3AW host Neil Mitchell sounds the alarm about Jim Chalmer's tax plan
Neil Mitchell has slammed Anthony Albanese 's government for having a plan to punish baby boomers as younger Australians increasingly decide elections.
The 73-year-old 3AW host, from the boomer generation, suggested Treasurer Jim Chalmers had an agenda to tax older Australians over 60.
'Boomers beware. Jim Chalmers is taking about "intergenerational justice" in tax,' he said.
'That means a tax on boomers, who actually did a bit to build this country.'
Chalmers used his National Press Club address this week to suggested Labor would use its landslide re-election to help younger Australians, with a hint about new taxes being considered to pay for this new relief.
Millennials and Generation Z voters - born after 1981 - outnumbered boomers at the last election for the first time ever.
'The decisions we make in the 2020s will determine the sort of living standards and intergenerational justice that we have in the decades to come,' Chalmers said.
'I think there is a broad recognition of that.'
Labor was re-elected last month with a plan to slash student debt by 20 per cent, saving the average graduate $5,520 at a cost to taxpayers of $16billion.
It also offered tax cuts for low-income workers earning $18,200 to $45,000, with students, apprentices and part-time workers more likely to be young.
This relief is set to cost the Budget $17.1billion over four years.
That means Labor would either have to cut spending or increase taxes to fund relief that overwhelmingly favours the young, with Treasury only forecasting Budget deficits in coming years as gross government debt soars above $1trillion.
That could see Labor review generous tax concessions on things like family trusts that can avoid paying tax on income generated from within the trust.
Former Labor leader Bill Shorten lost the 2019 election proposing a new 30 per cent tax on family trusts as funds were distributed to beneficiaries.
While that policy was scrapped, the government's upcoming productivity roundtable in August is expected to explore a range of new revenue-raising options, with Chalmers hinting at tax changes.
'The easiest thing in the world is for people to come to us and say we want you to dramatically cut the taxes in our part of the economy and spend dramatically more on our industry, without recognising that there are necessary trade‑offs associated with that,' Chalmers said.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers used his National Press Club address this week to suggested Labor would use its landslide re-election to help younger Australians, with a hint about new taxes to pay for new relief
The government is still proceeding with plans to impose a new 15 per cent tax on unrealised gains on superannuation balances above $3million, in a bid to raise $2.3billion a year in revenue.
In Opposition, Albanese vowed to leave untouched franking tax credits for company shareholders and negative gearing tax breaks for investor landlords, even though house prices have surged at a faster pace since the pandemic.
Labor also has no plans to introduce a capital gains tax on the family home.
These existing arrangements favour boomers who were able to buy a house to live in cheaply after the capital gains tax debuted in 1985.
Chalmers this week downplayed a point about government payments making up 27 per cent of the economy - the highest level since 1986 outside of the pandemic.
'It's not the highest spending since the 80s. I know that you mean absent Covid, but I think it's unusual that we absent Covid,' he said.
'Quite frequently I'll hear we've got the weakest growth in 40 years, or we've got the highest spending. That's not true.'
Boomers still have political power with both Albanese and Opposition Leader Sussan Ley hailing from that generation, covering those born from 1946 to 1964.
Chalmers belongs to Generation X, spanning 1965 to 1980, along with every state premier. Only the Northern Territory has a Millennial leader.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Urgent warning to Aussies with a side hustle from UberEats delivery drivers to OnlyFans models
Australians working side hustle jobs are set to get a rude tax bill as the government cracks down on gig economy roles. The Australian Taxation Office is now directly contacting digital platforms to identify potential income taxpayers - meaning those with a side hustle can no longer hide. CPA Australia, which represents Certified Practising Accountants, warned the ATO's new sharing economy reporting regime was targeting everyone from social media influencers to food deliverers. Jenny Wong, the group's tax lead, said this meant Australians doing gig economy jobs with the likes of UberEats, DoorDash, Airtasker, YouTube and even OnlyFans risked a big tax bill if they failed to declare their income from these platforms. 'Until this year, individuals have been required to self-declare the income from their side-hustles,' she said. 'Now nothing will go under the radar. If you deliver food with DoorDash, work some casual jobs through Airtasker, or make content for Patreon, YouTube or OnlyFans, these sites are now reporting your earnings to the tax office. 'Though people might not consider earnings from digital platforms as income in the same way as their regular job, it is all viewed the same way by the ATO. 'Chances are that many people have simply not been declaring this income at tax time. That all changes now.' Ms Wong said the tax office was also targeting those who rented out items online. 'If you use a website to rent out a car parking space or your designer handbag, this income will be recorded, and you'll need to pay tax,' she said. The tax office's sharing economy reporting regime is expanding, meaning it will now be aware of all income earned from gig economy jobs in the 2024-25 financial year, above the $18,200 tax-free threshold. 'So, if you've had a successful year earning money through advertising revenue and streaming subscriptions, as well as through gifts and gratuities, the ATO will be expecting you to cough up,' she said. 'Yes, this even includes free cars, holidays, clothes and anything else you're lucky enough to receive as a form of payment. 'Depending on how much you've earned during the year, this could be a significant amount, maybe even tens of thousands of dollars.' What can be claimed on tax? Australian workers can claim items worth up to $300 in one financial year if they are used exclusively for work purposes, including a handbag used to carry a laptop computer and home office furniture. But H&R Block's director of tax communications Mark Chapman said these items had to be used to generate an income. 'Let's be clear: to claim items like bags or sunglasses, they must be used in the course of earning income; and if there's any personal use, only the work-related portion can be claimed. And as always, records are essential,' he said. 'Items of capital equipment (such as furniture, computers and associated hardware and software) which cost less than $300 can be written off in full immediately.' Australians working from home can claim 70 cents an hour on their tax, as a fixed rate claim method, provided they had proof since July 2024, in the form of diary entries, rosters or time sheets. Purchases made before June 30 can also be claimed as a tax deduction. 'With many retailers running end of financial year specials, any purchases you make now can be deducted in this year's tax return so from a cash flow point of view, you can minimise the time between purchase and tax deduction,' Mr Chapman said. What's the biggest misunderstanding about tax claims? Tax planning accountant Ben Johnston, a director of Johnston Advisory, said he had encountered many Australians during his three-decade career who thought the entire cost of a work-related item could be claimed on tax - because of those end of financial year sale campaigns on television. 'The benefits of tax deductions are so overstated where leading into the financial year - Officeworks, Dick Smith, Harvey Norman - all encouraging and really making people have urgency to spend money where it's actually really dumb to spend money to save tax,' he told Daily Mail Australia. 'Our tax system confuses and misleads people to spend money they don't need to just to save tax. 'A lot of people think they spend $10 on stationery and they get $10 back in tax when in fact they might be lucky to get $3.20 back. 'The notion of something being a hundred per cent tax deductible gets confused with being 100 per cent refundable and it's so false and retailers really prey on it.' Mr Johnston said he was frustrated by how many people didn't realise a tax claim simply reduced someone's taxable income. This led to them spending money falsely hoping to save money, even if it didn't necessarily put them into a lower marginal tax bracket. 'A refund's actually a false economy in a lot of ways - a lot of people don't understand that,' he said. 'Someone earning $200,000 a year - the most they get back out of that $10 is $4.70. 'If you're an apprentice, that hasn't worked a full year or only earned under $20,000, you spent $10, they get no money back because they don't pay tax. 'You only spend money on what you need for work - if you spend money incentivised for tax, then you're stupid; you're only getting a proportion of it back based on what your tax bracket is.'
Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Why that home you could afford in 2018 is now a fantasy - with Aussies urged to buy now before it's too late
The average Aussie can no longer afford the typical big city house they could seven years ago after property price rises soared at triple the pace of wages. Record-low interest rates during Covid followed by record-high immigration levels have caused house prices to climb by double-digit figures in some years. Across Australia, prices have surged by 56 per cent since 2018 but in Brisbane, house values have soared by 86 per cent and almost doubled in Adelaide. By comparison, overall wages have increased by just 18.6 per cent - or a third the level of property price increases. Finder personal finance expert Sarah Megginson said entry level prices were only likely to keep soaring, despite the high levels of mortgage stress. 'Demand – especially in affordable markets – is expected to surge, which could potentially push entry-level prices even higher and squeeze first home buyers further,' she said. Back in 2018, Australia's middle home price covering houses and units stood at $532,327, CoreLogic data showed. With a 20 per cent deposit, the average, full-time worker earning $83,486 was at a pinch able to get a loan and borrow five times their salary before tax. Seven years later, Australia's median home price now stands at $831,288. Someone earning the new average, full-time salary of $102,742 with the equivalent deposit would now have to borrow 6.5 times their income - putting them in the severe mortgage stress territory. The banks are reluctant to lend a prospective borrower more than five times their pay, with the Reserve Bank's two rate cuts in 2025, so far, hardly undoing the 13 increases in 2022 and 2023. The 3.85 per cent cash rate is the lowest since June 2023 but is still a far cry from the Covid record low of 0.1 per cent. Lower interest rates increase borrowing capacity, but they also put up house prices. Sydney, Australia's most expensive property market with the biggest inflow of overseas migration, has seen its mid-point house price climb by 49 per cent since mid-2018, with prices rising from $998,270 to $1.486million. But in Brisbane, house prices have soared by a whopping 85.7 per cent from $538,693 to just over $1million in a city with a large influx of interstate migration. Record-low interest rates during Covid followed by record-high immigration levels caused house prices to climb by double-digit figures during some years (pictured is a Sydney auction) Perth prices have soared by 69 per cent from $481,612 to $813,810, in another city with strong population growth from other parts of Australia. Adelaide house prices have almost doubled, surging by 89.3 per cent from $465,992 to $882,157. Melbourne, however, is the exception to other major capital city markets with its mid-point house price climbing by just 15.6 per cent from $813,064 to $939,965. This was the only big capital city where house prices increased at a pace slower than wages growth. What if I'm single? Single Australians earning the average wage were able to buy the median-priced house in most capital cities, except Sydney and Melbourne, less than a decade ago. But that's dramatically changed with only working couples now having a chance in most capital city markets. A Finder analysis revealed South Australia has seen the biggest decline since 2017, going from having 85 per cent of suburbs being affordable for singles to 19 per cent. The ratio in Western Australia has fallen from 67 per cent to just 17 per cent. In Queensland, it's plunged from 66 per cent to 19 per cent. New South Wales, which was an overpriced market eight years ago, saw the proportion of affordable suburbs fall from 40 per cent to 11 per cent. Despite weak price growth in Melbourne, the proportion of affordable suburbs in Victoria had declined from 50 per cent to just 16 per cent. 'Buying a home is harder than ever, especially if you're trying to do it on your own without a partner or family member,' Ms Megginson said. 'First home buyers are not expecting to step into a mansion for their first property, but even those with realistic expectations are shocked that even entry-level homes carry eye-watering price tags.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
NSW political staffers could be arrested after failing to appear at Dural caravan inquiry
A parliamentary committee is seeking warrants for the arrest of five New South Wales government staffers who failed to appear and give evidence to an inquiry examining the Sydney caravan 'fake terrorism plot'. The staffers – three from the office of the premier, Chris Minns, and two who work for the police minister, Yasmin Catley – were summoned to appear before the inquiry on Friday. But they did not show up. The staffers claimed – in a letter to the upper house committee chair, independent MP Rod Roberts – that they had the 'reasonable excuse or just cause' required by law to not appear. The staff members argued they were 'proxies' because Minns and Catley could not, as members of the lower house, be compelled to appear as witnesses. The inquiry – launched with the support of the Coalition, the Greens and crossbench MLCs – is examining the handling of information about the caravan plot amid concerns about whether parliament was 'misled' before controversial laws aimed at curbing antisemitism were rushed through parliament. In January, after it was announced that the caravan had been found in Dural laden with explosives, Minns said it had the potential to be a 'mass casualty event'. But in March, the Australian federal police revealed they believed it was a 'con job' by organised crime figures seeking to divert police resources and influence prosecutions. Minns has said he was briefed early on that the caravan plot 'could be something other than terrorism as it's classically defined and that no line of inquiry was being ruled out by NSW police'. The premier and the police minister refused to appear at the inquiry before the committee sought the appearance of their staffers. Friday's extraordinary decision to seek the arrest warrants could lead to the staffers being apprehended and brought before the committee to give evidence. But several steps have to be completed first. Roberts, the chair, will meet with the president of the Legislative Council, Nationals MP Ben Franklin, on Friday afternoon to submit the committee's case. Under the Parliamentary Evidence Act, if the president is satisfied that the five staffers failed to appear without just cause or reasonable excuse, the matter would be referred to a judge of the supreme court. If the judge agrees, then warrants would be issued and the staffers arrested and brought before the committee to give evidence. 'This decision follows numerous attempts by the committee over several weeks to secure the attendance of these staff by invitation and ultimately by summons,' Roberts said in a statement. The staffers summoned to appear included Minns' chief of staff, James Cullen, and two of his deputy chiefs of staff, Edward Ovadia and Sarah Michael. The police minister's chief of staff, Ross Neilson, was also summoned, along with Catley's deputy chief of staff, Tilly South. The staffers' letter to Roberts, released by the committee, stated: 'Our attendance before the select committee to give evidence would be at odds with the principles of ministerial accountability and comity between the houses of parliament.' Sign up to Afternoon Update Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion They pointed to an outstanding inquiry on parliamentary privilege and ethics, stating they suspected in light 'of recent events' it would consider whether compelling ministerial staff to give evidence infringed parliamentary privilege or 'offends principles' of Australia's Westminster system of government. 'In these circumstances, and particularly while the standing committee's inquiries are ongoing, we consider that there is a reasonable excuse or just cause for us to not attend the hearing, and we propose not to do so,' they wrote on Thursday. 'Given your [Roberts'] comments on breakfast radio yesterday as to the motivation for issuing the summonses, which make it clear we are 'proxies' because our respective ministers cannot be compelled as witnesses to the select committee, we also consider that they have not been properly issued.' The letter noted Ovadia had informed the committee he was on leave during the relevant period. Minns told reporters on Thursday that his staff would not appear. On Friday morning, Roberts conducted a roll call twice to empty chairs set out for the staffers before closing the hearing. Earlier in the week, the premier told 2GB radio he believed the inquiry was based on a 'giant conspiracy' led by his political opponents. Minns said summoning staffers to appear was a 'bid for some kind of relevance' by opponents. Asked if his staffers were prepared to be arrested, Minns said: 'Well, I hope it doesn't get to that. I mean, I think that would be a giant overreach. It's never happened before.' The NSW Liberal leader, Mark Speakman, was asked by reporters on Friday if the move was drastic. 'It is drastic and it's easily avoidable if they do the right thing, obey the law and appear,' he said. Minns and Catley were contacted for comment.
