, Farage said: "My party received over 4.1 million votes at the general election in July 2024. We have since won a large number of seats in local government, led the national opinion polls for many months and won the only by-election of this Parliament."Farage added that he was in favour of reforming the Lords, but that "the time has come to address the democratic disparity that exists in the upper house".He noted that the Green Party, Plaid Cymru and Ulster Unionist Party (UUP) have 13 peers between also pointed out that the Liberal Democrats have 76 peers, despite winning fewer votes than Reform at the previous election. The Lib Dems currently hold 72 seats in the Commons, making them the third largest party after Labour and the Conservatives."None of this holds water any longer given the seismic shifts that have taken place in British politics," Farage said his request to appoint peers was "modest", but did not outline who he would nominate if given the opportunity to do May, Reform made sweeping gains in local elections, as well as winning the Runcorn and Helsby by-election by just six success led Farage to claim that Reform UK was now the main opposition prime minister is under no constitutional obligation to elevate members of opposition parties, but will often ask opposition leaders to nominate individuals for December, Sir Keir appointed 30 new Labour peers, including his former chief of staff Sue Gray. The Conservatives appointed six new peers, while the Liberal Democrats appointed year, MPs backed plans to get rid of hereditary peers from the House of Lords.
The Herald Scotland
27 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
So Nicola Sturgeon achieved nothing? What a load of nonsense
I have not read the memoir - time has not permitted. And the noisy reaction from some quarters has been of no real interest – it has not triggered any impulse to delve deeper to find out what the fuss is about. All of this sound and fury is to be expected, and much of it has come from people with political views very different to those of the former first minister or from those at odds with Ms Sturgeon on particular issues. The publication of the memoir has, however, also led to assessments of what Ms Sturgeon achieved during her long time as first minister, from November 2014 to March 2023. And this, from a personal perspective, is a more interesting aspect. It has seemed that many people have been almost falling over themselves to flag their withering opinions on this front, with a black-and-white view that 'nothing' or close to nothing was achieved. From a business and economic perspective, and from a societal point of view, that seems like a most unfair conclusion. Thankfully, some assessments have been more positive, but these seem to have been drowned out somewhat. Ms Sturgeon's relationship with the business community, certainly from the perspective of the latter, seemed to deteriorate significantly amid the coronavirus pandemic. What is often forgotten is the period before that, when you could have taken the view that business was surprisingly positive about Ms Sturgeon. After all, many company leaders were and are vehemently opposed to independence, not infrequently because of personal political or ideological views but also for some because of fears about the effects of constitutional change. Touching briefly on the pandemic, you might have thought Ms Sturgeon's approach would have been appreciated by more business leaders. There was a steadiness about it, in contrast to the toing and froing and all the drama from former prime minister Boris Johnson. Read more We should also remember Ms Sturgeon argued eloquently and convincingly during this period against the hard Brexit delivered by Mr Johnson, which continues to cost businesses the length and breadth of the UK so dearly and to hammer the country's beleaguered economy. And there were surely few if any moments, for all the hue and cry from some in the business community, when it could have been argued that Ms Sturgeon and the Scottish Government were being far too cautious with the pandemic restrictions and lockdowns. That said, a narrative nevertheless developed during that period that the Scottish Government was not on the side of business. Leaving the politicking and emotion fuelled by Ms Sturgeon's memoir to one side and taking a detached look at her time as first minister, without having read the book, it is not at all difficult to immediately identify other major positives. Ms Sturgeon was first minister when the Scottish child payment was introduced in 2021. This continues to be an extremely important source of support for low-income families in Scotland, now amounting to a weekly payment of £27.15 for every child under 16 years of age. And it is all the more crucial given the savage welfare cuts at a UK level that began when the Tories came to power in 2010. Given the Scottish Government's very limited powers in this area, the Scottish child payment is a huge deal. And it is simple arithmetic that giving money to people who have to spend all or the vast bulk of their income to live feeds through directly to aggregate demand, thereby boosting the economy. Former Conservative prime minister David Cameron and erstwhile chancellor George Osborne highlighted the importance of welfare spending to growth when they cut it savagely and hammered the UK economy. Read more Claiming we were 'all in this together', they implemented a corporation tax cuts bonanza, which failed miserably to boost investment and the economy as they claimed it would, as company bosses hung on to the windfall or distributed it to shareholders while the population at large was made to pay the price for the global financial crisis. Ms Sturgeon also, during her time as first minister, stuck steadfastly in straitened financial times and amid grim budget squeezes coming from Westminster with the SNP's commitment to free university tuition for students ordinarily resident in Scotland and doing their first degree. This is so important in ensuring the talent pool is not diminished by restricting access to higher education to those able to pay for it or willing to take on huge amounts of debt. If we are serious about having a highly skilled workforce, free university tuition is essential. It was lamentable to see Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer go back on a previous pledge on free university tuition in England. Under 'social justice', one of Sir Keir's 10 pledges in 2020 when he was standing for Labour leader, the politician promised to 'support the abolition of tuition fees and invest in lifelong learning'. However, asked about this pledge in spring 2023 on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Sir Keir replied: 'We are likely to move on from that commitment, because we do find ourselves in a different financial situation." The trebling of tuition fees in England under the Cameron administration looked at the time like a politically driven move to narrow access to higher education, and it continues to do so. Of course, Ms Sturgeon could probably have done some things better on the business and economic front. It was unnecessary for her to pass an opinion that the proposed giant Cambo oil field off Shetland should not get the green light. The decision rested in any case with the UK Government. And the North Sea is still such an important provider of employment, directly and through the supply chain, and still makes a huge contribution to the Scottish economy. Having said that, there were far more positives than negatives from a business and economic perspective when Ms Sturgeon was first minister, even if the pluses seem very under-appreciated now. Perhaps the best overall assessment of Ms Sturgeon's time in charge is to be gleaned from examining the foreign direct investment (FDI) numbers over the period in which she was first minister. This, after all, gives a cold, objective view of the merits of Scotland as a place to do business in a global context. Companies look at many factors, including workforce skills and the stability of government and policymaking. In 2022, the last full year in which Ms Sturgeon was first minister, a then record 126 FDI projects were secured by Scotland, figures from accountancy firm EY revealed. This was up from 122 in 2021, and the 3.3% increase in the number of projects secured by Scotland in 2022 contrasted with a 6.4% decline in the UK as a whole that year. EY's Ally Scott said at the time: 'Scotland put in another powerful performance on FDI in 2022, securing record inward investment projects and UK market share.' The accountancy firm, publishing figures for 2024 this summer, highlighted the fact Scotland has been second only to London in terms of the number of FDI projects won in every year since 2015. That is mightily impressive. And those who would claim Ms Sturgeon achieved nothing, or was somehow detrimental to business and the economy, should reflect on this, once the emotion subsides a bit.
