Home secretary intervenes to try to halt bid to ban asylum seekers at protest-hit hotel
In a novel move, Ms Cooper has asked the judge for permission to intervene in Epping Forest District Council's bid for a temporary injunction blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex.
Edward Brown KC, for the Home Office, said that 'shortage of asylum accommodation is acute' and if Epping's bid was successful 'there could be similar applications made elsewhere, aggravating the pressures on the asylum estate'.
If granted, the injunction would mean the hotel's owner, Somani Hotels Limited, must stop housing asylum seekers at the site within 14 days. The Home Office was not represented at a previous hearing in the case on Friday, but at the start of a hearing on Tuesday, at which Mr Justice Eyre is due to hand down his ruling on whether the injunction should be granted, the department asked to be allowed to intervene.
Mr Brown KC, for the Home Office, said: 'If the injunction is granted by the court, it will substantially impact on the Home Secretary's statutory duties.'
He continued: 'The local authority should in fact have given some consideration to the wider public interest in this application.'He added that the injunction bid 'causes particular acute difficulties at the present date'.
He admitted that the home secretary had not applied to join previous injunction applications made by other councils, but said there was 'a very powerful reason' to do it in this case. Mr Brown KC said the court had not fully considered the wider impacts of the council's application on the duty of the Home Office to provide accommodation for asylum seekers.
'The issues are so grave that the secretary of state believes it essential to bring it to the attention of the court. We accept it is novel', Mr Brown KC said.
Philip Coppel KC, for the council, said the last minute bid to intervene was a 'thoroughly unprincipled application'. 'Its effect is to derail the court process, to upend the court's delivery of your judgement', he told the judge.
'It's not enough to say we've got a problem, or a demand, without saying what's on the other side to accommodate that demand,' Mr Coppel added.
Mr Justice Eyre noted that the Home Office was notified of the injunction application on 12 August.
This is a breaking story...
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Telegraph owner RedBird to turn page with Whitehall filing
The putative owners of The Daily Telegraph will take another step towards gaining control of the right-wing newspaper in the coming days when they formally notify Whitehall of their plans. Sky News has learnt that lawyers acting for RedBird Capital Partners, the US-based investor which will own a majority stake in the publisher if the deal is approved, could set out the company's proposals in a filing with the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) as soon as this week. The move would represent another step towards concluding the 27-month hiatus over the Telegraph's ownership - a period which began with Lloyds Banking Group forcing the newspaper's parent company into insolvency proceedings over outstanding loans owed by the Barclay family. Sources said that the notification by RedBird Capital's lawyers would pave the way for the lifting of an interim enforcement order (IEO) imposed by Lucy Frazer, the then Conservative culture secretary, in December 2023, which prevented the acquirers from exerting any control over the Telegraph. The removal of the IEO is likely to result in the DCMS issuing a new public interest intervention notice (PIIN), which would prompt investigations by Ofcom and the Competition and Markets Authority into the £500m takeover. Last month, the House of Lords approved legislation to allow a UAE state-backed investor - IMI - to acquire a stake of up to 15% in the Telegraph as part of the RedBird deal. The takeover had originally been conceived as a joint endeavour between RedBird and IMI but was thwarted by political opposition to foreign state ownership of national newspapers. IMI is controlled by Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the vice-president of the United Arab Emirates and ultimate owner of Manchester City Football Club. Other bidders tried to gatecrash the deal, with the field of rival contenders led by Dovid Efune, the owner of The New York Sun. Last month, his key backer - the hedge fund founder Jeremy Hosking - told Sky News their bid was "ready to go" if the RedBird-led transaction fell apart. Announcing its agreement to acquire the Daily and Sunday Telegraph titles in May, Gerry Cardinale, founder of RedBird Capital, said it marked the "start of a new era" for two of Britain's most prominent newspapers. However, it is nearly a month since the Lords voted to approve the legislation allowing IMI to own a minority stake, a verdict which prompted Mr Cardinale to say: "With legislation now in place, we will move quickly and in the forthcoming days work with DCMS to progress to completion and implement new ownership for The Telegraph." Sources said the formal notification to Whitehall could come as soon as this week but could yet be delayed further. Senior Telegraph executives and journalists are said to be frustrated at the latest phase of the process. Sky News has already revealed that Sir Leonard Blavatnik, owner of the DAZN sports streaming platform, and Daily Mail proprietor Lord Rothermere are preparing to buy minority stakes as part of the RedBird-led transaction. RedBird said in May that it was "in discussions with select UK-based minority investors with print media expertise and strong commitment to upholding the editorial values of the Telegraph". The Telegraph titles' parent company was forced into insolvency proceedings in 2023 by Lloyds, which ran out of patience with the Barclay family, their long-standing owner. RedBird IMI, a joint venture between the two firms, paid £600m several months later to acquire a call option that was intended to convert into ownership of the Telegraph newspapers and The Spectator magazine. The Spectator was sold last year for £100m to Sir Paul Marshall, the hedge fund billionaire, who has installed Lord Gove, the former cabinet minister, as its editor. None of the parties involved in the Telegraph ownership situation
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Asylum seekers to be removed from Essex hotel as council granted injunction
Asylum seekers to be removed from Essex hotel as council granted injunction Asylum seekers will be removed from an Essex hotel after a council was granted a temporary High Court injunction blocking them from being housed there. Epping Forest District Council had asked a judge to issue an interim injunction stopping migrants from being accommodated at the Bell Hotel in Epping. The injunction sought by the council meant the hotel's owner, Somani Hotels Limited, would have had to stop housing asylum seekers there within 14 days. The hotel has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. In a ruling on Tuesday, Mr Justice Eyre granted the temporary injunction, but extended the time limit by which the hotel must stop housing asylum seekers to September 12. He also refused to give Somani Hotels the green light to challenge his ruling, but the company could still ask the Court of Appeal for the go-ahead to appeal against the judgment. In his judgment, he said that while the council had not 'definitively established' that Somani Hotels had breached planning rules, 'the strength of the claimant's case is such that it weighs in favour' of granting the injunction. He continued that the 'risk of injustice is greater' if a temporary injunction was not granted. A further hearing on whether the injunction should be made permanent is expected to be held at a later date, and is expected to last two days. Several protests and counter-protests have been held in the town since a then-resident at the hotel was accused of trying to kiss a teenage girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu has denied charges against him and is due to stand trial later this month. A second man who resides at the hotel, Syrian national Mohammed Sharwarq, has separately been charged with seven offences, while several other men have been charged over disorder outside the hotel. The council said last week it was seeking an injunction due to 'unprecedented levels of protest and disruption' in connection with asylum seeker accommodation. Chris Whitbread, leader of the council, said the situation 'cannot go on' but the Government 'is not listening'. At a hearing on Friday, barristers for the council said that the site's 'sole lawful use' was as a hotel and that Somani Hotels had breached planning rules by using it to house asylum seekers. Philip Coppel KC, for the authority, said the situation was 'wholly unacceptable' and provided a 'feeding ground for unrest'. He said: 'There has been what can be described as an increase in community tension, the catalyst of which has been the use of the Bell Hotel to place asylum seekers.' Mr Coppel continued: 'It is not the asylum seekers who are acting unlawfully. It is the defendant, by allowing the hotel to be used to house asylum seekers.' He added: 'It really could not be much worse than this.' Piers Riley-Smith, for Somani Hotels, said that 'disagreement with Government policy' did not justify a 'draconian' injunction and that there would be 'hardship' caused to the company and those housed at the hotel. He also said that contracts to house asylum seekers were a 'financial lifeline' for the hotel, which was only 1% full in August 2022, when it was open to paying customers. Mr Riley-Smith said: 'It is clear that recent protests have expanded far beyond the local community and have gone into concerns about wider ideological and political issues from those outside the community. 'Those particular ideological, non-community concerns are not relevant to planning.' Following the ruling, Mr Whitbread said: 'I am delighted. This is great news for our residents. The last few weeks have placed an intolerable strain on our community but today we have some great news.' He continued: 'Home Office policy ignores the issues and concerns of local residents that the council represents. 'Today we have made a step towards redressing the imbalance and showing that local people do have some say, whatever the Home Office thinks.' Before judgment was handed down on Tuesday, barristers for the Home Office asked to intervene in the case, citing the 'substantial impact' caused to the Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, in performing her legal duties to asylum seekers. Edward Brown KC, for the department, told the court that moving asylum seekers in 'extremely short order' would cause a 'very significant operational burden' and 'particular acute difficulties' for the Government. But Mr Justice Eyre dismissed the Home Office's bid, stating that the department's involvement was 'not necessary'.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
US spy chief says UK has dropped its Apple backdoor demand
The U.K has dropped its demand for special access to Apple's cloud systems, or a 'backdoor,' following negotiations with the Trump administration, according to U.S. National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard. 'As a result, the U.K. has agreed to drop its mandate for Apple to provide a 'back door' that would have enabled access to the protected encrypted data of American citizens and encroached on our civil liberties,' Gabbard wrote in a post on X. She also claimed that she worked along President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance in the negotiations. This is the latest (and unexpected) development in a months-long saga that saw the British government secretly demanding Apple to grant its authorities access — essentially asking for a backdoor — to the encrypted data of iCloud users, effectively anywhere in the world, particularly those who turn on Advanced Data Protection (or ADP), an opt-in security feature. ADP turns on end-to-end encryption for iCloud, meaning only the user can access their files stored on Apple's cloud servers. The existence of the legal demand was first reported by The Washington Post in February, which was made under the U.K.'s Investigatory Powers Act 2016, also known as the Snoopers' Charter. The request sparked outrage and condemnation from privacy and security experts worldwide, who argued that if the U.K. government obtained what it wanted, it would weaken privacy for the whole world, and also open the door for more governments to make similar demands, even in other companies' technologies. Apple initially responded by removing ADP from the U.K., meaning new users couldn't turn it on. The company also said it would give guidance to existing users who 'will eventually need to disable this security feature.' In the meantime, Apple also reportedly challenged the backdoor mandate in court, a case that was initially secret but was then ruled to be held in public. Apple and the U.K. Home Office, which initiated the demand on behalf of the British government, did not respond to requests for comment. Olivia Colemanm, the press secretary of the U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence, referred to a February letter to Sen. Wyden and Rep. Biggs. Apple previously told TechCrunch that the company has 'never built a backdoor or master key' to any of its products or services and it 'never will.' Sign in to access your portfolio