
PM didn't want the Ram temple to become temple of the north…(his message was) develop Ayodhya so that it has cosmopolitan features: Nripendra Misra
Since he was picked as the officer-architect-in-chief of the Ram temple in Ayodhya, Nripendra Misra has made 120 trips to the town for work. In an interview with The Indian Express two days after the consecration of the statue of Ram as the king of Ayodhya, Misra, who served as the Principal Secretary to Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his entire first term, reflects on his learnings in the past five years. Excerpts:
Since you were appointed the chairman of the Ram temple's Construction Committee in February 2020, Ayodhya must have dominated your calendar?
Soon after my appointment, Covid was around the corner, and a national lockdown was ordered. I waited for about three months before starting my journey by car from Delhi to Ayodhya. It takes about nine hours. I arrived here with the two agreements — with L&T and Tata Consulting Engineers. Over the last five years, I have made about 120 trips to Ayodhya. And, each trip is a minimum of three days. I calculated that it is more than 365 days. More than a year of my life has been spent staying in the Circuit House in one room. Fortunately, they never changed that room. My day starts at 9 am and ends in the evening.
The seven new temples that have been built now…how do they relate to the Ram temple?
The seven new temples belong to Valmiki, Vishwamitra, Agastya, Vashistha, Nishadraj, Ahilya and Shabari. They were some of the key persons involved in Ram's life journey, especially his growing up to be a maryada purushottam. These seven temples encapsulate the message that the Prime Minister is keen to spread — of social cohesion, and a feeling that Ram belongs to everyone.
After the consecration or Pran Pratistha in January 2024, what has been the Prime Minister's message to you for the last year or so?
Whenever I have met the prime minister, not very frequently, but yes, whenever he is kind enough… at the temple, he wanted to understand the process, engineering. Because of his own experiences in Gujarat, having done the Sardar Patel statue, he was very familiar.
When I went for the first time, the controversy was at its peak about what kind of foundation and technology we should adopt because of the soil condition being close to the river and also close to Nepal earthquake features… So, that was the anxiety there. The moment I shared it with him, he expected this and said, 'Yes, yes, that is the most important aspiration of sadhus… the temple should last a thousand years.'
The moment I landed here, 'thousand years' was ringing in my ears. So, I explained to him that we did the soil foundation, (which) he was familiar with completely…
So, these were the kind of details he was willing to listen to and give his best advice. And, a kind of relationship developed. Once this (temple) got completed, he was very concerned about ensuring people come from all directions of India and abroad – North, South, East, West. He was very worried that this temple should not become a temple of the North.
So, every time he inquired about the number of devotees coming, the expected ratio, the proportion of people coming from the South. He felt at one stage that people who come from the South should not only accept it, but they should feel homely (at home). Please develop Ayodhya in a manner that it has cosmopolitan features. His other concern was the youth. He kept on repeating that the youth will ask what Ayodhya is and who Lord Rama is. He wanted them to know the cultural heritage of this country.
So, many people say that Prime Minister Modi is the kind of prime minister who has revived the cultural heritage and wealth of this nation. This (the Ram temple in Ayodhya), according to him, was the central point around which we could then weave the other structures. Be it Kedarnath, be it Shiva temple in Madhya Pradesh, be it Ram temple somewhere in Maharashtra or Rameshwaram in South. The cultural revival, not in the conservative sense, but in the sense of an entire thought process.
For the temple movement, led by the BJP, Ayodhya was a cause for correcting a historical wrong. Do you think a reconciliation has been achieved?
The message I was given by the prime minister was there should be nothing negative about what happened. There are inscriptions in front of the temple in Hindi and English. Nowhere have we used the name that such and such person came and he destroyed the temple. It is mentioned, of course, that the temple got destroyed, then the aandolan and finally culmination in the Supreme Court judgement, and its acceptance at the national level.
The PM's message was, please do not discuss negative thoughts. He kept mentioning that if you make that a prominent message, the younger generation would feel small. He did not want the younger generation to suffer from these temporary shocks that Sanatan Dharma faced. The younger generation should know how we have regained and conserved.
You have been in the government for long – as a DM, a telecom regulator, and then in the Prime Minister's office. Having seen politics, economy and society from a vantage position, how do you interpret the post-temple mood among those who were part of the movement? Do you see them moving forward or do you see multiple claims still coming for temples to be built in different places?
I place this responsibility not so much on the government. It will have to be of various social groups, representatives, elected or not elected – they must recognise. They have limits on correcting issues. We all know that the time which has gone does not come back. We do not keep it in our clutches. Once they realise that the time has gone by and once they realise the dream of the future while living in the present, then the society will be more positive, and will look towards the issues of development.
After all, there is another agenda. You and I are worried. There is 7% growth. Will I maintain it? I am going to be the third country in terms of economic power very soon. Why can't I become number 2 or 1? China is always in our memory – that they are far ahead of us. If these are the challenges, we weaken society by disintegration. We should rather strengthen the society to divert this energy to development… Social leaders of my country have a great responsibility.
In size, India would probably replace Japan as the fourth-largest economy… From the economic point of view, what should be the focus?
…we may have crossed (Japan) but they don't have so many poor, they don't have problems with proper nourishment. They don't have problems with education and health. I may say that I produce maximum milk, but does everyone take milk? The answer is no. So, my target should not be that I am maximum (at these parameters). My target should be, am I giving each individual the gains of my growth? I put health, wellness, hospitals at number 1, education at number 2, and third and most important is empowering the rural women. My agenda will be to achieve these goals.
The inclusivity of the Ayodhya project is reflected in what you said. But we also see Sambhal (the row over Jama Masjid there) coming up…
It's a problem. It's very special, deeper. Certain issues are in some manner localised. I always say the judgment on Ram temple was accepted by all only because it was by the Supreme Court. Everything got normalised. Everyone was then following daily routines. We can not seek justice for the past. It has to be forgotten.
The temple construction is almost over. You are also the Chairperson of the Prime Ministers Museum and Library. What role do you visualise for yourself over the next few years?
I am speaking about this for the first time. I have started thinking how long and how much. Perhaps, I will have to set the path, that I am useful up to this point, and beyond that I must divert my energies somewhere else. I am there in the Sangrahalaya. That assignment is with me. I will have to find some kind of constructive work to devote my time after six months or so.
Do you see the Ayodhya city growing in terms of prosperity, too, alongside the rise in tourism?
When I first came from Lucknow, Ayodhya was not even the size of a tehsil town. While we were seeing this battle in the courts and in other places, the local inhabitants belonging to different communities grabbed it (the opportunity)… A person earning Rs 500 is earning Rs 1,000 today. With that, of course, economic exploitation will come. People are encroaching on land. Speculation of land price is at its peak because the investments are coming, and the investment people want to maximise gains. At this stage, a planned growth is required.
The temple pulls devotees and tourists. Do you think there should be more to make them stay in Ayodhya, since people come here but leave by evening?
Yes. This should not become Agra. People stay in Delhi, come to Agra, and return. There is nothing else in Agra except the Taj Mahal. That was one agenda in my mind. Outside the premises of Ram temple, the social-cultural site has to be found. So, people spend a day or two more in Ayodhya. We must build 5-stars, community halls, and there have to be a lot more cultural presentations.
P. Vaidyanathan Iyer is The Indian Express's Managing Editor, and leads the newspaper's reporting across the country. He writes on India's political economy, and works closely with reporters exploring investigation in subjects where business and politics intersect.
He was earlier the Resident Editor in Mumbai driving Maharashtra's political and government coverage. He joined the newspaper in April 2008 as its National Business Editor in Delhi, reporting and leading the economy and policy coverage.
He has won several accolades including the Ramnath Goenka Excellence in Journalism Award twice, the KC Kulish Award of Merit, and the Prem Bhatia Award for Political Reporting and Analysis. A member of the Pulitzer-winning International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), Vaidyanathan worked on several projects investigating offshore tax havens.
He co-authored Panama Papers: The Untold India Story of the Trailblazing Offshore Investigation, published by Penguin.
... Read More

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
27 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Amid Omar Abdullah soft-pedalling, why NC is hardening stance against L-G Sinha?
Jammu and Kashmir BJP leader Manzoor Ahmad Bhat visited the Bone and Joint (B&J) Hospital in Srinagar Friday, following which he, in a statement, said that he 'reviewed' the functioning of the hospital. He also called for 'prompt appointment of the Medical Superintendent' in the hospital. The BJP's former media in-charge in the Valley, Bhat currently does not hold any post in the party. While sources said that Bhat visited the hospital to see a patient and was visibly upset when he asked for a meeting with the Medical Superintendent (MS), which could not materialise because of the acting MS's busy schedule, the tone and tenor of his statement was seen in a section of J&K political circles as 'a reflection of the BJP's grip on power in the Union Territory despite the elected National Conference (NC)-led government being in place'. It is such a perceived proximity of the principal Opposition BJP to the power centres in the UT that seem to be fuelling resentment in the ruling NC, which came to the fore Thursday when senior NC leader and J&K Deputy Chief Minister Surinder Choudhary accused the BJP of allegedly running a 'proxy government' through Lt Governor Manoj Sinha. Without taking names, Choudhary said if someone thought that he could 'crush the mandate of the people' he would not be allowed because 'the government is not scared and is ready to fight for the people'. In an apparent reference to the BJP, Choudhary alleged: 'The government is ours but someone else is running the proxy government.' He said, 'People have given us a mandate… but what is happening here today? And that's why we keep saying that Jammu and Kashmir should get back statehood.' He also said that some 'people will mend their ways' only after the return of J&K's statehood, which was a thinly-veiled attack on bureaucrats who, NC leaders believe, were taking orders mostly from the Raj Bhawan. Choudhary's tirade against Sinha marked the first direct attack of the NC government on the Centre-appointed L-G. Since October last year, when he took the helm of the NC-led government, CM Omar Abdullah has been treading cautiously in a bid not to upset the Centre amid the party's hope that it would facilitate in early restoration of statehood to J&K. Omar did not openly confront the L-G despite various rows like the one that erupted over the transfer of the Kashmir Administrative Service (KAS) and revenue officials by the Raj Bhavan. However, Choudhary's open attack indicated the party's changing position due to its rising frustration over the 'conflicting jurisdictional powers' of the elected government and the L-G, even as the Centre has yet to approve the Transaction of Business Rules (TBR) to define their respective powers across the departments. An NC section believes that Omar's non-confrontational approach towards the Centre and the Raj Bhawan was 'denting' his popularity in the Valley. Some party leaders are also said to be unhappy with his 'docile attitude' in running the government. 'We understand that there is a need to make a balanced approach, given that there are dual power centres. We can't move forward without the Centre's support,' said an NC leader. 'But here it is getting too far, you are asked to bend and you start to crawl. This is not going to help the government or our party. We are losing public respect by doing this.' An NC legislator said Omar needed to put his 'foot down', saying that there has been 'growing anxiety' within the party about the direction the government is taking. 'We know it is very tough to run this government, only the wearer knows where the shoe pinches. But many legislators feel that we need to fight at least where the Raj Bhawan is stepping into our jurisdiction,' said another NC MLA. 'The more we are ceding power, the weaker we are becoming. Now, even the bureaucrats feel where the original power lies and they don't want to annoy the Raj Bhawan. The legislators are not even entertained by the bureaucrats now while the BJP leaders and even its karyakartas have an easy access to the corridors of power, especially bureaucracy.' An NC leader, however, said that Choudhary's statement reflected the party's mood. 'The water has gone above the head now and even Omar sahib has spoken about it,' he said. 'If the Deputy Chief Minister talks about something, obviously he would have first discussed it with the Chief Minister'. Some non-BJP Opposition parties, however, claim that the elected government has itself 'ceded power to the Raj Bhawan'. 'There was a strong mandate to the party (NC) and they had the powers to revoke the laws that were framed during the last five years,' said Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) leader and legislator Waheed Para. 'But they (NC) have ceded the power themselves. They have been saying that the business rules don't allow this, business rules don't allow that. They are not fighting for the issues that they were given this mandate for, but instead for transfers. They have reduced themselves to an elected bureaucracy,' Para alleged.


Scroll.in
3 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Ola and Uber will not come to Goa, says CM Pramod Sawant
App-based cab services like Ola and Uber will not be allowed in Goa, said Chief Minister Pramod Sawant on Friday, reported The Indian Express. The announcement came after taxi operators in the state and some MLAs raised concerns about the Goa Transport Aggregator Guidelines, which were published in the gazette on May 20. The guidelines outline the framework to regulate app-based taxi and bike taxi operators through licensing fees, tariffs and incentives. Taxi unions fear this will enable the entry of app-based cab services in the state. 'People should not create confusion,' Sawant was quoted as saying by The Indian Express. 'These are the guidelines brought out for aggregators. Ola and Uber are not coming here. We have to put a system in place.' The Goa chief minister added that the government would 'take all the stakeholders – taxi owners, hoteliers and MLAs – everyone into confidence' to resolve the matter. The state transport department had invited feedback and objections to the guidelines within 30 days, The Indian Express reported. On June 9, hundreds of taxi drivers submitted formal objections at the department's Panaji office. Scroll has previously reported on the state government's efforts to introduce app-based taxis, which were met with protests. Taxi unions argue that the conflict over app-based services boils down to a question of employment for locals and that allowing large corporations with deep pockets to launch services in the state will result in 'outsiders' taking away jobs from the locals.


The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
Pahalgam terror attack: Jammu & Kashmir L-G Manoj Sinha hands over job letter to wife of pony rider Adil
'The Jammu and Kashmir Government on Saturday (June 14, 2025) provided a job to the wife of Adil Shah, a local pony ride operator who was killed in the April 22 Pahalgam attack while battling with terrorists,' officials said. Jammu & Kashmir Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha handed over the appointment letter to Adil Shah's wife Gulnaz Akhter at their house in the Hapatnar area of Pahalgam in Anantnag district. After interacting with Adil Shah's family members and some locals, Mr. Sinha told reporters that the government job to Ms. Akhter was a symbol of gratitude from the administration to her husband's valour. 'Gulnaz Akhter has been given a permanent job in the Fisheries Department in Anantnag. This is a mark of gratitude from the administration. We have talked to the family and the people of the village, who want increased employment opportunities in the region. We will take care of that in the days to come," Mr. Sinha said. The L-G said the Jammu & Kashmir Government has already provided financial assistance to Adil Shah's family for the bravery shown by the pony ride operator. Taking to X, Mr. Sinha said, 'Met the family members of martyr Syed Adil Hussain at Anantnag. Handed an appointment letter to his wife Mrs Gulnaz Akhter on compassionate grounds. The whole country is proud of the bravery of Adil who sacrificed his life while protecting tourists at Pahalgam on April 22.' Hundreds join pony driver's last rites, co-workers recall his attempt to stop one of the attackers in Pahalgam Assuring concrete measures and continued support to the family, Mr. Sinha said, "The government job to martyr Adil's wife symbolises our deep gratitude. I've assured his family members of concrete measures and continuous support so that they may live a life of dignity.' As many as 26 people, including Adil Shah, were killed in the terror attack at Baisaran meadow in Pahalgam on April 22. The gruesome attack with cross-border links prompted military action by India under Operation Sindoor, which targeted terror hideouts in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.