Combining forces: Opposition plans to break the big two's stranglehold on power begin to germinate
Tipperary North TD Michael Lowry giving a two-finger
salute
to People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy provided the indelible image of the row over Dáil speaking rights.
The lasting effect of that bitter row – about the speaking time given to Independent TDs who were supporting the Fianna Fáil-Fine Gael Coalition – on the 34th Dáil may be more subtle, but it is of central importance.
Before Christmas, The Irish Times reported that left-wing parties planned to co-ordinate more closely in light of what was rapidly becoming inevitable – that Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil in Government would be supported by Independents.
At that juncture it was impossible to predict the opening months of 2025 would be dominated by the speaking-rights battle. It provided a vivid example of Opposition parties working together – and the term 'combined opposition' was born.
READ MORE
Five and a half months after the election, the political system is finally settling into its usual rhythm. What the Opposition parties do next, the extent of their co-operation, and how their interests might align – or diverge – will impact the current, and potentially the future, shape of Irish politics. And some believe it could provide a dress rehearsal for the next government.
Independent TD for Tipperary North Michael Lowry appears to make an unparliamentary gesture in the Dáil. Photograph: People Before Profit/PA Wire
The speaking-rights incarnation of the combined opposition spanned the ideological divide, and dialogue across these lines has continued.
There are plenty of areas ripe for co-operation – although there is, predictably, more connective tissue on the left. The most obvious is
housing
– one Sinn Féin source predicts a 'an upping of the collective game', with the Occupied Territories Bill (banning trade between Ireland and Israel's illegal settlements in the West Bank)
and the Gaza conflict generally, disabilities and the neutrality/triple-lock debate also likely points of convergence.
Some are clear-eyed about the goal: 'to convince people an alternative government and administration is possible', says one Sinn Féin source.
Clearly, insufficient voters had faith in that last November.
'There just wasn't an alternative so people went with what they knew rather than take a risk,' says one Labour Party figure.
Against that, the same person believes there isn't much goodwill towards the Government. There is also less ambivalence to sharing power with Sinn Féin among some in Labour.
'I'm much more inclined to go in to government with Sinn Féin than Fine Gael,' says the same person, who would 'never' have considered that previously.
There is a shared interest in all Opposition parties arriving on the threshold of the next election, with voters open to the idea of an alternative government. But what that might look like is an open question – one likely to be coloured by how the coming years play out tactically and strategically for the Opposition.
[
Labour and the Social Democrats are now firmly in the orbit of Sinn Féin
Opens in new window
]
Some on the left conceive of a formal transfer pact, a statement of shared principles alongside party manifestos, and a commitment not to share power with Fine Gael or Fianna Fáil. But that view is far from universal, with a deep hostility towards it in some quarters. There is a palpable nervousness in Labour and the Social Democrats about having their identities eroded – something Sinn Féin figures acknowledge, accepting a 'strategic concern that they don't want to be overshadowed by us or swallowed by us'.
There are some significant divergences between the parties, particularly issues where Sinn Féin is perceived to be moving right – on migration, LGBTQ+ matters and the environment. One Social Democrats TD says their party is 'miles apart' from Sinn Féin on carbon and local property taxes, sketching out a divergence on 'the basic principles of how we fund the public service'.
Those points of difference may be impossible to reconcile, but paradoxically, they may be convenient markers for parties in the eyes of the electorate.
After all, Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael pull from different segments of 'middle Ireland' by retaining separate brands, but have co-operated for almost a decade, which will become 13 years if the Coalition goes full term.
While Opposition parties acknowledge a greater collaboration in this Dáil compared with the last, they are still feeling each other out, drawing up theories about what the others' intentions might be, or the internal politics of another party.
After the speaking-rights row, the first test of co-operation among the opposition will be the outcome of talks among left-wing parties about a consensus presidential candidate. It may fail, but it also provides a clear opportunity to outmanoeuvre the government parties in a high-profile contest.
Unlike the speaking-rights issue, which saw opposition across ideological divides, the dialogue is between Sinn Féin, People Before Profit, Labour, the Social Democrats and the Greens.
Labour leader Ivana Bacik arriving at Leinster House. Photograph: Sam Boal/Collins
The first effort came from Labour, whose leader,
Ivana Bacik
, invited the Social Democrats and Greens to talks – the same parties she had publicly identified as her priority for post-election discussions. Social Democrats acting leader
Cian O'Callaghan
then broadened the group by inviting Sinn Féin and People Before Profit.
The names linked most frequently with a presidential nomination are Independent Senator Frances Black and Independent TD Catherine Connolly.
But identifying a candidate who stands a good chance of winning, and is acceptable to all parties is a high bar to meet – some parties wonder whether Black would thrive in the white heat of a presidential campaign, and although Connolly is acceptable to those on the further left, as a former Labour member, it may be hard for that party to get behind her.
Other parties see Sinn Féin as 'slightly humbled' after the general election
There is endless opining about whether Sinn Féin will put forward a candidate for president – something that is going on within the party as well. On the one hand, it may baulk at sitting out the race, especially if Irish unity becomes a campaign trail issue. On the other, its brand may still be too polarising to reverse its recent sorry outings in presidential contests, and the last thing the leadership needs is another disappointing election.
Sinn Féin seems to have, to an extent, a convening power among its fellow Opposition parties. This has a simple logic to it, says one source outside the party.
'They're the biggest and the ones who take the initiative,' says the source.
This is a view shared by a Sinn Féin TD, who points out that the party has the most speaking time in the Dáil and goes first when questioning the Government.
'Collaboration has to be on terms that are comfortable for everybody,' says the source, but they also note: 'We are the largest party by a significant margin.'
Still, other parties see Sinn Féin as 'slightly humbled' after the general election.
Last week two meetings of Opposition parties were held in the Sinn Féin party rooms in Leinster House – one on a combined opposition motion on the issue of accessing assessments of need to align with a protest outside the Dáil by 14-year-old disability campaigner Cara Darmody.
The second was convened by Sinn Féin housing spokesman Eoin Ó Broin, which saw only left-wing parties involved, discussing engagement with civil society and trade unions to put pressure on the Government's housing record.
Spokespeople in other parties say they have been contacted by their Sinn Féin counterparts to arrange meetings as Oireachtas committees begin public sessions.
Others on the left also point to Sinn Féin visibly embracing things such as the Irish Neutrality League, with McDonald speaking at a recent event, and endorsing the counterprotest at a recent far-right march in Dublin.
Much of this could be the prosaic business of politics, or simply paying attention to detail. But one TD on the left says: 'I think Sinn Féin want to show themselves as leaders of the Opposition, the biggest party who are going to bring the other parties along.' A Social Democrats TD says: 'It feels like a different tack.'
For now, more is unknown than known about how different sets of interests and priorities will gel. But as the Oireachtas gets down to its usual business, the signs suggest there may be something germinating on the Opposition benches.
'You walk before you run,' says one Opposition TD.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
19 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Is Conor McGregor really the only person who wants to be President of Ireland?
The election for the next President of Ireland must take place before November 11th. It's June, so where is the list of Áras hopefuls? It's a job with status and prestige, a place in history, a large salary and a list of perks that includes generous expenses and fine accommodation in the Phoenix Park. None of the political parties have put forward a candidate – yet. And some might not bother. The way the system works is that a candidate nominated by a political party goes straight on the ballot paper. For independents, it's more complex. They must present themselves before county councillors, make their case and persuade four local authorities to allow them to run. READ MORE As of now two independents have declared their intention to run, MMA fighter Conor McGregor and former candidate and businessman Peter Casey. They have yet to get local authority approval. So what is the job of President of Ireland and why, with just months to the election, are there no declared candidates from the political parties? When can we expect the race to get going and what qualities make for an ideal president? Harry McGee from the Irish Times political team, explains. Presented by Bernice Harrison. Produced by Suzanne Brennan.


Irish Times
34 minutes ago
- Irish Times
EPA projections require a frank reassessment of Irish climate policies
Judging by the EPA's latest greenhouse gas projections , Ireland's climate policies are in urgent need of an overhaul . The projections issued annually relate to likely carbon emissions across the Irish economy up to 2030, but also for following decades up to 2050. It is clear existing policies are failing to deliver significant emission reductions or are being overtaken by increases in energy demand or economic growth. At best, Ireland might achieve a 16 per cent reduction in agricultural emissions compared with the 51 per cent that is required under law, which is reasonably aligned with our Paris Agreement commitments. This would be with full implementation of measures in the Government's climate action plan. READ MORE But even that 16 per cent is not guaranteed: the EPA reports that emissions under an 'existing measures' scenario might even increase by 2030 above their 2018 levels. That must not be allowed to happen. Why is Ireland failing in climate policy , you might wonder. Don't we have a gold standard climate law? While it's true that our 2021 Climate Act is well designed from a governance point of view, any law – even a good one – is no substitute for political will. That the political will has waned is obvious from a reading of the Programme for Government and the choice of rural independents as coalition partners. But other decisions and non-decisions, delays and prevarications suggest that the Government has little interest or commitment to acting on the recommendations of its climate experts , and prefers to bend to the will of major exporters and a highly self-serving reading of public opinion. Though the policy framework has been considerably improved, it seems to take an age to implement what should be straightforward decisions (and I'm not even speaking of major infrastructure projects). [ Q&A: What should we do about multiple climate risks threatening Ireland? Opens in new window ] The Departments of Finance and Public Expenditure still dictate the pace of investment, and administrative delays in making decisions of any kind are common. Public bodies are notoriously cautious and risk-averse, but that mindset means that we are not getting the decisive actions that the public was promised to clean up our energy system and put Ireland on a path to climate neutrality – ideally, before 2050. The director general of the EPA, Laura Burke, remarked last week at a conference in Dublin Castle that 'additional measures and accelerated implementation' are required if we are to even get close to the 2030 targets. She stated that 'scaling up' efforts will be necessary across the board. But what does that actually mean? For you and me, scaling up our efforts might mean an additional journey by bike or a meat-free dinner once a week, or installing solar panels (if you're privileged enough to own a roof). Worthy actions taken voluntarily make us feel better but they won't put a significant dent in Ireland's emissions. Systemic change requires a different set of levers – the use of regulations, mandates, incentives, subsidies and enforcement. The truth is that our public representatives and policy experts seem unwilling to discuss the big decisions that will be needed to dramatically transform our energy system and land use and prefer to rely on policies and measures that the EPA now acknowledges will not be sufficient. [ The 'foot may be coming off the action pedal': Climate plan fails to build on ambition Opens in new window ] For instance, the Dáil hardly ever debates climate policy though the actual words are mentioned frequently. When the numbers are going in the right direction (eg, chemical nitrogen use) everyone wants to claim the credit (good policy, good farmers, etc). When the numbers are going in the wrong direction (chemical nitrogen figures have increased in 2024 again, which will be confirmed by EPA inventories in coming weeks), no one accepts responsibility. When the pressure mounts to make a decision, policymakers revert to default and recommend another report or a new consultation. And meanwhile we are blowing through the first carbon budget by between 8 and 12 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, which adds up to the total annual emissions of countries like Armenia or Nicaragua. And whenever a negative news story comes out about emissions or climate science, the Government is quick to report Ireland's stellar progress in renewable electricity, even though this, too, is but a small flicker (excuse the pun) of what we will actually need to deliver by 2050. The kind of bold interventions we now need would restrict the energy consumption of large energy users like data centres , restrict urban private car use, and deploy effective, catchment-based limits on nitrogen, ammonia and greenhouse gas pollution from agricultural sources . [ Tech giants' indirect emissions rose 150% in three years amid AI growth, UN says Opens in new window ] Imaginative and brave measures to accelerate the roll-out of renewables and to ensure that their environmental impact is properly assessed and mitigated will be essential. We are facing into a global climate emergency , with global temperature increases now heading well north of 1.5 degrees and the prospect of dangerous climate breakdown occurring within our lifetimes. Clearly the newly established Joint Oireachtas Committee on Climate, Environment and Energy doesn't view it as much of an emergency: following lengthy delays in setting up the Oireachtas committees, it has met just twice since the general election in late November 2024, and only to elect a chair and vice chair. Yes, scaling is hard to do, so we had better do what we know already works and what we are good at delivering. If the magic beans (small-scale nuclear reactors, feed additives, biomethane) don't deliver, then we have to consider more radical pruning. Everything should be on the table, including livestock herd reductions, transport hubs in every town and village, mandatory afforestation in suitable areas and urgent State investment in making heat pumps, solar panels, sustainable building materials and shared mobility services affordable and accessible to all as a priority over the demands of incumbent energy, water and land-hungry industries. And no one needs to be left behind. Sadhbh O'Neill is a climate and environmental researcher and activist


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Nama chief makes good on Lenihan order not to ‘mess it up'
The late minister for finance Brian Lenihan, who set up the National Asset Management Agency (Nama) in 2009, left five words ringing in the ears of agency chief executive Brendan McDonagh shortly before he passed away 14 years ago this week. 'Brendan, don't mess this up,' Lenihan told McDonagh in their last meeting before he died, the Nama chief recalled to reporters on Wednesday. When Nama took over €72 billion of mainly toxic commercial property loans from five banks for a discounted price of €32 billion, the fear was that it would lose billions. Even when Ireland was at the end of an international bailout programme in 2013, members of the rescue team told Department of Finance officials that Nama would likely end up with a €10 billion shortfall. READ MORE It wasn't helped by Nama overpaying to the tune of €5.4 billion for the loans in the first place – adhering to a long-term economic value method forced upon it by legislation to lessen the holes that Nama transfers would trigger in the domestic banks' balance sheets. Many objectives have been projected on to Nama over the years, such as fixing the housing crisis , by virtue of the swathes of land it controlled; contributing more to the common good; and providing more homes for social housing, even though local authorities ended up accepting only about 2,400 of the almost 7,000 units offered over the years. Nama's remit widened about 13 years ago to deliver thousands of homes and develop land in the Dublin docklands . But Nama's core objective, enshrined in the very Act that set it up, was to obtain the best achievable financial return for the State. It made enemies along the way. Try finding a developer that has much good to say about dealing with Nama officials over the years – even ones that it agreed to work with, while enforcing against others. It's not difficult to find critics, too, in the halls of Leinster House. But it is now on track to deliver a lifetime surplus of €5.05 billion – having upgraded its forecast on Wednesday by €250 million – by the time it is wound down at the end of this year. Adding the €5.4 billion it first needed to recoup to break even on the original overpayment actually brings the total financial gains for the State to more than €11 billion. Lenihan would surely have approved of that outcome.