logo
Donalds unveils legislation to move NASA headquarters to Florida's Space Coast

Donalds unveils legislation to move NASA headquarters to Florida's Space Coast

The Hill02-04-2025
Florida gubernatorial candidate and Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) is set to introduce legislation in the House proposing that NASA headquarters be moved from Washington, D.C. to Florida.
The legislation's co-sponsors include a bipartisan group of Florida lawmakers, including Reps. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.), Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.), Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-Fla.), Scott Franklin (R-Fla.), Mara Salazar (R-Fla.), Daniel Webster (R-Fla.), Carlos Gimenez (R-Fla.), Brian Mast (R-Fla.), Darren Soto (D-Fla.), John Rutherford (R-Fla.), Cory Mills (R-Fla.), and Vern Buchanan (R-Fla.).
The bill, titled Consolidating Aerospace Programs Efficiently at Canaveral Act, is the House version of a Senate bill that was introduced by Florida Sens. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) and Ashley Moody (R-Fla.).
The bill proposes moving NASA headquarters to Florida's Space Coast in Brevard County within one year of enactment. The space coast is home to Kennedy Space Center and Cape Canaveral Space Force Station.
The Hill was the first outlet to report on the House version of the legislation.
Proponents of moving NASA to Florida point to the existing aerospace infrastructure along the Space Coast. They also note that Kennedy Space Center and Cape Canaveral Spaceforce Stations are primary launch sites for NASA and that having headquarters close by would streamline operations. Florida's proximity to the equator also makes it a prime location for launches.
The effort from Florida lawmakers comes as the lease on NASA Headquarters in Washington is set to expire in August of 2028. However, lawmakers from the Sunshine State are not the only ones pushing to relocate NASA to their home state.
Last month, a group of Ohio lawmakers sent a letter to Vice President JD Vance, who is from Ohio, and President Trump's pick to lead NASA Jared Isaacman, advocating to move the agency's headquarters to Cleveland.
The letter was signed by Ohio GOP Reps. Max Miller, Troy Balderson, Mike Carey, Warren Davidson, Jim Jordan, Dave Joyce, Bob Latta, Michael Rulli, Dave Taylor and Mike Turner as well as Democratic Rep. Marcy Kaptur. Ohio Sens. Bernie Moreno (R) and Jon Husted (R) also signed the letter.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

INTC: Intel Jumps on Reports of White House Investment in Ohio Factory
INTC: Intel Jumps on Reports of White House Investment in Ohio Factory

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

INTC: Intel Jumps on Reports of White House Investment in Ohio Factory

Aug 15 - Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) jumped more than 5% on Friday after reports suggested the Trump administration is in talks to take a stake in the company. The potential investment would support Intel's plan to build a massive semiconductor hub in Ohio, a project long touted as key to maintaining US leadership in high-end chip production. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 10 Warning Signs with INTC. Details of the stake and pricing remain under discussion, and Intel has not confirmed any deal. White House spokesman Kush Desai cautioned that talks remain hypothetical, while a company spokesperson highlighted Intel's commitment to supporting US technology and manufacturing initiatives. Tech analysts suggest such a move could offer Intel financial backing and strategic influence, helping the company catch up to rivals like Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) and AMD (NASDAQ:AMD). Intel's market value has dropped to roughly $104 billion since 2020, underscoring the urgency for government support. Observers in the industry say the Ohio plant may end up being the largest ever chip manufacturing plant globally but progress is hampered by delays. According to analysts, such as David Nicholson and Austin Lyons, the strategic use of US manufactured semi-conductors entails high demands with Intel being in a leading position to gain competence in the international market. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

Want to see the planet parade? Here's when to view the last show of 2025
Want to see the planet parade? Here's when to view the last show of 2025

USA Today

time26 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Want to see the planet parade? Here's when to view the last show of 2025

Did you miss the start of the planetary alignment last week? Well, don't worry, you'll still have a few more days to see it before the month is up. But this will be your last chance for the year. Usually, people can look up at the bright sky and spot at least one planet. Two or three planets are also commonly hanging out in the night sky, according to NASA. But what about when four, five, or even six planets are visible? Well, from Saturday, Aug. 16, to Wednesday, Aug. 20, six planets will be visible, according to Andrew Fazekas, the Communications Manager for Astronomers Without Borders. Stargazers hoping to see all of the planets will have "a very short window of time" to do so, Fazekas said. As Mercury will be more difficult to see the further we get to the end of August, and only a few of the planets will be visible with the naked eye. Here's what you should know about the planetary alignment, also known as the planetary parade or planet parade, and what you need to see it. Stargazers have another chance to view the planetary parade The planet parade, where all six planets are aligned, started on Aug. 10. They include Mercury, Venus, Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune, and Uranus. For those behind, Aug. 16 to Aug. 20 will become crucial to stargazers scared of missing out, according to Fazekas. From Aug. 19 and Aug. 20, the crescent moon will line up with Jupiter and Venus and be a "great guidepost" to help people spot the planets, Fazekas adds. The planetary parade will be visible around 45 minutes before sunset and the next one won't happen until Feb. 28, 2026, according to Starwalk. What will you be able to see? Six of the seven planets visible from Earth will be in the night sky if you're looking at the right time. "You can actually see all of them if you have, of course, binoculars and telescopes handy," said Fazekas. You will be able to see the following planets during the planetary parade: What do planets look like? Fazekas asks would-be stargazers to be wary of what they see online, especially now, as content created by AI becomes more prominent. Fazekas is worried people are "expecting too much. Because when you're talking about planetary parade, people think, 'oh, I'm going to see all these planets all together. I can't believe I'm going to see all of these things.' And really, to the untrained eye, the planets... just look like bright stars." What is a planetary parade? When multiple planets are visible in the night sky, people refer to it as a planetary alignment or parade, according to Fazekas and NASA. They can create an optical illusion that looks like there is a straight line. True planetary alignment is "virtually impossible." "The term planetary parade is a colloquial term. It's not an official astronomical one," said Fazekas. "It just simply means that the planets are visible in, generally, the same area of the sky." What equipment do you need to view a planetary parade? Certain planets will only be visible with binoculars or a small telescope. Those interested in purchasing equipment should steer clear of telescopes that cost less than $500 and opt for Celestron, Robert Lunsford, the American Meteor Society's newsletter editor and fireball report coordinator, told USA TODAY. He advises beginners to opt for a telescope with a lens instead of a mirror, and for those seeking a more affordable option, he recommends purchasing a pair of binoculars instead. Tips for viewing the planetary parade Fazekas advises people to do the following when trying to see the planets in the coming days: Also, be sure to pack any mosquito repellent and check the weather ahead of time to make sure skies are clear. Contributing: Carlie Procell, Janet Loehrke; USA TODAY Julia is a trending reporter for USA TODAY. Connect with her on LinkedIn,X, Instagram and TikTok: @juliamariegz, or email her at jgomez@

Trump's motivation for accusing Adam Schiff of fraud is clear. But the legal case is not
Trump's motivation for accusing Adam Schiff of fraud is clear. But the legal case is not

San Francisco Chronicle​

time26 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Trump's motivation for accusing Adam Schiff of fraud is clear. But the legal case is not

Sen. Adam Schiff has been on President Donald Trump's hit list for many years — an outspoken critic with a role in both of Trump's impeachments — so it came as no surprise when the president announced a criminal investigation into Schiff's financial transactions. What is far less clear is whether the California Democrat stepped over any legal lines when he bought two homes, on opposite coasts, and listed both of them for a number of years as his 'principal residence,' with potential benefits in mortgage rates and taxes. In 2003, three years after his election to the House of Representatives, Schiff and his wife, Eve, purchased a home in a Maryland suburb for themselves and their two young children. Six years later, the couple bought a condominium in Schiff's House district in Burbank. It was not until 2020 that he reclassified the Maryland home as a 'secondary' residence. Home owners can claim a tax deduction on mortgage payments for their primary residence, and Schiff says he took a deduction only on the condominium, saving $70 per year. They may also qualify for lower mortgage payments, and Schiff's office — while insisting that he has never misled his lenders — has not responded to questions on whether he sought reduced payments on either residence. The transactions came to Trump's attention last month. 'I have always suspected Shifty Adam Schiff was a scam artist,' Trump said in a July 15 post on his Truth Social network. Now, he said, federal financial investigators have found that 'Schiff has engaged in a sustained pattern of possible mortgage fraud,' and Ed Martin — designated 'special attorney' by Trump's Justice Department after he failed to win Senate confirmation as a U.S. attorney — will look into possible criminal charges. Schiff, unsurprisingly, called it a baseless smear, 'Donald Trump's latest attempt at political retaliation against his perceived enemies.' And Schiff, who served 24 years in the House before his Senate election last November, has been on Trump's enemies list at least since 2019, when he played a lead role in the congressional investigation that led to Trump's first impeachment. That followed disclosures that Trump had withheld congressionally approved military aid from Ukraine to pressure the nation's president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, to announce an investigation of Democratic candidate Joe Biden and his son Hunter. In 2021, Schiff also took part in the investigation that resulted in Trump's impeachment by the House for helping to incite the attack on the U.S. Capitol by a mob trying to overturn the 2020 election results. The Senate acquitted Trump in both cases, as Democrats lacked the two-thirds majority needed to remove him from office. Meanwhile, Schiff's supporters note that Trump has been silent about revelations last month that Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican and strong supporter of the president, and his now-estranged wife had declared three separate homes in Texas as their primary residences at the same time, which reportedly made it possible for them to reduce their loan payments by hundreds of thousands of dollars. Schiff insists he has done nothing wrong. He says he notified his lenders and mortgage companies that he and his wife listed both their homes as 'principal residences' because they lived in both places and did not use them as vacation homes or rental property. And he says he acted 'in consultation' with House legal staff. 'Big surprise — members of Congress, almost all of them, own more than one home or rent more than one home because we're required to be on both coasts,' Schiff said in a video posted online. Federal mortgage fraud is the crime of deliberately making false statements to mislead a lender or mortgage company into approving a loan or granting other financial benefits that otherwise would have been denied. It requires proof that the person knowingly provided misinformation about an important issue in order to deceive the lender into approving a loan or providing financial benefits. The crime is a felony punishable by up to 30 years in prison. So did Schiff knowingly deceive his lenders? That might depend on whom you ask. The evidence Trump has relayed to prosecutor Ken Martin contains 'very serious allegations if true, and they could potentially constitute some level of fraud,' William Jacobson, a Cornell law professor and conservative commentator, told Fox News. 'If an average citizen misrepresented mortgage documents … to get a favorable rate, I think such person would be prosecuted.' Jacobson also criticized Schiff and other Democrats for 'cheerleading' Trump's prosecution and conviction on 34 felony charges. Trump was found guilty by a New York jury in May 2024 of concealing $130,000 in payments to former porn actress Stormy Daniels to keep her from disclosing their sexual relationship before the 2016 election. A sentencing judge imposed no criminal penalties this January, as Trump was about to return to office. Schiff's actions drew a similar assessment from William Pulte, a former businessman appointed by Trump in January to direct the Federal Housing Finance Agency. In a 'criminal referral' to Justice Department officials in May, Pulte, citing media reports, said Schiff 'has, in multiple instances, falsified bank documents and property records to acquire more favorable loan terms.' A different assessment came from Lawrence Jacobson, a veteran real estate lawyer in Beverly Hills who has served as an expert witness in trials on property issues. 'He has done nothing wrong,' Jacobson — no relation to the Cornell professor — told the Chronicle. 'He made full disclosure to the lenders and did it only after advice of counsel. The only crime he committed was doing his job.' Candace Turitto, a professor of political science at the University of Maryland, said that 'technically, there's absolutely nothing wrong' with Schiff's transactions, based on the evidence so far. But she said the mortgage laws, allowing borrowers to claim benefits on only one home at a time, raise difficult legal and political issues for members of Congress from faraway states. 'It might make one ponder, where exactly is the line for a primary residence?' Turitto said. 'How much time of a year should I spend sleeping under a certain roof for it to count as primary? Must I travel across the country to go 'home' after work, while my MD or VA colleague has a 30-minute drive home?' And it also affects congressional dialogue, she said. Before the time of regular air travel, Turitto said, 'members of Congress would spend weekends and the like in DC. … They would socialize, break bread, talk shop in after-hours environments,' forming 'more cooperative relationships across party lines.' These days, she observed, 'there's much less of this.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store