logo
Fresh charges expected for former childcare worker Joshua Dale Brown

Fresh charges expected for former childcare worker Joshua Dale Brown

An alleged childcare paedophile accused of scores of child sex offences is expected to be hit with "further charges", according to his legal team.
On Tuesday, lawyers for Joshua Dale Brown appeared in the Melbourne Magistrates' Court, where he is accused of abusing eight children while working as a childcare educator at Creative Garden Early Learning in Point Cook, in Melbourne's western suburbs.
The 26-year-old is facing more than 70 charges including sexually penetrating children, sexual activity in the presence of a child and contaminating food.
Rishi Nathwani KC, who is representing Mr Brown, told the court the charges against his client were "in flux".
"The informant said there will be more charges," Mr Nathwani said, as he asked the court not to release charge sheets to the media.
"It would hinder the realisation of natural justice in his case and prejudice the administration of justice at this stage.
"I'd ask your honour to resist it and not grant it at this stage."
But Magistrate Donna Bakos disagreed.
"The thing about your application Mr Nathwani is that the charges are effectively a matter of public record," she said.
"I'm not prepared to restrict access.
"They are the charges before the court."
Mr Brown was due to return to court in September but during a brief administrative hearing today, that date was changed to early February.
He is now believed to have worked at 24 childcare centres over his career and his alleged offences have sparked a massive public health response, with authorities urging more than 2,000 children to be tested for sexually transmitted diseases as a precaution.
Mr Brown was arrested after police started investigating another man, Michael Simon Wilson, for the alleged rape of a teenage boy at Hoppers Crossing, also in Melbourne's western suburbs.
The ABC understands detectives who examined Mr Wilson's devices discovered material linking him to Mr Brown, who is also facing child abuse material charges.
Police will allege the two men are known to each other.
Mr Wilson was also due to return to court in September but will now return to court in November.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Melbourne star Steven May banned for three games for high hit on Carlton's Francis Evans
Melbourne star Steven May banned for three games for high hit on Carlton's Francis Evans

7NEWS

time4 minutes ago

  • 7NEWS

Melbourne star Steven May banned for three games for high hit on Carlton's Francis Evans

The AFL tribunal has taken an eternity to make decision on Melbourne star Steven May, who was cited for a controversial collision that concussed Carlton's Francis Evans on Saturday night. May faced the tribunal via a video hook-up on Wednesday night, with the tribunal eventually deciding — after deliberating for more than hour — the All-Australian defender was banned for three games. May was cited for rough conduct in an incident that divided the AFL world. It was reported that insiders at the AFL believed the case to be the most challenging they had seen in years. Experts were also divided, with some believing that May had to make a contest of the situation, while others have suggested he needed to slow down or deviate when he realised he was on a collision course with Evans. Star Channel 7 commentators Daisy Thomas and Kane Cornes both believe May had little choice but to contest the ball and make contact. Thomas said ahead of the tribunal: 'My mind would be blown if he does not get off. This is a footballing act to its core.' But North Melbourne great David King said May needed to be punished because Evans was hit 'with the absolute point of the shoulder' and May hit him 'flush' The AFL's match review officer Michael Christian graded May's contact as careless conduct, severe impact and high contact. But May told the tribunal on Wednesday that he could not believe he didn't take possession of the ball. 'I thought I did everything right, so I'm just a bit shocked,' he said. May and Evans clashed at speed, but Evans arrived a fraction of a second earlier than his opponent, getting his hands to the ball before May caught him high. Melbourne lawyer Adrian Anderson said there were nine reasons why the incident wasn't rough conduct, which included both players were travelling at pace, May was 'contesting the ball', the ball's bounce was 'unexpected', May didn't move off line, he didn't jump off ground, and May was significantly taller than Evans. Before the final decision was handed down, the tribunal deliberated for over an hour leading one tribunal reporter to wonder if the panel had gone into ghost mode. 'Has the Tribunal f***n ghosted me?' Fox Footy reporter David Zita wondered on social media, while a fan said: 'Ghosted all of us ...' Zita continued as he waited for the verdict: 'I'm sorry, but what the actual f***.' Eventually, the tribunal panel released its findings, deciding May was banned for three games. Even immediately after the incident there was debate on the hit, with Blues coach Michael Voss saying May's act was fair. 'Both players were in line with the ball and seemed to be attacking it,' he said post-match. 'Both sort of making a play at the ball, maybe one person was one step late, and obviously then the incident happens. 'But for Frankie (Evans) to be able to hold his line with a pretty strong man coming the other way was a pretty important moment in the game.' And Melbourne coach Simon Goodwin said May's intent was 'clearly' to win the ball. 'If you just look at his pure intent, it was purely for the ball and it was unfortunate,' he said. Goodwin said the AFL was doing an 'unbelievable' job in trying to eradicate concussion from the game. 'It's important that we limit it as much as we can but there will be football incidents where someone is concussed,' he said. May was concussed himself in a separate incident and was already ruled out of the Round 20 game.

Melbourne star Steven May banned for three games for high hit on Carlton's Francis Evans
Melbourne star Steven May banned for three games for high hit on Carlton's Francis Evans

West Australian

time4 minutes ago

  • West Australian

Melbourne star Steven May banned for three games for high hit on Carlton's Francis Evans

The AFL tribunal has taken an eternity to make decision on Melbourne star Steven May, who was cited for a controversial collision that concussed Carlton's Francis Evans on Saturday night. May faced the tribunal via a video hook-up on Wednesday night, with the tribunal eventually deciding — after deliberating for more than hour — the All-Australian defender was banned for three games. May was cited for rough conduct in an incident that divided the AFL world . It was reported that insiders at the AFL believed the case to be the most challenging they had seen in years. Experts were also divided, with some believing that May had to make a contest of the situation, while others have suggested he needed to slow down or deviate when he realised he was on a collision course with Evans. Star Channel 7 commentators Daisy Thomas and Kane Cornes both believe May had little choice but to contest the ball and make contact. Thomas said ahead of the tribunal: 'My mind would be blown if he does not get off. This is a footballing act to its core.' But North Melbourne great David King said May needed to be punished because Evans was hit 'with the absolute point of the shoulder' and May hit him 'flush' The AFL's match review officer Michael Christian graded May's contact as careless conduct, severe impact and high contact. But May told the tribunal on Wednesday that he could not believe he didn't take possession of the ball. 'I thought I did everything right, so I'm just a bit shocked,' he said. May and Evans clashed at speed, but Evans arrived a fraction of a second earlier than his opponent, getting his hands to the ball before May caught him high. Melbourne lawyer Adrian Anderson said there were nine reasons why the incident wasn't rough conduct, which included both players were travelling at pace, May was 'contesting the ball', the ball's bounce was 'unexpected', May didn't move off line, he didn't jump off ground, and May was significantly taller than Evans. Before the final decision was handed down, the tribunal deliberated for over an hour leading one tribunal reporter to wonder if the panel had gone into ghost mode. 'Has the Tribunal f***n ghosted me?' Fox Footy reporter David Zita wondered on social media, while a fan said: 'Ghosted all of us ...' Zita continued as he waited for the verdict: 'I'm sorry, but what the actual f***.' Eventually, the tribunal panel released its findings, deciding May was banned for three games. Even immediately after the incident there was debate on the hit, with Blues coach Michael Voss saying May's act was fair. 'Both players were in line with the ball and seemed to be attacking it,' he said post-match. 'Both sort of making a play at the ball, maybe one person was one step late, and obviously then the incident happens. 'But for Frankie (Evans) to be able to hold his line with a pretty strong man coming the other way was a pretty important moment in the game.' And Melbourne coach Simon Goodwin said May's intent was 'clearly' to win the ball. 'If you just look at his pure intent, it was purely for the ball and it was unfortunate,' he said. Goodwin said the AFL was doing an 'unbelievable' job in trying to eradicate concussion from the game. 'It's important that we limit it as much as we can but there will be football incidents where someone is concussed,' he said. May was concussed himself in a separate incident and was already ruled out of the Round 20 game.

Secrets of the missing Joker Steve Williams: The underworld ghost
Secrets of the missing Joker Steve Williams: The underworld ghost

News.com.au

time33 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Secrets of the missing Joker Steve Williams: The underworld ghost

It's been 20 years since notorious bikie boss Steve Williams vanished without a trace. He was last seen on June 14, 2005, at about 2.30pm at the Gepps Cross Hotel in Adelaide. Police believe he was then dropped at a trucking company in Gillman by an associate. His body has never been found and, while bikies, his family and the police all have differing theories on what happened to the Gypsy Joker, all agree he was likely murdered. A $200,000 reward is still on offer for information leading to a conviction or the recovery of Mr Williams' remains. Now, investigative reporter Luke Williams (no relation) revisits the case and uncovers secrets of the missing Joker in this three-part subscriber exclusive documentary launching Friday. Major Crime detectives believe the case is solvable – and that there are people who know exactly what happened to the notorious bikie. Detective Sergeant Paul Ward, Major Crime Investigation Branch, said 'despite the code of silence in outlaw motorcycle gangs' the police had 'received information and tip offs on potential burial sites' over the years. 'Over the last 20 years, friendships and loyalties may have changed,' he said in a statement marking the anniversary of Williams' disappearance. 'People are 20 years older, they may now have children of their own. I ask them to put themselves in Blayze Williams' position, growing up not knowing what happened to her father. 'For the sake of the Steven Williams' family, if you have information, please contact Crime Stoppers and help find his remains and bring him home to his family.' Watch Episode 1 here from 5am Friday Watch Episode 2 from 5am Saturday 'I was wrong about who killed dad': Blayze's shocking confession Watch Episode 3 from 5am Sunday

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store