Louisiana police officials charged with taking bribes in alleged visa fraud plot
The false police reports would indicate that the immigrant was a victim of a crime that would qualify them to apply for a so-called U visa, US attorney Alexander C Van Hook said Wednesday at a news conference in Lafayette, Louisiana. He said the police officials were paid $5,000 for each name they provided falsified reports for – and that there were hundreds of names.
There had been 'an unusual concentration of armed robberies of people who were not from Louisiana' when the scheme unraveled, Van Hook said, noting that two other people were also charged in the alleged plot.
'In fact, the armed robberies never took place,' he said.
Earlier in July, a federal grand jury in Shreveport returned a 62 count indictment charging the five defendants with crimes including conspiracy to commit visa fraud, visa fraud, bribery, mail fraud and money laundering, Van Hook said.
Those charged are Oakdale police chief Chad Doyle, Forest Hill police chief Glynn Dixon, former Glenmora police chief Tebo Onishea, Michael 'Freck' Slaney, a marshal in Oakdale, and Chandrakant 'Lala' Patel, an Oakdale businessman.
If convicted, the defendants could face years or even decades of jail time. Court and jail records don't list attorneys for any of them.
According to investigators, people seeking special visas would reach out to Patel, who would contact the lawmen and offer them a payment in exchange for falsified police reports that named the migrants as victims of armed robberies that never occurred.
The scheme went on for nearly a decade, Van Hook said.
Asked what might happen to the people who allegedly paid bribes, including whether they might be charged or their immigration status might be changed, Van Hook said he couldn't say yet – but that the investigation is ongoing.
Getting a U visa can give some crime victims and their families a pathway to US citizenship. About 10,000 people got them in the 12-month period that ended 30 September 2022, which was the most recent period for which the US Homeland Security Department has published data.
These special visas, which were created by Congress in 2000, are specifically for victims of certain crimes 'who have suffered mental or physical abuse' and are 'helpful to law enforcement or government officials in the investigation or prosecution of criminal activity,' based on a description of the program published by the US Citizenship and Immigration Services.
'These visas are designed to help law enforcement and prosecutors prosecute crimes where you need the victim or the witness there, ' Van Hook said. 'U visas serve a valuable purpose, and this is a case where they were abused.'
When asked about the extent of the fraud, Van Hook said there are 'hundreds of names' — specifically for visas that were approved.
At least two of the police chiefs had been arrested as of the Wednesday morning news conference, authorities said.
A spokesperson for the Louisiana attorney general's office, Lester Duhé, said that agency was assisting federal investigators with 'court-authorized activities' when asked about its role in the case.
The current or former police chiefs are from small central Louisiana municipalities that are near each other. They're in a part of the state that is home to multiple immigration detention facilities.
Although Louisiana doesn't share a border with a foreign country, there are nine ICE detention facilities in the state collectively holding nearly 7,000 people.
Local news outlets reported seeing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) and FBI agents entering the homes of two of the chiefs. Van Hook said authorities searched multiple police departments and a Subway sandwich shop that Patel operated.
Van Hook and others said at the news conference that the arrests do not mean the indicted chiefs' departments are corrupt.
In 2021, the USCIS warned that the U visa program was susceptible to fraud after a federal inspector general's audit found that administrators hadn't addressed deficiencies in their process.
The audit found that USCIS approved a handful of suspicious law enforcement signatures that were not cross-referenced with a database of authorized signatures, according to the inspector general's report. They were also not closely tracking fraud case outcomes, the total number of U visas granted per year, and were not effectively managing the backlog, which led to crime victims waiting for nearly 10 years before receiving a U visa.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
13 minutes ago
- Sky News
US trade war: The state of play as Trump signs order imposing new tariffs - but there are more delays
Donald Trump's trade war has been difficult to keep up with, to put it mildly. For all the threats and bluster of the US election campaign last year to the on-off implementation of trade tariffs - and more threats - since he returned to the White House in January, the president 's protectionist agenda has been haphazard. Trading partners, export-focused firms, customs agents and even his own trade team have had a lot on their plates as deadlines were imposed - and then retracted - and the tariff numbers tinkered. While the UK was the first country to secure a truce of sorts, described as a "deal", the vast majority of nations have failed to secure any agreement. Deal or no deal, no country is on better trading terms with the United States than it was when Trump 2.0 began. Here, we examine what nations and blocs are on the hook for, and the potential consequences, as Mr Trump's suspended "reciprocal" tariffs prepare to take effect. That will now not happen until 7 August. 2:49 Why was 1 August such an important date? To understand the present day, we must first wind the clock back to early April. Then, Mr Trump proudly showed off a board in the White House Rose Garden containing a list of countries and the tariffs they would immediately face in retaliation for the rates they impose on US-made goods. He called it "liberation day". The tariff numbers were big and financial markets took fright. Just days later, the president announced a 90-day pause in those rates for all countries except China, to allow for negotiations. The initial deadline of 9 July was then extended again to 1 August. Late on 31 July, Mr Trump signed the executive order but said that the tariff rates would not kick in for seven additional days to allow for the orders to be fully communicated. Since April, only eight countries or trading blocs have agreed "deals" to limit the reciprocal tariffs and - in some cases - sectoral tariffs already in place. Who has agreed a deal over the past 120 days? The UK, Japan, Indonesia, the European Union and South Korea are among the eight to be facing lower rates than had been threatened back in April. China has not really done a deal but it is no longer facing punitive tariffs above 100%. Its decision to retaliate against US levies prompted a truce level to be agreed between the pair, pending further talks. There's a backlash against the EU over its deal, with many national leaders accusing the European Commission of giving in too easily. A broad 15% rate is to apply, down from the threatened 30%, while the bloc has also committed to US investment and to pay for US-produced natural gas. 1:40 Where does the UK stand? We've already mentioned that the UK was the first to avert the worst of what was threatened. While a 10% baseline tariff covers the vast majority of the goods we send to the US, aerospace products are exempt. Our steel sector has not been subjected to Trump's 50% tariffs and has been facing down a 25% rate. The government announced on Thursday that it would not apply under the terms of a quota system. UK car exports were on a 25% rate until the end of June when the deal agreed in May took that down to 10% under a similar quota arrangement that exempts the first 100,000 cars from a levy. Who has not done a deal? Canada is among the big names facing a 35% baseline tariff rate. That is up from 25% and covers all goods not subject to a US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement that involves rules of origin. America is its biggest export market and it has long been in Trump's sights. Mexico, another country deeply ingrained in the US supply chain, is facing a 30% rate but has been given an extra 90 days to secure a deal. Brazil is facing a 50% rate. For India, it's 25%. What are the consequences? This is where it all gets a bit woolly - for good reasons. The trade war is unprecedented in scale, given the global nature of modern business. It takes time for official statistics to catch up, especially when tariff rates chop and change so much. Any duties on exports to the United States are a threat to company sales and economic growth alike - in both the US and the rest of the world. Many carmakers, for example, have refused to offer guidance on their outlooks for revenue and profits. Barriers to business are never good but the International Monetary Fund earlier this week raised its forecast for global economic growth this year from 2.8% to 3%. Some of that increase can be explained by the deals involving major economies, including Japan, the EU and UK. US growth figures have been skewed by the rush to beat import tariffs. There is an elephant in the room: inflation. Countries imposing duties on their imports force the recipient of those goods to foot the additional bill. Do the buyers swallow it or pass it on? The latest US data contained strong evidence that tariff charges are now making their way down the country's supply chains, threatening to squeeze American consumers in the months ahead. It's why the US central bank has been refusing demands from Mr Trump to cut interest rates. You don't slow the pace of price rises by making borrowing costs cheaper. A prolonged period of higher inflation would not go down well with US businesses or voters. It's why financial markets have followed a recent trend known as TACO, helping stock markets remain at record levels. The belief is that Trump always chickens out. He may have to back down if inflation takes off.
BreakingNews.ie
34 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Trump signs order imposing new tariffs on a number of trading partners
President Donald Trump has signed an executive order that sets new tariffs on a wide swath of US trading partners to go into effect on August 7. The move is the next step in his trade agenda that will test the global economy and sturdiness of American alliances built up over decades. Advertisement The order was issued shortly after 7pm on Thursday. It came after a flurry of tariff-related activity in the last several days, as the White House announced agreements with various nations and blocs ahead of the president's self-imposed Friday deadline. The tariffs are being implemented at a later date in order for the rates schedule to be harmonised, according to a senior administration official who spoke to reporters on a call on the condition of anonymity. After initially threatening the African nation of Lesotho with a 50% tariff, the country's goods will now be taxed at 15%. Taiwan will have tariffs set at 20%, Pakistan at 19% and Israel, Iceland, Norway, Fiji, Ghana, Guyana and Ecuador among the countries with imported goods taxed at 15%. Switzerland would be tariffed at 39%. My statement on Canada-U.S. trade: — Mark Carney (@MarkJCarney) August 1, 2025 Mr Trump had announced a 50% tariff on goods from Brazil, but the order was only 10% as the other 40% were part of a separate measure approved on Wednesday. Advertisement The order capped off a hectic Thursday as nations sought to continue negotiating with Mr Trump. It set the rates for 68 countries and the 27-member European Union, with a baseline 10% rate to be charged on countries not listed in the order. The senior administration official said the rates were based on trade imbalance with the US and regional economic profiles. On Thursday morning, Mr Trump engaged in a phone conversation with Mexican president Claudia Sheinbaum on trade. As a result of the conversation, the US president said he would enter into a 90-day negotiating period with Mexico, one of the nation's largest trading partners. Advertisement The current 25% tariff rates are staying in place, down from the 30% he had threatened earlier. Mexican president Claudia Sheinbaum (Marco Ugarte/AP) 'We avoided the tariff increase announced for tomorrow and we got 90 days to build a long-term agreement through dialogue,' Ms Sheinbaum wrote on X after a call with Mr Trump that he referred to as 'very successful' in terms of the leaders getting to know each other better. The unknowns created a sense of drama that has defined Mr Trump's rollout of tariffs over several months. However, the one consistency is his desire to levy the import taxes that most economists say will ultimately be borne to some degree by US consumers and businesses. 'We have made a few deals today that are excellent deals for the country,' Mr Trump told reporters on Thursday afternoon, without detailing the terms of those agreements or the nations involved. Advertisement The senior administration official declined to reveal the nations that have new deals during the call with reporters. Mr Trump said that Canadian prime minister Mark Carney had called ahead of 35% tariffs being imposed on many of his nation's goods, but 'we haven't spoken to Canada today'. Mr Trump separately on Thursday amended a previous order to raise the fentanyl-related tariff on Canada from 25% to 35%. Mr Trump had imposed the Friday deadline after his previous 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April resulted in a stock market panic. Advertisement His unusually high tariff rates, unveiled in April, led to recession fears — prompting Mr Trump to impose a 90-day negotiating period. When he was unable to create enough trade deals with other countries, he extended the timeline and sent out letters to world leaders that simply listed rates, prompting a slew of hasty deals. Mr Trump reached a deal with South Korea on Wednesday, and earlier with the European Union, Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines. His commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, said on Fox News Channel's Hannity that there were agreements with Cambodia and Thailand after they had agreed to a ceasefire to their border conflict. Going into Thursday, wealthy Switzerland and Norway were still uncertain about their tariff rates. EU officials were waiting to complete a crucial document outlining how the framework to tax imported cars and other goods from the 27-member state bloc would operate. Mr Trump had announced a deal on Sunday while he was in Scotland. Mr Trump said as part of the agreement with Mexico that goods imported into the US would continue to face a 25% tariff that he has ostensibly linked to fentanyl trafficking. He said cars would face a 25% tariff, while copper, aluminium and steel would be taxed at 50% during the negotiating period.
Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
America will be the chief victim of Trump's tariffs rampage
Donald Trump has succeeded in forcing America's democratic allies to their knees. His country must henceforth live with the invidious consequences of what he has done. 'It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal,' to borrow a line from Henry Kissinger. Vladimir Putin has strung Trump along for six months without paying a price. China has turned the tables, forcing the White House to hand over Nvidia H20 chips in exchange for rare earth magnets that Trump should have thought about before launching his trade war. Didn't the US treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, say China was playing with a 'pair of twos'? The average US tariff rate will settle near 20pc. This is comparable to the Smoot-Hawley tariff act of 1930 – but tariffs were already high before that infamous bill and the US was then a closed economy. Imports were just 5pc of GDP. They are 16.4pc today and include critical components that keep the productive machine going. 'We're looking at a shock to the economy seven or eight times as big as Smoot-Hawley,' said Paul Krugman, a Nobel laureate for trade theory. Euphoric markets are wishing away the reckless demolition of a global trade system built, led, and painstakingly nurtured by the US for 80 years. 'People just keep wanting to believe that Trump is making sense, that he isn't as ignorant and irresponsible as he seems. But he is,' said Prof Krugman. US economic growth slowed to 1.1pc in the first half of the year. You have to combine the two quarters because tariff 'front-running' distorted the GDP data. The relevant metric is that real final sales are the weakest since 2022. 'We estimate that real personal consumption has now stagnated on net for six months, which rarely happens outside of recession,' said Jan Hatzius, the chief economist at Goldman Sachs. If you think America is booming right now, you are looking a) in the rear view mirror, and b) at the wrong data. The next year will see a drip-drip of accumulating damage as stagflation hits with the textbook delay. Trump's tariffs are a tax on the US consumer. Maury Obstveld, ex-chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, says the pass-through from the Trump 1.0 episode was total. 'Not only did the prices of tariffed goods rise, they rose by the full amount of the tariffs. American households and businesses bore the entire burden; none was shifted to foreign exporters,' he said. The well-informed are watching the US bureau of labor's monthly index of pre-tariff prices for imports. This rose in June. It is the smoking gun that tells us who is really paying the tab. The Yale Budget Lab says consumers will face price rises of 40pc for shoes and 38pc for clothes. But higher prices are not the worst of it. The larger threat to the US is that it cannot substitute most of its imports. It would take a decade or more to rebuild industrial capacity across the board. Lorenzo Codogno, a former economist at Bank of America and now at LC Macro, says the US can cover just 10pc of current imports. 'It can perhaps add another 5-10pc over the next six months but after that it will take years. Trump's whole economic recipe is a disaster,' he said. Somebody must have whispered in Trump's ear that it takes 18 years to bring a new copper mine on stream. This week he set off the steepest one-day crash in Comex copper futures since 1968 by exempting copper ore from his 50pc tariffs. Taxes of 50pc remain on imported steel and aluminium, as well as copper products, and these together are a leaden weight around the ankles of US industry. America imports a fifth of its steel. The internal US price now trades at a 105pc premium to China and a 45pc premium to Europe, according to GMK. It is the most expensive in the world. Steel Dynamics and Cleveland Cliffs both raised steel prices last week to lock in bumper profits behind tariff protection. American cars will soon cost more. Trump secured the removal of European tariffs on US vehicles and industrial goods but this is washed away many times over by what he is doing to input costs. US car sales to Europe will fall. European car sales to the US will rise. Ditto for Japan. The aluminium story is worse. Twenty US smelters have closed since 2000. Only four remain. The country imports half its needs, and 90pc of its scrap, mostly from Canada. The US could revive some semi-obsolete smelters with enough subsidy but this would not close the gap. It costs up to $6bn (£4.5bn) and takes six years to build a new one. Rising steel, aluminium and copper costs are already feeding through to the US oil patch, hitting just as the Opec-plus cartel floods the global market with extra barrels. Oil insiders seethed with fury in the Dallas Fed's latest confidential survey. 'It's hard to imagine how much worse policies could have been,' said one executive. This cost shock comes at a time when America's shale boom is already long in the tooth. Scott Sheffield, a fracking pioneer, told this year's CeraWeek energy forum that the best tiers in the Permian would be exhausted by 2028. 'Everybody is running out of Tier 1 inventory,' he said. 'Drill, baby, drill' is a good line at Maga rallies but Trump is in fact putting marginal oil and gas fields out of business. His trade deals stipulate that Europe must buy $750bn of US energy exports over three years, South Korea must buy $100bn and so on. As widely pointed out, this is insanity on stilts. America's entire exports of oil and gas were only $166bn last year. Europe's gas consumption is declining. The EU could not absorb America's gas even if Trump could produce it. There are not enough ships to carry so much liquefied natural gas (LNG), and not enough shipyards able to build new ones. Europe's LNG terminals are running near full capacity. European utilities have long-term gas pipeline contracts with Norway, Algeria and Qatar. Brussels has no legal authority to force them to buy US gas instead. Norwegian pipeline gas is the world's cleanest, with a lower greenhouse footprint than LNG from Texas. The EU would have to scrap its methane regulation to meet Trump's demands, which is part of his purpose. As for buying more American oil, EU refineries cannot handle much more low-sulphur US crude. It is the wrong sort. You do not have to be a free trader in the school of Adam Smith to see that America will be the chief economic victim of its own trade taxes and capricious market meddling. But the greater damage is geopolitical. That hits all of us in the fraternity of open democracies. Britons can allow themselves a wry smile that Trump has just done to Brussels what it did to us in the Brexit wars. The EU used its political leverage over the UK at a vulnerable moment, weaponising emotions over the Irish border and fear of a cliff edge no-deal. At least we won't have to listen to any more insufferable cant about how the EU is a big mighty bloc that calls all the shots. But Brexiteers should restrain their Schadenfreude because the economic premise of Brexit was that the world is a benign place and that a rules-based global trading system exists outside the EU. None of that holds true any more. To Trumpian Americans I can only say this: relish your triumph but do not expect to have many friends left in the world. We cannot yet discern the terrible fall-out from these six months of power-drunk coercion but it will run very deep. Mistreated allies become foes.
