
Why Ground Beef Prices Are Hitting Record-Highs in the U.S.
'Egg prices have been through a rollercoaster ride. And now with beef, we're seeing quite a significant price rise,' says David Ortega, a food economist and professor at Michigan State University.
Earlier this year, egg prices skyrocketed, more than doubling in price in April when compared to March 2024. The sharp increase was caused by bird influenza outbreaks on American farms, which infected over 23 million birds that had to be culled.
As of early July, egg prices have since fallen back down to $3.78 per dozen from $6.23 in April.
Over the past 12 months, food prices as a whole have only risen by 2.7%, so what is causing this sharp increase in the price of ground beef?
Here's a breakdown of what's behind the soaring prices:
Cattle herd sizes are at a record low
Although the demand for ground beef products remains high in the U.S., the supply is facing a squeeze.
Cattle herd sizes are at the lowest they have been for almost 75 years, with just under 87 million cattle and calves recorded across the country at the start of 2025, according to the American Farmers Bureau Federation (AFBF).
AFBF economist Bernt Nelson has said that prices for feed steers (cattle bred for slaughter) have reached record highs, encouraging farmers to sell their cattle for meat production instead of breeding.
'High cattle prices combined with the unpredictability of future prices and profitability could compel farmers to continue marketing a higher percentage of females for beef rather than breeding,' he said in a February blog post.
And as farmers still struggle to make profit despite high prices, they may decide to sell off their remaining cattle due to slim margins.
'Even with these record high prices, margins for cattle farmers and ranchers are razor-thin thanks to continued elevated supply costs,' Nelson said in May.
One of the main high costs getting in the way of sustainable profit for cattle ranchers is that of feed for their herds, and this links back to adverse weather conditions brought on by climate change.
Read More: Why Were Eggs So Expensive in April?
Drought driven by climate change
'One of the main drivers has been the effects of climate change on beef production in the U.S. This is something that doesn't cause prices to rise overnight, so there's a considerable lag involved,' says Ortega.
A significant drought took place across the Great Plain states in 2022, forcing a lot of cattle farms to sell their livestock.
'What that [drought] does is erases feed for producers. There's less forage availability, so they sell a lot of their animals, because it becomes very costly to hold on to them,' Ortega notes.
A lot of the sold livestock, often slaughtered and turned into beef products, includes 'breeding stock,' meaning that in the long-term there is less capacity to breed new cows to keep up with consumer demand.
'If you couple that with the strong demand for beef, and there has been strong demand in particular for ground beef, because it is a very familiar product to consumers, it really puts a lot of pressure on prices, and that's why we've seen the increases,' says Ortega.
Uncertainty due to tariffs and concern over what might happen in the future
Ortega says he believes that tariffs 'are starting to play a role' in the rise of beef prices.
Despite a lot of domestic production, the U.S. still imports significant amounts of beef, particularly more lean trimmings. These trimmings are important for ground beef products.
'We import a lot of lean trimmings from countries like South Africa and Brazil, and that is in order to be able to blend this with our beef that tends to be fattier, and so we can make the proper blends in terms of fat content,' Ortega says.
President Donald Trump threatened earlier this month to install a 50% tariff against Brazil for what he described as a 'witch hunt' against former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is facing allegations that he planned to stay in power despite losing the 2022 Brazilian election.
'If these do go into effect, or even higher tariffs [are implemented], then I think we're going to see a notable further increase on things like ground beef and hamburger meat,' Ortega says.
Brazil, the world's largest exporter of beef, saw a rise in sales of meat to the U.S. this year after a trade war between Washington, D.C., and Beijing escalated. In May, Brazilian exports to the U.S. rose by 20%, and current imports from the country are almost double what they were in June 2024, according to the USDA.
With beef imports rising by 10% over the past year, a higher U.S. dependency on the product from abroad puts it more at risk should tariffs increase, particularly on top exporters to the U.S., the largest being Canada.
The U.S and Canada are currently in the midst of trade negotiations, with Trump most recently threatening a 35% tariff on all Canadian goods starting Aug. 1.
Global supply chains of beef have already been disrupted as a result of looming trade wars.
'There is a tremendous amount of uncertainty on the policy and trade front,' Ortega says, arguing that it has contributed to such price increases.
According to experts, even the slightest change within the beef market, as a result of tariffs, could further impact prices.
'Tariff-induced trade wars are sowing uncertainty for both ranchers and consumers alike. This has the potential to impact demand for beef, and even small changes in demand with such tight supplies could have a big impact on prices,' said Nelson.
Read More: Why Tomatoes Are Becoming a Lot More Expensive
How long will consumers feel the impact of these price increases?
When asked about when grocery shoppers could see prices start to fall, Ortega calls this the 'million dollar question.'
'Our research shows that it could be four years or so before prices for the consumer start to stabilize,' Ortega says.
Other price fluctuations, such as when eggs were reaching record-high prices earlier this year, were more 'predictable' as they were due to bird influenza outbreaks.
But as there's more at play regarding the ground beef price hikes, it's harder to know when things will settle.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
2025 tax guide for expats: What you need to know about taxes if you live outside the U.S.
Living abroad doesn't mean you can leave your U.S. tax responsibilities behind. If you're an American expat, the IRS still expects you to report your worldwide income — no matter where you live or work. Here's the good news: There are a few different tax breaks that help many expats avoid U.S. taxes altogether. This tax guide for expats will help you understand which forms to file, what income to report and how to take advantage of key exclusions and credits so you can stay compliant and avoid overpaying. What you should report to the IRS if you live abroad U.S. citizens and resident aliens must report their global income — no matter where it's earned. That means wages, dividends, interest, rental income and self-employment earnings all need to be included on your annual tax return, converted into U.S. dollars using the applicable exchange rate. You'll also need to file Form 1040 if your income exceeds the standard filing threshold, which is now $15,750 for single filers and $31,500 for married-filing-jointly filers in 2025. If you're self-employed and earn $400 or more, a return is required regardless of your total income. Learn more: Self-employment tax: What it is, how to calculate it Beyond income, expats with foreign financial accounts worth over $10,000 at any point during the year must file a foreign bank account report (FBAR) separately from their tax return. See this IRS page on FBARs for more information. If you own specified foreign financial assets — like foreign stocks, retirement accounts or insurance policies — with values above set thresholds ($200,000 for single filers and $400,000 for married-filing-jointly filers living abroad), you may also need to file Form 8938 under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA). See this IRS page on FATCA for more information. Other filings may apply if you have ties to foreign trusts, corporations or investment vehicles. Learn more: Trump's temporary tax breaks: 5 'big beautiful bill' provisions that may not stick around for long Tax breaks for U.S. expats U.S. expats can take advantage of several tax breaks that help reduce or eliminate double taxation. Here are the most important ones to know for the 2025 tax year: Foreign earned income exclusion (FEIE) You can exclude up to $130,000 of foreign earned income from U.S. taxes in 2025. That amount doubles to $260,000 if you're married and both spouses qualify for the FEIE. Those dollar amounts are adjusted for inflation each year. To qualify for this tax benefit, your tax home must be abroad, and you must meet either the bona fide residence test or the physical presence test. The physical presence test is defined by the IRS as being 'physically present in a foreign country or countries for at least 330 full days during any period of 12 consecutive months.' 'The physical presence test is great because it is objective — if you meet the 330-day requirement, then you get the benefits of FEIE,' says Nicolás Castillo, CPA at Rook International CPAs, which specializes in global tax strategies. One thing many expats don't realize is that if you don't technically qualify for the physical presence test at the time of filing, you may still be able to claim the deduction. You'll need to file for an extension using Form 4868 or Form 2350. You can then apply the extra time towards the FEIE. If the physical presence test doesn't work for you, the other test to qualify for the FEIE is the bona fide residence test. This test 'is excellent for those with a more subjective situation,' Castillo says. 'Perhaps the taxpayer has lived in Italy his/her whole life, but spends time in the U.S. for work or an extended holiday. Then there are a number of claims you must make to prove you are a true resident of the other country.' Retirement savings and the FEIE The foreign earned income exclusion reduces your taxable income, and that can limit your ability to contribute to U.S. retirement accounts such as IRAs. For example, if the FEIE drops your income to zero, the IRS interprets that as you having no earned income. You must have earned income to contribute to an IRA. But keep in mind that, as noted below, if you choose not to claim the FEIE, you may be prevented from claiming it for the next 5 years. See this IRS page on the foreign earned income exclusion for other important details, including which types of income do and don't qualify and how the IRS defines a 'foreign tax home.' Another twist to consider: If you opt not to claim the FEIE, then you may be prevented from claiming it for the next 5 years. See this IRS page for more information. Foreign housing exclusion or deduction If you qualify for the FEIE, then generally you'll qualify for the foreign housing tax break, which lets you exclude or deduct certain foreign housing costs above a base amount. For 2025, the base amount is $20,800, and the maximum expense is $39,000, though this maximum may vary depending on where you live. Generally, the base amount is 16 percent of the FEIE exclusion amount (which is $130,000 in 2025) and the maximum you can claim is 30 percent of the FEIE exclusion. Remember, the FEIE amount adjusts each year for inflation. Generally, the foreign housing exclusion is for people who are employed by a company, while the foreign housing deduction is for self-employed people. See this IRS page for more on the foreign housing exclusion and deduction. Get started: Match with an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals Foreign tax credit (FTC) If you pay income taxes to a foreign government, you can claim a dollar-for-dollar credit towards any U.S. taxes owed. For example, if you paid the equivalent of $10,000 in taxes to Germany, you'd get a $10,000 credit towards your U.S. taxes. You can use both the foreign earned income exclusion (FEIE) and the foreign tax credit (FTC), but not on the same portion of income. Expats often use both the FEIE (for the first $130,000 of earned income) and the FTC (for any excess income) to reduce or eliminate their U.S. tax burden. 'The foreign earned income exclusion is often easier to report. But the foreign tax credit is often a better mechanism for Americans in high-tax countries,' Castillo says. While the foreign tax credit isn't refundable, generally you can carry forward unused amounts. 'Not only does it prevent double taxation, but any excess tax carries forward to be used in a future year. Sometimes, like in France, the tax treaty enhances the FTC and allows us to use French social taxes, too,' Castillo says. Keep in mind that the interaction between the FEIE, the FTC and the foreign taxes you pay can get complex, especially for high-income earners in high-tax countries, so hiring a tax pro with expertise on expat issues could be a smart move. Learn more: 5 tips to find the best tax preparer for you U.S. tax benefits still apply As a U.S. citizen living abroad, you're still entitled to many of the same tax breaks and credits as U.S. residents, assuming you meet the requirements. Standard deduction: The 2025 standard deduction is $15,750 for single filers and $31,500 for married couples filing jointly. You can also choose to itemize if that provides a greater tax benefit. Child tax credit (CTC): Expats with qualifying children may claim the child tax credit, worth up to $2,200 per child in 2025. Retirement contributions: As a U.S. expat, you can still contribute to an IRA — but only if you have taxable earned income. If you use the foreign tax credit, your income remains taxable, keeping you eligible. But if you exclude all of your income using the foreign earned income exclusion, you won't qualify to contribute, since the IRS considers your compensation $0. Choose your tax break carefully if growing your retirement savings is a goal. Learn more: Trump signs massive megabill into law — here's what it means for your money To take advantage of these benefits, you must file a U.S. tax return and the appropriate forms — such as Form 2555 for the FEIE or Form 1116 for the FTC. What are the tax deadlines for expats? Most expats get an automatic two-month extension to file, which pushes their filing deadline to June 15. There's a catch, however: Any taxes you owe are still due by April 15 — you'll owe interest on any taxes not paid by the April due date. Plus, you must attach an explanation to your tax return, stating that you qualify for the automatic two-month extension. See this IRS page for more details on who qualifies and who doesn't. Filing a tax extension to October 15 is also possible, but you need to request it. Learn more: 2025 federal tax brackets and current income tax rates


Atlantic
7 minutes ago
- Atlantic
The Warped Idealism of Trump's Trade Policy
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Tomorrow is Donald Trump's deadline to agree to trade deals before he imposes tariffs, and he means it this time. Why are you laughing? (In fact, since saying that yesterday, he's already chickened out with Mexico, putting the 'taco' in, well, TACO.) But the president has already written off hopes of reaching agreements with some allies. Yesterday, Trump announced that he was raising tariffs on many Brazilian goods to 50 percent across the board, as retribution for Brazil's prosecution of former President Jair Bolsonaro, a Trump ally. This morning, Trump wrote on Truth Social that Prime Minister Mark Carney's decision to recognize a Palestinian state 'will make it very hard' to strike a deal with Canada. The president's perpetual caving can make him seem craven and opportunistic, but you can detect a different impulse in his handling of trade policy too: a warped kind of idealism. When Trump began his political career, he said he would put ' America First,' rather than using American power to enforce values overseas. Wars to fight repressive autocrats were foolish ways to burn cash and squander American lives. The promotion of human rights and democracy were soft-headed, bleeding-heart causes. Trump, a man of business, was going to look out for the bottom line without getting tangled up in high-minded crusades. Now that's exactly what he's doing: using trade as a way to make grand statements about values—his own, if not America's. This is troubling on legal, moral, and diplomatic levels. The Constitution specifically delegates the power to levy tariffs to Congress, but legislators have delegated some of that capacity to the president. Trump has invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which allows him to impose tariffs in response to an 'unusual and extraordinary threat,' on the basis that Congress cannot act quickly enough. This use of the law is, as Conor Friedersdorf and Ilya Somin wrote in The Atlantic in May, absurd. The White House's months of vacillation on its tariff threats since make the idea of any emergency even less credible. Understanding why Trump would be sensitive about Bolsonaro's prosecution, which stems from Bolsonaro's attempt to cling to power after losing the 2022 election, is not difficult—the parallels between the two have been often noted—but that doesn't make it a threat to the United States, much less an 'unusual and extraordinary' one. Likewise, Canadian recognition of a Palestinian state is unwelcome news for Trump's close alliance with Israel, but it poses no obvious security or economic danger to the U.S. A Congress or Supreme Court interested in limiting presidential power could seize on these statements to arrest Trump's trade war, but these are not the legislators or justices we have. Setting aside the legal problems, Trump's statements about Brazil and Canada represent an abandonment of the realpolitik approach he once promised. Even if Carney were to back down on Palestinian statehood, or Brazil to call off Bolsonaro's prosecution, the United States wouldn't see any economic gain. Trump is purely using American economic might to achieve noneconomic goals. Previous presidents have frequently used U.S. economic hegemony to further national goals—or, less charitably, interfered in the domestic affairs of other sovereign nations. But no one needs to accept any nihilistic false equivalences. Trump wrote in a July 9 letter to Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva that the case against Bolsonaro was 'an international disgrace' and (naturally) a 'Witch Hunt.' Although the U.S. has taken steps to isolate repressive governments, Trump's attempts to bail out Bolsonaro are nothing of the sort. The U.S. can't with a straight face argue that charging Bolsonaro is improper, and it can't accuse Brazil of convicting him in a kangaroo court, because no trial has yet been held. The U.S. government has also long used its power to bully other countries into taking its side in international disputes, but the swipe at Canada is perplexing. The Trump administration remains the most stalwart ally of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (notwithstanding some recent tensions), and the U.S. government has long withheld recognition of any Palestinian state as leverage in negotiations. Even so, slapping tariffs on Canada for a symbolic decision such as this seems unlikely to dissuade Carney or do anything beyond further stoking nascent Canadian nationalism. This is not the only way in which Trump's blunt wielding of tariffs is likely to backfire on the United States. Consumers in the U.S. will pay higher prices, and overseas, Jerusalem Demsas warned in April, 'the credibility of the nation's promises, its treaties, its agreements, and even its basic rationality has evaporated in just weeks.' But it's not just trust with foreign countries that the president has betrayed. It's the pact he made with voters. Trump promised voters an 'America First' approach. Instead, they're getting a 'Bolsonaro and Netanyahu First' government. Here are three new stories from The Atlantic: Virginia Giuffre's family was shocked that Trump described her as 'stolen.' Every scientific empire comes to an end. Hamas wants Gaza to starve. Today's News President Donald Trump's tariffs are set to take effect tomorrow as his administration scrambles to finalize trade deals with key partners. Mexico received a 90-day extension, while other countries, including China and Canada, remain in negotiations. Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy to the Middle East, and Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee will visit Gaza tomorrow to inspect aid distribution as the humanitarian crisis worsens in the region. Dispatches Evening Read By Katherine J. Wu For decades, evolutionary biologists pointed to such examples to cast hybridization as hapless—'rare, very unsuccessful, and not an important evolutionary force,' Sandra Knapp, a plant taxonomist at the Natural History Museum in London, told me. But recently, researchers have begun to revise that dour view. With the right blend of genetic material, hybrids can sometimes be fertile and spawn species of their own; they can acquire new abilities that help them succeed in ways their parents never could. Which, as Knapp and her colleagues have found in a new study, appears to be the case for the world's third-most important staple crop: The 8-to-9-million-year-old lineage that begat the modern potato may have arisen from a chance encounter between a flowering plant from a group called Etuberosum and … an ancient tomato. Tomatoes, in other words, can now justifiably be described as the mother of potatoes. More From The Atlantic Take a look. These photos capture moments from the 2025 World Aquatics Championships in Singapore, where more than 2,500 athletes from over 200 nations competed in events spanning six aquatic sports.
.jpg&w=3840&q=100)

Miami Herald
36 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Free tax filing program could soon be axed by the IRS. Here's what to know
The Internal Revenue Service is poised to discontinue its Direct File program, which allows millions of Americans to file their taxes for free, drawing criticism from some Democrats. During a tax summit on July 28, IRS Commissioner Billy Long said the cost-free service is 'gone,' according to Bloomberg Tax. 'Big beautiful Billy wiped that out,' he added, referencing the sweeping congressional spending bill signed into law by President Donald Trump on July 4. The bill does not outright end Direct File, but it allocated $15 million to the Treasury Department to establish a task force to review the program and assess other options. An IRS spokesperson confirmed the agency is awaiting the task force's findings, which must be delivered to Congress within 90 days. 'We look forward to Treasury's forthcoming report to Congress on the Direct File program and on potential public-private partnership alternatives to Direct File, as required by the One Big Beautiful Bill,' the spokesperson said in a statement to McClatchy News. 'Long is committed to modernizing the IRS and providing a taxpayer experience that meets today's expectations, which includes giving taxpayers transparency into the status of their tax returns and audits,' the statement said. The Direct File program allows eligible taxpayers in certain states to electronically file their federal tax returns directly on the IRS website at no cost. The agency launched the pilot program in 2024, under then-President Joe Biden, making it available to taxpayers in 13 states. It was later expanded to include 25 states, including California, New York, Florida, Texas, Illinois, North Carolina and Pennsylvania. Residents of these 25 states reporting W-2 wage income, Social Security income, retirement income, and other credits and deductions are able to use the free service. But, taxpayers with business, rental or gig economy income are ineligible. The IRS website has a brief survey, allowing taxpayers to determine whether they are eligible. The Treasury Department said in October that more than 30 million Americans would be eligible to use the service during the 2025 tax season. Many Republicans have expressed criticism of the Direct File program, arguing it poses a number of problems. 'The program's creation and ongoing expansion pose a threat to taxpayers' freedom from government overreach,' a group of 29 House Republicans said in a December letter to Trump. They argued that the IRS faces a conflict of interest in preparing tax returns because it simultaneously acts as the tax collector and enforcer. The agency 'has little incentive to ensure hardworking Americans do not pay more than they owe in taxes and may instead benefit from families and small businesses paying greater amounts than they are required by law,' the letter said. Sen. Mike Crapo, an Idaho Republican, has also said it's unclear whether the program is legal without congressional approval. Democrats, on the other hand, have long defended the pilot program, contending it saves taxpayers time and money. In a January letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, then a nominee for the role, dozens of Democratic senators and representatives lauded the successes of Direct File. They said it had saved $5.6 million in tax preparation fees in its first year and was on track to save $11 billion per year 'at scale.' Since reports of the IRS' plan to axe the program emerged, several Democrats have expressed their disapproval. 'Direct File was an easy way for Americans to file their taxes for FREE each year,' Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, wrote on X. 'It's a no-brainer — and it's popular. So why in the world did the Trump administration kill it?' she added. 'To give a huge handout to giant tax prep companies like TurboTax that rip Americans off.'