
Google in Mexico faces major potential fine as antitrust ruling nears
Although Google does not release detailed revenue results by country, the potential fine could be among the largest ever imposed by Mexico's Federal Economic Competition Commission (Cofece). Cofece and Google declined to comment.
The watchdog expects to make a decision by June 17, according to its own published timeline. Under Mexican law, 8 per cent of annual revenue is the maximum fine for monopolistic practices.
Cofece accuses the company of establishing an effective monopoly in the Mexican digital advertising market. It began its investigation into Google Mexico in 2020 and issued a summons in 2023, beginning the trial phase of the procedure.
Google then had the opportunity to present evidence against the allegations.
A company can apply for an injunction blocking the antitrust ruling until a specialized court decides on whether it should be ratified or not.
Cofece requested Google's financial information from tax authority SAT, a timeline of updates on the case's record of history showed.
While Google parent Alphabet does not include specific revenue numbers for Mexico in its earnings reports, the U.S. tech giant is the largest company to be challenged by Mexico's antitrust regulator.
According to annual results for 2024, the company's revenue for its "other Americas" region, which includes Latin America, was about $20.4 billion.
In 2022, Cofece fined a group of liquefied petroleum gas distributors 2.4 billion Mexican pesos ($126.03 million) for price fixing.
Cofece's database shows that an oral hearing with Google about the case, considered one of the final steps in such cases, took place on May 20.
In 2020, in response to anticompetitive investigations into Google, Lina Ornelas, Director of Public Policy and Government Relations at Google Mexico, said at a company event, "Being big isn't bad. What matters is that you don't take out any competitors with your products, even though yours can be very efficient, and that's why you have more users."
Separately, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has clashed with Google, filing a suit against the company over its decision to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the "Gulf of America" for U.S. users of Google Maps, after President Donald Trump renamed the body of water. The suit argues Google does not have the "authority" to rename it.
Lawmakers from the ruling Morena party have since last year called on Cofece to resolve Google's long-standing case.
If Cofece rules against Google, the move would mirror the tech titan's legal woes in the United States, where a U.S. district judge last year ruled it holds an unlawful monopoly in online search and related advertising.
The U.S. Justice Department and a coalition of states want Google to share search data and cease multibillion-dollar payments to Apple and other smartphone makers to be the default search engine on new devices. Antitrust enforcers are concerned about how Google's search monopoly gives it an advantage.
In a separate case, a federal judge said Google illegally dominated two markets for online advertising technology, with the Justice Department saying that Google should sell off at least its Google Ad Manager, which includes the company's publisher ad server and its ad exchange.
($1 = 19.0435 Mexican pesos)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNA
37 minutes ago
- CNA
Google tweaks Google Play conditions following EU pressure
PARIS :Alphabet unit Google said on Tuesday it will make it easier for app developers to steer customers to channels other than Google after the European Union competition watchdog charged it with breaching EU regulations. In March, Google was hit with two charges of breaching the EU's landmark Digital Markets Act (DMA), which aims to rein in the power of Big Tech. Google has been in the European Commission's crosshairs since early 2024 over whether it restricts app developers from informing users about offers outside its app store Google Play and whether it favours its vertical search services such as Google Flights. Regulators have said Alphabet technically prevents app developers from freely steering consumers to other channels for better offers. They said a service fee charged by the company for facilitating the initial acquisition of a new customer by an app developer via Google Play goes beyond what is justified. In a blog post, Google said that following discussions with the European Commission, developers, and other experts, Google is updating certain terms. "While we still have concerns that these changes could expose Android users to harmful content and make the app experience worse, we're updating our External Offers Program for the EU with revised fees and more options for Android developers, following DMA discussions with the European Commission," EMEA Senior Competition Counsel Clare Kelly said. The company, which has been fined more than 8 billion euros ($9.3 billion) by the EU for various antitrust violations, risks fines of up to 10 per cent of its global annual sales if found guilty of breaching the DMA. ($1 = 0.8580 euros)


CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Google settles YouTube children's privacy lawsuit
Google will pay $30 million to settle a lawsuit claiming it violated the privacy of children using YouTube by collecting their personal information without parental consent, and using it to send targeted ads. A preliminary settlement of the proposed class action was filed on Monday night in San Jose, California, federal court, and requires approval by U.S. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Google denied wrongdoing in agreeing to settle. The Alphabet unit agreed in 2019 to pay $170 million in fines and change some practices to settle similar charges by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and New York Attorney General Letitia James. Some critics viewed that accord as too lenient. Google did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Tuesday. Lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to similar requests. The parents or guardians of 34 children accused Google of violating dozens of state laws by letting content providers bait children with cartoons, nursery rhymes and other content to help it collect personal information, even after the 2019 settlement. Van Keulen dismissed claims against the content providers -including Hasbro, Mattel, Cartoon Network and DreamWorks Animation - in January, citing a lack of evidence tying them to Google's alleged data collection. Mediation began the next month, leading to the settlement. The proposed class covers U.S. children under 13 who watched YouTube between July 1, 2013 and April 1, 2020. Lawyers for the plaintiffs said there could be 35 million to 45 million class members. They said if 1 per cent to 2 per cent submit claims, a rate comparable to similar earlier cases, claimants could receive $30 to $60 each, before deducting legal fees and costs. The lawyers plan to seek up to $9 million from the settlement for legal fees. Alphabet posted net income of $62.7 billion on revenue of $186.7 billion in the first half of 2025.
Business Times
6 hours ago
- Business Times
Americans fear AI permanently displacing workers: Reuters/Ipsos poll
[WASHINGTON] Americans are deeply concerned over the prospect that advances in artificial intelligence could put swaths of the country out of work permanently, according to a new Reuters/Ipsos poll. The six-day poll, which concluded on Monday (Aug 18), showed 71 per cent of respondents said they were concerned that AI will be 'putting too many people out of work permanently.' The new technology burst into the national conversation in late 2022 when OpenAI's ChatGPT chatbot launched and became the fastest-growing application of all time, with tech heavyweights like Facebook owner Meta Platforms, Google owner Alphabet and Microsoft offering their own AI products. While at present there are few signs of mass unemployment – the US jobless rate was just 4.2 per cent in July – artificial intelligence is stirring concerns as it reshapes jobs, industries and day-to-day life. Some 77 per cent of respondents to the Reuters/Ipsos poll said they worried the technology could be used to stir up political chaos, a sign of unease over the now-common use of AI technology to create realistic videos of imaginary events. President Donald Trump last month posted on social media an AI-generated video of former Democratic president Barack Obama being arrested, an event that never happened. Americans are also leery about military applications for AI, the Reuters/Ipsos poll showed. Some 48 per cent of respondents said the government should never use AI to determine the target of a military strike, compared with 24 per cent who said the government should allow that sort of use of the technology. Another 28 per cent said they were not sure. The general enthusiasm for AI shown by many people and companies has fuelled further investments, such as Foxconn and SoftBank's planned data centre equipment factory in Ohio. It has also upended national security policies as the US and China vie for AI dominance. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up More than half of Americans – some 61 per cent – said they were concerned about the amount of electricity needed to power the fast-growing technology. Google said earlier this month it had signed agreements with two US electric utilities to reduce its AI data centre power consumption during times of surging demand on the grid, as energy-intensive AI use outpaces power supplies. The new technology has also come under criticism for applications that have let AI bots hold romantic conversations with children, generate false medical information and help people make racist arguments. Two-thirds of respondents in the Reuters/Ipsos poll said they worried that people would ditch relationships with other people in favour of AI companions. People were split on whether AI technology will improve education. Some 36 per cent of respondents thought it would help, while 40 per cent disagreed and the rest were not sure. The Reuters/Ipsos survey gathered responses online from 4,446 US adults nationwide and had a margin of error of about two percentage points. REUTERS