Budget approval process begins
The National Assembly on Tuesday initiated the process of the approval of federal budget for fiscal 2025-26, allowing 108 demands for grants worth Rs5,162.5 billion for 29 ministries and divisions after rejecting 405 cut motions proposed by the opposition.
During the assembly session, chaired by Speaker Ayaz Sadiq, Finance and Revenue Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb presented the demands under the head of development and non-development ongoing expenditures in the house.
The approval of grants pertained to Climate Change Ministry worth Rs3.852 billion; Commerce Division, Rs26.998.5 billion; Communications Division, Rs114. 378 billion; Defence Production, Rs2.879 billion; Economic Affairs Division Rs20.664 billion; Foreign Affairs Division, Rs62.584 billion; and others.
Later, the opposition presented 405 cut motions in the Cabinet Secretariat, Commerce, Defence and Energy ministries and divisions. The opposition members termed the performance of these ministries unsatisfactory and demanded a reduction in their budget.
The house approved 29 demands for the Cabinet Secretariat worth Rs151.63 billion and rejected 112 cut motions of the opposition; five demands of the Defence Ministry worth over Rs2,600 billion, rejecting 22 cut motions and two demands for Commerce Division of Rs26.99 billion, rejecting 69 cut motions.
The house postponed the approval of cut motions and demands for grant pertaining to the ministries of Interior, Finance, Human Rights, and National Food Security until Wednesday (today). The session will resume on Wednesday (today) morning.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Bajaur pays the price again
EDITORIAL: Days after Minister of State for Interior Talal Chaudhary had declared on the floor of the National Assembly that no military operation would be launched in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), the authorities have done exactly that, proceeding with one in the province's Bajaur district. The operation, it must be noted, had initially begun last month but was paused amid hopes that talks between the Bajaur Amn Jirga and militant commanders may bear fruit, making armed action in the area avoidable. But with negotiations collapsing, August 11 saw security forces launch what is being termed a 'targeted' operation, striking militant hideouts in several tehsils of the district. Parts of Bajaur will now face a three-month curfew, signalling that the security situation may remain volatile for an extended period. As with operations past, this latest armed action will also likely displace the local population from their homes and upend their lives, with the authorities having already asked residents to move into relief camps. Such experiences have long fuelled opposition to military operations, which have repeatedly brought mass displacements, destruction of infrastructure and property, followed by entirely lacklustre rehabilitation efforts. Nevertheless, with the terror threat emanating from KP's erstwhile tribal districts mounting by the day – militants targeting civilians and security personnel alike, and terrorising the people of Bajaur – doing nothing was never going to solve matters either. The question does arise, however: why were such elements allowed to re-entrench themselves in parts of KP over a prolonged period, facing little meaningful resistance from the law enforcement and intelligence apparatus, while civilian authorities – both federal and provincial – were also caught napping? The hard-won gains of past operations, which had driven these groups out at great cost have been recklessly squandered, and now the hapless people of Bajaur will once again pay the price of this lax attitude to the terror menace. Their opposition to armed action must not be misconstrued as sympathy for militants; it is the natural response of communities that have spent decades as victims in a war that never seems to end. This latest operation must also serve as a sobering reminder that the fight against terror cannot be waged in silos. The threat is national, and so must be the resolve to confront it, with an unambiguous consensus on denying terror groups and extremist ideologies any physical or ideological space within society. History shows that while armed actions against these forces may become unavoidable after a certain point, they cannot be the sole answer. Without a united political front and sustained societal efforts to tackle the roots of radicalisation, Pakistan will remain trapped in a cycle of perpetual instability and violence. In this context, the prime minister's Independence Day call for national unity and invitation to all political parties to join the 'Misaq-i-Istehkam-i-Pakistan' – yet another bid to forge national solidarity in the face of domestic and external threats – may sound promising on paper. But too often such initiatives prove to be heavy on rhetoric, but devoid of follow-through. The government has repeatedly shown that it has little appetite for forging genuine unity, as demonstrated by its clampdown on political dissent, muzzling of the media and hounding of opponents. When political rivals are routinely convicted under anti-terror clauses, it cheapens the gravity of laws meant to protect the public from genuine threats, while also deepening societal fault lines, breeding resentment and diverting resources away from the task of tackling forces that pose existential dangers to the country. This erodes the collective resolve needed to confront terrorism in all its forms. Our rulers must realise that calls for national unity ring hollow when they prioritise their own political survival over the hard work required to build a united front against threats that endanger us all. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Govt rejects lower gas tariff plea
The Commerce Division argued that tariff concession had been offered to those sectors that had a significant share in Pakistan's exports in 2011, whereas the glass industry's annual exports of $15.9 million were negligible. Photo: file The government has decided against granting a concessionary gas tariff to the zero-rated and export-oriented sectors. It made the decision while considering litigation pertaining to tariff reduction for such industries. In a recent meeting of the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC), it was observed that concessionary gas tariffs had already been exhausted in 2023 and considering those tariffs for zero-rated and export-oriented industries at the current stage may open the floodgates to similar cases. The ECC noted the position and directed the Commerce Division to pursue the case expeditiously in consultation with the Attorney General office. The Ministry of Commerce briefed the meeting that in 2019 Ghani Glass filed a writ petition in the Lahore High Court, praying that the concessionary gas/re-gasified liquefied natural gas (RLNG) tariff, fixed at Rs600 per million British thermal units (mmBtu) and granted to the zero-rated/export-oriented sectors, may be extended to the petitioner as well. The Petroleum Division, Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority, Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited (SNGPL) and the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) were listed as respondents in the petition. However, the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Commerce were not impleaded as parties in the case until April 7, 2025. The court directed that the Ministry of Finance, in coordination with the Ministry of Commerce and other relevant stakeholders, within 60 days, place the case of Ghani Glass before the ECC for developing a rational policy to ensure that only the export-oriented industries receive all concessions, rather than allowing sector-based classifications that permit non-exporting industries to take benefit unfairly. The ECC was directed to consider, within 60 days, the petitioner's request for the grant of tariff concession in respect of Sui gas/RLNG, with specific reference to discrimination by excluding glass from the export-oriented sectors. The relevant authority was also directed to examine the application of lower tariff to the petitioner from the date of filing the case (ie, 2015) until the period the benefit was extended to the zero-rated/export-oriented industries. The court directed that the ECC should take into consideration the potential of the glass industry to increase its export share and earn maximum foreign exchange. Furthermore, the forum should examine whether it was feasible to charge any export-focused industry higher prices compared to rates prevalent in other countries. The Commerce Division stated that the FBR, vide Statutory Regulatory Order (SRO) 1125(I)/2011, had granted zero-rated sales tax status to major sectors such as textile, carpet, leather goods, sports goods and surgical instruments. In 2018, the Petroleum Division extended the concessionary RLNG tariff of Rs600 per mmBtu to exporters of the same zero-rated sectors. Following the withdrawal of SRO 1125 through the Finance Bill 2019, an administrative gap emerged regarding the continuation of reduced gas tariffs. Consequently, the Ministry of Commerce declared the erstwhile zero-rated sectors as "export-oriented sectors" in December 2019. Accordingly, the tariff concession remained in place until 2023 and after that it was discontinued. The Commerce Division argued that the concession had been offered to those sectors that had a significant share in Pakistan's total exports in 2011, whereas the glass industry's annual exports of $15.9 million at that time were negligible. On the advice of the Ministry of Law and Justice, the Ministry of Commerce filed a Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal on June 12, 2025 in the Supreme Court, challenging the ruling of the Lahore High Court. Keeping that situation in view, the Commerce Division told the ECC that the demand of Ghani Glass for tariff concession was untenable and may not be entertained. It sought the ECC's approval for the proposal. The ECC considered the Ministry of Commerce's summary, "Implementation of Decision of the Lahore High Court in Writ Petition No 61559 of 2019 titled Ghani Glass versus Federation of Pakistan", and noted the position presented therein. It directed that the Ministry of Commerce may approach the Attorney General office.
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Bilateral trade, investment: Pakistan, US vow to boost cooperation
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan and the United States have reaffirmed their commitment to strengthening bilateral trade and investment, following a high-level meeting between Finance Minister Senator Muhammad Aurangzeb and Natalie Baker, Chargé d'Affaires of the US Embassy here. During the meeting held at the Finance Division, both sides discussed avenues for expanding economic cooperation, finalising a landmark trade agreement, and unlocking new opportunities across key sectors including energy, minerals, IT, and cryptocurrency. The finance minister stated that Pakistan's economy had 'turned a corner,' noting that the recent upgrade by Moody's — aligning all three major international rating agencies in their assessment of Pakistan's economic performance—was clear evidence that the hard and necessary reforms undertaken by the government were yielding positive results. He highlighted Pakistan's bold and much-needed tariff reforms aimed at liberalising trade and steering the country towards export-led growth. Aurangzeb thanked the US for its continued economic and development support to Pakistan and recalled his recent visit to Washington, DC, where he had constructive engagements with US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick and United States Trade Representative Ambassador Jamieson Greer to finalise the trade agreement between both the countries. The minister emphasised that the agreement would usher in a new era of economic collaboration —particularly in energy, mines and minerals, IT, cryptocurrency, and other sectors — while expanding market access, attracting investment, and fostering cooperation in areas of mutual interest. He expressed hope that the deal would lead to increased US investment in Pakistan's infrastructure, development projects, and digital and mining sectors, which were ready for tangible action and progress. Natalie Baker said that the trade agreement presented a significant opportunity for both Pakistan and the US to expand bilateral trade. She noted that US companies were taking a keen interest in investment and entrepreneurial opportunities in Pakistan, particularly in supply chain, production, project management, energy, critical minerals, mining, and oil exploration. Both sides reaffirmed their commitment to working closely together to advance these initiatives, ensuring mutually beneficial outcomes and further strengthening trade and economic cooperation between the two countries. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
