
Scholarship Displacement Robs Students Of Much-Needed Financial Aid
When it comes to paying for college, common wisdom says to apply for as much financial aid as you possibly can. This includes scholarships and grants that come from institutions and government agencies, and private scholarships, too.
Unfortunately, colleges and universities have policies that can rob students of aid they may have spent weeks or months pursuing on their own. They do this through something called "scholarship displacement," which reduces aid awards based on outside scholarships a student receives.
To understand scholarship displacement, education attorney Dr. Gregory J. Vincent of Vincent Strategies says to imagine a student from a low-income household is awarded a $5,000 local scholarship.
"The family is excited because they think this means a lighter financial burden," says Vincent. 'But when they submit it to the school, the institution reduces its own $5,000 grant by the same amount.'
This means the net benefit of the scholarship to the family is zero, even if the student earned it based on their grades, an essay, membership in certain organizations or something else.
Is Scholarship Displacement Wrong?
Using outside scholarships as an excuse to reduce need-based aid for students may not be illegal, but most experts agree it's unethical.
Higher education consultant Tom O'Hare of Get College Going says that, at the very least, the practice nullifies the hard work a student and their family will spend searching for and applying for scholarships.
Not only that, but scholarship displacement typically takes place late in the enrollment process and after students have already committed to a school. This means it can place students and their families in a financial bind after it's too late to pick a different school or program.
Danilo Umali of Game Theory College Planners says he has been helping his clients fight scholarship displacement for well over a decade, and that he considers the practice a type of "resource discrimination."
Umali says that families who put significant effort into pursuing outside scholarships could even wind up paying more for college in the end since reduced aid offers can stick through four years of college even if the displaced scholarship was only offered for one year. He also estimates that families who are unaware of financial aid displacement could easily lose $10,000 to $30,000 from a single college offer.
With higher education costs on the rise and cumulative student loan debt reaching more than $1.7 trillion nationally, it's a shame that colleges and universities are still using this practice — legal or not.
How To Fight Scholarship Displacement
While most would agree that scholarship displacement is a pretty bad concept, you don't have to blindly accept what your college says. There are steps you can take to fight against this practice or get the decision reversed.
If you earn a scholarship from a third party organization and you're worried about scholarship displacement, you can ask them to pay you the scholarship funds directly instead of sending the money to your school.
James Lewis of the National Society of High School Scholars (NSHSS) says they may also be willing to pay the scholarship into a 529 college savings account if you have one. That way, you can use the funds for room and board, tuition, textbooks, and other higher education expenses without getting the school involved.
"This preserves a student's autonomy over how the funds are used while maintaining eligibility for need-based financial aid," he says.
John Morganelli of Ivy Tutors Network says being a "squeaky wheel" may be enough to get your school to change course when it comes to scholarship displacement.
"Schools are far more likely to make exceptions for families that speak up," he says.
If aid has been reduced or displaced, pushing back, either through a formal merit appeal or an informal aid conversation, can prompt the school to reconsider.
Vincent adds that students and their families should ask specific questions of the college's financial aid office about how outside scholarships are treated. Families should also request a copy of the school's displacement policy in writing, he said.
Brian Safdari of College Planning Experts also says families can appeal to the university through a process many parents do not know about. This can begin a negotiation that could lead to scholarship displacement being reversed, more aid being offered and a better deal for the student overall.
"If you know how to appeal or negotiate and have the right leveraging strategies, you can get the grants reinstated," he says.
To appeal a financial aid offer through your school, you should reach out to the university's financial aid office to inquire.
If you're worried about putting a ton of work into earning scholarships you never actually benefit from, you may want to go a different route altogether. Umali says that the best way to avoid displacement is to focus all of your efforts on obtaining grants and discounts directly from the college.
Why? Because many "outside" scholarships are time consuming, overly competitive, and tend to involve smaller dollar amounts.
By focusing on grants and discounts from the college instead, you can potentially obtain $25,000 to $45,000 a year from a single college.
"That dwarfs the amounts you would typically see from an outside source," says Umali. "Plus, these college offers are good for all four years the student is in attendance."
The Bottom Line
While many people have never even heard of scholarship displacement, this sneaky problem can rob parents and students of outside scholarships they worked hard to find, apply for and earn.
Unfortunately, this practice is used by all kinds of colleges and universities around the country, although some states have banned scholarship displacement or have laws that limit its use.
If you want to actually benefit from outside scholarships, knowing how scholarship displacement works and how to spot it is your best first step. And if you find a school is limiting your aid because of scholarships from third parties, complaining loudly, filing an appeal, or both could work in your favor.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cuomo proposes boosting specialized NYPD unit Mamdani wants to disband
NEW YORK — As part of a $250 million public safety plan, Andrew Cuomo said Monday he wants to nearly double the size of a specialized NYPD unit as controversy around the division and police funding has heated up on this year's mayoral race campaign trail. In an afternoon press conference in Midtown Manhattan, Cuomo, who's running as an independent in November's mayoral contest, said he'd if elected add 400 officers to the ranks of the NYPD's Strategic Response Group. Cuomo also used the occasion to take a shot at Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani, who following last week's Midtown shooting said he was backing away from previous calls to defund the NYPD. Cuomo and Mayor Eric Adams have both seized on Mamdani's past tweets about wanting to defund the department, arguing they show his true feelings. 'If he became mayor, I guarantee you would see the rate of attrition increase,' Cuomo said at the Midtown news conference. 'What police officer wants to work for a mayor who says they're racist and anti-queer and a threat to public safety? What police officer wants to work for a mayor who doesn't have their back?' Formed in 2015 mostly to respond to dangerous incidents like active shooter situations as well as mass protests, the SRG currently has about 500 members, so Cuomo's proposed new hires would mark a significant expansion. The SRG has drawn criticism from civil rights advocates and Democratic elected officials concerned about its members facing disproportionately high rates of excessive force accusations, especially as it relates to protest response. Mamdani, who's polling as the favorite to win November's election, has said he would disband the SRG and replace it with a unit focused squarely on tactical deployment, cutting out the mass protest response component. 'I think it would be a tremendous mistake to disband them,' Cuomo told reporters at his Midtown press conference, noting its members responded to last week's horrific Park Ave. shooting that left an NYPD officer dead. Cuomo said he believes it's important the SRG retains all the functions it currently plays, including protest response, but that it's also key to add an additional 400 members — over a four year period — to increase coverage in all five boroughs, especially at big transit hubs and commercial corridors. Asked if he's at all concerned about the high rates of abuse of force accusations against SRG members, Cuomo said the NYPD needs to make sure to police their own better. 'If we know the line and we know when someone steps over the line, there are discipline actions, including dismissal, sanctions, etcetera,' he said. 'So you have to strictly enforce the line.' Cuomo, who resigned as governor in 2021 amid sexual and professional misconduct accusations, floated his proposal for a larger SRG as part of a broader public safety plan that also included new details for how he envisions being able to hire 5,000 new officers to get the NYPD's total uniformed headcount to about 40,000. The main proposal Cuomo floated is making new hires eligible for $15,000 sign-on bonuses that'd push their starting salaries to about $75,000, making the wage level competitive with neighboring counties and other big U.S. cities. Mamdani, a democratic socialist who centered his Democratic primary campaign on proposals to make the city more affordable, has taken a different approach to public safety, saying he wouldn't seek to expand the ranks of the NYPD. Instead, he has said he'd keep them flat and also launch a new civilian agency, the Department of Community Safety, that'd handle mental health emergency response in order to let cops focus on fighting crime. In a press conference in downtown Manhattan on Monday, Mamdani said such a shift in focus would ensure officers aren't forced to work overtime, which he argued is a big reason cops are leaving the department at high rates, citing conversations he's had with rank-and-file officers. 'The fact that every year we ask them to take on additional responsibilities, we are making it more and more difficult for them to respond to the very responsibilities that drew them to the job in the first place,' he said. Though Mamdani now says he supports keeping the police headcount flat, he posted frequently years ago about his support for defunding and dismantling the NYPD. In one especially explosive tweet, Mamdani wrote in 2020 that the NYPD is 'racist, anti-queer & a major threat to public safety.' In recent interviews with the Daily News, the heads of four of the NYPD's five main unions — representing lieutenants, sergeants, detectives and captains — said they are skeptical about his purported change of heart and don't believe Mamdani's pledge to keep the department headcount flat. 'If he wins, he's going to dismantle the department and its going to take us 15 years to correct the damage he's going to do,' said Vincent Vallelong, president of the Sergeants Benevolent Association, which has endorsed Adams for reelection. The Police Benevolent Association, the NYPD's largest union representing rank-and-file officers, was alone among the department's union heads in not knocking Mamdani. 'We just buried a hero police officer,' said PBA President Patrick Hendry, whose union has yet to endorse in the mayoral race. 'We are focused on caring for his family, not on what any politician has to say.' Adams, who's also running on an independent line in November and has been largely supportive of increasing NYPD funding in his first term, contended Cuomo doesn't know what he's talking about as it relates to the SRG. 'SRG comes with specific skills and talents that you want to use, you don't want SRG riding up on our subways just doing routine patrol or responding to routine codes of service. They have a specific task, we have enough of them to do the task,' Adams told The News at City Hall in arguing against an SRG expansion. 'One candidate is stating he doesn't want SRG at demonstrations. That's one candidate. Another candidate is picking an arbitrary number with no science behind it,' the mayor added. _____
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Right-wing media personality Alex Stein interrupted an NBC News broadcast to share his feelings–and MAGA loved every moment.
MAGA celebrated conservative media personality and comedian Alex Stein after he interrupted an NBC News broadcast from the Texas state capitol on Monday afternoon to shout, 'MSNBC sucks.' Interrupting correspondent Ryan Chandler during his cross, Stein, 38, barged into frame and began shouting 'MSNBC sucks,' repeating himself several times before he was led away. 'Sometimes this happens, and we can understand that that can happen, and while we love free speech, we're going to keep control here,' host Kelly O'Donnell explained.

Associated Press
22 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Alaska Sen. Murkowski toys with bid for governor, defends vote supporting Trump's tax breaks package
JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) — Republican U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, speaking with Alaska reporters Monday, toyed with the idea of running for governor and defended her recent high-profile decision to vote in support of President Donald Trump's tax breaks and spending cuts bill. Murkowski, speaking from Anchorage, said 'sure' when asked if she has considered or is considering a run for governor. She later said her response was 'a little bit flippant' because she gets asked that question so often. 'Would I love to come home? I have to tell you, of course I would love to come home,' she said. 'I am not making any decisions about anything, because my responsibility to Alaskans is my job in the Senate right now.' Several Republicans already have announced plans to run in next year's governor's race, including Lt. Gov. Nancy Dahlstrom. Republican Gov. Mike Dunleavy is not eligible to seek a third consecutive term. Alaska has an open primary system and ranked choice voting in general elections. Murkowski is not up for reelection until 2028. A centrist, Murkowski has become a closely watched figure in a sharply divided Congress. She has at times been at odds with her party in her criticism of Trump and blasted by some GOP voters as a 'Republican in name only.' But her decision to support Trump's signature bill last month also frustrated others in a state where independents comprise the largest number of registered voters. She previously described her decision-making process around the bill as 'agonizing.' On Monday, she said it was clear to her the bill was not only a priority of Trump's but also that it was going to pass, so it became important to her to help make it as advantageous to the state as she could. 'So I did everything within my power — as one lawmaker from Alaska — to try to make sure that the most vulnerable in our state would not be negatively impacted,' she said. 'And I had a hard choice to make, and I think I made the right choice for Alaskans.'