Former Royal Navy head sacked after investigation finds his behaviour fell 'far short'
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) launched an investigation into Admiral Sir Ben Key after he was reportedly suspended as First Sea Lord in May, over an alleged affair with a female subordinate.
The MoD confirmed that Admiral Sir Ben's service with the Royal Navy had now been terminated.
Chief of Defence Staff Admiral Sir Tony Radakin said: "We expect the highest standards of behaviour from our service personnel and our civil servants."We investigate all allegations of inappropriate behaviour and will take robust action against anyone found to have fallen short of our standards, regardless of their seniority."
Admiral Sir Ben Key said: "Serving as First Sea Lord has been one of the greatest privileges of my life, and I pay tribute to the dedicated and professional officers, sailors, Royal Marines and civil servants who make up the Royal Navy."I deeply regret my conduct in the spring of last year, which fell well below the standard I set for myself and that which I set for the Royal Navy. As such, I fully accept the decision of the Defence Council.
"I am very sorry to those I have hurt personally, and I apologise to everyone who serves with the Royal Navy.
"Finally, I am very grateful for the support of my wife, family and friends during a very difficult time."
Admiral Sir Ben joined the Navy in 1984 and saw action in Kosovo and Iraq.
He had command of a number of military vessels before becoming commanding officer of the aircraft carrier HMS Illustrious in 2009.
In August 2021, he took charge of the UK's evacuation efforts in Afghanistan after the fall of Kabul to the Taliban, before becoming First Sea Lord in November 2021, until his suspension in May 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Evening Standard
9 hours ago
- Evening Standard
Taliban fighters 'brought to the UK on secret airlift flights'
One man, who arrived before the fall of Kabul, is believed to have applied for his Taliban-connected relatives to follow him. The MoD confirmed he is now in Britain but did not disclose the whereabouts of his Taliban sympathiser family.
BBC News
12 hours ago
- BBC News
'Massive challenge' as refugees sleeping rough rise in Derby
When Mohammad arrived in Derby in 2022 from Afghanistan, he was relieved to have escaped the Taliban government which had just regained was staying alone in a hotel in the city with other asylum seekers awaiting a decision from the Home Office on whether they could was delighted to be granted refugee status in 2023 - but he was then given a month to leave his marked the beginning of a nerve-wracking four-week wait to see if the local council could help. Mohammad says worry was widespread in the hotel among those granted refugee status that they would soon be on the streets."In Derby, the demand for housing is very, very high", he the final day of his notice period arrived, the council still had not managed to find him a friend then approached him with a solution - a charity which offers refugees a temporary room with a local family while they try to establish themselves. "One of my friends was living with a hosting family. I contacted him, he said there is a community of people helping [refugees] who are homeless," Mohammed said. Mohammad says he felt lucky to come into contact with the Derby refugee charity Upbeat Communities the day before he says he would have been left on the he knew from the hotel told him they had been forced to gather at the train station at midnight, night after night, where the council routinely picks homeless refugees up and places them in short-term emergency accommodation. The Home Office is responsible for housing asylum seekers, but they are moved on from their government-funded accommodation a month after they are granted refugee status. In 2023, there were 187 refugees classified as homeless in Derby. That number increased by 70% in 2024 to number of those refugees found sleeping rough for at least one night in 2023 was 16. By 2024 that number had increased to 161 - a tenfold increase. Local councils in the UK have a legal responsibility to help anyone who is homeless or at risk of homelessness - but many are facing significant challenges meeting housing demand. 'Massive challenge' Andrew Jackson who oversees the Host Derby scheme at the charity which helped Mohammad, says they have seen referrals rise to the point where they can now only help around half of the cases."We initially started it up to respond to the needs of asylum seekers [whose claim for asylum had been rejected by the government] who were destitute, who needed help with housing," he said."But over the last few years we've seen increasing demand from those recognised as refugees in the UK, at risk of homelessness, needing support once their Home Office support stopped."The challenges around social housing demand, around private rental costs, means that people are ending up in street homelessness."It's a massive challenge, a massive situation." Mr Jackson said a backlog of asylum seeker claims from the previous government under the Rwanda policy that have suddenly been dealt with by the Home Office could be a factor behind the rise in the numbers sleeping City Council says that it recognises that more refugees are sleeping rough and considered homelessness, but the most vulnerable must be prioritised in the long queue for social housing. The authority says it cannot prioritise refugees, unless they have other vulnerabilities. Gillian Scothern was a volunteer with Upbeat Communities helping with English language lessons and started to notice many of the refugees she was helping were suddenly becoming homeless on receiving their decision from the government."I felt quite bad about that because we've got spare rooms," Ms Sothern said. She then decided to make the spare rooms at her home available to refugees through the host scheme, which she described as "important"."The first person to come, he was so traumatised for sleeping rough for such a long time. "He had a bad knee injury and was about to get it operated on, and it was cancelled at the last moment because they discovered he was homeless and they wouldn't be able to discharge him anywhere. "I think he felt that his life was finished, more or I just thought, he's exactly the same age as my son. And look at him.""We talk so much about human rights, and one of the basic human rights is surely to have food and shelter."These are people who want to get on in life. They just want to make a life again." Mohammad is now looking forward to a brighter future as his family have recently been able to join him in the he says he will always be grateful to his host family."They gave me everything," he said.
Telegraph
14 hours ago
- Telegraph
As HMS Prince of Wales cruises the Pacific, it's time to take a look at our Carrier Air
There have been two developments this month that concern the future of Royal Navy carrier-borne aviation, one negative and one positive. The negative one was the National Audit Office's report on the UK's F-35 capability. The second was the positive progress on uncrewed systems to operate from our two aircraft carriers. In the NAO report on the F-35, there are some positives. It's a good jet, 'many times more able to survive and successfully deliver attacks than previous UK aircraft.' It starts looking less positive when current capabilities are compared to various MoD targets. 'Approximately one third of the fleet was available to perform all required missions in 2024'. 'Approximately half were available to perform at least one of seven possible missions'. The current carrier strike group deployment has forced the issues with lack of engineers into the spotlight whilst the lack of global spares was rather embarrassingly exposed during the same deployment by the jet stranded in India recently. The delivery forecast is grim and costs are high. So far we have received 38 jets and spent $11bn, giving a rough figure of £289m per jet. That sounds very shocking, and indeed it is, but we should remember that the RAF's 90-odd flyable Typhoons cost us something like £35bn in today's money to acquire – a nose-bleeding £388m per jet. And they are fourth generation, whereas the F-35 is a modern fifth generation fighter. So it could be worse.
