At least 13 may have killed themselves over UK's Post Office wrongful convictions scandal
Another 59 people contemplated suicide over the scandal, one of the biggest miscarriages of justice in U.K. history.
From around 1999 to 2015, hundreds of people who worked at Post Office branches were wrongly convicted of theft, fraud and false accounting, with some imprisoned and others forced into bankruptcy. Some lost their homes, while others suffered health problems or breakdowns in their relationships or became ostracized by their communities.
Retired judge Wyn Williams, who chairs a public inquiry into the scandal, said in a report published Tuesday that 13 people killed themselves as a consequence of a faulty Post Office accounting system 'showing an illusory shortfall in branch accounts,' according to their families.
The problems at the Post Office, which is state-owned but operates as a private business, were known for years. But the full scale of the injustice didn't become widely known until last year, when a TV docudrama propelled the scandal to national headlines and galvanized support for victims.
The culprit was software called Horizon, which the Post Office introduced 25 years ago across branches to automate sales accounting. When the software showed false account shortfalls, the Post Office accused branch managers of dishonesty and obliged them to repay the money.
In all, the report said that about 1,000 people were prosecuted and convicted based on evidence from the faulty system. The government has since introduced legislation to reverse the convictions and compensate the victims.
Jo Hamilton, a former Post Office manager and a lead campaigner, said that the report 'shows the full scale of the horror that they unleashed on us.'
Tuesday's report was the first to be published from the inquiry, which is expected to issue a further report at a later date that will potentially attribute blame.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Home Office intervenes as English council bids to stop housing refugees
THE Home Office has asked to intervene in a court case brought by an English council attempting to block asylum seekers from being housed in a local hotel. Epping Forest District Council sought an injunction from the Royal Court of Justice on Tuesday to prevent asylum seekers from being allowed to stay at the former Bell Hotel in the area. If granted, the injunction would mean the hotel's owner, Somani Hotels Limited, must stop housing asylum seekers at the site within 14 days. The Home Office was not represented at a previous hearing in the case on Friday. (Image: Jordan Pettitt/PA Wire) However, at the start of a hearing on Tuesday, at which Justice Eyre is due to hand down his ruling on whether the injunction should be granted, the department asked to be allowed to intervene. Edward Brown KC, for the Home Office, said: 'If the injunction is granted by the court, it will substantially impact on the Home Secretary's statutory duties.' He continued: 'The local authority should in fact have given some consideration to the wider public interest in this application.' Brown added that the injunction bid 'causes particular acute difficulties at the present date'. Piers Riley-Smith, representing Somani Hotels Limited, which owns the Bell Hotel, told the High Court that the company supports the Home Office's request to intervene in Epping Forest District Council's bid for a temporary injunction. But Philip Coppel KC, for the council, said that the Home Office's request was 'a thoroughly unprincipled application made in a thoroughly unprincipled way', and that the department knew of the injunction bid last week but 'sat on their hands'. More to follow…
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Home secretary intervenes to try to halt bid to ban asylum seekers at protest-hit hotel
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has made a last-ditch attempt to halt a bid in the High Court to remove asylum seekers from a protest-hit migrant hotel. In a novel move, Ms Cooper has asked the judge for permission to intervene in Epping Forest District Council's bid for a temporary injunction blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex. Edward Brown KC, for the Home Office, said that 'shortage of asylum accommodation is acute' and if Epping's bid was successful 'there could be similar applications made elsewhere, aggravating the pressures on the asylum estate'. If granted, the injunction would mean the hotel's owner, Somani Hotels Limited, must stop housing asylum seekers at the site within 14 days. The Home Office was not represented at a previous hearing in the case on Friday, but at the start of a hearing on Tuesday, at which Mr Justice Eyre is due to hand down his ruling on whether the injunction should be granted, the department asked to be allowed to intervene. Mr Brown KC, for the Home Office, said: 'If the injunction is granted by the court, it will substantially impact on the Home Secretary's statutory duties.' He continued: 'The local authority should in fact have given some consideration to the wider public interest in this application.'He added that the injunction bid 'causes particular acute difficulties at the present date'. He admitted that the home secretary had not applied to join previous injunction applications made by other councils, but said there was 'a very powerful reason' to do it in this case. Mr Brown KC said the court had not fully considered the wider impacts of the council's application on the duty of the Home Office to provide accommodation for asylum seekers. 'The issues are so grave that the secretary of state believes it essential to bring it to the attention of the court. We accept it is novel', Mr Brown KC said. Philip Coppel KC, for the council, said the last minute bid to intervene was a 'thoroughly unprincipled application'. 'Its effect is to derail the court process, to upend the court's delivery of your judgement', he told the judge. 'It's not enough to say we've got a problem, or a demand, without saying what's on the other side to accommodate that demand,' Mr Coppel added. Mr Justice Eyre noted that the Home Office was notified of the injunction application on 12 August. This is a breaking story...
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What is the coalition of the willing?
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has spoken with the UK's allies in the so-called 'coalition of the willing', amid a multinational push to guarantee Ukraine's security once fighting stops in eastern Europe. Here, the PA news agency looks at who is in the coalition and what they can achieve: – What is the coalition of the willing? At least 31 countries have signed up to help defend a peace deal in Ukraine, once one is struck, in an effort to ward off a future attack by Russia. The UK is among those 'willing', with the Government prepared to put 'boots on the ground and planes in the air', Sir Keir said when he unveiled plans for the coalition at London's Lancaster House in March. But it is not the first of its kind. Former US president Bill Clinton suggested in 1994 that sanctions could be imposed by a 'so-called coalition of the willing', to quell North Korea's nuclear ambitions, and his successor George W Bush announced a similar alliance in the early-2000s to disarm the then-Iraqi president Saddam Hussein. – Who has signed up? Leaders from the UK, France, Germany, Finland and Italy have all indicated their willingness to defend a peace deal in Ukraine. They joined Donald Trump, who has not signed up to the coalition, and his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky in the White House this month. A total 31 countries are in the coalition, according to the Government's National Security Strategy 2025. Beyond Europe, it has attracted support from the Canadian and Australian prime ministers Mark Carney and Anthony Albanese. – Will British troops go to Ukraine? After Sir Keir's commitment to put 'boots on the ground and planes in the air together with others' to militarily defend a peace deal, No 10 unveiled its support for a Multinational Force Ukraine, in an effort to help regenerate Ukraine's own armed forces. Military chiefs have previously met in Paris to agree a strategy for the force, and to coordinate plans with the EU, Nato, the US and more than 200 planners from 30 international partners. And in Washington, European leaders discussed early-stage proposals for a security guarantee, similar to Nato's article five principle – that an attack one member is an attack on the entire bloc. – What has the coalition achieved? 'The coalition of the willing has been successful in advocating for Ukraine and communicating with Trump and the US administration during its outreach to Russia,' says Edward Arnold from the Royal United Services Institute (Rusi) think tank. 'Moreover, it has undertaken lengthy military planning and has established a leadership and command structure. However, much remains uncertain, especially the nature of any agreed ceasefire or whether a broader peace process is on the cards.' But the US's commitment is 'far from certain', he told the PA news agency, and warned that 'European planners cannot progress the planning until the US position is agreed'. – What is Nato's role? Nato's Mark Rutte has attended meetings of the coalition of the willing, and Mr Trump appeared pleased with his efforts at their meeting when he described the secretary general as 'a great, great political leader'. But Mr Arnold warned that an article five-style mutual defence deal could amount to 'de facto' membership of the bloc for Ukraine, something which Russian president Vladimir Putin 'is unlikely to agree to'. He said: ''Nato article five-style' guarantees are being talked about but Nato is a unique alliance which is not able to be replicated for Ukraine. 'Moreover, if any coalition of the willing member signed a mutual defence clause with Ukraine, and then Ukraine was attacked further, that could conceivably draw that Nato member into direct conflict with Russia, thereby potentially triggering article five.' Sir Keir has welcomed 'some sort of article five-style guarantees', which he said 'fits' with some of the coalition's work, and Mr Trump who met Mr Putin in an Alaska summit claimed Moscow will 'accept' multinational efforts to guarantee Ukraine's security.
