logo
Intel Slides After New CEO's Comeback Plan Worries Investors

Intel Slides After New CEO's Comeback Plan Worries Investors

Mint25-07-2025
(Bloomberg) -- Shares of Intel Corp. tumbled 8.5% on Friday after Chief Executive Officer Lip-Bu Tan sparked concerns that he was more focused on cost cutting than restoring the chipmaker's technological edge.
As part of Intel's second-quarter report, Tan said the company will cancel some factory projects and take a more conservative approach to future spending. Tan called the investments begun under his predecessor, Pat Gelsinger, excessive and unwise.
'I do not subscribe to the belief that if you build it, they will come,' he said on a conference call with analysts.
At the same time, Tan struggled to give a clear picture of how he'll make the company more competitive again. Gelsinger had embarked on an ambitious plan to turn Intel into a chip foundry, a business that makes products for outside clients. A key part of that was moving toward a more advanced production technique called 14A. But Tan signaled Thursday that Intel will only roll out that technology tentatively.
The company will add large-scale capacity for 14A when Tan is convinced he has enough customers committed to using it, he said on the call. That didn't sit well with investors, who sent the shares down to $20.70 in New York on Friday, the stock's biggest single-day decline in more than three months.
'The idea you might step away from 14A if you can't get someone to invest in it is a problem,' said Wedbush Securities Inc. analyst Matt Bryson.
The crux of the concern: If Intel stops introducing new manufacturing technology, it's bowing out of the race for leadership of the chip industry — and closing the book on what made it untouchable for decades.
Intel's woes have previously spurred speculation that it might be acquired or broken up, though there's no clear path to a major deal. Possible suitors for Intel's factory division, such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., have backed away from the idea. Tan also has said he aims to keep Intel's manufacturing and product-design businesses together, though he does plan to offload smaller divisions.
Intel confirmed on Friday that it aims to spin off its networking group into a standalone business. The company said it has begun identifying strategic investors, without naming them. CRN previously reported on the plan.
In its earnings report, Intel gave an upbeat third-quarter sales forecast while missing estimates for some profit measures. Margins will be tighter than Wall Street anticipated in the period, and Intel only expects a break-even quarter. Analysts had projected a 4-cent gain on that basis.
In the second quarter, revenue amounted to $12.9 billion, little changed from a year earlier. Analysts had projected $11.9 billion. The company posted a loss of 10 cents a share, compared with an estimated profit of 1 cent.
Intel's stock had been up 13% this year through Thursday's close. Though that gain was in line with most chip stocks in 2025, rivals Nvidia Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. have performed better — lifted by their artificial intelligence prospects.
Tan's focus is getting Intel's financial house in order, a task that has included thousands of layoffs and the slashing of capital spending. The company said Thursday that already-paused factories in Germany and Poland won't go ahead, and progress at another project in Ohio will be slowed.
Intel will reduce capital expenditures on new plants and equipment this year and plans to make further cuts to that budget next year. The company will spend about $18 billion this year and less in 2026, executives said.
Tan, who took the CEO job in March, acknowledged that he still has work to do to make the company more competitive in its main markets: processors for personal computers and servers. He's also still crafting Intel's plan to crack the AI chip industry — an area where Nvidia dominates.
Third-quarter sales will be $12.6 billion to $13.6 billion, Intel said. Analysts on average had projected a number at the low end of that range.
The company has benefited from a resurgence in the PC industry, driven in part by manufacturers' efforts to build up inventory before tariffs hit. But the Silicon Valley pioneer has lost market share to rivals and is struggling to attract foundry clients.
Intel's layoff plans — first announced during the previous quarterly report — will reduce staff by 15%, Intel said. And the company expects further cuts through attrition and the splitting off of business units, Chief Financial Officer Dave Zinsner said in an interview.
The chipmaker aims to end the year with 75,000 employees, down more than 20% from the end of the June quarter. Bloomberg News reported in April that Intel was looking to cut its workforce by roughly that amount.
Analysts have expressed concern that PC demand will decelerate after a strong first half. The threat of tariffs imposed by the US — and other nations in retaliation — may have prompted PC makers to rush to stock up ahead of prospective cost spikes, the company warned last quarter.
Demand was better than expected last quarter because an economic slowdown didn't materialize, Zinsner said. But the company is aware that some demand might have stemmed from consumers and businesses trying to avoid tariffs.
'We felt like tariffs might be a headwind in the second quarter and would further unsettle the economy,' he said. 'None of that transpired.'
Intel's client computing division had revenue of $7.9 billion last quarter, topping the average prediction of $7.3 billion. Data center sales were $3.9 billion, compared with a $3.7 billion estimate. The foundry division generated revenue of $4.4 billion, in line with projections.
Intel had previously said it planned to cut operating expenses to about $17 billion this year and $16 billion in 2026. The Santa Clara, California-based company remains on track for the 2025 cuts, Intel said Thursday.
Tan's predecessor, Gelsinger, had concentrated on expanding Intel's factory network, once its key competitive advantage. He laid out plans to spend tens of billions of dollars on making its plants the best in the industry again, a status that would force rivals to use it as an outsourced provider of manufacturing.
'We will take a fundamentally different approach to building our foundry business,' Tan said in a memo to staff Thursday. 'Over the past several years, the company invested too much, too soon – without adequate demand. In the process, our factory footprint became needlessly fragmented and underutilized. We must correct our course.'
For now, the biggest user of its factories is Intel's internal design teams. Some of Intel's best offerings now contain components made by TSMC, adding more pressure to its margins.
Adjusted gross margin — the percentage of sales remaining after excluding the cost of production — was about 30% in the second quarter and will be 36% in the current period. That's close to half of what it was when Intel's chips dominated the data center market. Nvidia has margins above 70%.
Intel's Zinsner said the company isn't yet ready to unveil AI-related gear. The chipmaker is focusing on the development of products that will fit in unserved parts of the market.
Ultimately, Intel needs to figure out how it can benefit from artificial intelligence, Emarketer analyst Jacob Bourne said in a note.
'A fundamental market truth isn't going away,' he said. 'Global demand for AI chips continues to soar, and Intel must find its footing in that value chain.'
(Updates shares starting in first paragraph.)
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FCA Says Banks Could Face £9 Billion Bill on Car Loans
FCA Says Banks Could Face £9 Billion Bill on Car Loans

Mint

time20 minutes ago

  • Mint

FCA Says Banks Could Face £9 Billion Bill on Car Loans

(Bloomberg) -- The UK's Financial Conduct Authority will consult on a redress scheme to guide banks on how they should compensate customers that were missold used car loans, which could leave the lenders on the hook for at least £9 billion ($11.9 billion). The cost of the redress scheme could plausibly be as high as £18 billion but a lower figure was more likely, according to a press release by the FCA on Sunday. The announcement comes after the UK's top court handed a big boost to banks on Friday, overruling lower court judgments and reducing the amount they will need to pay out in compensation. 'Any redress scheme must be fair to consumers who have lost out and ensure the integrity of the motor finance market, so it works well for future consumers,' the FCA said in the statement. 'We will publish the consultation by early October and finalise any scheme in time for people to start receiving compensation next year.' While the Supreme Court's judgment will see banks avoid the enormous payouts many had feared, they still face having to pay out some compensation. Many of the UK's biggest lenders, including Lloyds Banking Group Plc and Banco Santander SA, have provisioned for potential losses. American Depositary Receipts of lenders like Lloyds and Close Brother Group Plc soared in value after the judgment was handed down on Friday. The full extent of the losses that banks will face as a result of hidden commissions in car finance arrangements won't be clear until the redress scheme is finalized, but fears of a PPI style compensation scheme have been allayed by the Supreme Court's judgment. Three rulings by the Court of Appeal were the subject of the decision on Friday, with two of them overturned on appeal in favor of the banks. The Supreme Court did say that in one of the cases a customer had been treated unfairly by the lender, FirstRand Ltd., and that will help shape the regulator's redress scheme. 'The Supreme Court agreed with several factors we had identified which could point towards an unfair relationship and fall foul of the Consumer Credit Act,' the FCA said in it's statement. 'This clarity helps us because we have been looking at what is unfair and, prior to this judgment, there were different interpretations of the law coming from different courts.' (Updates with more details) More stories like this are available on

Death Toll Rises to 4 at Chile Mine Collapse as Search Continues
Death Toll Rises to 4 at Chile Mine Collapse as Search Continues

Mint

time20 minutes ago

  • Mint

Death Toll Rises to 4 at Chile Mine Collapse as Search Continues

(Bloomberg) -- Codelco said it recovered the bodies of three of the five workers caught in a tunnel collapse at one of the world's biggest underground copper mines in central Chile. A search for the other two continues. The update brings the official death toll to four after another person was confirmed dead in the immediate aftermath of Thursday's incident. Nine others were injured. 'In parallel with the efforts we continue to make with the utmost commitment to rescue our two colleagues who remain trapped, Codelco is providing all necessary support to families and loved ones during this difficult time,' the company wrote in a statement. The state-owned miner is grappling with a human tragedy unfolding at the site of its El Teniente mine south of Santiago, in an incident that's also stoking concerns for global copper supply. Codelco, the world's biggest copper supplier, halted mining at the site after a collapse attributed to seismic activity struck a new section of the complex, called Andesita. It's the latest setback for the company's efforts to recover from a years-long output slump. A 100-person team — including some of those who helped free 33 workers trapped in another Chilean mine in 2010 — has been working on the El Teniente rescue effort. The 120-year-old El Teniente mine is crucial for Codelco's aim to return to pre-pandemic production levels of about 1.7 million tons a year from about 1.4 million tons now. Codelco delayed reporting quarterly results, including production guidance, on Friday as it deals with the accident. When operations can resume at the mine will depend on the outcome of an investigation into the collapse, how much reinforcement of infrastructure is required and whether mining method adjustments are needed. Mines in Chile are designed to withstand much stronger seismic activity than the 4.2-magnitude event that caused the collapse. More stories like this are available on

Bryce Harper and His Nine Figures Can't Front MLB's Pay Fight
Bryce Harper and His Nine Figures Can't Front MLB's Pay Fight

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

Bryce Harper and His Nine Figures Can't Front MLB's Pay Fight

(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Bryce Harper, star first baseman for the Philadelphia Phillies, got in the face of Major League Baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred during a team meeting recently. Manfred, according to ESPN, was discussing baseball's challenging economics. Harper, who is in the midst of a $330 million contract, used an expletive to tell the commissioner to leave if he intended to talk about a salary cap. Manfred fired back, and then cooler heads eventually prevailed, allowing the meeting to continue — without a salary cap discussion. The now-infamous confrontation is just the latest skirmish in an intensifying battle between MLB owners and players over how to fairly distribute baseball's riches and maintain competitive balance. The league and its owners believe a salary cap is a tool that can accomplish both goals. The players' union, which has long opposed a cap, argues that the concept will only serve to protect the economic interests of owners. It's certainly in Harper's interest to advance the union's argument. But most MLB players don't — and likely never will — earn the kind of money Bryce Harper does. As labor strife intensifies, and a potential lockout looms with the current collective bargaining agreement set to expire in 2026, it's these everyday players — not the nine-figure superstars — who need to be the face of this fight. Baseball has always had haves and have-nots. But over the last half-decade, spending on free agents by a handful of major market teams has far outpaced what most other teams (small market or otherwise) can afford. At the start of the 2025 season, for example, the Los Angeles Dodgers' $398.2 million payroll was more than four times bigger than the combined payrolls of the bottom four teams (the Marlins, White Sox, Rays, and Athletics). Those well-heeled teams aren't stocking up on players earning $760,000 per year, MLB's minimum salary in 2025. They're inflating their payrolls with big contracts for a small number of free-agent superstars. On Opening Day this year, there were 953 players on MLB rosters, only 15 of whom earned at least $30 million per year. Of course, the other players aren't exactly hurting. More than half of all of the league's players earn at least $1 million per year. That might seem like a lucrative deal for everyone involved. However, between 2002 and 2024, MLB players have actually seen their share of league revenues decline, from 63% in 2002 to just 47% in 2024, according to Manfred. And while blockbuster contracts keep growing — Juan Soto's new 15-year deal with the Mets is worth $765 million — most players face a different reality. At the start of the 2025 season, the median MLB salary was $1.35 million, down from $1.5 million in 2024. In 2015, it was $1.65 million, which remains — a decade later — a record high. Several factors account for the slippage. The most important one is a sort of indentured servitude. MLB rules mandate that a player has six years of service on a big league roster before gaining free-agency rights. This requirement, which typically follows several years at the minor league level, allows a team to control and underpay athletes, often through their prime playing years. Consider Paul Skenes, the ace pitcher for the Pittsburgh Pirates who won the National League Rookie of the Year award. He's currently paid $875,000 and won't be eligible for free agency and a market-rate payday until 2030. As it happens, Skenes is lucky compared to his peers. He's already a superstar and, barring injury, will eventually be paid like one. Most MLB players will never get to free agency at all, much less get the chance to earn their actual worth. Last year, the head team physician for the Texas Rangers claimed that the average career of a major-leaguer lasts three years. Back in 2007, demographic data showed that it was 5.6 years. It's easy to overlook those players; they fill out rosters, have a few good years (hopefully) and ultimately serve as filler in baseball card packs. But if the MLB Players Association is serious about building a fairer economic system, it must prioritize their needs. From a policy standpoint, that means the MLBPA must be willing to negotiate its long-standing opposition to a salary cap. Holding onto principles is admirable, but if the median salary is declining, those principles haven't accomplished much. A better course of action would be to act in the interests of most MLB players, negotiate shorter rookie contracts, a salary floor and a guaranteed share of league revenue in exchange for a salary cap. The concept isn't far-fetched: the National Football League, National Basketball Association, and National Hockey League all have negotiated some version of the concept. Fans like the parity, and players like owning a piece of the league's revenues. Well-paid veteran players certainly have a role in negotiations to obtain these concessions. But they shouldn't be the face of the fight. Not only are they poor representatives for players unlikely to reach age 30 in an MLB uniform. They are uniquely unsympathetic characters to a sporting public wary of money grabs. Bryce Harper, demanding uncapped compensation (while going nose-to-nose with the commissioner), isn't going to persuade anyone. Rookies and role players with a message of fairness just might. Baseball needs their voices more than the vets. More From Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Adam Minter is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering the business of sports. He is the author, most recently, of 'Secondhand: Travels in the New Global Garage Sale.' More stories like this are available on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store