Budget approval process begins
Listen to article
The National Assembly on Tuesday initiated the process of the approval of federal budget for fiscal 2025-26, allowing 108 demands for grants worth Rs5,162.5 billion for 29 ministries and divisions after rejecting 405 cut motions proposed by the opposition.
During the assembly session, chaired by Speaker Ayaz Sadiq, Finance and Revenue Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb presented the demands under the head of development and non-development ongoing expenditures in the house.
The approval of grants pertained to Climate Change Ministry worth Rs3.852 billion; Commerce Division, Rs26.998.5 billion; Communications Division, Rs114. 378 billion; Defence Production, Rs2.879 billion; Economic Affairs Division Rs20.664 billion; Foreign Affairs Division, Rs62.584 billion; and others.
Later, the opposition presented 405 cut motions in the Cabinet Secretariat, Commerce, Defence and Energy ministries and divisions. The opposition members termed the performance of these ministries unsatisfactory and demanded a reduction in their budget.
The house approved 29 demands for the Cabinet Secretariat worth Rs151.63 billion and rejected 112 cut motions of the opposition; five demands of the Defence Ministry worth over Rs2,600 billion, rejecting 22 cut motions and two demands for Commerce Division of Rs26.99 billion, rejecting 69 cut motions.
The house postponed the approval of cut motions and demands for grant pertaining to the ministries of Interior, Finance, Human Rights, and National Food Security until Wednesday (today). The session will resume on Wednesday (today) morning.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Pakistan, US to finalise trade deal next week
Listen to article Pakistan and the US have resolved to conclude trade talks next week, the finance ministry said on Wednesday after a meeting between Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb and US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. The negotiations, focused on reciprocal tariffs, are part of a broader push to reset economic ties at a time of shifting geopolitical alignments and Pakistan's efforts to avoid steep US duties on exports. 'Both sides showed satisfaction on the ongoing negotiations and resolved to conclude the trade negotiations next week,' finance ministry said in a statement, adding that a longer-term strategic and investment partnership is also under discussion. Pakistan faces a 29% tariff on exports to the US under President Donald Trump's measures to target countries with large trade surpluses with the US. Pakistan's surplus was around $3 billion in 2024. To offset the imbalance and ease tariff pressures, Islamabad has offered to import more US goods, including crude oil, and to open up investment opportunities through concessions for US firms in Pakistan's mining sector. Earlier this week, Pakistan-US co-hosted a webinar promoting investment in Pakistan's mineral sector, including the $7 billion Reko Diq copper-gold project. Read More: Trump says Pakistani officials visiting US next week for trade talks Senior officials from both governments and US investors discussed public-private partnerships and regulatory reforms. The US Export-Import Bank is reviewing financing proposals worth $500 million to $1 billion in Reko Diq. Trump, who hosted Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir at the White House last week, has earlier said trade helped avert a deeper conflict between Pakistan and India. After last month's Pakistan-India conflict, which led to heightened military tensions in the region, Trump repeatedly stated that the nuclear-armed South Asian neighbours agreed to a ceasefire following US-mediated talks. He claimed hostilities ended after he urged both countries to focus on trade instead of war. The Trump statements came in the context of heightened tensions triggered by the killing of 26 people—mostly tourists—in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK). Read More: 'If you don't stop, no trade': Trump on Pakistan-India ceasefire The attack led to a dramatic escalation between the two nuclear-armed neighbours. India accused Pakistan of supporting the militants behind the assault, a claim Islamabad strongly denied. India launched airstrikes against what it described as militant training camps across the border. Pakistan said the strikes hit civilian areas, causing dozens of casualties. In retaliation, Pakistan hit 26 Indian military facilities and dozens of Pakistani drones hovered over major Indian cities, including capital New Delhi, in the offensive operations on May 10.
Express Tribune
14 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Judicial credibility hangs in balance
Listen to article As the Supreme Court's Constitutional Bench (CB) gears up to resume hearing on review petitions against the majority verdict in the reserved seats case on Thursday, speculation is swirling about the direction of the decision and the political tremors it may unleash. Experts believe the ruling will rest on how the court chooses to read the Constitution: either with a microscope or a magnifying glass. Former additional attorney general Waqar Rana notes that the fate of the case hinges on two distinct interpretative approaches to the Constitution: a literal and pedantic reading, treating the Constitution as an ordinary statute or a liberal and organic interpretation that upholds foundational constitutional values. "It is a test of the judiciary when judging the state (Paula Newberg) whether it follows and upholds the Constitution by approaching it with the latter rules of interpretation or it follows the former rules," Rana stated. He added that from a historical perspective, the judiciary has been split into two camps: one aligned with the tradition of Justice Cornelius and the other with that of Justice Munir. "Choices are simple. The Court either follows constitutional faith or continues with idolatry of necessity. In the ultimate analysis, the faith of people in the judicial system as an independent arbiter of justice and the rule of law is at stake." The reserved seats case is pivotal in determining whether Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) secures 23 additional National Assembly seats, which would significantly affect the power balance in the lower house and determine whether the ruling coalition secures a two-thirds majority. To date, the judgment authored by Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah – and endorsed by seven other judges – has not been implemented by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP), despite being nearly a year old. Observers note that four judicial opinions were rendered in the case. Among them is the second opinion, authored by Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail and supported by then chief justice Qazi Faez Isa. This view, widely referred to as the "Mandokhail Formula," allows PTI some representation in the National Assembly. Should this view be endorsed by a new majority, the ruling coalition could achieve a two-thirds majority, while PTI reclaims a parliamentary presence. A senior lawyer commented that endorsement of Justice Mandokhail's view could offer a "win-win situation" for both the government and PTI: the ruling alliance gets its supermajority, and PTI regains entry into Parliament. The third opinion was penned by Justice Aminuddin Khan, head of the CB, and Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan. They dismissed the Sunni Ittehad Council's (SIC) petition, upholding both the Peshawar High Court and ECP decisions, which held that reserved seats could not be allocated to SIC. Their opinion called for the redistribution of the 78 unallocated seats among all qualifying parties, especially the PML-N and PPP. Justice Amin's role as the CB's presiding judge gives his position added weight, and notably, six new judges have joined the current bench. However, none of the six judges who were part of the original bench are included in the review proceedings. Even two judges who had earlier endorsed the majority order are not publicly supporting the July 12 judgement in court. One judge, during recent hearings, even used the term "biased" to describe the original majority decisionan unprecedented move that has added further uncertainty to the case's outcome. Meanwhile, debate is growing over whether the new majority will side with Justice Amin's stance or adopt the Mandokhail formula. Legal insiders note that although two judges – Justice Ayesha Malik and Justice Aqeel Ahmad Abbasi – have already dismissed the review petitions and their votes will count in the final decision, many believe the July 12 majority judgement may not survive the ongoing review. Some pro-government legal voices claim that the 27th Constitutional Amendment is under discussion, allegedly aiming to restructure judicial authority over the long term. This has reignited debate on whether judicial independence, a core feature of the Constitution, is being preserved or compromised. Notably, petitions challenging the 26th Constitutional Amendment have yet to be scheduled by the CB, despite repeated calls from senior SC judges. Observers argue that the judges who benefited from the 26th Amendment appear less concerned about judicial independence than those who were sidelined by it. Though the government appears confident about the outcome, the bench is reportedly eager to conclude the review proceedings swiftly. PTI's counsel, Hamid Khan, has requested adjournment until August 5, citing his general adjournment, but sources suggest the court is unlikely to delay proceedings, especially with judges' summer vacations already in effect.
Express Tribune
14 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Budget approval process begins
Listen to article The National Assembly on Tuesday initiated the process of the approval of federal budget for fiscal 2025-26, allowing 108 demands for grants worth Rs5,162.5 billion for 29 ministries and divisions after rejecting 405 cut motions proposed by the opposition. During the assembly session, chaired by Speaker Ayaz Sadiq, Finance and Revenue Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb presented the demands under the head of development and non-development ongoing expenditures in the house. The approval of grants pertained to Climate Change Ministry worth Rs3.852 billion; Commerce Division, Rs26.998.5 billion; Communications Division, Rs114. 378 billion; Defence Production, Rs2.879 billion; Economic Affairs Division Rs20.664 billion; Foreign Affairs Division, Rs62.584 billion; and others. Later, the opposition presented 405 cut motions in the Cabinet Secretariat, Commerce, Defence and Energy ministries and divisions. The opposition members termed the performance of these ministries unsatisfactory and demanded a reduction in their budget. The house approved 29 demands for the Cabinet Secretariat worth Rs151.63 billion and rejected 112 cut motions of the opposition; five demands of the Defence Ministry worth over Rs2,600 billion, rejecting 22 cut motions and two demands for Commerce Division of Rs26.99 billion, rejecting 69 cut motions. The house postponed the approval of cut motions and demands for grant pertaining to the ministries of Interior, Finance, Human Rights, and National Food Security until Wednesday (today). The session will resume on Wednesday (today) morning.
