Chandigarh admn reduces hiked property tax for current fiscal after public outcry
In a major relief to homeowners and business owners across the city, the Chandigarh Administration Wednesday announced a reduction in the property tax rate for the assessment year 2025-26.
The decision came a day after the Chandigarh mayor and former mayors met the UT Administrator Gulab Chand Kataria over the hiked property tax and protests by Resident Welfare Associations (RWAs).
The Chandigarh Administration notification on the revised property tax rates reads: 'In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of Section 90 of the Punjab Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 as extended to UT Chandigarh and in partial modification of notification dated March 31, 2025, the Administrator, Union Territory Chandigarh is pleased to allow amendment in the property tax chargeable on commercial, industrial, institutional and residential lands and buildings in Chandigarh to be levied by the Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of Section 90 of the Act.'
The Chandigarh Municipal Corporation (MC) first introduced a 3 per cent property tax on the annual rateable value (ARV) of commercial, industrial and institutional lands and buildings in 2004.
Later, in 2015, the tax was extended to residential properties. Since then, there had been no revision in the rates.
Previously, the administration in its notification had announced the property tax rates effective from April 1, wherein residential property owners would face a threefold increase, while commercial property tax rates were doubled. As per the Administration's previous notification, commercial and industrial properties would be charged 6 per cent of the annual rateable value (ARV) for 2025-2026, whereas, as per revised rates announced, 5 per cent of the ARV would be charged.
Welcoming the notification, Mayor Harpreet Kaur Babla, said, 'The decision brings much-needed relief to the citizens and business community of Chandigarh. We welcome the decision made by the Chandigarh Administration to reduce the increased property tax rates for the assessment year 2025-26.'
'This significant move has been made possible due to the continuous and dedicated efforts of the BJP and ours. We persistently raised the issue of the steep property tax hike, voicing the concerns of the common people and tirelessly advocating for their financial well-being. The matter was taken up at multiple levels, with continuous dialogue and meetings involving residents, traders, public representatives and the Chandigarh Administration,' the mayor added.
Chandigarh MP Manish Tewari said, 'Property Taxes were levied without any structured consultation with public representatives or the people of Chandigarh acting through their respective Resident Welfare Associations. The tax proposals were never placed before or deliberated by the House Tax Committee or the General House of the Municipal Corporation…This band-aid approach of first levying taxes and rolling them back partially is the antithesis of healthy democratic functioning.
'The fundamental issue is what are the principles or the formula by which funds are devolved by the Chandigarh Administration to the Municipal Corporation. The Congress demands the complete rollback of the property tax levied, and 30 per cent of the funds received by the Chandigarh Administration vide the Union budget must be an automatic pass-through to the Municipal Corporation without any let or hindrance, as is the norm laid down by various Finance Commissions,' Tewari added.
Chandigarh AAP president Vijay Pal said, 'We had opposed a three-time hike in the property tax by the Chandigarh Administration with the internal consent of the BJP. Powers invested in representatives of the city councillors were rejected by bureaucrats of the administration, with the hidden support of the ruling party. AAP had to approach the high court against the dictator's decision. Now, they are fooling people of the City by a marginal reduction in illegally imposed property tax, which is just an eye-wash, the public will revert to their so-called gift at the right opportunity in due course.'
Chandigarh Pradesh Congress Committee president H S Lucky said, 'The party demands complete rollback of the increased property tax as it was increased arbitrarily without following the due procedure and against public sentiment. This reduction has also happened because of the sustained pressure built by the Chandigarh Congress and the general public. The BJP and the Chandigarh Administration were on the back foot because of the continuous agitation launched by the Congress.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
35 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Beyond the headlines: As HC order on MNREGA gives TMC a boost, BJP says act against ‘corruption' first
After multiple setbacks in court, the TMC-led state government got significant relief as the Calcutta High Court recently directed the Central government to resume the MNREGA scheme in the state from August 1. The BJP, however, has pointed out that while it is 'not against MNREGA scheme,' the onus is on the ruling TMC to first take action against 'corruption' in its ranks. The Centre, through an earlier order dated March 9, 2022, stopped releasing funds for the scheme, citing irregularities under Section 27 of the Act. In May 2023, the Paschim Banga Khet Majoor Samity (PBKMS), a rural workers' trade union, filed a petition in the High Court challenging the suspension. A Division Bench of Chief Justice T S Sivagnanam and Justice Chaitali Chatterjee noted that while Clause 27 allows the Ministry of Rural Development to withhold funds for a 'reasonable period' in case of irregularities, the scheme in Bengal has been stalled for nearly three years. 'At this juncture, the endeavour of the court is on implementation of the scheme in the state of West Bengal, which has been kept in abeyance for close to three years,' the Bench observed. A senior official in the state administration welcomed the verdict and expressed hope that the Centre would not only release MNREGA funds but also 'unblock' dues under other centrally sponsored schemes, such as PMAY-G. 'The Centre cannot withhold funds for years because of corruption involving a few. The state has Rs 8,000 crore pending under PMAY-G alone. We hope this order will pave the way for resumption of other stalled projects as well,' the official said. TMC leaders termed the HC order as a 'much-awaited relief for the state and its millions of NREGA workers.' In a post on X, the TMC wrote, 'We made a promise to the people of Bengal – that we would fight for their rights with every ounce of strength in our bodies and we reaffirm our commitment to fight for Bengal against the ZAMINDARS in every forum, at every level.' Party MP Abhishek Banerjee also wrote in a post on X, 'The Calcutta High Court's order to restart MNREGA in Bengal is a blow to BJP's politics of revenge. This wasn't governance, it was retribution. The Court's directive to resume the scheme from August 1 is a step toward restoring justice.' However, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee struck a more cautious note. 'The Centre is sending teams to Bengal, but they haven't released a single rupee in years. This is public money. People have worked, but they haven't been paid. Who will pay them? We had to pay from state funds. That's why we launched the 'Karmashree' scheme,' she said. Anuradha Talwar, leader of Paschim Banga Khet Majoor Samity, the organisation that filed the petition, called the verdict a moral victory. It is the reward of the hard work and persistence of PBKMS members who did not give up their struggle despite three frustrating years. Our next task is to now ensure a corruption-free MNREGA in our State and to continue our struggle against BJP's attempts to kill MNREGA.' CPI(M) Central Committee member Sujan Chakraborty also welcomed the order.'From the very first day we have been asking… Why are poor labourers suffering because of the fight between BJP and TMC? It is their right. There may be corruption allegations. That can be investigated. But it is not acceptable that, year after year, MNREGA work has been stopped,' he said. BJP MP Samik Bhattacharya, however, maintained a guarded stance. 'We're not against MNREGA. But the TMC government wants to loot public money. The Centre cannot allow that. They've admitted to corruption but haven't taken action against those responsible,' he said. Atri Mitra is a Special Correspondent of The Indian Express with more than 20 years of experience in reporting from West Bengal, Bihar and the North-East. He has been covering administration and political news for more than ten years and has a keen interest in political development in West Bengal. Atri holds a Master degree in Economics from Rabindrabharati University and Bachelor's degree from Calcutta University. He is also an alumnus of St. Xavier's, Kolkata and Ramakrishna Mission Asrama, Narendrapur. He started his career with leading vernacular daily the Anandabazar Patrika, and worked there for more than fifteen years. He worked as Bihar correspondent for more than three years for Anandabazar Patrika. He covered the 2009 Lok Sabha election and 2010 assembly elections. He also worked with News18-Bangla and covered the Bihar Lok Sabha election in 2019. ... Read More
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
NIA: PFI made hit list of 950; ex-dist judge & activists in it
1 2 3 4 Kochi: The National Investigation Agency (NIA) probing the larger conspiracy involving the banned outfit Popular Front of India (PFI) claimed to have unearthed extensive "hit lists" according to the case documents submitted before the NIA Special Court in Ernakulam. The documents were submitted as evidence opposing the bail pleas filed by accused Muhammed Bilal, Riyasudheen, Ansar K P, and Saheer K V, who allegedly are local PFI leaders. The central agency said PFI's secret 'Reporters Wing' prepared a list of more than 950, which includes a former district judge, activists and political workers. The NIA reiterated its allegation that these documents were part of PFI's 'India 2047' plan, which allegedly aimed to establish Islamic rule in India. The agency claims the documents and related evidence also link the planning and execution of RSS leader K S Sreenivasan's murder at Melamuri Junction in Palakkad on April 16, 2022 as part of a broader conspiracy to terrorise the public and eliminate individuals who opposed the organisation's ideology. According to case documents submitted, investigators seized documents allegedly prepared by the Reporters Wing containing personal details, which include names, photographs, ages, addresses and daily routines of targets. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo NIA claims these lists were found during raids across multiple locations. Around 240 names were recovered from the possession of accused Sirajudheen, a Reporters Wing member. A separate list of 197 individuals was found in a pen drive seized from approver Muhammed Sadik. Additional hit lists with details of over 500 persons were found in the house of absconding accused Ayoob T A. A list containing names of five individuals, including a former district judge of Kerala, was discovered during a raid at PFI's training facility in Aluva, known as Periyar Valley. The NIA also stated that the Periyar Valley campus is an arms training centre of PFI, which was attached by NIA in 2022. According to the agency's submission in the court, the office-bearers, leaders and members besides their affiliates, conspired over the last few years inside and outside Kerala, with their agenda to overthrow democracy in India and implement Islamic rule in the country by 2047, for which they prepared structured stages of progression. Although the accused dismissed the allegations, bail pleas filed by the accused were rejected by the court, citing sufficient prima facie evidence under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Delhi High Court seeks police response on ex-MLA Balyan's bail plea in MCOCA case
1 2 3 New Delhi: Delhi High Court sought the response of police to the bail plea of former AAP MLA Naresh Balyan, arrested in a MCOCA case. Justice Manoj Jain issued notice to Delhi Police on Balyan's bail plea and posted the hearing on July 3 while asking the superintendent of jail to send Balyan's nominal roll and a report on his medical status, as the accused has sought interim bail on health grounds. The court also directed the state to file an updated status report in the matter. Balyan's counsel submitted that his client was arrested in the case under Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act on Dec 4, 2024, the day a trial court granted him bail in an alleged extortion case, and he had been in custody since then. Balyan previously withdrew the bail plea from the high court after police filed a chargesheet in the case. He moved the trial court seeking bail, but it was rejected. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi Balyan had argued there was "no shred of evidence" against him and the case was "completely frivolous", while claiming that the FIR did not even mention his name. The counsel pointed out that the former lawmaker himself raised a complaint against the crime. Delhi Police, however, opposed the bail plea, saying like Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, there was a bar on granting bail to an accused under MCOCA unless certain conditions, including reasonable grounds to show the accused did not commit the crime, were met, which was not the case here. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed! IC Markets Start Now Undo Claiming there was a "continuous unlawful activity" to sustain invocation of MCOCA against Balyan, the special counsel for police said no relief could be given to him. Balyan was accused of being a "facilitator" in an organised crime syndicate. On Jan 15, a trial court denied bail to Balyan, before which Delhi Police had claimed that the investigation was at a crucial stage in the case and he could hamper the probe if allowed the reprieve. The prosecutor cited 16 FIRs lodged against the alleged syndicate members in various parts of Delhi and claimed it "created havoc in the society and amassed huge illegal wealth". New Delhi: Delhi High Court sought the response of police to the bail plea of former AAP MLA Naresh Balyan, arrested in a MCOCA case. Justice Manoj Jain issued notice to Delhi Police on Balyan's bail plea and posted the hearing on July 3 while asking the superintendent of jail to send Balyan's nominal roll and a report on his medical status, as the accused has sought interim bail on health grounds. The court also directed the state to file an updated status report in the matter. Balyan's counsel submitted that his client was arrested in the case under Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act on Dec 4, 2024, the day a trial court granted him bail in an alleged extortion case, and he had been in custody since then. Balyan previously withdrew the bail plea from the high court after police filed a chargesheet in the case. He moved the trial court seeking bail, but it was rejected. Balyan had argued there was "no shred of evidence" against him and the case was "completely frivolous", while claiming that the FIR did not even mention his name. The counsel pointed out that the former lawmaker himself raised a complaint against the crime. Delhi Police, however, opposed the bail plea, saying like Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, there was a bar on granting bail to an accused under MCOCA unless certain conditions, including reasonable grounds to show the accused did not commit the crime, were met, which was not the case here. Claiming there was a "continuous unlawful activity" to sustain invocation of MCOCA against Balyan, the special counsel for police said no relief could be given to him. Balyan was accused of being a "facilitator" in an organised crime syndicate. On Jan 15, a trial court denied bail to Balyan, before which Delhi Police had claimed that the investigation was at a crucial stage in the case and he could hamper the probe if allowed the reprieve. The prosecutor cited 16 FIRs lodged against the alleged syndicate members in various parts of Delhi and claimed it "created havoc in the society and amassed huge illegal wealth".
