Trump Unveils New Tariff Rates Targeting Exports from Dozens of America's Biggest Trading Partners after Months of Negotiations
Key changes include new tariff rates that will be implemented at 12:01 a.m. on August 7, instead of the previously announced Friday deadline. Notable rates include 15 percent for both Iceland and Israel, 30 percent for South Africa, 25 percent for India, 40 percent for Myanmar, 39 percent for Switzerland, and 20 percent for Taiwan and Vietnam.
Drawing Trump's Ire
Trump X
Brazil, the largest economy in South America, will face a steep tariff increase to 50% starting August 6, Trump announced on Wednesday. Back on April 2 during his "Liberation Day" statement, the president had warned that Vietnam could be hit with a 46% tariff.
However, earlier this month, Vietnam managed to negotiate a preliminary trade agreement with the U.S., resulting in a reduced tariff rate.
Trump seen unveiling the initial tariff list on April 2 X
Israel's updated tariff rate is now 2 percentage points lower than the 17 percent duty announced back in April — even though the country hasn't officially signed a deal with the White House.
In his executive order revising the reciprocal tariff rates on Wednesday, Trump said that some countries "have agreed to, or are on the verge of agreeing to, meaningful trade and security commitments with the United States."
On the other hand, he said some nations have either not pursued any deal at all or, despite participating in talks, have proposed terms that he believes don't adequately correct trade imbalances or fail to sufficiently support U.S. economic and national security interests.
Donald Trump X
The highest tariff rates will be imposed on Syria at 41 percent, followed by Laos and Myanmar at 40 percent, Switzerland at 39 percent, and both Iraq and Serbia at 35 percent.
The revised list also includes a 35 percent tariff on Canadian imports, after Trump signed an order raising the existing rate by 10 percentage points.
According to the White House, countries not mentioned in the announcement will face a standard 10 percent tariff.
No Compromise Move
In the months leading up to Thursday's order, Trump had already finalized major trade deals covering roughly one-third of all U.S. trade. The president struck a major agreement with the European Union, setting a 15 percent tariff on EU goods during a visit to Scotland over the weekend.
Trump X
In return, the 27-member bloc agreed to buying $750 billion worth of U.S. energy and investing $600 billion into the American economy.
Preliminary trade arrangements were also reached ahead of the updated tariff rollout and the Friday deadline. These included a 10 percent tariff for the United Kingdom, a 19 percent rate for both the Philippines and Indonesia, and a 15 percent duty for Japan and South Korea.
"President Trump has reset decades of failed trade policy," read a statement released by the White House.
"Today's Order underscores President Trump's commitment to take back America's economic sovereignty by addressing the many nonreciprocal trade relationships that impact foreign relations, threaten our economic and national security, and disadvantage American workers."
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Thursday that over 100 countries were still engaged in talks with the administration and were keen to secure reduced tariff rates.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
16 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Cadillac will add value as 11th F1 team, says McLaren's Zak Brown
LONDON – Cadillac's arrival in Formula One next year as an 11th team will bring added financial value with new partners and more fan engagement rather than diluting resources, according to McLaren's American chief executive officer Zak Brown. The General Motors-backed team have taken staff already from rival outfits, their European headquarters at Silverstone being close to other factories, and are also competing for sponsorship. Brown, whose team comprising Oscar Piastri and Lando Norris are dominating this year's championship after winning the 2024 constructors' title, saw no reason to fear a dilution of resources, however. 'I think on employees they are definitely going to take a lot more than they give, which is fine,' he said the Hungarian Grand Prix. 'My general view is if someone wants to go work for a rival team then shame on me. For sponsors, I think they'll bring more new to the table than take.' Brown expected Cadillac also to bring more competition eventually, although they faced a tough challenge as newcomers, and more fans to a series that now has three US rounds – Miami, Austin and Las Vegas – and a growing audience in America. 'Will we get a better US TV deal, more American presence? I think their sponsors and Cadillac will spend money in the sport, the teams get a percentage of that so I see them as a value add to the sport,' he added. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Four men arrested in Bukit Timah believed to be linked to housebreaking syndicates Singapore Criminal trial of Hyflux founder Olivia Lum and five others starts Aug 11 Singapore Profile of Kpod user has shifted from hardcore drug users to young people: Experts Tech Former data analyst creates AI tutor that assesses students based on Singapore schools' criteria Opinion I used to be impatient. Then I became a granddad Life Pixar film-maker, We Bare Bears creator Daniel Chong on the lessons his S'porean parents taught him Opinion Recognising our imperfections is part of what makes Singapore whole Business The risks of using 'decoupling' to own two properties 'I'm not worried about maybe some of the short term-ness of they are going to take an employee here or there or poach a sponsor here or there. I think the contribution will be bigger than that.' Cadillac secured approval of their bid in March, after a 764-day entry process and initial opposition from Formula One and the other 10 teams wary of a potential reduction in the share of revenues. The team are also backed by TWG Global, whose chief executive Mark Walter has an estimated net worth of US$12.5 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. The first new team since US-owned Haas debuted in 2016 said in July they were already two thirds of the way towards a targeted headcount of 600 by next season and no longer even the smallest outfit. REUTERS
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
After almost losing Trump, Putin gets his ideal summit
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Few analysts believe the Russian leader will be content to stop the war based on a real estate negotiation alone. – In late July 2025, President Vladimir Putin of Russia was facing a stark reality: He was on the verge of losing President Donald Trump, the one Western leader possibly willing to help him get his way in Ukraine and achieve his long-held goal of rupturing the European security order. After months of trying to get Mr Putin to end the war, MrTrump had grown tired of ineffectual phone calls and talks and had begun issuing ultimatums. Even worse for Mr Putin, Mr Trump appeared to have patched up his relationship with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine, despite an Oval Office blow-up earlier in 2025 , that delighted Moscow. It was not clear that Mr Trump would be able or willing to follow through on the threats he had made to put punishing tariffs on nations buying Russian oil , or what real impact such moves would have on Moscow. But Mr Trump's deadline for Mr Putin to end the war was swiftly approaching, presaging some sort of further rift between the White House and the Kremlin. So Mr Putin shifted tack ever so slightly. Despite previous refusals by Russian officials to negotiate over territory in the Russia-Ukraine war, the Russian leader, during a meeting at the Kremlin last week, left Mr Trump's special envoy, Mr Steve Witkoff, with the impression that Russia was now willing to engage in some deal-making on the question of land. 'We're going to get some back and we're going to get some switched,' Mr Trump said on Aug 8. 'There'll be some swopping of territories to the betterment of both.' By speaking a language Mr Trump understands – the language of real estate – Mr Putin secured something he had been seeking ever since January: A one-on-one meeting with the US leader, without Mr Zelensky present, to make his case and cut a deal. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Four men arrested in Bukit Timah believed to be linked to housebreaking syndicates Singapore Criminal trial of Hyflux founder Olivia Lum and five others starts Aug 11 Singapore Profile of Kpod user has shifted from hardcore drug users to young people: Experts Tech Former data analyst creates AI tutor that assesses students based on Singapore schools' criteria Opinion I used to be impatient. Then I became a granddad Life Pixar film-maker, We Bare Bears creator Daniel Chong on the lessons his S'porean parents taught him Opinion Recognising our imperfections is part of what makes Singapore whole Business The risks of using 'decoupling' to own two properties 'It has been a very good week for Putin,' said Dr Sam Greene, a professor of Russian politics at Kings College London. 'He has taken himself out of a position of significant vulnerability. He has manoeuvred this entire process into something that is more or less exactly what he needed it to be.' At the same time, tensions between Washington and Kyiv have reappeared. Mr Zelensky said on Aug 9 that the Ukrainian Constitution does not allow his government to negotiate away the country's land. Mr Trump initially told European officials that the meeting with Mr Putin would be followed by a three-way summit with both Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky. But the Kremlin quickly said no such promise had been made. The White House proceeded anyway. Few analysts believe the Russian leader will be content to stop the war based on a real estate negotiation alone. Mr Putin has made it clear that, among other things, he wants a formal promise that Ukraine will not enter Nato or any other Western military alliances, host Western troops on its territory or be allowed to build up a military that threatens Russia – making Ukraine perpetually vulnerable. 'The fundamental thing for Russia is domination,' Dr Greene said. Mr Alexander Gabuev, director of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center in Berlin, said Mr Putin would come into the summit on Aug 15 in Alaska pursuing various scenarios. They include a favourable deal with Mr Trump that the US President successfully forces upon Ukraine or a favourable deal with Mr Trump that Mr Zelensky refuses, causing the United States to walk away from Ukraine, Mr Gabuev said. The third option, he noted, is that the Russian leader continues his current path for another 12 to 18 months, with the expectation that Ukraine will run out of soldiers faster than the Russian war economy runs out of steam. Mr Putin understands that Mr Trump is willing to offer things few other American leaders would ever consider, which could help Russia fracture Ukraine and divide the Western alliance. 'If you could get Trump to recognise Russia's claim to the lion's share of the territory that it has taken, understanding that the Ukrainians and the Europeans might not come along for the ride on that, you drive a long-term wedge between the US and Europe,' Dr Greene said. But despite wanting those things, Mr Putin will not stop the war for them, if getting them means agreeing to a sovereign Ukraine with a strong military, aligned with the West, that is able to make its own arms, Mr Gabuev said. 'Trump is a big opportunity for him,' Mr Gabuev said. 'I think that he understands that. But at the same time, he is not ready to pay the price of Ukraine slipping away forever.' Mr Stefan Meister, a Russia analyst at the German Council on Foreign Relations, said the two leaders would come into the summit with different goals – Mr Trump's being to end the war and Mr Putin's being a strategic repositioning of Russia. 'For Putin, it's really about bigger goals,' Mr Meister added. 'It is about his legacy. It is about where Russia will stand after this war. It is much more fundamental. This creates a different willingness to pay costs.' And despite negotiations about his country's land, Mr Zelensky will not be in the room. 'For Ukraine, it is a disaster,' Mr Meister said. THE NEW YORK TIMES
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
America is undermining its soft power in sports
US President Donald Trump during an executive order signing ceremony in the South Court Auditorium at the White House in Washington. NEW YORK – The pre-teen boys who play for Venezuela's Cardenales Little League are on their way to the upcoming Little League World Series. Credit is due to their talent and diligence – and an exemption from President Donald Trump's travel ban personally granted by Secretary of State Marco Rubio last week. Unfortunately, before this special waiver, their participation was far from guaranteed. In July, a different Venezuelan Little League team, Cacique Mara, was denied US visas and a chance to play in a different event in South Carolina. The harsh, differential treatment of two youth teams is a new phenomenon in American sports. For decades, the US was recognized for its openness to international athletes and competition. Sports generated goodwill, as well as diplomatic, cultural and economic benefits, making it a US soft power. Now, the unwillingness to welcome athletes from everywhere is eroding it. For as long as Americans have played organized sports, foreigners have been on the team. Major League Baseball has profited from immigrant talent since the 1870s, for example. But it was only during the middle decades of the 20th century that athletes began migrating to the US in large numbers for the express purpose of training and playing a sport. These days, we are accustomed to seeing foreign-born players competing in – and dominating – top leagues, such as the National Basketball Association. Lesser-known, but just as important, is the growth of athletes at the amateur and semi-professional level. Consider college sports. During the 1999-2000 academic year, 3,589 international athletes comprised 2.4% of the National Collegiate Athletic Association's top-tier Division I athletes; by 2023-24, that number had ballooned to 13,198 or 7%. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Four men arrested in Bukit Timah believed to be linked to housebreaking syndicates Singapore Criminal trial of Hyflux founder Olivia Lum and five others starts Aug 11 Singapore Profile of Kpod user has shifted from hardcore drug users to young people: Experts Tech Former data analyst creates AI tutor that assesses students based on Singapore schools' criteria Opinion I used to be impatient. Then I became a granddad Life Pixar film-maker, We Bare Bears creator Daniel Chong on the lessons his S'porean parents taught him Opinion Recognising our imperfections is part of what makes Singapore whole Business The risks of using 'decoupling' to own two properties Several factors draw them. First, there's the money. American sports have more of it than any other country. The big salaries paid at the professional level are an obvious attraction. But so, too, are the opportunities at the collegiate and youth levels. Thanks to media rights revenue, for example, US colleges and universities fund scholarships, facilities and coaching at a scale and quality unavailable anywhere else in the world. Overseas athletes aren't just attracted to superior gym facilities, of course. Sticking with basketball as an example, long before aspiring European players have ever heard of an NCAA Final Four, they've likely fallen for an American basketball culture that represents freedom and self-expression. At a time when America's image abroad totters, Steph Curry and his 3-point shooting skills remain popular everywhere. What government, anywhere, doesn't wish that its values could be similarly embraced by global youth culture? Saudi Arabia's recent, expensive embrace of sports as public diplomacy (sportswashing, in the eyes of many) is just one example of a country trying to emulate American success and co-opt some of the narrative. Money alone can't buy American soft power success. A country also needs values that it can sell, and a government willing to make the effort. For example, since 2002, the US State Department has hosted a Sports Diplomacy Division intended to foster cultural exchanges and open up countries to American businesses along the way. Shaquille O'Neal, Ken Griffey Jr., and Cal Ripken Jr. have been among its most prominent envoys, presumably to the benefit of the NBA, MLB and their media partners. Meanwhile, a cultivated image of openness has long been matched by an immigration policy that welcomes individuals with extraordinary abilities, including athletes. If someone wants to come to the US to compete, train and earn, that person has been, for the most part, welcome in recent decades. The country's role as host for major international competitions – such as the FIFA World Cup (in 1994 and 2026) and multiple Olympic games (with Los Angeles on tap for 2028) – strengthens this perception and serves as a platform for promoting American soft power. Trump's travel bans and immigration policies, ostensibly created to preserve national security, undermine those efforts. Though not targeted specifically at athletes, they are already casualties. In June, the State Department denied visas to members of Senegal's national women's basketball team, who were planning a US training camp, and Cuba's national women's volleyball team, who were intending to compete in a tournament in Puerto Rico. But players visiting the US temporarily – say, for a tournament or training camp – aren't the only ones who are experiencing a different kind of welcome, either. Foreign-born athletes who plan to enroll in colleges and universities this fall experienced significant visa delays and uncertainties this spring. Most issues in the latter category were eventually resolved, but the message both at home and abroad was unmistakable: It's your passport–not your talent or determination–that decides whether you get to play. Athletes lose out. The US loses more. In the increasingly intense battle for global loyalties, Americans need ambassadors and events that showcase their best values and culture. Sports do that, and the US shouldn't willingly squander its lead. BLOOMBERG
